Misconceptions of Christianity

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I knew this was comin and I knew I’d be sorry when it was here. Maybe some more tomorrow guys.

@Ephrem, nah, fighting is the wrong to look at it. Same controversies different century.[/quote]

…well, at least you guys aren’t killing eachother over disagreements anymore, so that’s good…
[/quote]

Funny how the secular powers that be are still violent and bloody, eh? Even funnier is that the more Godless they are, the bloodier they are. Still funnier is that this was always true. Weird.

[/quote]

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
[/quote]

ummm…not that I mind at all, but…I take it then that you’re agreeing with me? [/quote]

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

I hate to be so damn predictably correct and all, but yeah. LOL. :slight_smile:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

The part about Mary getting the title of diety, all it takes is a little time and after a while the entire Roman Catholic Chruch will consider it as tradition. Yes there might be some backlash at the start, but it will be accepted after time. [/quote]

Lol. “I heard a rumor…oh, it’s not true? Well, ok, but it will be!”

Did you hear the one about how Catholics are building a secret army of robots to conquer the earth? Well, even if it’s not, given enough time it will be!
[/quote]

Sloth you at least have heard the rummor of what I am speaking. All it takes is time and the Pope could make it so. The same thing came about by calling Mary “Sinless.” That was not an oral tradition all the way back to the early church. If is was it would have been taught, but it did not take effect until the 1800’s.

I’d like to make some request of my protestant pals of perpetual Pontiff pulverizing.

  1. Don’t pass on rumors, then when corrected, make up a future where it would be true.

  2. Do not claim to know the hearts and minds of man as if you were God. When I tell you I do not pray through an icon, do not tell me I do. When I honor a saint, or ask for their prayers, do not tell me I am giving them the adoration reserved for God. To claim that I do is to claim that you have awareness of my inner thoughts. If you want to discuss our practices do not claim Catholic-mind reading abilities. For now on, if someone’s argument starts on that sort of premise–that you know the nature of our inner thought–the question will be ignored by myself.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I knew this was comin and I knew I’d be sorry when it was here. Maybe some more tomorrow guys.

@Ephrem, nah, fighting is the wrong to look at it. Same controversies different century.[/quote]

…well, at least you guys aren’t killing eachother over disagreements anymore, so that’s good…
[/quote]

Funny how the secular powers that be are still violent and bloody, eh? Even funnier is that the more Godless they are, the bloodier they are. Still funnier is that this was always true. Weird.

[/quote]

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
[/quote]

ummm…not that I mind at all, but…I take it then that you’re agreeing with me? [/quote]

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

…well, if reality had any meaning to those people we wouldn’t have religion in the first place…

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I knew this was comin and I knew I’d be sorry when it was here. Maybe some more tomorrow guys.

@Ephrem, nah, fighting is the wrong to look at it. Same controversies different century.[/quote]

…well, at least you guys aren’t killing eachother over disagreements anymore, so that’s good…
[/quote]

Funny how the secular powers that be are still violent and bloody, eh? Even funnier is that the more Godless they are, the bloodier they are. Still funnier is that this was always true. Weird.

[/quote]

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
[/quote]

ummm…not that I mind at all, but…I take it then that you’re agreeing with me? [/quote]

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

…well, if reality had any meaning to those people we wouldn’t have religion in the first place…
[/quote]

Even for you that was embarrsingly lame ephrem.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
I’d like to make some request of my protestant pals of perpetual Pontiff pulverizing.

  1. Don’t pass on rumors, then when corrected, make up a future where it would be true.

  2. Do not claim to know the hearts and minds of man as if you were God. When I tell you I do not pray through an icon, do not tell me I do. When I honor a saint, or ask for their prayers, do not tell me I am giving them the adoration reserved for God. To claim that I do is to claim that you have awareness of my inner thoughts. If you want to discuss our practices do not claim Catholic-mind reading abilities. For now on, if someone’s argument starts on that sort of premise–that you know the nature of our inner thought–the question will be ignored by myself. [/quote]

Will do. I just have an issue with taking direction from the Pope as being equal with the Holy Scriptures. If it is scripurally based I have zero issues, but not scripturally based then I take issue.

I do not mind you respecting the Saints that have gone before us, and learning from them. I would like to say that you, Brother Chris, and Katz are very good Catholic Brothers. I welcome your knowledge. IMO it is the people that call themselves Catholic, but do not understand what it means to be one. For Example, I started asking people several years ago if they were Christian. When they said, “Yes I follow Christ but I go to Catholic Church,” to me they were beleivers in Jesus. If they said, “No I am not a Christian I am Catholic,” to me that meant they followed the Chruch and not Christ. There are both Catholics and Protestants that go to church on Easter and Christmas only. I take a real issue with that. You either follow Christ or you do not. There is no middle ground.

Tirib and I see what the average “Catholic” is distorting the teachings of the church. Same thing can be said for Protestants that take the word for word literal readings of the Bible. I am not one to beleive that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, but I do beleive that the Genesis story is 100% true and did happen. Could the Earth be 6,000 years old, yes it could be, but being 6,000 years old has no baring on whether we are saved or not. Could Mary be sinless because God made it so, yes, but Mary being sinless has no baring on whether we are saved or not. There just seems to be a lot of Mary in the Catholic Chruch and a lot less Jesus IMO. If you are talking with Mary you are not talking to God. Asking Mary or the Saints to pray for you all the time does not have a baring on whether we are saved or not. If you are only relying on the prayers of Mary or the Saints then there is an issue. God wants to walk with us. To walk with us means to talk with us. Go to God first. When I ask people to pray for me it is so they know my struggles and will try to share the load with me. They will ask me how I am doing the next time they see me. It lets me know that someone is walking a mile in my shoes. I do not think they have a better connection to God. I agree that at least you 3 guys do not worship Mary or the Saints. I believe that is the teaching of the Church.

I do have a question. Why do you ask Mary and the Saints to pray for you?

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

…well, if reality had any meaning to those people we wouldn’t have religion in the first place…
[/quote]

Even for you that was embarrsingly lame ephrem. [/quote]

…and yet it’s true. If this life had as much value as heaven holds for religious folks, things might be different…

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

If it is scripurally based I have zero issues, but not scripturally based then I take issue…[/quote]

If scripture is the only guide, then you must take the genesis account of creation as literal. Otherwise, you rely on thought–a tradition of thought if you will–which is found outside of scripture. For, in fact, you will not find your approach to the creation account anywhere in scripture. And so, along with a young earth, the Sola Scripturaist is stuck with a young earth and a dome as the sky. If he rejects the literal words, attempting to interject a figurative argument, he must rely on a tradition (even if solely his own tradition) outside of the account, therefore, outside of scripture.

Our entire service culminates upon Jesus…

Yet, you don’t seemed bothered setting aside time to talk to me. And I’m not even blessed amongst men. And seriously, trust me, I’m not.

Yet, in scripture we’re asked to pray for others. By extension, others can pray for us.

Ok, but Catholicism doesn’t teach anything like that.

Because praying for others is not only traditional, but scriptural.

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

…well, if reality had any meaning to those people we wouldn’t have religion in the first place…
[/quote]

Even for you that was embarrsingly lame ephrem. [/quote]

…and yet it’s true. If this life had as much value as heaven holds for religious folks, things might be different…
[/quote]

Atheism didn’t stop state atheists from their own deeds. Enough with the Atheism of Peace message. No one is buying it.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

…well, if reality had any meaning to those people we wouldn’t have religion in the first place…
[/quote]

Even for you that was embarrsingly lame ephrem. [/quote]

…and yet it’s true. If this life had as much value as heaven holds for religious folks, things might be different…
[/quote]

Atheism didn’t stop state atheists from their own deeds. Enough with the Atheism of Peace message. No one is buying it.[/quote]

…i never brought that up slothie, your friend katzenjammer did. Nice try though…

[quote]ephrem wrote:

Nice try though…
[/quote]

All successful attempts are :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

…well, if reality had any meaning to those people we wouldn’t have religion in the first place…
[/quote]

Even for you that was embarrsingly lame ephrem. [/quote]

…and yet it’s true. If this life had as much value as heaven holds for religious folks, things might be different…
[/quote]

Atheism didn’t stop state atheists from their own deeds. Enough with the Atheism of Peace message. No one is buying it.[/quote]

…i never brought that up slothie, your friend katzenjammer did. Nice try though…
[/quote]

Yes, you did - you can’t hide from me.

Anyway, taking this: “If this life had as much value as heaven holds for religious folks, things might be different…”

…I must say Ephrem, that^^ is a step in the right direction for you. All first steps in the direction of Truth are a bit clumsy (and, of course, in the eyes of God we’re all clumsy.) Fortunately, the faith teaches us to be patient of our straggling brethren.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…who are the godless parties in this current conflict?
[/quote]

Technically all of them as I am sure our religious brethren will inform us.[/quote]

…well, if reality had any meaning to those people we wouldn’t have religion in the first place…
[/quote]

Even for you that was embarrsingly lame ephrem. [/quote]

…and yet it’s true. If this life had as much value as heaven holds for religious folks, things might be different…
[/quote]

Atheism didn’t stop state atheists from their own deeds. Enough with the Atheism of Peace message. No one is buying it.[/quote]

You are looking at it the wrong way round. Groups of people are typically pretty nasty to other groups of people. Power has a corrupting influence. Whether people grab on to Religion to use as an Excuse or Atheism. The cause is not the faith or lack of it, it is human nature.

The reason that the religious try to throw up State Atheism as the biggest butcher is that firstly they wrongly include a number of religiously motivated individuals and groups as being atheist, and secondly some of the truly atheist groups just so happened to have larger populations to murder. This was due to the timing in history more than being any product of lack of religion.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

Because praying for others is not only traditional, but scriptural.
[/quote]

So then why are they so special? Why do you just not ask us to pray for you. Why are they better than you or me? Do they have a direct line to God that you or I do not? We are all considered Saints. As in the Apostles Creed, the communion of Saints, all this means is to have fellowship with your Brothers and Sisters in Christ. Why are they better?

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

The reason that the religious try to throw up State Atheism as the biggest butcher is that firstly they wrongly include a number of religiously motivated individuals and groups as being atheist, and secondly some of the truly atheist groups just so happened to have larger populations to murder. This was due to the timing in history more than being any product of lack of religion.[/quote]

Hey, if this lets you sleep at night.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

So then why are they so special? Why do you just not ask us to pray for you. Why are they better than you or me? Do they have a direct line to God that you or I do not? We are all considered Saints. As in the Apostles Creed, the communion of Saints, all this means is to have fellowship with your Brothers and Sisters in Christ. Why are they better?[/quote]

Just because I’m taking a break from writing my own wordy posts, read this a few times.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Yep, I am going to tell you that. We do not pray through them. We show our respects and honor great people of the Church. And we do use earthly items in our observances, because well, we have earthly bodies and senses. Man builds statues to remember, recall, and honor their respected. >>>[/quote Forget statues and relics, if I was wrong not one family would feel the want to own a camera, even. >>>[/quote] I just quoted you the official canons from your greatest of all ecumenical councils wherein it is clearly stated that the prostration of oneself before relics refers you to the prototype it represents. Whatever else YOU may do, I’m reporting what THAT says. AND the reason you give for using them is exactly the reason NOT TO. We are commanded to live not according to the flesh, but to worship God in spirit and truth. That’s the point. Man does indeed build all kinds of things for all kinds of reasons and always has. Look brother, No protestant claims great benefits from God through photography. If they did, I would write the first piece condemning them as idolaters and calling them to repentance. [quote]Sloth wrote: Protestants wouldn’t clutch the bible to them while praying. Yes, the bible is an earthly object, yet protestants in their meditations will often kneel with it firmly grasped in hand, even kissing it. Do they pray through the bible? The physical earthly book before them? Do protestants despise Passion Plays, the nativity scene during Christmas, the fish/Jesus Icon?[/quote] I don’t personally do passion plays, christmas, nativity scenes or Jesus fish. However, protestants who do participate in these things do not do them as part of their formal service to God and heaven as catholics do with their saints and relics. Also, the bible is the written word of God, but even then none of the inadvertent motions you cite are even vaguely equivalent to the codified and allegedly efficacious dogma of Rome. [quote]Sloth wrote:I’ll play the game, too. I will refuse to accept what is told to me about the private inner thought of the protestant, by the protestant. I will instead claim that they believe they are praying THROUGH the bible, a physical object, to God. I, yes I, will determine the inner thoughts of the Protestant. There, now we both claim psychic powers. It’s an unfair advantage the protestant makes use of, but I intend to borrow it.[/quote] I answered this already, but will here add that if you are NOT using these “holy” objects to “refer” you to their prototypes then you stand condemned by your own church. I’m not addicted to the phraseology of “praying through” either. Call it… whatever, it’s using physical objects in the worship of/prayer to (ok, dulia) dead people.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
<<< How are untold volumes written on Adam Smith? Lincoln? Washington? Does the protestant object? But, whole volumes can’t be written about the most blessed of all women? I don’t even understand the line of thinking. Does the American evangelical raise up the founding fathers, and other Americans figures, as people to be honored and respected in word and image, while arguing that the blessed of all women is nothing more that a passing moment in history? Yikes.[/quote] You really need get this squared away in yer mind once and for all. Nothing in any way related to historical figures, no matter how great and significant has anything to do with sacred service to God or heaven. No evangelical I have ever known would prostrate themselves before or kiss ANY piece of historical Americana while talking to a very dead Samuel Adams. I do hereby formally denounce this completely non existent straw man in advance just in case any Christian falls into it in the future. Your church holds under pain of condemnation that these practices are to be upheld as pleasing service to God and as a means of divine blessing to men. NONE of the non catholic observances (American history, photography etc) you have here mentioned are even roughly analogous. I’m promising you even our pagan pals see this much. [quote]Sloth wrote:
<<< Sorry, but we believe the Church is made up of the earthy and the heavenly congregation. >>>[/quote]So do we (at least I) >>> [quote]Sloth wrote:We have no problem asking our church members to pray for us. >>>
[/quote]Neither do we except we prefer they be alive in this world since their is no evidence God wants or expects us to invoke the favors of those who have gone on to be with the Lord. Or once again that they are even aware of what’s happening in this world. There are a couple of very rare and special instances in the bible which I suspect I may be hearing about, but they do not establish anything like this practice.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
I am glad you follow the Pope and what he says. I see why you all say what you do, but you refuse to see how we feel about the subject. We put forth the most authoritative source on the subject, The Bible, and you say your oral tradition and doctrine superceeds The Bible. I personally have an issue with this and many others on this website.[/quote]
The pharisees and sadducees relied on tradition to support their doctrine as well. Mark 7 is very interesting concerning this topic.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

This is what I am having issues with. Putting Mary on a pedistal that she was better than us. I understand the issue with Mary interceeding for you so that is why you pray to her. I alright with going to the priest for confession but then take it to the High Priest in Jesus Christ. These are just my thoughts. I do not understand why you need to go to Mary for help. [/quote]

Why wouldn’t you ask someone to pray for you? You don’t request prayers for you and your family? You don’t pray for others?
[/quote]

I stated that I could understand going to a priest to pray for me. Mary is not omnipresent or omniscent so she can not hear everyones prayer.[/quote]

We don’t believe so either. We do believe she can hear our prayers because God allows it. And even hearing all of our prayers, does not make for omnipresence or omniscience, anyways. Such is the knowledge of knowing where the tiniest constituent of matter has been, is, and ever will be, in all of creation.

Let me just cut to the chase for a minute. Have you ever lost a loved one? Do you visit their grave site? Do you let them know you miss them?
[/quote]

Yes, but I do not ask them to pray for me. We have never seen or talked to Mary. I talk to God because we walk with him daily. The Holy Spirit speaks to us. Mary does not have a Holy Spirit given to us so there is no reason to ask her to pray for us. It is one thing to think about Mary and her being the Mother of God, but that is all she is. The Doctrine of Mary in the Roman Catholic Church is not Biblical by any stretch of the imagination. It distracts us from going to the one that we should be going to. The foot of the cross and the throne of grace.[/quote]

Have you ever seen the Doctrine of Mary. You may be correct that the Bible does not have much directly about Mary (which it has fairly a lot of about her in there), but that does not mean the Doctrine about Mary does not have Scripture in it or is not biblical.

Read the doctrines, then you can say it is not Biblical, because from my point. It is, it has scripture in it, it has a lot of scripture in it.

http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/03/31/qa-religious-violence-risks-reputation-of-indias-hyderabad/

http://www.minnpost.com/worldcsm/2010/04/15/17387/in_india_religious_violence_leaves_long_trail_of_refugee_camps

…people kill people for all kinds of reasons. Religion is one of them. Killing people in the name of atheism is not. People were killed because of ideology: e.i. communism or fascism, but not atheism. If you know of an instance were people were killed by an atheist for being a deist or having a belief of any kind, i’d like to know, seriously…