Marvels: The Avengers (Trailer)

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
PS - As with ALL Marvel movies, there is a piece to watch after the end of the credits.

I didn’t understand it much, but I don’t follow these story lines the way some die hards do.

There was a face of someone at the end, talking with the aliens, the face looked very sinister and dark. This has to be the teaser for part 2.[/quote]

SPOILER ALERT DO NOT CLICK ON LINK UNLESS YOU WATCHED FILM.

This is the alien that was shown at the end of the movie and will likely be the next avengers villain.

[quote]TK52 wrote:
SPOILERS SPOILERS

I also liked how they showed Stark and Banner becoming friendly when working together. It added a new dynamic to Stark’s character, moving him past the narcissistic, self-serving guy people thought he was. Then to see the Hulk grab and “wake” him up at the end was just awesome. I had chills. Ruffalo was amazing, as Banner and for the facial expression and acting of Hulk. Didn’t miss Norton at all and I was a huge fan of his film.
[/quote]

x2 to all of this.

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]TK52 wrote:
SPOILERS SPOILERS

I also liked how they showed Stark and Banner becoming friendly when working together. It added a new dynamic to Stark’s character, moving him past the narcissistic, self-serving guy people thought he was. Then to see the Hulk grab and “wake” him up at the end was just awesome. I had chills. Ruffalo was amazing, as Banner and for the facial expression and acting of Hulk. Didn’t miss Norton at all and I was a huge fan of his film.
[/quote]

x2 to all of this.[/quote]

SPOILERS SPOILERS

Also, when Iron Man asks Captain America to lead them, and Cap tells em what to do, especially the Hulk, and they all listen without questioning or hesitation, I just lost it. Unreal scene. Little things like that made this movie amazing.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]NAUn wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
haha yeah, hes all of that. Never said he wasnt, but to characterize him as “just a whiny bitch” ignores his actual abilities, the damage he was able to do with those abilities, and really his entire back story.
[/quote]

He is definitely a whiny bitch with no redeeming personality traits. I don’t see how that is debatable. Of course he has abilities- he’s a god. If he were Joe Schmoe we wouldn’t be discussing how big of a whiny bitch he is.

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
And hes not Draco Malfoy, Draco had legitimate skill hamstrung by miserable parenting. Had he had parents who actually raised him, he would have been great.

[/quote]

You could argue the same thing about Loki, at least within the continuity they are portraying in the movies, which is what this thread and my comment are about. The tipping point for Loki in Thor was realizing he was adopted. It gave him a “reason” to act on his feelings of inadequacy and jealousy. If Draco would have been great with involved parenting, then one could just as easily say that Loki would have been great with honest parenting.

Also, in both Thor and Avengers it’s primarily the power of others that he uses to wreck havoc e.g. Kingship of Asgard/the Destroyer and alien army/Tesseract. His delusion and ineptitude is really underscored by the fact that he imagines himself as some all powerful ruler of Earth (if successful) even though he is really a puppet. I think the movie highlights this fact in several scenes. Draco was similarly a puppet who got in over his head for the same reasons.
[/quote]

I don’t think Loki was inept; not after what he did in the prologue. He couldn’t be written as some completely irredeemable autonomous villain because the story had to show us why Thor would still feel a fraternal responsible for him (“come home”) and lay significant groundwork for future movies. But, I do agree that Loki was in over his head in bargaining with you-know-who (not Voldemort)…Thor even says something about how he would not be allowed to rule by his new allies. The implication being that someone far worse is waiting to throw down the gauntlet…

Yes, Loki is blinkered by his lust for power (if you want to call it delusion) and is a puppet in some respects, but you know who is pulling the strings now. A bigger picture is starting to emerge where the most powerful beings we’ve seen so far aren’t quite at the top of the food chain. SHIELD were making preparations for the coming storm with the Avengers initiative + at least one other contingiency plan, and even Fury was revealed to be a subordinate in his own organization.

[/quote]

GREAT POST.

The way I see it for the sequel to work as well as this movie they need Joss Wheadon to stay no matter what it cost he is the MVP. The problem with any team story especially Marvel teams is to keep the egos in check long enough for the story to play out. I think they have a great cast I hope they stay level headed and don’t get sequel Fame-fever and start asking for more money and script approval and get replaced.

[/quote]

Couldn’t agree more. No self-respecting fan could say that they didn’t have at least one “hell yeah” moment - and there were multiple heart-in-mouth fangasms for EVERY hero. Even Coulson got his star turn. Nobody should come away from this feeling cheated. The detractors forget that a movie like this usually has the kiss of death.

Whedon is a genius for the simple reason that this has never been done before on this scale. And if anybody doubts that he IS a genius, they need to think on how he cracked this movie: q) how do you balance several lead characters in a team up movie? a ) Let them fight for screen time…

Bay has NOTHING on this guy: where Bay is an outsider meddling with geek material, Whedon IS a geek. He watches these movies himself and reads the comics and knows the audience.

The second post-credits sequence was brilliant. [spoilers]

How do you top Thanos? Make everybody sit around for another five minutes to watch the Avengers eating Turkish kebabs. Build expectations then give them nothing. Even superheroes need downtime. Like the SHIELD analyst waiting for his Helicarrier shift to end by playing Space Invaders…

[/spoilers]

To top it all off, reaction to the new, ‘playful’ Hulk has been so positive that Marvel has reversed their decision not to do another solo Hulk movie. It’s all on Whedon and Hulk wasn’t even the lead.

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]NAUn wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
haha yeah, hes all of that. Never said he wasnt, but to characterize him as “just a whiny bitch” ignores his actual abilities, the damage he was able to do with those abilities, and really his entire back story.
[/quote]

He is definitely a whiny bitch with no redeeming personality traits. I don’t see how that is debatable. Of course he has abilities- he’s a god. If he were Joe Schmoe we wouldn’t be discussing how big of a whiny bitch he is.

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
And hes not Draco Malfoy, Draco had legitimate skill hamstrung by miserable parenting. Had he had parents who actually raised him, he would have been great.

[/quote]

You could argue the same thing about Loki, at least within the continuity they are portraying in the movies, which is what this thread and my comment are about. The tipping point for Loki in Thor was realizing he was adopted. It gave him a “reason” to act on his feelings of inadequacy and jealousy. If Draco would have been great with involved parenting, then one could just as easily say that Loki would have been great with honest parenting.

Also, in both Thor and Avengers it’s primarily the power of others that he uses to wreck havoc e.g. Kingship of Asgard/the Destroyer and alien army/Tesseract. His delusion and ineptitude is really underscored by the fact that he imagines himself as some all powerful ruler of Earth (if successful) even though he is really a puppet. I think the movie highlights this fact in several scenes. Draco was similarly a puppet who got in over his head for the same reasons.
[/quote]

I don’t think Loki was inept; not after what he did in the prologue. He couldn’t be written as some completely irredeemable autonomous villain because the story had to show us why Thor would still feel a fraternal responsible for him (“come home”) and lay significant groundwork for future movies. But, I do agree that Loki was in over his head in bargaining with you-know-who (not Voldemort)…Thor even says something about how he would not be allowed to rule by his new allies. The implication being that someone far worse is waiting to throw down the gauntlet…

Yes, Loki is blinkered by his lust for power (if you want to call it delusion) and is a puppet in some respects, but you know who is pulling the strings now. A bigger picture is starting to emerge where the most powerful beings we’ve seen so far aren’t quite at the top of the food chain. SHIELD were making preparations for the coming storm with the Avengers initiative + at least one other contingiency plan, and even Fury was revealed to be a subordinate in his own organization.

[/quote]

GREAT POST.

The way I see it for the sequel to work as well as this movie they need Joss Wheadon to stay no matter what it cost he is the MVP. The problem with any team story especially Marvel teams is to keep the egos in check long enough for the story to play out. I think they have a great cast I hope they stay level headed and don’t get sequel Fame-fever and start asking for more money and script approval and get replaced.

[/quote]

Couldn’t agree more. No self-respecting fan could say that they didn’t have at least one “hell yeah” moment - and there were multiple heart-in-mouth fangasms for EVERY hero. Even Coulson got his star turn. Nobody should come away from this feeling cheated. The detractors forget that a movie like this usually has the kiss of death.

Whedon is a genius for the simple reason that this has never been done before on this scale. And if anybody doubts that he IS a genius, they need to think on how he cracked this movie: q) how do you balance several lead characters in a team up movie? a ) Let them fight for screen time…

Bay has NOTHING on this guy: where Bay is an outsider meddling with geek material, Whedon IS a geek. He watches these movies himself and reads the comics and knows the audience.

The second post-credits sequence was brilliant. [spoilers]

How do you top Thanos? Make everybody sit around for another five minutes to watch the Avengers eating Turkish kebabs. Build expectations then give them nothing. Even superheroes need downtime. Like the SHIELD analyst waiting for his Helicarrier shift to end by playing Space Invaders…

[/spoilers]

To top it all off, reaction to the new, ‘playful’ Hulk has been so positive that Marvel have reversed their decision not to do another solo Hulk movie. It’s all on Whedon and Hulk wasn’t even the lead.
[/quote]

In the second post credits, you notice how Cap looked like he was tryin to hide his face and Banner kept crackin up? Stark kept throwin looks at Banner like “dude, stop laughing, be serious!”

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]NAUn wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
haha yeah, hes all of that. Never said he wasnt, but to characterize him as “just a whiny bitch” ignores his actual abilities, the damage he was able to do with those abilities, and really his entire back story.
[/quote]

He is definitely a whiny bitch with no redeeming personality traits. I don’t see how that is debatable. Of course he has abilities- he’s a god. If he were Joe Schmoe we wouldn’t be discussing how big of a whiny bitch he is.

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
And hes not Draco Malfoy, Draco had legitimate skill hamstrung by miserable parenting. Had he had parents who actually raised him, he would have been great.

[/quote]

You could argue the same thing about Loki, at least within the continuity they are portraying in the movies, which is what this thread and my comment are about. The tipping point for Loki in Thor was realizing he was adopted. It gave him a “reason” to act on his feelings of inadequacy and jealousy. If Draco would have been great with involved parenting, then one could just as easily say that Loki would have been great with honest parenting.

Also, in both Thor and Avengers it’s primarily the power of others that he uses to wreck havoc e.g. Kingship of Asgard/the Destroyer and alien army/Tesseract. His delusion and ineptitude is really underscored by the fact that he imagines himself as some all powerful ruler of Earth (if successful) even though he is really a puppet. I think the movie highlights this fact in several scenes. Draco was similarly a puppet who got in over his head for the same reasons.
[/quote]

I don’t think Loki was inept; not after what he did in the prologue. He couldn’t be written as some completely irredeemable autonomous villain because the story had to show us why Thor would still feel a fraternal responsible for him (“come home”) and lay significant groundwork for future movies. But, I do agree that Loki was in over his head in bargaining with you-know-who (not Voldemort)…Thor even says something about how he would not be allowed to rule by his new allies. The implication being that someone far worse is waiting to throw down the gauntlet…

Yes, Loki is blinkered by his lust for power (if you want to call it delusion) and is a puppet in some respects, but you know who is pulling the strings now. A bigger picture is starting to emerge where the most powerful beings we’ve seen so far aren’t quite at the top of the food chain. SHIELD were making preparations for the coming storm with the Avengers initiative + at least one other contingiency plan, and even Fury was revealed to be a subordinate in his own organization.

[/quote]

GREAT POST.

The way I see it for the sequel to work as well as this movie they need Joss Wheadon to stay no matter what it cost he is the MVP. The problem with any team story especially Marvel teams is to keep the egos in check long enough for the story to play out. I think they have a great cast I hope they stay level headed and don’t get sequel Fame-fever and start asking for more money and script approval and get replaced.

[/quote]

Couldn’t agree more. No self-respecting fan could say that they didn’t have at least one “hell yeah” moment - and there were multiple heart-in-mouth fangasms for EVERY hero. Even Coulson got his star turn. Nobody should come away from this feeling cheated. The detractors forget that a movie like this usually has the kiss of death.

Whedon is a genius for the simple reason that this has never been done before on this scale. And if anybody doubts that he IS a genius, they need to think on how he cracked this movie: q) how do you balance several lead characters in a team up movie? a ) Let them fight for screen time…

Bay has NOTHING on this guy: where Bay is an outsider meddling with geek material, Whedon IS a geek. He watches these movies himself and reads the comics and knows the audience.

The second post-credits sequence was brilliant. [spoilers]

How do you top Thanos? Make everybody sit around for another five minutes to watch the Avengers eating Turkish kebabs. Build expectations then give them nothing. Even superheroes need downtime. Like the SHIELD analyst waiting for his Helicarrier shift to end by playing Space Invaders…

[/spoilers]

To top it all off, reaction to the new, ‘playful’ Hulk has been so positive that Marvel have reversed their decision not to do another solo Hulk movie. It’s all on Whedon and Hulk wasn’t even the lead.
[/quote]

In the second post credits, you notice how Cap looked like he was tryin to hide his face and Banner kept crackin up? Stark kept throwin looks at Banner like “dude, stop laughing, be serious!”
[/quote]

LOL. Yeah. Chris Evans was working on another movie and had a beard when they went back to film that scene. They were corpsing because he was trying to hide it.

Good movie. End battle scene was one of the best.

That said, Dark Knight, X2 and even 1st Iron Man were better IMO.

Overall movie was well done, Hulk scenes were some of the best.

Why didn’t I see mention of post credit scenes earlier, grrr.

The movie shattered opening day records…200million domestically in a weekend!

[quote]Deercalf wrote:
The movie shattered opening day records…200million domestically in a weekend![/quote]
Pretty cool indeed. Not sure if the Dark Knight Rises will be able to beat it since it won’t have the benefit of 3D.

3-D version is pretty sick, especially the fight and aerial scenes.

This will be a Blu-Ray to buy IMO. Also, the character seen after the credits looks to be very formidable as a future villain, I hope the movie biz follows up on this.

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
Good movie. End battle scene was one of the best.

That said, Dark Knight, X2 and even 1st Iron Man were better IMO.

Overall movie was well done, Hulk scenes were some of the best.[/quote]

I really can’t compare. X2 didn’t balance characters like Avengers; it was The Wolverine show; Iron Man didn’t have the baggage of the subsequent movies (Iron Man 2 did); Chris Nolan’s Batman movies, as good as they are, are influenced by genre movies just as much as Batman comics…

Nolan is a self-confessed Bond fanatic.

The scenes between Lucius Fox and Bruce Wayne are inspired by Q prepping Bond for a mission -the Batmobile prototype scene is straight out of a Bond movie. Rachel Dawes’ death is inspired by the end of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service … and TDKR will continue the theme with Bane being the most ‘Bondian’ villian yet.

Whedon had to do a semi-sequel to five movies. He didn’t have the freedom of any of those directors. Fingers crossed that they give him Black Panther or the next Hulk.

Whedon has also written story lines for various comics, such as The Astonishing X-Men. I have this in TPB and it’s written in a way that gives the characters a genuine, human quality, to them. He’s great at what he does.

My wife and I will be seeing this in Imax 3-D Wednesday. I think Greeny’s more excited than I am… if that’s possible.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
3-D version is pretty sick, especially the fight and aerial scenes.

This will be a Blu-Ray to buy IMO. Also, the character seen after the credits looks to be very formidable as a future villain, I hope the movie biz follows up on this. [/quote]

You’ve got IM3 and the sequels to Thor and Cap to bring you up to speed on that guy. IM3 marks the beginning of phase 2 (mentioned in the movie). Avengers marked the end of phase 1 and Avengers 2 will mark the end of phase 2. So expect new solo movies, new heroes and new enemies by the time Avengers 2 is released.

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Whedon has also written story lines for various comics, such as The Astonishing X-Men. I have this in TPB and it’s written in a way that gives the characters a genuine, human quality, to them. He’s great at what he does.

My wife and I will be seeing this in Imax 3-D Wednesday. I think Greeny’s more excited than I am… if that’s possible.[/quote]

I’m sure you know that to ‘get’ Whedon is to ‘get’ his writing. There are some brilliant moments in it where a throwaway line speaks volumes. No need for a CGI set piece. It’s the Serenity of superhero movies.

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Whedon has also written story lines for various comics, such as The Astonishing X-Men. I have this in TPB and it’s written in a way that gives the characters a genuine, human quality, to them. He’s great at what he does.

My wife and I will be seeing this in Imax 3-D Wednesday. I think Greeny’s more excited than I am… if that’s possible.[/quote]

I’m sure you know that to ‘get’ Whedon is to ‘get’ his writing. There are some brilliant moments in it where a throwaway line speaks volumes. No need for a CGI set piece. It’s the Serenity of superhero movies.[/quote]

I’ve watched all of Buffy and all but the last season of Angel. I love his writing. He has so many little things that when added up you go “OMG! WTF?” in the best way possible.

I haven’t been to the movies in awhile, and this movie makes me appreciate going to movies that much more.

Expected release date for Blu-Ray and DVD is Sept 25.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
3-D version is pretty sick, especially the fight and aerial scenes.

This will be a Blu-Ray to buy IMO. Also, the character seen after the credits looks to be very formidable as a future villain, I hope the movie biz follows up on this. [/quote]

It’s the biggest opening weekend in history. There will at least be one more.

EDIT: It’s already at #55 on the all-time worldwide box office list.

Sooo this was my first time seeing Prometheus Trailer in the theaters as well and WOW it looks amazing.

[quote]Grneyes wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Whedon has also written story lines for various comics, such as The Astonishing X-Men. I have this in TPB and it’s written in a way that gives the characters a genuine, human quality, to them. He’s great at what he does.

My wife and I will be seeing this in Imax 3-D Wednesday. I think Greeny’s more excited than I am… if that’s possible.[/quote]

I’m sure you know that to ‘get’ Whedon is to ‘get’ his writing. There are some brilliant moments in it where a throwaway line speaks volumes. No need for a CGI set piece. It’s the Serenity of superhero movies.[/quote]

I’ve watched all of Buffy and all but the last season of Angel. I love his writing. He has so many little things that when added up you go “OMG! WTF?” in the best way possible. [/quote]

It’s definitely got the Whedon touch. There’s a scene where SHIELD’s chain of command evokes memories of Wolfram & Hart and the Watcher’s Council combined. Just a bunch of old people talking on monitors barking orders at Nick Fury (although they are played by Powers Boothe and Jenny Agutter, so even the casting pushes the idea that these aren’t just cameos) but it suggests an entire world beyond and that we’ve only seen SHIELD’s mailroom so far. Not a spoiler, as it’s only a fleeting moment, but it pays to be a fan.

I’d also rec. The Cabin in the Woods if you haven’t seen it yet. Not directed by Whedon, but the script is all him.