Members with Skinny People Avatars

It’s a cultural thing, no doubt. Many girls I knew in school (ages 13-16), had boyfriends and had sex. The girls who were sexually active were generally the ones who developed early. Several girls in my class had boyfriends around 18 years old, when they themselves were 14. They didn’t seem too interested in boys at the same age as them.

I remember my brother got together with a 14 year old when he was 21. Her parents were too thrilled with that one, lol. They were together for 10 years, though, and have a child together. It all depends on the person… I had a 17 year old GF at 22, which I don’t see anything wrong with at all.

[quote]Makavali wrote:
Mr.Purple wrote:
A guy in his early twenties looking at 16 year old girls? That’s called nature, not pedophilia.

Actually, nature would be looking at fully developed females. Their prime is supposed to be 18-30 or something.[/quote]

I don’t know, man. A young guy being attracted to a 16 year old that is well on her way to fully developed, seems pretty natural to me. She might fill out a bit more in the next two years, but still… a lot of 16 year olds look like women, not like little girls.

.

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
OctoberGirl wrote:
yah… let’s not get into other cultures especially as one country just upheld the marriage of an 8yr old to a 47 year old man.

I know. I’m the one who started the thread on PWI condemning it.

let’s not use other nations as an example

I’m not. Hence, “I won’t get into the law outside of the US.”

and just because some things are legal doesn’t mean they are right. It used to be legal to do a lot of things that were wrong.

Quite true. The law once said that it was wrong for a man to have anal sex with his own wife. We all know how mistaken that law is.

However, one must demonstrate why it is “wrong” to have sex with a 16-year old, if the law says that it’s permissible. The only answer I would accept (having rejected the arguments that she hasn’t yet matured physically (yes, she has), legally (yes, she has, with provisos), or emotionally (…uh, no, probably not, but how many women ever do in this culture?) is if a person who was much more advance than her in age, income, political or social power, etc. exerted his coercive powers on her, making her bend to his will and provide sex to him.

But in this case, I’d say that it would be just as “wrong” if she were 16, 26, or 36. In other words, her age is irrelevant.

I get the 16yr old thing, it’s a pervy thing but understandable.

Do you think it’s just as pervy for a 35-year-old woman to sleep with a 16-year-old stud?

but don’t get on all worked up as if it to be held in high regard

Who’s getting worked up? I’m just making conversation.

I didn’t know there was a thread about that in PWI

I am not attracted to 16yr old boys so yah, I would think that would be pervy.

and did you just say women don’t ever mature emotionally?

I do support Romeo and Juliet laws, I am not a fan of 36yr old men dating 16yr old girls.
[/quote]

I’ll hop on board with it being highly inappropriate/pervy for and adult woman to have sex with a 16 year old boy. Actually make that 17, 18, 19… Okay at the moment anyone under 30 looks dodgy but I don’t believe there are or should be different standards for women than men.

Too be far, when I was in the Marines, at 17 I banged a 42 MILF. She was hot, she rocked my world, but she was old and she had an 18 year old daughter. Was it wrong? Possibly. Was it good for me? Hell yes.

[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:

I’ll hop on board with it being highly inappropriate/pervy for and adult woman to have sex with a 16 year old boy. Actually make that 17, 18, 19… Okay at the moment anyone under 30 looks dodgy[/quote]

well now thats just depressing.

[quote]Westclock wrote:
CrookedCrown wrote:
Typically, unless you have 20,000 posts or more, it is unwise to create a thread that commands a segment of the T-Nation community to perform a certain task against their own will. I, for one, would love to see Professor X knock you out with some wise wordplay, but he usually won’t touch these types of threads with a 10-foot pole. You have just turned the entire forum against you with your incredibly inane post. If that was your intent, congratulations. If not, then may God have mercy on your soul.

Please remove yourself from Professor X’s nuts. There are quite a few people occupying that space already.[/quote]

Yeah dude–There is a 3 month waiting list to be on those nuts. Get to the back of the line.

[quote]SickAbs wrote:
Teen girls > older women…[/quote]

high five

i wish i was fucking a 17 year old right now.

[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
i wish i was fucking a 17 year old right now.[/quote]

Do you envision him blond or brunette?

[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
i wish i was fucking a 17 year old right now.[/quote]

Trouble with 17-year-olds is they blow up your phone the next day, and it usually takes them like a week of nospeaky before they take the hint.

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
i wish i was fucking a 17 year old right now.

Do you envision him blond or brunette?
[/quote]

depends, how old are your kids again?

[quote]Itchy wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
i wish i was fucking a 17 year old right now.

Trouble with 17-year-olds is they blow up your phone the next day, and it usually takes them like a week of nospeaky before they take the hint.[/quote]

word, this is true.