[quote]Professor X wrote:
ZEB wrote:
I was not going to post on this thread but after reading some of the horrendous comments I felt that I had to.
Those who are calling Jackson a pedophile do not have all(or perhaps any) of the facts. They saw the headlines and like good little sheep they nodded in agreement and went on there merry way. Well I’ve read in detail about both cases in which there were either allegations or actual criminal charges and from what I’ve read I have found absolutely nothing which would cause me to believe that Michael Jackson molested any children. however, I did find two guilty parties.
Was the man eccentric? Certainly, and in fact to a fault. He never had a childhood as he was busy performing. Consequently he never had the opportunity to do some of the things that boys get to do, hang out with friends, get into a little mischief etc. Jackson acted out in this way with the boys that he invited to his home. Did it look suspicious? It certainly did. But the motivating factor for Jackson was not sex, but companionship. He was looking for a way to act out just as a child might.
Finally, those of you who have not lived long enough might be more inclined to believe every word that comes from a prosecutors mouth. I’ve found that while most prosecutors are well intended there are some who seek headlines. They do this to build up their name in order to run for higher office or for some other reason. The best way for a sitting DA or any prosecutor to make a name for him or herself is to bring down a big name, like Michael Jackson.
For example in the 1993 case the prosecutors office of LA county interviewed almost 30 boys in order to try to bring forth more information against Jackson. The DA’s office figured that there had to be a long list of boys that were molested because at the time he was accused of molesting only one particular boy. Upon being interviewed privately each boy stated that Jackson never touched them in an inappropriate manner. They also stated that Jackson was very kind to them and that sex was never discussed in any way. Was this reported in the press? No, the press was too busy trying to make a story out of nothing. The original boy in question was lying about Jackson. He was prompted to do this by his father who was attempting to extort money from the Jackson family, which unfortunately eventually worked.
I won’t go into any more details this post is already too long, but the real guilty parties are the LA County DA’s office with their single minded obsession to prosecute Jackson and of course the other guilty party is the press for never really telling the complete truth.
To the posters who still think that Jackson is a child molester spend an hour or two and read about both case’s you might find that with the illumination of facts not only will Michael Jackson not look like a pedophile, but in fact look like the very brave man that he was. One who had to live the last 16 years of his life under a cloud of shame that he did not deserve!
The world is a better place because Michael Jackson lived. May he rest in peace.
First, I’m glad to see you post again.
Second, I think you will find that the people that quick to say he “diddled little children” are also many of the same ones with one liners on every thread but never actually say anything of substance.
It is easy to tell jokes and tote the party line. Thinking shit through and being critical doesn’t seem to come as a package deal.
Mike always acted like a big kid. He also took his plastic surgery way too far. However, neither of these mean he deserved to be spit on like he was for nearly 20 years simply because some people love to see famous people fall.
“You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become a villain”
-Harvey Dent[/quote]
I think this might be about the second or third time we’ve actually agreed on something. One thing I will say about you though, you always come ready for a fight armed with facts and not afraid to state your opinion. I can’t say such things about the sub humans who have tried to taint Jacksons reputation with drive by style postings. It’s just wrong.
I feel very strongly about this from several different perspectives. The wrong done Jackson was horrific:
-
For 16 years the press demonized this man for fun and profit when they actually had access to the facts.
-
A DA’s office which ran amuck in my opinion, out to vilify someone because of their status and no doubt certain personal gain.
-
many people acting like sheep and gobbling up the nonsense without checking the facts- As you so aptly put it: “Thinking shit through and being critical doesn’t seem to come as a package deal.”
-
Finally the hypocrisy in the aftermath. The press writing these glowing stories about this great talent gone forever. It makes me sick to my stomach.
Anyway, take care my friend.
Zeb