[quote]IamMarqaos wrote:
@Clinton131 - that’s a really good post. Thanks.[/quote]
x2
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]csulli wrote:
In fact usmc was comparing female false rape accusers to ACTUAL rapists. You fuckin guys are making your red pill “movement” look fucking retarded when you can’t even read something as simple as that without misinterpreting it as being the fucking opposite! That’s usually what you accuse the feminists of doing.[/quote]
Chris stop being a dipshit… lol[/quote]
the woman who ‘rapes’ the man through false accusation faces absolutely no consequences for destroying his life. he gets sentenced 25 to life, if her lie is exposed, she may have to pay a $20 fine.
the man who forcibly rapes the woman does 25 to life.
I hope you guys get it this time, because I really can’t explain it using smaller words.
[quote]csulli wrote:
In fact usmc was comparing female false rape accusers to ACTUAL rapists. You fuckin guys are making your red pill “movement” look fucking retarded when you can’t even read something as simple as that without misinterpreting it as being the fucking opposite! That’s usually what you accuse the feminists of doing.[/quote]
Indeed. Most of them know nothing.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
My guess is Mr. Walkway suffers from some sort of sexual shyness or awkwardness and rationalizes it away by pushing the issues of false rape and similar topics found on MRM sites.
[/quote]
bingo
[quote]Yogi wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
My guess is Mr. Walkway suffers from some sort of sexual shyness or awkwardness and rationalizes it away by pushing the issues of false rape and similar topics found on MRM sites.
[/quote]
bingo[/quote]
let’s not get carried away
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]csulli wrote:
In fact usmc was comparing female false rape accusers to ACTUAL rapists. You fuckin guys are making your red pill “movement” look fucking retarded when you can’t even read something as simple as that without misinterpreting it as being the fucking opposite! That’s usually what you accuse the feminists of doing.[/quote]
Chris stop being a dipshit… lol[/quote]
the woman who ‘rapes’ the man through false accusation faces absolutely no consequences for destroying his life. he gets sentenced 25 to life, if her lie is exposed, she may have to pay a $20 fine.
the man who forcibly rapes the woman does 25 to life.
I hope you guys get it this time, because I really can’t explain it using smaller words. [/quote]
That’s a legit point to make, but it’s not the one you were making. Not the one we called you out on. You said he was comparing a rapist to an innocent, law abiding man. He wasn’t. He was doing the opposite, and now that it’s been pointed out to you, you’ve figured it out. But you decided to divert attention from that by making a different point. Moving the goalposts, deflecting the argument to something else. Things you guys are always getting onto feminists for… (and feminists definitely do those things, but if you’re going to criticize, you have to do so from a position of superiority. You can’t be making the very same mistakes as your opponent.)
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]csulli wrote:
In fact usmc was comparing female false rape accusers to ACTUAL rapists. You fuckin guys are making your red pill “movement” look fucking retarded when you can’t even read something as simple as that without misinterpreting it as being the fucking opposite! That’s usually what you accuse the feminists of doing.[/quote]
Chris stop being a dipshit… lol[/quote]
the woman who ‘rapes’ the man through false accusation faces absolutely no consequences for destroying his life. he gets sentenced 25 to life, if her lie is exposed, she may have to pay a $20 fine.
the man who forcibly rapes the woman does 25 to life.
I hope you guys get it this time, because I really can’t explain it using smaller words. [/quote]
That’s a legit point to make, but it’s not the one you were making. Not the one we called you out on. You said he was comparing a rapist to an innocent, law abiding man. He wasn’t. He was doing the opposite, and now that it’s been pointed out to you, you’ve figured it out. But you decided to divert attention from that by making a different point. Moving the goalposts, deflecting the argument to something else. Things you guys are always getting onto feminists for… (and feminists definitely do those things, but if you’re going to criticize, you have to do so from a position of superiority. You can’t be making the very same mistakes as your opponent.)[/quote]
…so you think that I made the original post of that digression with a moot point in mind, while the obvious point identifying his false equivalence was staring me right in the face?
ok bud. call it whatever you want lol. USCMD’s logical fallacy was so clearly visible, even stevie wonder blah blah etc…
Here’s a link for those who missed an important childhood lesson.
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Here’s a link for those who missed an important childhood lesson.
It’s more like the boy who cried wolf inception version. The boy who cried wolf about the girl who cried wolf.
The feminists have always been saying the statistics about made up rape were made up 
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Here’s a link for those who missed an important childhood lesson.
how about crying rape because you “feel dirty”?
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
the woman who ‘rapes’ the man through false accusation faces absolutely no consequences for destroying his life. he gets sentenced 25 to life, if her lie is exposed, she may have to pay a $20 fine.
the man who forcibly rapes the woman does 25 to life.
I hope you guys get it this time, because I really can’t explain it using smaller words. [/quote]
You’re talking about false accusations and slander, that specifically reveal itself in this case as a woman making a false accusation about a man raping her.
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Here’s a link for those who missed an important childhood lesson.
how about crying rape because you “feel dirty”?
How about crying fake rape because you feel scared of someone feeling dirty?
[quote]debraD wrote:
It’s more like the boy who cried wolf inception version. The boy who cried wolf about the girl who cried wolf.
[/quote]
A false false rape claim. He’s a triple agent.
no evidence? no problem!
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Interesting. First you state the following with unbridled vigor when talking about (typically) the man as the perp:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
In these type of situations we strongly suggest that the suspect submit to a polygraph. These are very accurate in detecting deceit and if a suspect is truly innocent they can assist in clearing them of any charges. I know most of you on these forums are going to say “don’t talk to the police” and never submit to a polygraph. But out of those suspects that are adamant of their innocence, agree to take the polygraph, and pass it, I am very comfortable with the fact that they are telling the truth and that they are being falsely accused.
For those that refuse to take it,I will be honest and say that I would lean towards the victim’s rendition of what occurred as the truth. I realize that those that are refusing to take the polygraph are exercising their 5th amendment right and I respect that right, but I am being honest about my personal feelings on the issue based on my 21 years of experience in this arena. Just for clarification, I cannot use the fact that a suspect refuses to take the polygraph as evidence against them in court…
[/quote]
But here you don’t display the same amount of ambition for use of the polygraph when it comes to the woman (typically) as the liar:
Why is your scale so seemingly unbalanced?
[/quote]
As he mentioned, governing bodies and associations like the International Association of Chiefs of Police strongly discourage against polygraphing victims, and several states have legislation specifically prohibiting it. To quote the article I posted, â??victims often feel confused and ashamed, and experience a great deal of self-blame because of something they did or did not do in relation to the sexual assault. These feelings may compromise the reliability of the results of such interrogation techniques. The use of these interrogation techniques can also compound these feelings and prolong the trauma of a sexual assault."
I would guess clinton’s reluctance to polygraph victims stems from both practical and ethical concerns. The results would be unreliable whether the accusation was false or not, and if the rape allegation were true, which is typically the case, a polygraph would be traumatic to the victim. Polygraphing an accused perpetrator, whether he was innocent or not, runs neither of these risks and provides useful evidence in a case that is typically difficult to investigate. It seems perfectly logical to me.
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
no evidence? no problem!
[/quote]
You could be wrongly accused of murder tomorrow, that happens sometimes too.
The point most are making is that while yes you can go grab youtube videos and articles as ‘evidence’ it’s still an enormously irrational thing to actively live in fear about.
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
I don’t hate women…I live in fear of them… not because of what they can do to me physically or emotionally, but legally.
I just can’t believe that they are permitted to do by society. im sure that if a lot of you guys did some research, your minds would be absolutely blown as well. get red-pilled. .you’ll be doing yourselves a favor.
I don’t know how society has degraded itself so far to reach this point… where cab drivers are forced to install cameras in their vehicles because of how commonly they are accused of rape… where a 30 year old woman can rape a 14 year old boy, become pregnant, and sue him for child support and win (doing no jail time), even though he is too young to even legally hold a job imagine if the roles were reversed.
women can and do easily ruin the lives of great men, simply because they want attention. great men have lost EVERYTHING, including their children, and decades of their lives, because a woman felt like she had been wrong. I feel like this is something that gets swept under the rug to the point of becoming ignored completely.
now again, I don’t hate women, im just afraid of the power they wield… as anyone who knows anything would be.
this story (as just about every other troll story), was for lulz. was not expecting to be caught in the first post… lol
[/quote]
It was a weak troll but i personally know someone that this happened to (the guy literally just walked a drunk girl home from a college party, if you knew him you would know hes a straight arrow prude)
He spent thousands on legal fees and had to switch colleges and move to another state because of what it did to his reputation there. Even after the girl finally copped to lying.
I agree, its scary as fuck, and one of the reasons i have never (and never will) go home with a random chick at a bar
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]csulli wrote:
In fact usmc was comparing female false rape accusers to ACTUAL rapists. You fuckin guys are making your red pill “movement” look fucking retarded when you can’t even read something as simple as that without misinterpreting it as being the fucking opposite! That’s usually what you accuse the feminists of doing.[/quote]
Chris stop being a dipshit… lol[/quote]
the woman who ‘rapes’ the man through false accusation faces absolutely no consequences for destroying his life. he gets sentenced 25 to life, if her lie is exposed, she may have to pay a $20 fine.
the man who forcibly rapes the woman does 25 to life.
I hope you guys get it this time, because I really can’t explain it using smaller words. [/quote]
Bitch, please.
Dover man sentenced to 17 years in prison for sexually assaulting 10-year-oldold girl: A former Sussex County man who was convicted of sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl and sharing images of the incident on a peer-to-peer computer network was sentenced to 17 years in state prison Friday, authorities said.
A ten-year-old! Video evidence! 17 years!
Whereas persons convicted of the forcible rape of adults, which is distinct from sexual assault in that it is a violent crime consisting in forcible penetration of an unwilling victim, period, and does not include other forms of sex crime (e.g. statutory rape, date rape), which may be considered gray area, are sentenced to 9.75 years, on average, and serve 5.4. RECAP: FIVE YEARS FOR A VIOLENT RAPE.
Fear-mongering gains what? False accusations are terrifying enough without lies and distortions, just as rape is. These are crimes that require no falsification to incite fear. Also, just as most men have women for whom they fear (wives, daughters) women have men for whom they fear. No woman wants her husband or son accused of sexual assault and those of us with reasonable awareness of the world are cognizant that it is possible. Just as men have always been aware that their sixteen-year-old daughters are at risk, women are aware that their college-age sons are at risk.
Some of you are just such idiots and jerks. You’re slimy, Walkaway.
[quote]red04 wrote:
it’s still an enormously irrational thing to actively live in fear about.[/quote]
I don’t understand why this massive point is being ignored.
Do false rape accusations happen? Absolutely, and it’s awful.
Is it worth living your life in fear over, and abstaining from all sexual intimacy? Definitely not.
Personally, I just think that the dude’s so sexually insecure he’s impotent.
Nae luck, Walkway! Like playing snooker with a rope, is it? Tried thumbing it in?