Legalizing Weed

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
581

Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.

582

[quote]storey420 wrote:
Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.[/quote]

My mistake. I came in on the end of that and only responded to what I saw on this page.

Either way, it doesn’t seem like a droning lot of pot-head nonworking morons happen to be the only ones that think it should be legalized.

583

[quote]storey420 wrote:
Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.[/quote]

You seem to say a lot of nothing with a lot of words .

584

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]storey420 wrote:
Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.[/quote]

My mistake. I came in on the end of that and only responded to what I saw on this page.

Either way, it doesn’t seem like a droning lot of pot-head nonworking morons happen to be the only ones that think it should be legalized.[/quote]

IMO the problem is you are dealing with an expert. Most of the people here are as such.

585

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]storey420 wrote:
Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.[/quote]

My mistake. I came in on the end of that and only responded to what I saw on this page.

Either way, it doesn’t seem like a droning lot of pot-head nonworking morons happen to be the only ones that think it should be legalized.[/quote]

IMO the problem is you are dealing with an expert. Most of the people here are as such.
[/quote]

LOL.

Mind you…to “abuse” weed to make it lethal,

[quote]In summary, enormous doses of Delta 9 THC, All THC and concentrated marihuana extract ingested by mouth were unable to produce death or organ pathology in large mammals but did produce fatalities in smaller rodents due to profound central nervous system depression.

The non-fatal consumption of 3000 mg/kg A THC by the dog and monkey would be comparable to a 154-pound human eating approximately 46 pounds (21 kilograms) of 1%-marihuana or 10 pounds of 5% hashish at one time. In addition, 92 mg/kg THC intravenously produced no fatalities in monkeys. These doses would be comparable to a 154-pound human smoking at one time almost three pounds (1.28 kg) of 1%-marihuana or 250,000 times the usual smoked dose and over a million times the minimal effective dose assuming 50% destruction of the THC by smoking.

Thus, evidence from animal studies and human case reports appears to indicate that the ratio of lethal dose to effective dose is quite large. This ratio is much more favorable than that of many other common psychoactive agents including alcohol and barbiturates (Phillips et al. 1971, Brill et al. 1970).[/quote]

Get that. You would have to consume 46lbs of it at once…to STILL NOT DIE.

I don’t think Method Man and Redman could pull that off if Cheech and Chong were visiting for the weekend.

586
587

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]storey420 wrote:
Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.[/quote]

My mistake. I came in on the end of that and only responded to what I saw on this page.

Either way, it doesn’t seem like a droning lot of pot-head nonworking morons happen to be the only ones that think it should be legalized.[/quote]

IMO the problem is you are dealing with an expert. Most of the people here are as such.
[/quote]

LOL.

Mind you…to “abuse” weed to make it lethal,

[quote]In summary, enormous doses of Delta 9 THC, All THC and concentrated marihuana extract ingested by mouth were unable to produce death or organ pathology in large mammals but did produce fatalities in smaller rodents due to profound central nervous system depression.

The non-fatal consumption of 3000 mg/kg A THC by the dog and monkey would be comparable to a 154-pound human eating approximately 46 pounds (21 kilograms) of 1%-marihuana or 10 pounds of 5% hashish at one time. In addition, 92 mg/kg THC intravenously produced no fatalities in monkeys. These doses would be comparable to a 154-pound human smoking at one time almost three pounds (1.28 kg) of 1%-marihuana or 250,000 times the usual smoked dose and over a million times the minimal effective dose assuming 50% destruction of the THC by smoking.

Thus, evidence from animal studies and human case reports appears to indicate that the ratio of lethal dose to effective dose is quite large. This ratio is much more favorable than that of many other common psychoactive agents including alcohol and barbiturates (Phillips et al. 1971, Brill et al. 1970).[/quote]

Get that. You would have to consume 46lbs of it at once…to STILL NOT DIE.

I don’t think Method Man and Redman could pull that off if Cheech and Chong were visiting for the weekend.[/quote]

I just want the money being spent on marijuana enforcement spent on meth and coke busts.

588

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Get that. You would have to consume 46lbs of it at once…to STILL NOT DIE.

I don’t think Method Man and Redman could pull that off if Cheech and Chong were visiting for the weekend.[/quote]

Haha. That one cracked me up.

589

a treatment for Alzheimers ?

590

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

a treatment for Alzheimers ?[/quote]

Hey Congratulations! I only posted that already (well the actual study referenced) 4 or 5 pages ago. But you knew that already cause you totally read through the thread!

591

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]storey420 wrote:
Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.[/quote]

You seem to say a lot of nothing with a lot of words .
[/quote]

I get it, you are not a fan of reading.

592

[quote]storey420 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]storey420 wrote:
Jesus, you too Prof X? I literally said in my post the PB responded to that it is potentially harmful when a) abused, b)used by children, c) smoked (the obvious possible harmful outcomes when inhaling smoke for years)

That’s it, I even pointed out how most of the other harmful effects were pretty well checked already on this thread as being weak studies or tied in with alcohol or other drugs.

No, it didn’t dignify a response just needed reading comprehension. My position is well stated on this thread in support of legalization and recreational use but I also think if you take the position that there is ZERO possible harm in using MJ that you are clearly biased or stupid.[/quote]

You seem to say a lot of nothing with a lot of words .
[/quote]

I get it, you are not a fan of reading.
[/quote]

What did you do ? Fuck up and sit on your cigar ?

593

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/national_world&id=8876577

HALLELUJAH :slight_smile: I did not check WA or OR

594

You know one thing about Barack getting a second term… Maybe near the end of his presidency he’ll just say “fuck it” and legalize pot for everyone lol.

595

[quote]csulli wrote:
You know one thing about Barack getting a second term… Maybe near the end of his presidency he’ll just say “fuck it” and legalize pot for everyone lol.[/quote]

I am hoping because he is a lame duck he will at least reschedule and decriminalize it .

596

[quote]csulli wrote:
You know one thing about Barack getting a second term… Maybe near the end of his presidency he’ll just say “fuck it” and legalize pot for everyone lol.[/quote]

Might as well get something out of it. Pot certainly makes taking another 4 years more tolerable.

597

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:
You know one thing about Barack getting a second term… Maybe near the end of his presidency he’ll just say “fuck it” and legalize pot for everyone lol.[/quote]

I am hoping because he is a lame duck he will at least reschedule and decriminalize it .[/quote]

Whoa! You think obama is a lame duck?

598

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:
You know one thing about Barack getting a second term… Maybe near the end of his presidency he’ll just say “fuck it” and legalize pot for everyone lol.[/quote]

Might as well get something out of it. Pot certainly makes taking another 4 years more tolerable.[/quote]

Lol, I can think of a new entitlement program for him. A free bag of weed for every conservative in the nation to help them cope.

599

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:
You know one thing about Barack getting a second term… Maybe near the end of his presidency he’ll just say “fuck it” and legalize pot for everyone lol.[/quote]

I am hoping because he is a lame duck he will at least reschedule and decriminalize it .[/quote]

Whoa! You think obama is a lame duck?
[/quote]

600

Well it’s legal in Ma amd.I’ve figured out how to be an entrepreneur, I’ll go to my doc fet him to write me a script for the umpteen ailments I have, then when the dispensaries open here I’ll sell my what I get. I mentioned this to two peopke who smoked and they both jumped at buying my ill gotten weed from me. So I’ve learned two things weed smokers are dumb, as I’m sure rhey could do the same if they went to there doctors, and two they’re lazy and would rather wait until someone else does all the work for them