Salon looooooves them some pedophiles.
But they are a total fringe organization. Not to be taken seriously.
Watch out for those wiley Republicans, though. You never know what they’ll do!
Salon looooooves them some pedophiles.
But they are a total fringe organization. Not to be taken seriously.
Watch out for those wiley Republicans, though. You never know what they’ll do!
So, if I may summarize, you feel that science is akin to a Pandora’s Box, because scientific discoveries may compel the acceptance of behaviors previously considered immoral. It follows, then, that you must believe certain topics (eg, pedophilia) should be ‘off limits’ for scientific inquiry, lest it be discovered that they have a biological basis, which in turn would put us on that slippery slope to obligatory acceptance. Is that a fair extrapolation of your position?
Likewise, 50 years ago miscegenation and desegregated bathrooms were also considered (by many) to be horrific and morally indefensible.
You are so fake and it is so obvious to all of us. Is this all you have left to work with?
“You’re afraid of SSSSCIIENCE!!!”
Nice one.
The next chapter is well under way.
Eventually, the idea that it’s “horrific and morally indefensible” would drift away…just like “ending slavery, miscegenation, the oppression of women, the exploitation of children, belief in witchcraft, the geocentric model of the universe…”
No it wouldn’t, any more than discovering a biological basis for criminality would lead to its normalization.
Let’s just say a wise man understands your position in this thread puts you in a completely “indefensible” position when the next chapter in this saga is perused.
I would prefer if you would answer my question directly.
Breitbart – 11 Sep 15

Sarah Nyberg claimed to be a pedophile,
Wow. These Democrats had better watch out, they are attracting the kinds of fringe groups that are going to give them a bad name. I wonder why it is they are attracting these sorts. Some serious soul searching and pandering to the other side must be in order.
Indeed they are. Extremist groups espousing horrific, morally indefensible ideas have always been among us (and always will). But my point is, even if the science demonstrated unequivocally that sexual attraction to children is innate, this would in no way compel a change in attitude regarding the acceptability of pedophilia–it (pedophilia) would remain just as immoral and unacceptable as it is now. The same would be true if we discovered a biological basis for other behaviors considered morally unacceptable (eg, criminality
I just can’t speak with that level of certainty. As our culture changes and is influenced by others, there is no telling what may be around a corner half a century away.
Who would have imagined the horror of using a nuclear weapon fifty years prior to the actual event? It doesn’t get much worse than vaporizing 300,000 people, but we totally did that.
Science has always been manipulated by the evil and perverse and I never see a point where it’s empiricism will become immune from the depravity of man.
No doubt, if pedophilia were determined to be innate, groups like NAMBLA would use that fact in support of their attempts to legalize it. Wouldn’t matter one whit.
I guess what it boils down to is, I have more faith (in us, as a society) to differentiate between social mores that should be jettisoned in light of advances in scientific understanding, and those which should be unaffected by such advances.
I would also point out that attempts to muzzle/limit science because one doesn’t like what might be discovered requires opening a Pandora’s Box as well.
Some might term that as…wishful thinking. Others understand that slippery slopes are indeed…slippery. Real tough to put the brakes on…you try it one of these days.
So, if I may summarize, you feel that science is akin to a Pandora’s Box, because scientific discoveries may compel the acceptance of behaviors previously considered immoral. It follows, then, that you must believe certain topics (eg, pedophilia) should be ‘off limits’ for scientific inquiry, lest it be discovered that they have a biological basis, which in turn would put us on that slippery slope to obligatory acceptance. Is that a fair extrapolation of your position?
Our entire history of literature is populated with allegories of similar theme. It may even be one of the original plots.

The Savile scandal caused public revulsion, but experts disagree about what causes paedophilia - and even how much harm it causes, hears Jon Henley
No. It’ll never happen. Never ever never.
Text: Very affable.
Subtext: Not so much.