Mexican Loyalties in the United States

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
Here’s a little spoonful for you, don’t think I’ll make this a habit.

This thread is based on the premise that immigrants, particularly Hispanic immigrants, are not assimilating into American culture. The evidence used was a survey done of Mexicans in Mexico, but was believed to have been given to mexican-americans. That belief was incorrect. Further, the argument that Hispanics are not assimilating to the culture has been strongly questioned if not completely disproven by the literature. Unfortunately, several posters on this board refuse to look at that literature. Further, they scorn it claiming it is “not real science.” This is possibly because it disproves their assumptions.

I’ve given evidence which challenges several premises on this thread. These include: questions about assimilation, the number of illegal immigrants in the US, and the ways that those illegal immigrants enter the country.
[/quote]

But, we’re not just discussing the first article. We’ve also been discussing an article showing lagging achievement, drop out rates, etc. We are not arguing if Hispanics (I’ve focused on illegals) can assimilate. We’re arguing they don’t assimilate fast enough at the rate their population is increasing. So, even if they could assimilate at the 2nd gen., 100% percent (which is absurd), that’s still 1 extra generation just to hit the ground running. But again, the second article points out that we’re seeing education and social problems persisting in 3rd and 4th generations.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
Here’s a little spoonful for you, don’t think I’ll make this a habit.

This thread is based on the premise that immigrants, particularly Hispanic immigrants, are not assimilating into American culture. The evidence used was a survey done of Mexicans in Mexico, but was believed to have been given to mexican-americans. That belief was incorrect. Further, the argument that Hispanics are not assimilating to the culture has been strongly questioned if not completely disproven by the literature. Unfortunately, several posters on this board refuse to look at that literature. Further, they scorn it claiming it is “not real science.” This is possibly because it disproves their assumptions.

I’ve given evidence which challenges several premises on this thread. These include: questions about assimilation, the number of illegal immigrants in the US, and the ways that those illegal immigrants enter the country.

But, we’re not just discussing the first article. We’ve also been discussing an article showing lagging achievement, drop out rates, etc. We are not arguing if Hispancis (I’ve focused on illegals) can assimilate. We’re arguing they don’t assimilate fast enough at the rate their population is increasing. So, even if they could assimilate at the 2nd gen., 100% percent (which is absurd), that’s still 1 extra generation just to hit the ground running. But again, the second article points out that we’re seeing education and social problems persisting in 3rd and 4th generations. [/quote]

It’s due to that “superior everything” they claim to have had. Better technology, education, medicine, warfare, inventions, you name it. Those dumb Europeans were thousands of years behind, according to them.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

It’s due to that “superior everything” they claim to have had. Better technology, education, medicine, warfare, inventions, you name it. Those dumb Europeans were thousands of years behind, according to them. [/quote]

What’s due to that? 3rd and 4th generation issues? I don’t know. I’ve seen it suggested that hispanics (just talking population, not individuals) are buying into the mindset of “The man’s gonna keep me down, anyways.” So, they lash out and give up before even trying. A rejection of the culture and attempting success in it.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
Here’s a little spoonful for you, don’t think I’ll make this a habit.

This thread is based on the premise that immigrants, particularly Hispanic immigrants, are not assimilating into American culture. The evidence used was a survey done of Mexicans in Mexico, but was believed to have been given to mexican-americans. That belief was incorrect. Further, the argument that Hispanics are not assimilating to the culture has been strongly questioned if not completely disproven by the literature. Unfortunately, several posters on this board refuse to look at that literature. Further, they scorn it claiming it is “not real science.” This is possibly because it disproves their assumptions.

I’ve given evidence which challenges several premises on this thread. These include: questions about assimilation, the number of illegal immigrants in the US, and the ways that those illegal immigrants enter the country.

But, we’re not just discussing the first article. We’ve also been discussing an article showing lagging achievement, drop out rates, etc. We are not arguing if Hispancis (I’ve focused on illegals) can assimilate. We’re arguing they don’t assimilate fast enough at the rate their population is increasing. So, even if they could assimilate at the 2nd gen., 100% percent (which is absurd), that’s still 1 extra generation just to hit the ground running. But again, the second article points out that we’re seeing education and social problems persisting in 3rd and 4th generations.

It’s due to that “superior everything” they claim to have had. Better technology, education, medicine, warfare, inventions, you name it. Those dumb Europeans were thousands of years behind, according to them. [/quote]

LOL. They truly live in an upside-down world. It’s no different than talking to a SWPL, I suppose.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
There is a point of view that is being totally missed here, and that is from illegal Latinos. One of the facilities I stayed on my Federal vacation was an INS holding facility, it was the closest facility to my home. I used to talk with these guys who came illegally, and asked them what they will do once they get deported. They said, without hesitation, to come right back regardless of the risk of getting arrested again.

They did not care, not one bit, about getting locked up yet again. They would talk about how they get money for their kids, and how weak this government is for just allowing people to come into their country and basically give away free money to those who just had kids. Guys would talk (laughing while doing it) about how they had their wife literally walk into a hospital and just have their babies for free. I had asked them if they felt bad for taking money from the citizens, and they would reply with, “FUCK NO.”

Because to them, they felt that the government was giving it away for free. They had no regard for the law or the citizens of this country, having caused identity theft and forgery. I had to hold back my anger in front of them, because to them I am just another pinche gringo. Guys I am telling you, they have no regard, NO REGARD, for our laws or for our people. Chuckling away about the poor bastard who’s SSN they would steal, or plan to steal when they come back.

And like mentioned above, these are the people who give the hard working immigrants who want to come here the right way a bad name.

You do raise a good cultural point that I have noticed about Mexico. There is a real feeling here that if something is easy to take then the person who made it easy to take is just stupid and deserves to lose it.

In the UK in a number of supermarkets there are self service checkout lines. You beep your own items through then pay using an automated system. My Mexican friends find this absolutely hilarious. In Mexico the store would be bankrupted in a week.

One of the two Mexican Power companies has just been taken over due to being ridiculously badly run. There was a report on the news today showing streets where literally thousands of people had just hooked up to steal electricity from the Grid. The report was not laying the blame on the people, it was pointing out how stupid the company was.

This is exactly my point, just because I leave my front door unlocked, does not make it ok to come into my house. You run the risk of not making it out alive.

This sense of entitlement is ridiculous, the feeling of “we are poor and you aren’t and you have to pay for us” makes me sick. That which can be stolen is fair game with many of these people. [/quote]

It is not that they think they are entitled to handouts from the government, quite the reverse. They have grown up in a culture where that doesn’t happen so they don’t quite understnd it. The second part is very Mexican though, if you leave your cellphone on a table in a restaurant here you don’t bother going back for it.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
Here’s a little spoonful for you, don’t think I’ll make this a habit.

This thread is based on the premise that immigrants, particularly Hispanic immigrants, are not assimilating into American culture. The evidence used was a survey done of Mexicans in Mexico, but was believed to have been given to mexican-americans. That belief was incorrect. Further, the argument that Hispanics are not assimilating to the culture has been strongly questioned if not completely disproven by the literature. Unfortunately, several posters on this board refuse to look at that literature. Further, they scorn it claiming it is “not real science.” This is possibly because it disproves their assumptions.

I’ve given evidence which challenges several premises on this thread. These include: questions about assimilation, the number of illegal immigrants in the US, and the ways that those illegal immigrants enter the country.

But, we’re not just discussing the first article. We’ve also been discussing an article showing lagging achievement, drop out rates, etc. We are not arguing if Hispanics (I’ve focused on illegals) can assimilate. We’re arguing they don’t assimilate fast enough at the rate their population is increasing. So, even if they could assimilate at the 2nd gen., 100% percent (which is absurd), that’s still 1 extra generation just to hit the ground running. But again, the second article points out that we’re seeing education and social problems persisting in 3rd and 4th generations. [/quote]

Honest question: If I post information which proves some of the things you’ve mentioned here to be in error or calls your logic into question, will you simply dismiss it as “not science”?

All evidence that can possibly be brought in will be from economists and social scientists. Will you read the material? And have you at least skimmed the assimilation article I posted above?

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
There is a point of view that is being totally missed here, and that is from illegal Latinos. One of the facilities I stayed on my Federal vacation was an INS holding facility, it was the closest facility to my home. I used to talk with these guys who came illegally, and asked them what they will do once they get deported. They said, without hesitation, to come right back regardless of the risk of getting arrested again.

They did not care, not one bit, about getting locked up yet again. They would talk about how they get money for their kids, and how weak this government is for just allowing people to come into their country and basically give away free money to those who just had kids. Guys would talk (laughing while doing it) about how they had their wife literally walk into a hospital and just have their babies for free. I had asked them if they felt bad for taking money from the citizens, and they would reply with, “FUCK NO.”

Because to them, they felt that the government was giving it away for free. They had no regard for the law or the citizens of this country, having caused identity theft and forgery. I had to hold back my anger in front of them, because to them I am just another pinche gringo. Guys I am telling you, they have no regard, NO REGARD, for our laws or for our people. Chuckling away about the poor bastard who’s SSN they would steal, or plan to steal when they come back.

And like mentioned above, these are the people who give the hard working immigrants who want to come here the right way a bad name.

You do raise a good cultural point that I have noticed about Mexico. There is a real feeling here that if something is easy to take then the person who made it easy to take is just stupid and deserves to lose it.

In the UK in a number of supermarkets there are self service checkout lines. You beep your own items through then pay using an automated system. My Mexican friends find this absolutely hilarious. In Mexico the store would be bankrupted in a week.

One of the two Mexican Power companies has just been taken over due to being ridiculously badly run. There was a report on the news today showing streets where literally thousands of people had just hooked up to steal electricity from the Grid. The report was not laying the blame on the people, it was pointing out how stupid the company was.

This is exactly my point, just because I leave my front door unlocked, does not make it ok to come into my house. You run the risk of not making it out alive.

This sense of entitlement is ridiculous, the feeling of “we are poor and you aren’t and you have to pay for us” makes me sick. That which can be stolen is fair game with many of these people.

It is not that they think they are entitled to handouts from the government, quite the reverse. They have grown up in a culture where that doesn’t happen so they don’t quite understnd it. The second part is very Mexican though, if you leave your cellphone on a table in a restaurant here you don’t bother going back for it.[/quote]

Come to Sherman Oaks, you will find it either cleaned or repaired.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
There is a point of view that is being totally missed here, and that is from illegal Latinos. One of the facilities I stayed on my Federal vacation was an INS holding facility, it was the closest facility to my home. I used to talk with these guys who came illegally, and asked them what they will do once they get deported. They said, without hesitation, to come right back regardless of the risk of getting arrested again.

They did not care, not one bit, about getting locked up yet again. They would talk about how they get money for their kids, and how weak this government is for just allowing people to come into their country and basically give away free money to those who just had kids. Guys would talk (laughing while doing it) about how they had their wife literally walk into a hospital and just have their babies for free. I had asked them if they felt bad for taking money from the citizens, and they would reply with, “FUCK NO.”

Because to them, they felt that the government was giving it away for free. They had no regard for the law or the citizens of this country, having caused identity theft and forgery. I had to hold back my anger in front of them, because to them I am just another pinche gringo. Guys I am telling you, they have no regard, NO REGARD, for our laws or for our people. Chuckling away about the poor bastard who’s SSN they would steal, or plan to steal when they come back.

And like mentioned above, these are the people who give the hard working immigrants who want to come here the right way a bad name.

You do raise a good cultural point that I have noticed about Mexico. There is a real feeling here that if something is easy to take then the person who made it easy to take is just stupid and deserves to lose it.

In the UK in a number of supermarkets there are self service checkout lines. You beep your own items through then pay using an automated system. My Mexican friends find this absolutely hilarious. In Mexico the store would be bankrupted in a week.

One of the two Mexican Power companies has just been taken over due to being ridiculously badly run. There was a report on the news today showing streets where literally thousands of people had just hooked up to steal electricity from the Grid. The report was not laying the blame on the people, it was pointing out how stupid the company was.

This is exactly my point, just because I leave my front door unlocked, does not make it ok to come into my house. You run the risk of not making it out alive.

This sense of entitlement is ridiculous, the feeling of “we are poor and you aren’t and you have to pay for us” makes me sick. That which can be stolen is fair game with many of these people.

It is not that they think they are entitled to handouts from the government, quite the reverse. They have grown up in a culture where that doesn’t happen so they don’t quite understnd it. The second part is very Mexican though, if you leave your cellphone on a table in a restaurant here you don’t bother going back for it.

Come to Sherman Oaks, you will find it either cleaned or repaired.

[/quote]

A friend of mine had his wing mirrors stolen then the idiot who stole them tried to sell them back to him.

Should have paid him with a fist in his mouth.

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
Honest question: If I post information which proves some of the things you’ve mentioned here to be in error or calls your logic into question, will you simply dismiss it as “not science”?

All evidence that can possibly be brought in will be from economists and social scientists. Will you read the material? And have you at least skimmed the assimilation article I posted above?

[/quote]

No. I’d like to see you actually make an argument, backing it up with quotes from your material, if you’d like. But don’t come on here looking for a reading list war. The dropout rate for hispanics was in 2007 was 21.4, according to the NCES. This http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2009/section3/indicator20.asp, a look at status dropout rates, breaks it down to 34% (holy crap!) for foreign born, and 11% for native born. Even native born show a rate double that of whites, and worse than the 8.4% for blacks.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
Honest question: If I post information which proves some of the things you’ve mentioned here to be in error or calls your logic into question, will you simply dismiss it as “not science”?

All evidence that can possibly be brought in will be from economists and social scientists. Will you read the material? And have you at least skimmed the assimilation article I posted above?

No. I’d like to see you actually make an argument, backing it up with quotes from your material, if you’d like. But don’t come on here looking for a reading list war. The dropout rate for hispanics was 21.4 according to the NCES. This http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2009/section3/indicator20.asp, a look at status dropout rates, breaks it down to 34% (holy crap!) for foreign born, and 11% for native born. Even native born show a rate double that of whites, and worse than the 8.4% for blacks.[/quote]

Don’t forget the lower Mexican enrollment!

Seriously, though, G_L. I’ll make a public apology for misreading the original article if it makes you happy.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

Don’t forget the lower Mexican enrollment!

[/quote]

And that’s true. What about the those who dropped out–or never even started–back home, never attending a public school in the US? They’re not even in these numbers.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Should have paid him with a fist in his mouth. [/quote]

Oh that he did!

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
Honest question: If I post information which proves some of the things you’ve mentioned here to be in error or calls your logic into question, will you simply dismiss it as “not science”?

All evidence that can possibly be brought in will be from economists and social scientists. Will you read the material? And have you at least skimmed the assimilation article I posted above?

No. I’d like to see you actually make an argument, backing it up with quotes from your material, if you’d like. But don’t come on here looking for a reading list war. The dropout rate for hispanics was 21.4 according to the NCES. This http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2009/section3/indicator20.asp, a look at status dropout rates, breaks it down to 34% (holy crap!) for foreign born, and 11% for native born. Even native born show a rate double that of whites, and worse than the 8.4% for blacks.

Don’t forget the lower Mexican enrollment!

Seriously, though, G_L. I’ll make a public apology for misreading the original article if it makes you happy. [/quote]

Can we have a Youtube video with tears and promises not to let it happen again?

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
Honest question: If I post information which proves some of the things you’ve mentioned here to be in error or calls your logic into question, will you simply dismiss it as “not science”?

All evidence that can possibly be brought in will be from economists and social scientists. Will you read the material? And have you at least skimmed the assimilation article I posted above?

No. I’d like to see you actually make an argument, backing it up with quotes from your material, if you’d like. But don’t come on here looking for a reading list war. The dropout rate for hispanics was in 2007 was 21.4, according to the NCES. This http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2009/section3/indicator20.asp, a look at status dropout rates, breaks it down to 34% (holy crap!) for foreign born, and 11% for native born. Even native born show a rate double that of whites, and worse than the 8.4% for blacks.[/quote]

This is what I mean about you being purposefully and willfully ignorant. You are actually refusing to read information that you don’t like. I’m impressed that you admit it.

You don’t want to get into a “reading list war?” Guess what? Adults read. Even when they don’t like the information.

I’m curious though, why exactly do you think that economics and the social sciences aren’t real sciences? Does it have something to do with your religion? Were you home schooled and taught this perhaps? Did someone actually teach you that you shouldn’t listen to points of view that you don’t share?

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

Seriously, though, G_L. I’ll make a public apology for misreading the original article if it makes you happy. [/quote]

I just try to keep down your bullshit levels PR. You want to make me happy why don’t you try reading Borjas. I’ll tell you in advance that he agrees with a lot of what you’re saying. Maybe you’ll come here making arguments that aren’t complete bullshit. Hell, after reading that other thread it seems you’ve picked up an econ book lately, perhaps you can learn.

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

Seriously, though, G_L. I’ll make a public apology for misreading the original article if it makes you happy.

I just try to keep down your bullshit levels PR. You want to make me happy why don’t you try reading Borjas. I’ll tell you in advance that he agrees with a lot of what you’re saying. Maybe you’ll come here making arguments that aren’t complete bullshit. Hell, after reading that other thread it seems you’ve picked up an econ book lately, perhaps you can learn. [/quote]

You surprised me with this answer, young padawan. I was all geared-up for my public apology, humiliation, and rehabilitation, and now all I have is a mandate to cut back on the BS. Yessir!

It’s been awhile since I’ve read Borjas. I’ve seen some of the stuff he publishes through the CIS. He takes a dim view of low-skill immigration and illegal immigration in general, from what I remember.

Here’s some more hatefacts Borjas published on Los Angeles and welfare:
http://borjas.typepad.com/the_borjas_blog/2009/02/la-county-and-welfare.html

Pretty interesting, no?

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
This is what I mean about you being purposefully and willfully ignorant. You are actually refusing to read information that you don’t like. I’m impressed that you admit it.

You don’t want to get into a “reading list war?” Guess what? Adults read. Even when they don’t like the information.

I’m curious though, why exactly do you think that economics and the social sciences aren’t real sciences? Does it have something to do with your religion? Were you home schooled and taught this perhaps? Did someone actually teach you that you shouldn’t listen to points of view that you don’t share?
[/quote]

And here we go:

  1. This is a forum. The only reason I participate in a forum is to make my viewpoints known. Or, to debate another member’s view. That is, we are both responding in our own words, using figures, sources, etc., where needed. This is not Gamibt’s (or anyone’s) personal link dump, where you get to drop off a reading list for the rest of us. State your case, and source where needed.

  2. If I did my “assigned homework,” and disagreed with it, or claimed it wasn’t relevant, even backed up by my own links, I’d get; “Oh, oh, you just don’t understand it. Or, or, maybe you just skimmed it!”

  3. Economics is snake oil. Economists, the salesmen. Classical, Neoclassical, Keynesian, Neo-Keynesian, Chicago School, Austrian, and whatever new brands we’ll see in the future. Wherever the ideological wind blows, a new school of thought pops up. Free markets work best? Markets work best when Governments can manipulate money, rates, spending, whatever? Build mathematical models based on assumed human behavior? Is economics more like physics? Or do we observe actual human beings and their societies? I could teach a student everything he needs to know about economics in 1 hour. The rest of it is justification for government jobs and money. My religion? Give me a break. Don’t act like economics is evolutionary biology. Geeze, they have to poll each other just to see what the majority believes on economic issues.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

Seriously, though, G_L. I’ll make a public apology for misreading the original article if it makes you happy.

I just try to keep down your bullshit levels PR. You want to make me happy why don’t you try reading Borjas. I’ll tell you in advance that he agrees with a lot of what you’re saying. Maybe you’ll come here making arguments that aren’t complete bullshit. Hell, after reading that other thread it seems you’ve picked up an econ book lately, perhaps you can learn.

You surprised me with this answer, young padawan. I was all geared-up for my public apology, humiliation, and rehabilitation, and now all I have is a mandate to cut back on the BS. Yessir!

It’s been awhile since I’ve read Borjas. I’ve seen some of the stuff he publishes through the CIS. He takes a dim view of low-skill immigration and illegal immigration in general, from what I remember.

Here’s some more hatefacts Borjas published on Los Angeles and welfare:
http://borjas.typepad.com/the_borjas_blog/2009/02/la-county-and-welfare.html

Pretty interesting, no? [/quote]

Unfortunately I have to do some work tonight, but I’ll try to get to your link tomorrow.

How is it that you know who Borjas is, but don’t know the number of illegal immigrants, how they get into the country, or information about assimilation?

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
This is what I mean about you being purposefully and willfully ignorant. You are actually refusing to read information that you don’t like. I’m impressed that you admit it.

You don’t want to get into a “reading list war?” Guess what? Adults read. Even when they don’t like the information.

I’m curious though, why exactly do you think that economics and the social sciences aren’t real sciences? Does it have something to do with your religion? Were you home schooled and taught this perhaps? Did someone actually teach you that you shouldn’t listen to points of view that you don’t share?

And here we go:

  1. This is a forum. The only reason I participate in a forum is to make my viewpoints known. Or, to debate another member’s view. That is, we are both responding in our own words, using figures, sources, etc., where needed. This is not Gamibt’s (or anyone’s) personal link dump, where you get to drop off a reading list for the rest of us. State your case, and source where needed. [/quote]

I’ve consistently highlighted and sourced information which disputed premises on this thread. When I provided information you didn’t like, you scoffed and said it wasn’t real. Further, you refuse to read information that is contradictory to your beliefs. Explain to me how refusing to read contradictory evidence is “debate.”

[quote]
2. If I did my “assigned homework,” and disagreed with it, or claimed it wasn’t relevant, even backed up by my own links, I’d get; “Oh, oh, you just don’t understand it. Or, or, maybe you just skimmed it!”[/quote]

This is a great fantasy.

Nice rant. Care to address the social sciences as well? Why stop when you’re going strong?

You still haven’t answered why you don’t think they’re sciences or why you won’t read material from these fields.