[quote]Blackaggar wrote:
i think trix kind of sucked, the only person that really loved them was that rabbit thing
[/quote]
On a related note, I always hoped that rabbit would open up a can of whoop-ass on those fucking kids who kept taking his cereal. I mean, they stole his property right in front of his face!
[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
[quote]Blackaggar wrote:
i think trix kind of sucked, the only person that really loved them was that rabbit thing
[/quote]
On a related note, I always hoped that rabbit would open up a can of whoop-ass on those fucking kids who kept taking his cereal. I mean, they stole his property right in front of his face![/quote]
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]rehanb_bl wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Like was said when this first broke, YOU CAN’T SEE SHIT BEHIND THE COUNTER…which is why everyone acting like they could see through walls was flat out wrong.
None of you know how many times they tried to get back up or if they pulled a knife while down on the ground.
We said all of this already.
It looks like we were right.
Glad to see he gets freedom and not jail time.
If these were two guys attacking a woman, there never would have been a discussion.[/quote]
for the first time i totally agree with you
also this
[quote]chushin wrote:
In the original thread, I made a crack about customers not being allowed in the kitchen. Pursuing the guy into a private area made them the aggressors. That’s probably the reason why the charges were dropped in the end.
[/quote]
[/quote]
Hey! I never said that![/quote]
Yes you did. I agree with it totally. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
^ I’m hurt that you didn’t want to take credit for it…
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
[quote]Blackaggar wrote:
i think trix kind of sucked, the only person that really loved them was that rabbit thing
[/quote]
On a related note, I always hoped that rabbit would open up a can of whoop-ass on those fucking kids who kept taking his cereal. I mean, they stole his property right in front of his face![/quote]
Meh, a prolonged beating with a metal rod would have been better.
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
Good. Self defense and fully justified.
Any one who doesn’t agree with me is a retard and I’m not getting into any debates. (I like that one Bonez, hope you don’t mind if I steal it.)[/quote]
THe difference is my opinion is based on what the law says should happen and yours is based on god knows what. [/quote]
Well shieeet, I thought we agreed not to get into any debates.
My opinion, you arrogant fuck, is that the law is wrong. Obviously.
I think those two bitches should have the same rights as rabid dogs after they jump that counter. I hope this is all becoming clear to you.
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
My opinion, you arrogant fuck, is that the law is wrong.
[/quote]
My opinion, you confused clown, is that peaches are delicious. What both of our opinions have in common is that theyre irrelevant here.
U mad?
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
My opinion, you arrogant fuck, is that the law is wrong.
[/quote]
My opinion, you confused clown, is that peaches are delicious. What both of our opinions have in common is that theyre irrelevant here.
U mad?
[/quote]
Yeah yeah we get it bonez, it should have gone to trial. Bizarre! Bizarre I tell you. lol
No one gives a shit, we’re happy to see it turn out like it should for that guy.
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
My opinion, you arrogant fuck, is that the law is wrong.
[/quote]
My opinion, you confused clown, is that peaches are delicious. What both of our opinions have in common is that theyre irrelevant here.
U mad?
[/quote]
Yeah yeah we get it bonez, it should have gone to trial. Bizarre! Bizarre I tell you. lol
No one gives a shit, we’re happy to see it turn out like it should for that guy.[/quote]
No that is pretty bizarre, and I see something bigger here. I think that the grand jury squashed it there because they don’t trust the trial to come to the right conclusion.
If that is correct, it shows a big problem when citizens are so distrusting of each other that they won’t even take this to trial, when we have the video.
I personally wouldn’t have gone for an indictment either, but this is simultaneously scary and awesome to know that I am in the majority on this one.
AWESOME!!!
I felt pretty sure the guy was screwed…nice to see the ‘rule book’ fly out of the window every once in a while when it comes to cases like this.
my bad
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
Didn’t see the whole video, don’t know how far he went with hitting them when they were on the ground. It may have been excessive, or, if he was honestly afraid for his safety, it may not.
What I do know is that I resent they way some women will try to challenge or attack men, knowing that it puts the man in a no win situation - either he gets backed down by a woman, and is seen as a coward, or he hits her, and goes to jail. Actually had an exgirlfriend brag, years ago, that she “had more balls than most guys” because she could “stand down most guys she knows”. My reply was “Yeah, but what are they gonna do… hit you?” … She promptly shut up.
So while I dont exactly condone men hitting women, this video does serve as a reminder to women who do that that, yeah, one of these days you’re going to try it with the wrong guy and get your skull fractured.[/quote]
set and match.
[quote]Blackaggar wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I liked Cocoa Puffs better…and Trix has been played out.[/quote]
i think trix kind of sucked, the only person that really loved them was that rabbit thing
i dont like lucky charms either
Nes quick on the other hand is superb![/quote]
Blasphemer! Lucky Charms ARE magically delicious.
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
Good. And I hope they do get hit with trespassing, as well. They deserve to get fucked over - and publicly.[/quote]
Agreed.
Guy went a little overboard but bottomline is none of this would have ever happened if two stupid bitches could have kept their shit together.
I’ve got a warm-fuzzy that he wasn’t indicted, although, I AM curious as to what caused him to beat them after they were down. With seconds between the blows. I’m thinking that may have been the difference maker. Could one of the ladies have been going for a weapon???
Also surprised this was in NY.
Ok so obviously my view is colored by the fact that I support the guy…
This is local paper that goes a lot more in depth there a links to a lot of their articles on the case including the one released after.
In a couple of them they quote the other workers saying the women were threatening and verbally abusive to the other employees…I don’t know that all the other employees followed this same line in their testimony, but I’d lay significant money on it.
The grand jury was convened to determine indictments for all the people in the incident. Not just the guy. They are in fact the ones that will determine if the women should be prosecuted for trespassing.
I imagine that the rules of what you can introduce in a grand jury proceedings are much looser than an actual trial so tidbits like the one chick getting fired for stealing and the other chick being arrested for harassment probably got in which I am sure did them no favors.
Also its unclear what tone the prosecution took…tbh the interviews on the prosecution side look like they took a somewhat favorable view of his actions…obviously they are being pc but there is no talk of travesty of justice except from the one woman’s attorney.
Looking through the other links related to the first story it was abundantly clear he had a ton of local support and DA’s are political animals.
The articles list a couple other fights that have happened in or around that mcd’s so I’d say in general you’d be more geared up for serious trouble working there than in some suburban mall.
Also the women it appears declined to testify in their defense on the trespassing charges so it was largely his word that they claimed they were going to “cut him” versus no rebuttal. I’d guess his coworkers jumped on that bandwagon as well.
So we have a case where they can either drop or they can risk prosecuting thats very unpopular with terrible supporting eyewitnesses and only unclear video to back it up. Probably didn’t push it too hard.
Lol apparently he’s considering a lawsuit against his employer… no real opinion on that but it seems funny.
[quote]groo wrote:
Ok so obviously my view is colored by the fact that I support the guy…
This is local paper that goes a lot more in depth there a links to a lot of their articles on the case including the one released after.
In a couple of them they quote the other workers saying the women were threatening and verbally abusive to the other employees…I don’t know that all the other employees followed this same line in their testimony, but I’d lay significant money on it.
The grand jury was convened to determine indictments for all the people in the incident. Not just the guy. They are in fact the ones that will determine if the women should be prosecuted for trespassing.
I imagine that the rules of what you can introduce in a grand jury proceedings are much looser than an actual trial so tidbits like the one chick getting fired for stealing and the other chick being arrested for harassment probably got in which I am sure did them no favors.
Also its unclear what tone the prosecution took…tbh the interviews on the prosecution side look like they took a somewhat favorable view of his actions…obviously they are being pc but there is no talk of travesty of justice except from the one woman’s attorney.
Looking through the other links related to the first story it was abundantly clear he had a ton of local support and DA’s are political animals.
The articles list a couple other fights that have happened in or around that mcd’s so I’d say in general you’d be more geared up for serious trouble working there than in some suburban mall.
Also the women it appears declined to testify in their defense on the trespassing charges so it was largely his word that they claimed they were going to “cut him” versus no rebuttal. I’d guess his coworkers jumped on that bandwagon as well.
So we have a case where they can either drop or they can risk prosecuting thats very unpopular with terrible supporting eyewitnesses and only unclear video to back it up. Probably didn’t push it too hard.
Lol apparently he’s considering a lawsuit against his employer… no real opinion on that but it seems funny.[/quote]
Did you read the comments on the article? There where only four but one of them claimed one of the women started a fight the next day!!
If he sues McD’s I wonder if he could prove unsafe working conditions? There where several fights at that particular eatery
[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
Good. And I hope they do get hit with trespassing, as well. They deserve to get fucked over - and publicly.[/quote]
Agreed.
Guy went a little overboard but bottomline is none of this would have ever happened if two stupid bitches could have kept their shit together. [/quote]
One of them has a criminal record from before. I think the guy did the right thing.