[quote]JMoUCF87 wrote:
toocul4u wrote:
Bricknyce wrote:
toocul4u wrote:
So, let’s say 1.1g/kg of protein to remain above zero in nitrogen balance. that’s about 360 calories of protein for a 180 lb man. and according to jmocfu78, that’s 90 percent of our total calories here. so we’d be eating 400 total calories a day, and this would provide the fastest loss. whatev
Our recommendations are NOT BASED ON KILOS; they are on POUNDS.
Do people even fucking read writings in full anymore?!
Do people even fucking know how to interpret any god-damned form of media these days?!
I sometimes feel like I’m dealing with people with the attention span of a 1-year old!
you haven’t made a single “recommendation” based on kilos OR pounds here, don’t you read your own fucking writings?
It was said to take only the minimum protein needed to maintain muscle. I’m wondering where you are getting 1.2-1.5g/lb as a minumum?
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/72/2/551S/F2
to quote myself earlier in this very thread I said “as calories come down, protein needs go up”
therefore, the numbers you presented are not applicable. you can get away with MUCH less protein if your overall calories are above maintenance. however, this is not so while dieting, especially a “hardcore” diet designed for maximum fat loss in minimum time.
if you want actual numbers, buy the book in the link I provided earlier.
toocul4u, I know I’ve said this before, but please consider finding a new hobby. knitting maybe?[/quote]
Well, sorry, but “yourself” isn’t a good enough reference for me.
you guys get mad because i hold you responsible for the hhhuuuuuge way your mouths run.
Why not increase fat more than you say, without exceeding the top number of calories? doing that would require less protein, as you just said, it would also create a better hormonal environment for continued fat burning.