[quote]HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?[/quote]
Why don’t take a seat? Take a seat, right over there.
[quote]HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?[/quote]
It does make me uncomfortable. But not nearly as much as your attire in your newest avatar of the fact that you’re trying to fire that assault rifle with the safety on. Doesn’t bode well for the future of our country.
[quote]HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?[/quote]
HMac- Until I just saw this pic blown up and figured out what it is, I thought it was a picture of Obama’s head photoshopped onto some kid… LMAO!!
OP; your retarded and don’t understand humor.
go buy some and come back later.
[quote]Westclock wrote:
SickAbs wrote:
jailbaitgallery.com Is it sick that that’s my fav website ever now?
Just try not to accidentally rape your own illegitimate daughter when you stubble home in haze from a hard night of slogging with the “Bros”
I joke, but seriously, dont rape her.[/quote]
lol
[quote]Mr.Purple wrote:
A guy in his early twenties looking at 16 year old girls? That’s called nature, not pedophilia.
[/quote]
Why 16 year olds ? They dont even have tits or asses yet and look like a little sister.
They are skinny and flat all around, no curves, no muscles yet.
There are some that look like 20 year olds at 16.
But my point is, why no JUST look at ACTUAL 18-20 year olds ? Its not like girls get significantly less slutty/ attention whoring in 2-3 years.
[quote]polo77j wrote:
HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?
It does make me uncomfortable. But not nearly as much as your attire in your newest avatar of the fact that you’re trying to fire that assault rifle with the safety on. Doesn’t bode well for the future of our country.[/quote]
lol.
first off, that’s actually classified as a pistol.
second, the safety is on the left side of the weapon. impossible for you to know whether it’s on or not.
what’s wrong with my outfit? all the cool kids are doing it.
[quote]polo77j wrote:
HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?
It does make me uncomfortable. But not nearly as much as your attire in your newest avatar of the fact that you’re trying to fire that assault rifle with the safety on. Doesn’t bode well for the future of our country.[/quote]
Sharp eye…
[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:
pushmepullme wrote:
I like the guys with the skinny avatars, esp. when they are big in real life. It keeps OG away from em, leaves em for me!
When we identify them, what do we do? You know.[/quote]
I may want to do it to… what do you do?
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
polo77j wrote:
HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?
It does make me uncomfortable. But not nearly as much as your attire in your newest avatar of the fact that you’re trying to fire that assault rifle with the safety on. Doesn’t bode well for the future of our country.
Sharp eye…[/quote]
wtf
[quote]Raided wrote:
Attention T-Nation members with skinny people as your avatars:
If it isnt to be cruel, to wind your self up, to know the enemy or the person isnt incredible ripped then change that picture. You know who you are. This is T-Nation, there isnt anything intelligent or relentless about wanting to look like a 12 year old schoolgirl’s pin-up.[/quote]
Obviously you missed the people with no avatar thread.Maybe get a picture then you could act like yours is better.
[quote]HolyMacaroni wrote:
polo77j wrote:
HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?
It does make me uncomfortable. But not nearly as much as your attire in your newest avatar of the fact that you’re trying to fire that assault rifle with the safety on. Doesn’t bode well for the future of our country.
lol.
first off, that’s actually classified as a pistol.
second, the safety is on the left side of the weapon. impossible for you to know whether it’s on or not.
what’s wrong with my outfit? all the cool kids are doing it.[/quote]
And it’s not impossible for me to know whether or not the safety was on or not, I could’ve been there … wrap your mind around THAT. And I’ll call it whatever I want. It’s never about being right or wrong, it’s about how many people you can convince to believe you.
[quote]Westclock wrote:
Be a real man. Do a “self evaluation” and find some girl that wasn’t fucking 11 when you were graduating from highschool. [/quote]
I wonder, Westclock, if you think Harrison Ford is a pedophile… or at least, whether you think he plays one in the movies.
After all, in Raiders of the Lost Ark, we learn that the reason he and Dr. Abner Ravenwood had a “falling out” was that the doc discovered that Indy was banging his teenage daughter Marion.
Indy was 27. Marion was 16 or 17 when Abner found out about it. And they’d been going at it for quite a while.
But that’s only a ten-year difference in age. What about Han Solo and Princess Leia? Leia’s only supposed to be about 19 in Episode 4, and while Han’s age is a little sketchy, Harrison Ford is 14 years older than Carrie Fisher, so let’s say at least mid-thirties. Which means Leia was probably about 11 when Han was getting kicked out of the Imperial Academy.
Of course, when Harrison Ford first appeared as Han Solo in 1977, Anne Heche was eight years old. That didn’t stop the randy 56-year-old from being all over her 29-year-old body in Six Days, Seven Nights. (See Harrison as Quinn Harris about to grab at Anne’s boob in picture above.)
So by your reasoning, neither Han Solo, Indiana Jones, nor Quinn Harris are “real men,” because they go after quite younger women.
Okay.
Everyone relax with the Pedophilia remarks. My avatar is getting nervous…
[quote]DJS wrote:
Everyone relax with the Pedophilia remarks. My avatar is getting nervous…[/quote]
hahahaha
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Westclock wrote:
Be a real man. Do a “self evaluation” and find some girl that wasn’t fucking 11 when you were graduating from highschool.
I wonder, Westclock, if you think Harrison Ford is a pedophile… or at least, whether you think he plays one in the movies.
After all, in Raiders of the Lost Ark, we learn that the reason he and Dr. Abner Ravenwood had a “falling out” was that the doc discovered that Indy was banging his teenage daughter Marion.
Indy was 27. Marion was 16 or 17 when Abner found out about it. And they’d been going at it for quite a while.
But that’s only a ten-year difference in age. What about Han Solo and Princess Leia? Leia’s only supposed to be about 19 in Episode 4, and while Han’s age is a little sketchy, Harrison Ford is 14 years older than Carrie Fisher, so let’s say at least mid-thirties. Which means Leia was probably about 11 when Han was getting kicked out of the Imperial Academy.
Of course, when Harrison Ford first appeared as Han Solo in 1977, Anne Heche was eight years old. That didn’t stop the randy 56-year-old from being all over her 29-year-old body in Six Days, Seven Nights. (See Harrison as Quinn Harris about to grab at Anne’s boob in picture above.)
So by your reasoning, neither Han Solo, Indiana Jones, nor Quinn Harris are “real men,” because they go after quite younger women.
Okay.[/quote]
You do realize that Han Solo and Indiana Jones and Quinn Harris are fictional characters.
And by definition are infact not “real men”.
Also age difference is another thing, going after pre-pubescent girls at any age is demented.
My highschool example does apply to all situations, for example, while it is a little creepy for a 50-60 year old to fuck a 19 year old, its still acceptable even though she was not even a fetus when he graduated from highschool.
Atleast shes fully grown and fully developed, by definition a woman.
Theres a difference between fucking a younger woman and fucking a child, no matter how old you are.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Westclock wrote:
Be a real man. Do a “self evaluation” and find some girl that wasn’t fucking 11 when you were graduating from highschool.
I wonder, Westclock, if you think Harrison Ford is a pedophile… or at least, whether you think he plays one in the movies.
After all, in Raiders of the Lost Ark, we learn that the reason he and Dr. Abner Ravenwood had a “falling out” was that the doc discovered that Indy was banging his teenage daughter Marion.
Indy was 27. Marion was 16 or 17 when Abner found out about it. And they’d been going at it for quite a while.
But that’s only a ten-year difference in age. What about Han Solo and Princess Leia? Leia’s only supposed to be about 19 in Episode 4, and while Han’s age is a little sketchy, Harrison Ford is 14 years older than Carrie Fisher, so let’s say at least mid-thirties. Which means Leia was probably about 11 when Han was getting kicked out of the Imperial Academy.
Of course, when Harrison Ford first appeared as Han Solo in 1977, Anne Heche was eight years old. That didn’t stop the randy 56-year-old from being all over her 29-year-old body in Six Days, Seven Nights. (See Harrison as Quinn Harris about to grab at Anne’s boob in picture above.)
So by your reasoning, neither Han Solo, Indiana Jones, nor Quinn Harris are “real men,” because they go after quite younger women.
Okay.[/quote]
hahaha…this was just awesome
[quote]SickAbs wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
Westclock wrote:
Be a real man. Do a “self evaluation” and find some girl that wasn’t fucking 11 when you were graduating from highschool.
I wonder, Westclock, if you think Harrison Ford is a pedophile… or at least, whether you think he plays one in the movies.
After all, in Raiders of the Lost Ark, we learn that the reason he and Dr. Abner Ravenwood had a “falling out” was that the doc discovered that Indy was banging his teenage daughter Marion.
Indy was 27. Marion was 16 or 17 when Abner found out about it. And they’d been going at it for quite a while.
But that’s only a ten-year difference in age. What about Han Solo and Princess Leia? Leia’s only supposed to be about 19 in Episode 4, and while Han’s age is a little sketchy, Harrison Ford is 14 years older than Carrie Fisher, so let’s say at least mid-thirties. Which means Leia was probably about 11 when Han was getting kicked out of the Imperial Academy.
Of course, when Harrison Ford first appeared as Han Solo in 1977, Anne Heche was eight years old. That didn’t stop the randy 56-year-old from being all over her 29-year-old body in Six Days, Seven Nights. (See Harrison as Quinn Harris about to grab at Anne’s boob in picture above.)
So by your reasoning, neither Han Solo, Indiana Jones, nor Quinn Harris are “real men,” because they go after quite younger women.
Okay.
hahaha…this was just awesome[/quote]
oh you know things are wrong if SickAbs likes and agrees with your post…
[quote]HolyMacaroni wrote:
UtahLama wrote:
polo77j wrote:
HolyMacaroni wrote:
does this make you…uncomfortable?
It does make me uncomfortable. But not nearly as much as your attire in your newest avatar of the fact that you’re trying to fire that assault rifle with the safety on. Doesn’t bode well for the future of our country.
Sharp eye…
wtf[/quote]
He can see THROUGH shit. Sharp eye.
[quote]Westclock wrote:
You do realize that Han Solo and Indiana Jones and Quinn Harris are fictional characters. And by definition are infact not “real men”.[/quote]
Of course I realize that they are fictional characters. They are fictional characters who, just like Achilles, Sir Galahad and (I will not say “Jesus,” I will not say “Jesus…”) Aragorn, are held up as exemplars of heroism and manliness.[quote]
Also age difference is another thing, going after pre-pubescent girls at any age is demented.[/quote]
Wait, I thought we were talking about 17-year-old girls. 17-year-old girls are, “by definition” not pre-pubescent, inasmuch as the onset of puberty generally occurs in the early teens. [quote]
My highschool example does apply to all situations, for example, while it is a little creepy for a 50-60 year old to fuck a 19 year old, its still acceptable even though she was not even a fetus when he graduated from highschool.[/quote]
I’m curious, Westclock. At what age do you figure that it becomes “a little creepy” for a man to have sex with a 19-year old woman? Certainly not 20. Nor 30, I would imagine.
40? 35? Do I hear 37 and a half? [quote]
Atleast shes fully grown and fully developed, by definition a woman.[/quote]
Ah, now there’s the rub. By what definition? Because you must know that there is no consensus on the matter.
At what age does a girl become a woman? Biologically speaking, it’s at whatever age she has her first period. At that time, she is, “by definition,” of breeding age. This is generally age 13, although in the inner cities (thanks in large part to hormones in hamburgers), it’s not uncommon for girls to experience menarche at the age of 8.
Legally speaking? Well, that’s tricky, because first of all, are we talking age of majority, or age of consent? If it’s age of majority, are we talking about full majority, which is 21 in the United States (although it’s 20 in Japan, and 18 in most other countries)? Or just “old enough to vote?”
If we’re talking age of consent, then you must know that it varies widely from state to state. It is legal to have sex with a 16-year-old girl in 31 states and the District of Columbia, and legal to have sex with a 17-year-old in 39 states and DC.
I won’t get into the law outside of the US, but it gets to be pretty young. Like 16 in the UK, 15 in France and Sweden, 14 in Austria, Germany, and Bulgaria, and 12 in the Vatican City. No altar boy jokes, please. (a US citizen abroad, by the way, is legally permitted to have sex with a 16-year-old girl, but no younger than 16, even if local laws permit it).
It can be said that European girls are more emotionally mature at fourteen than most American girls are at seventeen, nineteen, or twenty-three, but if emotional maturity were the benchmark for determining readiness for sexual activity, than the age of consent in the United States would be thirty-five.
[quote]Theres a difference between fucking a younger woman and fucking a child, no matter how old you are.
[/quote]
And once again, a seventeen-year-old is NOT physically, legally (in most jurisdictions), nor emotionally (in most cultures) a child. By definition.