Interesting points Mark, I appreciate your reply.
I’ve been reading recently about the recovery rates of tendons and ligaments, as it is much lower than that for muscles, and it seems like there is some benefit to repeat exposure to stress but that it is important to alternate the stress if the agenda is to improve their capabilities as fast as possible without exceeding their recovery abilities.
When it comes to lift-specificity (strength-skill) there seems to be little room for variation within the movement and then, I suppose, one could at most exercise a movement pattern twice in a week and not vary the stress to greatly, i.e. low bar one day, high bar the other.
But, if one is more interested in exercising a movement pattern, such as a bench press movement, one can maybe get away with doing that three times a week, by alternating the type and also including a tempo modulation. So, bench one day, incline the second, and decline the third.
I think gymnasts (Christopher Sommer) and climbers (Eva López) seem to have interesting ideas with regards to training and connective tissues, but I appreciate that this does not necessarily appeal to the powerlifting population.
I’m hoping it has value to someone reading, otherwise, I’ve wasted my time and theirs, but Christopher is a big proponent of strengthening the dynamic pivoting of the knee joint, to train its supporting structures and not only focus on its primary movers through barbell squats alone. I can’t do an inside squat to save my life. Weighted shoulder dislocates have been a tremendous boon to my shoulder health, which is something that are a part of his preparatory training programs. The reasoning behind his prescriptions is that we tend to injure ourselves at our weak link, so it is important to strengthen these weak links so when they encounter load, they are prepared.
Similarly, Eva, when designing the training program most climbers follow to strengthen their finger tendons is entirely predicated on doing the easiest training level possible that elicits a compensation response even if it is possible to do more.