[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Those two things are not even close to similar.
[/quote]
But you are unable or unwilling to say in what way they differ? There is a law requiring that ‘reverence’ not be broken within this monument. Don’t like the law? Don’t enter the monument. It’s a sacred place. Want to provoke Police officers, break the law, resist arrest and insult the memory of the founding fathers? Do it ANYWHERE other than inside a sacred monument built to honour the memory of Thomas Jefferson. Isn’t that enough freedom for you?
[/quote]
Sorry but my studies of Jefferson over the years would indicate to me that he would abhor the heavy handed treatment that these badge wearing thugs exhibited.
[/quote]
- How could anyone know what a revolutionary era libertarian would think about:
a) The current state of American society?
[/quote]
Well, I reckon one could read his biography and his writings and draw some logical conclusions. Make sense to you?
Then you’re ahead of me on that count.
I repeat, it was unnecessary and unwarranted. “Overreaction” springs to mind.
[/quote]
This reply smells of cop out. The question 'how was this officer’s behaviour ‘unnecessary and unwarranted’ and why do you describe it as an ‘overreaction?’ comes to mind.
On drawing logical conclusions about Jefferson’s opinions of a world that would be completely alien to him:
Jefferson might consider the enfranchisement of women and minorities and the direct election of Senators to be an abomination. Just saying…logical conclusions you know? He might want to go out and buy some slaves to work his plantation and have some embarrassing and confusing moments being introduced to his President or something. 270-year-old white guy see? Not the same world anymore.
Possibility that he would change his opinions rapidly upon being brought up to date with ‘events’. Might ask ‘WTF have you done with my country?’ and ‘may I die again please?’ Might not agree with you that resisting criminal offenders should be brought to the ground gently and not held in a choke hold. The possibilities are endless.