Misconceptions of Christianity 2

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
LOL - and I come back to find we are discussing “prosperity” theology! nice . . .[/quote]

Yeah…can’t say much in that category except, I want the “too much money” problem. It’d be a nice change.[/quote]

So instead of praying for rain all the time, go out and prepare the field for the rain. Then you might see that the rain is coming. [/quote]

Confucuis say what?[/quote]

You can pray till you are blue in the face that you want a Lamborgini or whatever material object you want. Your chances of getting by only praying is 0. If you go out get a job, start saving money, and praying then your chances of getting the Car is much better than 0. Do you see what I am saying?

The average person who plays the lottery puts almost $50 a month and pray they win. There chances of winning it are 1 in a billion or something like that. I can guarantee you that if you put that $50 a month for 70 years into a mutual fund paying 10-12% you will have a million dollars at the end of 70 years. Just imagine if you saved $100 or $500 a month. Start somewhere and IMO God will bless you for saving, and you will be that much closer to getting your Car.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
LOL - and I come back to find we are discussing “prosperity” theology! nice . . .[/quote]

Yeah…can’t say much in that category except, I want the “too much money” problem. It’d be a nice change.[/quote]

So instead of praying for rain all the time, go out and prepare the field for the rain. Then you might see that the rain is coming. [/quote]

Confucuis say what?[/quote]

You can pray till you are blue in the face that you want a Lamborgini or whatever material object you want. Your chances of getting by only praying is 0. If you go out get a job, start saving money, and praying then your chances of getting the Car is much better than 0. Do you see what I am saying?

The average person who plays the lottery puts almost $50 a month and pray they win. There chances of winning it are 1 in a billion or something like that. I can guarantee you that if you put that $50 a month for 70 years into a mutual fund paying 10-12% you will have a million dollars at the end of 70 years. Just imagine if you saved $100 or $500 a month. Start somewhere and IMO God will bless you for saving, and you will be that much closer to getting your Car.
[/quote]

Oh that kind of thing…My mutual funds TANKED, so no thanks there. While I typically do fiscally sound things with my mula, I don’t put a priority on getting rich. Mainly because it would take me away from my family, not to mention the gym…I could make a ton more money right now, but I’d never be home. It’s not worth that. When the wife hits menopause, that’s a different story :). However, if providence directed a shit load of money to my bank account, I certainly won’t refuse it.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
LOL - and I come back to find we are discussing “prosperity” theology! nice . . .[/quote]

Yeah…can’t say much in that category except, I want the “too much money” problem. It’d be a nice change.[/quote]

So instead of praying for rain all the time, go out and prepare the field for the rain. Then you might see that the rain is coming. [/quote]

Confucuis say what?[/quote]

You can pray till you are blue in the face that you want a Lamborgini or whatever material object you want. Your chances of getting by only praying is 0. If you go out get a job, start saving money, and praying then your chances of getting the Car is much better than 0. Do you see what I am saying?

The average person who plays the lottery puts almost $50 a month and pray they win. There chances of winning it are 1 in a billion or something like that. I can guarantee you that if you put that $50 a month for 70 years into a mutual fund paying 10-12% you will have a million dollars at the end of 70 years. Just imagine if you saved $100 or $500 a month. Start somewhere and IMO God will bless you for saving, and you will be that much closer to getting your Car.
[/quote]

If I put $50 a month in a mutual fund for 70 years I would also have a million and I am a godless heathen.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
LOL - and I come back to find we are discussing “prosperity” theology! nice . . .[/quote]

Yeah…can’t say much in that category except, I want the “too much money” problem. It’d be a nice change.[/quote]

So instead of praying for rain all the time, go out and prepare the field for the rain. Then you might see that the rain is coming. [/quote]

Confucuis say what?[/quote]

You can pray till you are blue in the face that you want a Lamborgini or whatever material object you want. Your chances of getting by only praying is 0. If you go out get a job, start saving money, and praying then your chances of getting the Car is much better than 0. Do you see what I am saying?

The average person who plays the lottery puts almost $50 a month and pray they win. There chances of winning it are 1 in a billion or something like that. I can guarantee you that if you put that $50 a month for 70 years into a mutual fund paying 10-12% you will have a million dollars at the end of 70 years. Just imagine if you saved $100 or $500 a month. Start somewhere and IMO God will bless you for saving, and you will be that much closer to getting your Car.
[/quote]

If I put $50 a month in a mutual fund for 70 years I would also have a million and I am a godless heathen.[/quote]

I agree, but that was not the point of my analogy.

[quote]blacksheep wrote:
<<< When well-meaning Christians quote 1 Chronicles 16:22 (“Do not touch My anointed ones, and do My prophets no harm,” NASB) to cover up corruption or charlatanism, they do horrible injustice to Scripture. This passage does not require us to stay quiet when a leader is abusing power or deceiving people.

On the contrary, we are called to confront sin in a spirit of love and honesty-and we certainly aren’t showing love to the church if we allow the charismatic Al Capones of our generation to corrupt it."[/quote]I used to hear this every day when I was taking these guys on just about full time. God’s anointed do not propound a comprehensive collection of fatally false doctrine and practice.

This goes along with what haney1 was saying too. There is a desperate need for people to be able to learn to discern the gospel truth from doctrines of demons. One of the churches I was invited to years ago (Assemblies of God, yes Swaggart’s outfit) was pastored by a very decent guy who had been in the ministry several times longer than I’d been saved. Actually, it was a mutual friend that talked him into having me there because that teaching was in his church and HE didn’t even recognize why it was bad beyond all the focus on money and bodily health.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]haney1 wrote:
<<< I took it as you were agreeing with me on alot of what I wrote. I just wanted to restate what a pathetic job the Church as done in regards to this. I do agree that it is funny that we both came to the same main doctrinal conclusions. The odd thing is I originally started as opposed to the many core points in the reformed position. As I learned to actually study the Bible I found myself beginning to agree the reformed position. You may find this odd, but what actually started that leg of my journey was when I begin to rethink my eschatological view. >>>[/quote]Yep, that is different I’ll say. lol. Eschatology remains my weakest area of study. I know what I don’t believe, but still haven’t put my stake down on exactly where I’m at there.[quote]haney1 wrote:<<< It was those questions which forced me to learn those Bible study methods vs. Once I reconciled what I believe to be the erroneous exegesis of that view point I was then enabled to actually look at complex texts like Romans 9 and understand PaulÃ??Ã?¢??s argument in a better light. Actually it helped me to understand Romans period. The arguments which Paul put forth in that letter are incredible. It is a masterpiece in my opinion that is unrivaled in stating the condition of man with God. [/quote]Calvin called the book of Romans “The Gospel According to Paul”. That one epistle represents a lifetime of study all by itself. That ol boy met Jesus in a truly awe inspiring way and I’m not even talkin about the road to Damascus.

Here we have a guy with EVERYTHING going for him. He has brains, status, money, education and was probably married early on. He grew up at the feet of that giant of Judaism Gamaliel. He’s a pillar of the religious Jewish community smiled upon both by them and Rome. He has dedicated his life to eradicating the heretical idolatrous followers of this kook from Galilee. He has absolutely no earthly reason to be dissatisfied with anything about his truly ideal life for that time and place.

He is on his way to arrest Christians at Damascus (acts ch. 9 Acts 9 NASB 1995) when he is overcome by light and winds up on the ground addressing whoever this exactly is demanding an explanation for his persecutions as “Lord”. He is told by the risen Christ Himself what he is gonna do next and where to go get further instructions. While he is in the house of a man named Judas the Lord appears to a Damascan disciple named Ananias and tells him to go to the house and lay hands on this man Saul of Tarsus so that he may regain his sight because “he is a chosen instrument of Mine, to bear My name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel; for I will show him how much he must suffer for My name’s sake.”

This man with everything to live for is now found in the SYNAGOGUES preaching the gospel that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ using their own scriptures in which he was eminently qualified to have an opinion by their own recognition. Imagine what people were thinking. Talk about the backfire of all time!!! “Just an upside down minute here!!! I thought this was supposed to be the guy Jerusalem sent to stop these fanatics?!?! What is he doing here filling Damascus and our synagogues with the teaching of this name Jesus saying He IS the Son of God?!?!?”

Saul would go on to become the Apostle Paul and write at least 13 books of the NT including the mighty epistle to the Romans. (I doubt the Pauline authorship of Hebrews despite that also being a magnificent book)

He would also go on to fulfill the Lord’s word to Ananias that he would greatly suffer saying in 2nd Cor.11:22-29 the following:[quote]“23-Are they servants of Christ?Ã?¢??I speak as if insaneÃ?¢??I more so; in far more labors, in far more imprisonments, beaten times without number, often in danger of death. 24-Five times I received from the Jews thirty-nine lashes. 25-Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, a night and a day I have spent in the deep. 26-I have been on frequent journeys, in dangers from rivers, dangers from robbers, dangers from my countrymen, dangers from the Gentiles, dangers in the city, dangers in the wilderness, dangers on the sea, dangers among false brethren; 27-I have been in labor and hardship, through many sleepless nights, in hunger and thirst, often without food, in cold and exposure. 28-Apart from such external things, there is the daily pressure on me of concern for all the churches. 29-Who is weak without my being weak? Who is led into sin without my intense concern?”[/quote] The same Paul who also said this in Romans 8:15-19:[quote]15-For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, Ã?¢??Abba! Father!Ã?¢?? 16-The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God, 17-and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him so that we may also be glorified with Him. 18-For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us. 19-For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God.[/quote]This stalwart blue blood of position, prestige and power counted it all loss for Christ’s sake and went from a life of opulent comfort to one of unimaginable earthly suffering only to rejoice in the fact that all that pain could not even compare to the glory he knew was coming. Yes, it is of the highest likelihood that 2 Corinthians was written before Romans or about the same time.

Alright folks, I’ll really try n climb down from this pulpit now. I really don’t mean to get so carried away.[/quote]

I wouldn’t say eschatology is my best postion either, but it was challenged with a different view. When challenged I usually try to get to the truth. Sometimes it leads me to my original belief, in this case it lead me a new one. Which atually changed how I read the Bible as a whole and forced me to reconcile alot more than I intended.

The rest of your post was great!

[quote]Cortes wrote:

I say this without the slightest bit of animosity, but I am tired of repeating myself.

Go back and read our dialogue, if you care enough to, and see what I actually said, and what you started by implying. Now read your post here again and see how you’ve taken what you originally implied and turned it into what I’ve “said.” Not so.

One last time:

First, for the sake of argument, we are assuming there is a Heaven and a God, are we not?

If so, then…

The Real Doll never has a thought in the first place. She is an empty vessel.

The human thinks from the start. She can choose this or that. If she chooses that, one thing happens. If she chooses this, another. After her choice is made, all is revealed, one way or the other, and what is revealed is pure, absolute, unadulterated Truth. ALL of the truth. Once you have ALL of the truth, “free will” as we humans perceive it can no longer be the same thing as the free will that exists in Heaven.

I said this earlier in the thread, but our view, our perception and even ability to imagine what happens after death, particularly if there really is a God and a Heaven, are severely limited and distorted. By mortality, bias, misconception, ignorance, pride, desire, temptation, jealousies, fears. I’m not saying that the Truth cannot be gleaned from all of this, or, at least, slivers of Truth, but we have to be careful not to assume that “life” in Heaven is going to be anything like it is here, now.
[/quote]

And yet you still dont answer my question:

Why keep the Truth hidden till after death, then? Why play this big game of “You have to believe even though there are plenty of reasons not to, but if you do anyway you get the big prize”?

Why wouldnt a benevolent god skip the “possible slivers of truth” part, and just let people get straight to the Truth?

And my point about free will stands: if free will exists in heaven, but no one sins in heaven because of the circumstances, than its a matter of circumstances, not free will, that causes sin on earth – those circumstances are determined by god, making god responsible for sin on earth, not free will.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Why keep the Truth hidden till after death, then? Why play this big game of “You have to believe even though there are plenty of reasons not to, but if you do anyway you get the big prize”?

Why wouldnt a benevolent god skip the “possible slivers of truth” part, and just let people get straight to the Truth?[/quote]

Hey, I know you’re not addressing this to me, but I couldn’t help but jump in. First of all you’d have to have an understanding of the Christian Bible to fully comprehend this, and that’s not a slam of any kind. There are plenty of books which I should be reading and have not touched yet. God did in fact communicate with his people (us) long ago. The people turned their backs on him (free will thingy) and he withdrew his presence. He later sent his only begotten son, Jesus Christ as the one mediator between man and God. Through your belief in him you will be saved (separated) from your sin and live eternally in heaven. Nothing mysterious about that. In fact, it’s a very simple message. Perhaps difficult to accept for some, but certainly uncomplicated, right?

Not quite, but I like the way you think. When God gave man free will, man chose to sin. It began early and often. If you are accusing God of creating an environment where man can sin you remind me of a typical lawyer whose client is never at fault. “McDonalds gave my client hot coffee your honor naturally it burned him, not my clients fault, the car jiggled, those dam paper cups are flimsy bla bla bla.”

Anyway, freedom and responsibility go together. Well, not in our society any longer, but they sure used to go together.

God gave us free will so that we could choose of our own accord to worship him. Simple right? If he created an environment that only gave you one option, that is to worship him and not sin, then he is defacto creating robots who do not have free will.

Choice is about options. Options are about freedom, Freedom is about creating an open environment where man can sin if he chooses because choice is about options, oh yea I said that sorry.

Anyway sorry to bust in to your conversation, but hey this is the Internet right?

[quote]ZEB wrote:

If he created an environment that only gave you one option, that is to worship him and not sin, then he is defacto creating robots who do not have free will.[/quote]

Heaven is such an environment with only one option.

So, once in heaven, you will become a defacto robot, since you will only ever choose to worship him and not sin.

Yeah?

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

If he created an environment that only gave you one option, that is to worship him and not sin, then he is defacto creating robots who do not have free will.[/quote]

Heaven is such an environment with only one option.

So, once in heaven, you will become a defacto robot, since you will only ever choose to worship him and not sin.

Yeah?[/quote]

Why did Jesus not sin while on Earth? He was from heaven so he knew what it was like. He knew it was better than this sin filled world. Once we get to heaven we will know what Jesus was talking about in the Bible. We will still have the free will to sin, but we will not because we will see the glory of God. We will no longer want to sin.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

If he created an environment that only gave you one option, that is to worship him and not sin, then he is defacto creating robots who do not have free will.[/quote]

Heaven is such an environment with only one option.

So, once in heaven, you will become a defacto robot, since you will only ever choose to worship him and not sin.

Yeah?[/quote]

Why did Jesus not sin while on Earth? He was from heaven so he knew what it was like. He knew it was better than this sin filled world. Once we get to heaven we will know what Jesus was talking about in the Bible. We will still have the free will to sin, but we will not because we will see the glory of God. We will no longer want to sin.[/quote]

Ok. We wont sin because we will see the glory of god, and no longer want to.

Why does god hide his glory then? Why not just show us said glory now, so we no longer want to sin?

And, if its going to be anyones response, no, god has not shown that glory to us already.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

If he created an environment that only gave you one option, that is to worship him and not sin, then he is defacto creating robots who do not have free will.[/quote]

Heaven is such an environment with only one option.

So, once in heaven, you will become a defacto robot, since you will only ever choose to worship him and not sin.

Yeah?[/quote]

Heaven is Gods domain, his living quarters if you will. How you choose to behave in someone’s house is probably quite a bit differently than how choose to behave at a local bar. My personal belief is that heaven is so grand, amazing, um what’s the word? I don’t know, different, like nothing we’ve ever experienced before that you won’t want to sin. And I also think that leaving your body behind changes you. For example, you can now fit into a size 4 ladies. No seriously, for me to explain the mind of God to you is impossible as no one knows the mind of God. But I think I’ve presented some very plausible explanations. You’ll either do what no other Internet poster has ever done in the history of the Internet and change your mind, or you’ll move on in what you believed prior.

Either way we had this exchange and we are both the better for it. Well, maybe not better, but we did have the exchange no one can deny that.

:slight_smile:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
<<< If this is true, why wouldnt God just skip the first state, have people be born into the “transformed” state, and not put in them the original state which leads to sin?[/quote]See the passage above I quoted from the 9th of Romans.
[/quote]

Not gonna lie, not exactly sure what its all about. Basic message: God can do as god wants? [/quote]Here again are verses 1-24 of the 9th of Romans:[quote]" 1-I am telling the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience testifies with me in the Holy Spirit, 2-that I have great sorrow and unceasing grief in my heart. 3-For I could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, 4-who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, 5-whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen.

6-But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7-nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: “THROUGH ISAAC YOUR DESCENDANTS WILL BE NAMED.” 8-That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants. 9-For this is the word of promise: “AT THIS TIME I WILL COME, AND SARAH SHALL HAVE A SON.” 10-And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; 11-for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls, 12-it was said to her, “THE OLDER WILL SERVE THE YOUNGER.” 13-Just as it is written, “JACOB I LOVED, BUT ESAU I HATED.”

14-What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? May it never be! 15-For He says to Moses, “I WILL HAVE MERCY ON WHOM I HAVE MERCY, AND I WILL HAVE COMPASSION ON WHOM I HAVE COMPASSION.” 16-So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy. 17-For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “FOR THIS VERY PURPOSE I RAISED YOU UP, TO DEMONSTRATE MY POWER IN YOU, AND THAT MY NAME MIGHT BE PROCLAIMED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE EARTH.” 18-So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires.

19-You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20-On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21-Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use? 22-What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23-And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24-even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles.[/quote]Here we get major though necessarily incomplete clues of the mind of God in relation to sin, redemption from it and by unavoidable implication the role of the will.

Paul has here just proclaimed the free and immutable providence of an almighty God in controlling precisely what transpires in His creation right down to those he will either love or hate. He has used the example of twins not yet born and not having committed any act good or evil and God as unequivocally declaring his love for one and hatred for the other. I have heard and read every conceivable explanation for why this does not mean what it clearly states (and there are plenty of other places in bible affirming this as well).

Paul quite rightly anticipates the instant obvious objection by INDIVIDUAL sinners (v. 19) which would be “hold on there pal. If that’s the case then how can he hold ME responsible for my sin if His will is irresistible”? Paul, being entirely unimpressed offers ZEEROH explanation and responds with the firm rebuke of “on the contrary. WHO ARE YOU O MAN who answers back to God”. Right here Paul, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit has a ready made opportunity to offer any one of the myriad of moderated explanations mortal man has attempted to make this say something else. He doesn’t. He leaves it right there with amounts to “shut up and own the fact that He’s God and you ain’t”.

In verses 22-24 the Apostle parts the veil a bit as it were on exactly the issue of why He purposed that sin should certainly exist and why He appears to tolerate it for the time being. He posits this as a rhetorical question saying in essence “Did you ever stop to think that even though God had every right and sufficient inclination to destroy evil straight away that He did not do so in order that evil should grow ever more evil along side the saints displaying greater and greater contrast between the two, not to mention the fact all must continue until the last of God’s chosen has been redeemed? He further states that sinners were prepared for destruction just as the saints (even us) were prepared BEFOREHAND for glory.”

In 2 Timothy 1:9 Paul also says “who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in Christ Jesus from all eternity His purpose in grace granted in Christ is from all eternity and that cannot be possible if the entrance of sin was not also purposed and rendered certain from all eternity.

Revelation 13:8 calls Jesus Christ the “Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”. Why is He slain in the plan of God before the entrance of Sin? Because from all eternity sin was a certainty and it was certainty in the purpose of God who is Himself the only being who has so existed. Sin was rendered certain so that the unsearchable love mercy and grace of the one true God could be displayed before His creation in His saving some of them from it. Not in it, but from it.

Maybe more later.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Why does god hide his glory then? Why not just show us said glory now, so we no longer want to sin?

And, if its going to be anyones response, no, god has not shown that glory to us already. [/quote]

You say show us your Glory Lord and I will believe. He says I am holding back my glory so more people have a chance to hear about me and beleive.

If he shows his glory right now, it will be the end of times, and judgement day is upon us. At that point he will judge the living and the dead. There will be no time for you to beleive and be saved. His heart aches for you to turn to him. He loves you.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

I say this without the slightest bit of animosity, but I am tired of repeating myself.

Go back and read our dialogue, if you care enough to, and see what I actually said, and what you started by implying. Now read your post here again and see how you’ve taken what you originally implied and turned it into what I’ve “said.” Not so.

One last time:

First, for the sake of argument, we are assuming there is a Heaven and a God, are we not?

If so, then…

The Real Doll never has a thought in the first place. She is an empty vessel.

The human thinks from the start. She can choose this or that. If she chooses that, one thing happens. If she chooses this, another. After her choice is made, all is revealed, one way or the other, and what is revealed is pure, absolute, unadulterated Truth. ALL of the truth. Once you have ALL of the truth, “free will” as we humans perceive it can no longer be the same thing as the free will that exists in Heaven.

I said this earlier in the thread, but our view, our perception and even ability to imagine what happens after death, particularly if there really is a God and a Heaven, are severely limited and distorted. By mortality, bias, misconception, ignorance, pride, desire, temptation, jealousies, fears. I’m not saying that the Truth cannot be gleaned from all of this, or, at least, slivers of Truth, but we have to be careful not to assume that “life” in Heaven is going to be anything like it is here, now.
[/quote]

And yet you still dont answer my question:

Why keep the Truth hidden till after death, then? Why play this big game of “You have to believe even though there are plenty of reasons not to, but if you do anyway you get the big prize”?
[/quote]
Beats me. That’s the way he want’s it I guess. Just because he doesn’t do what you think he should or want, doesn’t mean it’s right or he does not exist.

I suppose it would not be very noble that way, but you have to go to the source and ask him yourself. We can say what he did, but very little about why he did it. I wish it were easier too. But anything you choose ain’t easy, so your screwed no matter what.

We don’t know who or what folks do in heaven. We don’t know if people sinned or chose to do something else or not. The truth about what lies beyond death, is that nobody knows save for a select few who have had legit ‘near-death’ experiences. And those folks have only a little insight… Anybody who speaks with authority about the afterlife is usually full of shit. There is very little detailed info in scripture about it. Other sources are at best questionable. The good news, is one day we will all know.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

If he created an environment that only gave you one option, that is to worship him and not sin, then he is defacto creating robots who do not have free will.[/quote]

Heaven is such an environment with only one option.

So, once in heaven, you will become a defacto robot, since you will only ever choose to worship him and not sin.

Yeah?[/quote]

Why did Jesus not sin while on Earth? He was from heaven so he knew what it was like. He knew it was better than this sin filled world. Once we get to heaven we will know what Jesus was talking about in the Bible. We will still have the free will to sin, but we will not because we will see the glory of God. We will no longer want to sin.[/quote]

Being the son of God certainly did not hurt his chances…

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
<<< If this is true, why wouldnt God just skip the first state, have people be born into the “transformed” state, and not put in them the original state which leads to sin?[/quote]See the passage above I quoted from the 9th of Romans.
[/quote]

Not gonna lie, not exactly sure what its all about. Basic message: God can do as god wants? [/quote]Here again are verses 1-24 of the 9th of Romans:[quote]" 1-I am telling the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience testifies with me in the Holy Spirit, 2-that I have great sorrow and unceasing grief in my heart. 3-For I could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, 4-who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, 5-whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen.

6-But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7-nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: “THROUGH ISAAC YOUR DESCENDANTS WILL BE NAMED.” 8-That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants. 9-For this is the word of promise: “AT THIS TIME I WILL COME, AND SARAH SHALL HAVE A SON.” 10-And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; 11-for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls, 12-it was said to her, “THE OLDER WILL SERVE THE YOUNGER.” 13-Just as it is written, “JACOB I LOVED, BUT ESAU I HATED.”

14-What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? May it never be! 15-For He says to Moses, “I WILL HAVE MERCY ON WHOM I HAVE MERCY, AND I WILL HAVE COMPASSION ON WHOM I HAVE COMPASSION.” 16-So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy. 17-For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “FOR THIS VERY PURPOSE I RAISED YOU UP, TO DEMONSTRATE MY POWER IN YOU, AND THAT MY NAME MIGHT BE PROCLAIMED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE EARTH.” 18-So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires.

19-You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20-On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21-Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use? 22-What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23-And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24-even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles.[/quote]Here we get major though necessarily incomplete clues of the mind of God in relation to sin, redemption from it and by unavoidable implication the role of the will.

Paul has here just proclaimed the free and immutable providence of an almighty God in controlling precisely what transpires in His creation right down to those he will either love or hate. He has used the example of twins not yet born and not having committed any act good or evil and God as unequivocally declaring his love for one and hatred for the other. I have heard and read every conceivable explanation for why this does not mean what it clearly states (and there are plenty of other places in bible affirming this as well).

Paul quite rightly anticipates the instant obvious objection by INDIVIDUAL sinners (v. 19) which would be “hold on there pal. If that’s the case then how can he hold ME responsible for my sin if His will is irresistible”? Paul, being entirely unimpressed offers ZEEROH explanation and responds with the firm rebuke of “on the contrary. WHO ARE YOU O MAN who answers back to God”. Right here Paul, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit has a ready made opportunity to offer any one of the myriad of moderated explanations mortal man has attempted to make this say something else. He doesn’t. He leaves it right there with amounts to “shut up and own the fact that He’s God and you ain’t”.

In verses 22-24 the Apostle parts the veil a bit as it were on exactly the issue of why He purposed that sin should certainly exist and why He appears to tolerate it for the time being. He posits this as a rhetorical question saying in essence “Did you ever stop to think that even though God had every right and sufficient inclination to destroy evil straight away that He did not do so in order that evil should grow ever more evil along side the saints displaying greater and greater contrast between the two, not to mention the fact all must continue until the last of God’s chosen has been redeemed? He further states that sinners were prepared for destruction just as the saints (even us) were prepared BEFOREHAND for glory.”

In 2 Timothy 1:9 Paul also says “who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in Christ Jesus from all eternity His purpose in grace granted in Christ is from all eternity and that cannot be possible if the entrance of sin was not also purposed and rendered certain from all eternity.

Revelation 13:8 calls Jesus Christ the “Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”. Why is He slain in the plan of God before the entrance of Sin? Because from all eternity sin was a certainty and it was certainty in the purpose of God who is Himself the only being who has so existed. Sin was rendered certain so that the unsearchable love mercy and grace of the one true God could be displayed before His creation in His saving some of them from it. Not in it, but from it.

Maybe more later.
[/quote]

So, god loves some people and hates others, chooses at will who will be who…

and you call this benevolent?

Seriously.

[quote]pat wrote:
Beats me. That’s the way he want’s it I guess. Just because he doesn’t do what you think he should or want, doesn’t mean it’s right or he does not exist.

I suppose it would not be very noble that way, but you have to go to the source and ask him yourself. We can say what he did, but very little about why he did it. I wish it were easier too. But anything you choose ain’t easy, so your screwed no matter what.

We don’t know who or what folks do in heaven. We don’t know if people sinned or chose to do something else or not. The truth about what lies beyond death, is that nobody knows save for a select few who have had legit ‘near-death’ experiences. And those folks have only a little insight… Anybody who speaks with authority about the afterlife is usually full of shit. There is very little detailed info in scripture about it. Other sources are at best questionable. The good news, is one day we will all know.
[/quote]

The problem is you attach claims to your god, but the stories you tell and things you believe say otherwise.

A god who acts in the way yours does is not benevolent.

Its not a matter of what I think he should do or not. Its a matter of “If he does this, than this does not apply”

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
<<< If this is true, why wouldnt God just skip the first state, have people be born into the “transformed” state, and not put in them the original state which leads to sin?[/quote]See the passage above I quoted from the 9th of Romans.
[/quote]

Not gonna lie, not exactly sure what its all about. Basic message: God can do as god wants? [/quote]Here again are verses 1-24 of the 9th of Romans:[quote]" 1-I am telling the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience testifies with me in the Holy Spirit, 2-that I have great sorrow and unceasing grief in my heart. 3-For I could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, 4-who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, 5-whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen.

6-But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7-nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: “THROUGH ISAAC YOUR DESCENDANTS WILL BE NAMED.” 8-That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants. 9-For this is the word of promise: “AT THIS TIME I WILL COME, AND SARAH SHALL HAVE A SON.” 10-And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; 11-for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls, 12-it was said to her, “THE OLDER WILL SERVE THE YOUNGER.” 13-Just as it is written, “JACOB I LOVED, BUT ESAU I HATED.”

14-What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? May it never be! 15-For He says to Moses, “I WILL HAVE MERCY ON WHOM I HAVE MERCY, AND I WILL HAVE COMPASSION ON WHOM I HAVE COMPASSION.” 16-So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy. 17-For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “FOR THIS VERY PURPOSE I RAISED YOU UP, TO DEMONSTRATE MY POWER IN YOU, AND THAT MY NAME MIGHT BE PROCLAIMED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE EARTH.” 18-So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires.

19-You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20-On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21-Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use? 22-What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23-And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24-even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles.[/quote]Here we get major though necessarily incomplete clues of the mind of God in relation to sin, redemption from it and by unavoidable implication the role of the will.

Paul has here just proclaimed the free and immutable providence of an almighty God in controlling precisely what transpires in His creation right down to those he will either love or hate. He has used the example of twins not yet born and not having committed any act good or evil and God as unequivocally declaring his love for one and hatred for the other. I have heard and read every conceivable explanation for why this does not mean what it clearly states (and there are plenty of other places in bible affirming this as well).

Paul quite rightly anticipates the instant obvious objection by INDIVIDUAL sinners (v. 19) which would be “hold on there pal. If that’s the case then how can he hold ME responsible for my sin if His will is irresistible”? Paul, being entirely unimpressed offers ZEEROH explanation and responds with the firm rebuke of “on the contrary. WHO ARE YOU O MAN who answers back to God”. Right here Paul, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit has a ready made opportunity to offer any one of the myriad of moderated explanations mortal man has attempted to make this say something else. He doesn’t. He leaves it right there with amounts to “shut up and own the fact that He’s God and you ain’t”.

In verses 22-24 the Apostle parts the veil a bit as it were on exactly the issue of why He purposed that sin should certainly exist and why He appears to tolerate it for the time being. He posits this as a rhetorical question saying in essence “Did you ever stop to think that even though God had every right and sufficient inclination to destroy evil straight away that He did not do so in order that evil should grow ever more evil along side the saints displaying greater and greater contrast between the two, not to mention the fact all must continue until the last of God’s chosen has been redeemed? He further states that sinners were prepared for destruction just as the saints (even us) were prepared BEFOREHAND for glory.”

In 2 Timothy 1:9 Paul also says “who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in Christ Jesus from all eternity His purpose in grace granted in Christ is from all eternity and that cannot be possible if the entrance of sin was not also purposed and rendered certain from all eternity.

Revelation 13:8 calls Jesus Christ the “Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”. Why is He slain in the plan of God before the entrance of Sin? Because from all eternity sin was a certainty and it was certainty in the purpose of God who is Himself the only being who has so existed. Sin was rendered certain so that the unsearchable love mercy and grace of the one true God could be displayed before His creation in His saving some of them from it. Not in it, but from it.

Maybe more later.
[/quote]

So, god loves some people and hates others, chooses at will who will be who…

and you call this benevolent?

Seriously.[/quote]What I call it is irrelevant. He calls it justice for every last one to die and mercy that He saves some of them. I agree. I agree because I trust Him and I trust Him because He is the author and finisher of my faith. You asked how and why sin came to be and what role the human will plays from a Christian perspective.

God desired that the full splendor of His glorious nature be worshiped by His creatures in His showing Himself ultimately just and unbending in His judgment of evil (defined by Him) on one hand and ultimately loving, merciful and gracious in paying for the sins of His elect Himself and thereby reconciling them to His holy justice on the other.

As Paul says. “Who are you o man (or me?) who answers back to God?” In ways not fully accessible to mortal and fallen men, God rendered the birth of human sin an absolute certainty while remaining fully innocent of it’s commission intending to infallibly order it to His own purpose and exaltation. Once again, I do not understand the precise eternal mechanisms by which He accomplished this and quite honestly I don’t even care anymore. I know that HE understands and that is not just good enough, but fully satisfying to me.

I assure you this was not always the case. In my younger days I read, studied, prayed and meditated on these high questions til my brain hurt and my eyes burned, but somewhere along the way it became clear that if the towering giants of the faith on whose shoulders I was attempting to stand died without understanding, I would too. I act on what He has chosen to reveal and leave His secret providence to Him. I don’t know who the elect are except that I’m one of them. For all I know, regardless of what things look like today, you, Ephrem and Mike may be as well and if you are? You WILL come home and you WILL do it joyfully, humbly and willingly. If not it is none of my business. My business is to tell you in an uncompromising, truthful and gracious manner. All also defined by Him, but executed imperfectly by me.

Tiribulus’ post raised some questions I’d like to ask, I present one of them.

Why does God want to be worshiped? Isn’t that a bit odd and childlike? I can see it having psychologically sound aspects if people worship something because there is a childlike/pure quality in the act of worshiping itself, eventhough it is easy to taint that too. But the idea that God wants to be worshiped because He/She is glorious and splendid is suspicious to me. It sounds like something an earthly king demands from subjects for quite earthly reasons.
As is probably clear, I personally don’t believe God has ever asked for such behaviour from humankind, but it’s men that have spoken for him. Anyway, has this seemingly childish demand from God ever bothered you and if it has, have you found any answers?