Massachusetts Senate Race

Because unlike liberals I can produce facts, here is the video on his radio show.

His talk show says the same thing.

[quote]pat wrote:
Puhleeeze, You are missing something very big here. MA is the most democrat based state in the nation. Talking about voting nepotism this state has got it…These people vote democrat because that what good Massachutians do, it’s what their parents did, it’s what their grandparents did. Second, the seat was held by the most liberal democrat in history and yet, in a huge swing the voters went to the right…If your a big fan of democratic power, this should scare the shit out of you…The one place this should not have happened was in Massachusetts. It is the most liberal state in the nation…
A tree stump with a (D) in front of it should have won.[/quote]

Oh man, Democrats are really screwed, now that the Republicans have a 41-59 majority in the Senate.

[quote]K2000 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Puhleeeze, You are missing something very big here. MA is the most democrat based state in the nation. Talking about voting nepotism this state has got it…These people vote democrat because that what good Massachutians do, it’s what their parents did, it’s what their grandparents did. Second, the seat was held by the most liberal democrat in history and yet, in a huge swing the voters went to the right…If your a big fan of democratic power, this should scare the shit out of you…The one place this should not have happened was in Massachusetts. It is the most liberal state in the nation…
A tree stump with a (D) in front of it should have won.[/quote]

Oh man, Democrats are really screwed, now that the Republicans have a 41-59 majority in the Senate.
[/quote]

I see you had your daily serving of John Stewart last night.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
The ironic thing is that this election was in a state where they already have universal health, and they hate it and want the free market insurance back.[/quote]

Hold up… Massholes don’t like Romney Care??? That’s weird. Isn’t Romney supposed to be the Republican candidate who’s actually a fiscal conservative? I thought Romney’s big bragging point during the primary campaign was his ability to manage a big business operation.

[quote]JEATON wrote:
I see you had your daily serving of John Stewart last night.[/quote]

Actually, I don’t get cable or watch TV. It’s just logical.

You keep watching though…

[quote]K2000 wrote:

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
The ironic thing is that this election was in a state where they already have universal health, and they hate it and want the free market insurance back.[/quote]

Hold up… Massholes don’t like Romney Care??? That’s weird. Isn’t Romney supposed to be the Republican candidate who’s actually a fiscal conservative? I thought Romney’s big bragging point during the primary campaign was his ability to manage a big business operation.[/quote]

Careful there Clyde - let’s not confuse this ^^ train wreck of an attempted thought with an actual one, shall we?

Next time you’d like to contribute, rather than stammering like a gibbering clown, here’s a little advice: you might want read the previous posts, assemble a few facts, think about them, breathe deeply, and then write something relevant & coherent.

Well, it looks like the liberals seem to be a bit upset over the turn of events in Mass. How nice to see, how very nice to see.

:slight_smile:

[quote]thefederalist wrote:
scott brown won because fox news is more powerful than we realize. glenn beck, after the election (of course he couldn’t do it beforehand), skewered brown on both his radio show and on fox; he, in truth, finds brown to be a joke much like olbermann does.

democrats can, right now, pass a bill making it illegal to breathe air. they won’t because they lack the cohesiveness republicans have due to the ability of fox news to tune in to the hearts and minds of idiots. [/quote]

Man, I really hope there are large numbers of delusional liberals who believe exactly this. Be sure to convince as many of your brain dead comrades of the above as you can. Lemme know how I can help.

[quote]K2000 wrote:

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
The ironic thing is that this election was in a state where they already have universal health, and they hate it and want the free market insurance back.[/quote]

Hold up… Massholes don’t like Romney Care??? That’s weird. Isn’t Romney supposed to be the Republican candidate who’s actually a fiscal conservative? I thought Romney’s big bragging point during the primary campaign was his ability to manage a big business operation.[/quote]

Big Business is different than Big Gov. So, tell me then, if you want to bag on a Republican created Health plan run by the state, how can you support one forced by democrats nationwide that mostly mirrors this very plan?

This is what happens when you are a R in a blue state, trying to work with democrats and THEIR agenda. Is this not an example that the approach fails to cut costs , rations care and increases costs?

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Trust me when I say this is worth clicking on:

Hitler Finds Out Scott Brown Won Massachusetts Senate Seat

[/quote]

Yeah, I know, I posted it in this thread like, two days ago :wink:

Hilarious video

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Hilarious video[/quote]

And riddled with truth.

It’s a really great film too, btw.

I need to spread this video around here, because a bill was proposed in California for Socialized Medicine. This shit needs to get shot down now.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Big Business is different than Big Gov. So, tell me then, if you want to bag on a Republican created Health plan run by the state, how can you support one forced by democrats nationwide that mostly mirrors this very plan?

This is what happens when you are a R in a blue state, trying to work with democrats and THEIR agenda. Is this not an example that the approach fails to cut costs , rations care and increases costs?
[/quote]

I’m not bagging on Romney Care… Massachusetts has the lowest percentage of uninsured people in the nation (only 4% uninsured). I think that is fucking fantastic.

I also think the majority of Massholes prefer to keep Romney Care going – even though they like to bitch about it, it’s popular enough as a program that it’s going to stay. Don’t expect to see Romney Care go away any time soon… Massholes understand that having a program like Romney Care is better than not having it, even with it’s flaws.

Funny how Romney has been quiet about the health care reform debate… If Romney Care was good enough for Massachusetts, why isn’t it good enough for the rest of the nation?

[quote]K2000 wrote:

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Big Business is different than Big Gov. So, tell me then, if you want to bag on a Republican created Health plan run by the state, how can you support one forced by democrats nationwide that mostly mirrors this very plan?

This is what happens when you are a R in a blue state, trying to work with democrats and THEIR agenda. Is this not an example that the approach fails to cut costs , rations care and increases costs?
[/quote]

I’m not bagging on Romney Care… Massachusetts has the lowest percentage of uninsured people in the nation (only 4% uninsured). I think that is fucking fantastic.

I also think the majority of Massholes prefer to keep Romney Care going – even though they like to bitch about it, it’s popular enough as a program that it’s going to stay. Don’t expect to see Romney Care go away any time soon… Massholes understand that having a program like Romney Care is better than not having it, even with it’s flaws.

Funny how Romney has been quiet about the health care reform debate… If Romney Care was good enough for Massachusetts, why isn’t it good enough for the rest of the nation?
[/quote]

It’s not good enough for the rest of the nation because really, it’s just another bloated, minimally effective, high cost, bureaucratic nightmarish, state run program like the rest of them (I live in Maine with “Dirigo”. TennCare, another disaster).

Mass voters didn’t WANT more “Gov’t Healthcare”.

RomneyCare Revisited
What Massachusetts voters knew about health reform.

Perhaps that’s because Bay State residents know something the rest of the country doesn’t. In 2006, then GOP Governor Mitt Romney brought about a universal insurance plan that bears an uncanny resemblance to ObamaCareâ??and a meticulous new study confirms that the result has been high costs in return for minimal benefits.

Full Story:

[quote]K2000 wrote:

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Big Business is different than Big Gov. So, tell me then, if you want to bag on a Republican created Health plan run by the state, how can you support one forced by democrats nationwide that mostly mirrors this very plan?

This is what happens when you are a R in a blue state, trying to work with democrats and THEIR agenda. Is this not an example that the approach fails to cut costs , rations care and increases costs?
[/quote]

I’m not bagging on Romney Care… Massachusetts has the lowest percentage of uninsured people in the nation (only 4% uninsured). I think that is fucking fantastic.

I also think the majority of Massholes prefer to keep Romney Care going – even though they like to bitch about it, it’s popular enough as a program that it’s going to stay. Don’t expect to see Romney Care go away any time soon… Massholes understand that having a program like Romney Care is better than not having it, even with it’s flaws.[/quote]

Is that so, Clyde? How odd that you should say so - because it’s extremely unpopular here. Next time we’ll be sure to consult you so we’ll know what we should think.

If you want your premiums raised and a program that is already terribly in debt - by all means, let’s nationalize it!

[quote]K2000 wrote:

Funny how Romney has been quiet about the health care reform debate… If Romney Care was good enough for Massachusetts, why isn’t it good enough for the rest of the nation?
[/quote]
Have you ever read the constitution? Do you understand difference between state and federal gov’t and the powers they retain?