[quote]therajraj wrote:
You might say he puts the infant back in infantry[/quote]
I definitely recommend.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
You might say he puts the infant back in infantry[/quote]
I definitely recommend.
I don’t see the point in trying to get rid of Kony. This is Africa we’re talking about. What, is America going to get rid of every warlord and politician (redundancy, I know) in Africa along with him? No? Then you’re just paving the way for the next Kony.
Unless the plan is to go to war with all of Africa, this is largely a waste of time.
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]storey420 wrote:
“Yes getting rid of Joseph Kony is a good idea but why now? Why not 10 or 15 years ago?”
I just dont understand this at all. People have been lobbying and trying to raise awareness for YEARS. Clearly they thought it was worthwhile years ago. Besides the main point is getting momentum going NOW, so yeah would’ve been great years ago but better late than never right? and granted there is way more work to be done than killing one man, lots of wounds to heal and rebuilding but its a start right? Why are we so “get em” with Saddam and willing to not even look twice at where the money is going for that debacle (until its too late) but then all over this like a shitstorm like they’ve done something really wrong?
[/quote]
Yeah, getting rid of him years ago would have been great, but some of these posts seem to indicate we’ve missed the boat so fuck it, do nothing… I say better late then never.
I’d like somebody to set up a bounty pool, not just for this cock sucker, but for all the cocksuckers in africa doing this sort of thing. I’d call it ‘Big game Hunting’ and I would donate. [/quote]
Ah, I see some American’s ARE willing to war with all of Africa.
I feel like this should surprise me more than it does.
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]storey420 wrote:
“Yes getting rid of Joseph Kony is a good idea but why now? Why not 10 or 15 years ago?”
I just dont understand this at all. People have been lobbying and trying to raise awareness for YEARS. Clearly they thought it was worthwhile years ago. Besides the main point is getting momentum going NOW, so yeah would’ve been great years ago but better late than never right? and granted there is way more work to be done than killing one man, lots of wounds to heal and rebuilding but its a start right? Why are we so “get em” with Saddam and willing to not even look twice at where the money is going for that debacle (until its too late) but then all over this like a shitstorm like they’ve done something really wrong?
[/quote]
Yeah, getting rid of him years ago would have been great, but some of these posts seem to indicate we’ve missed the boat so fuck it, do nothing… I say better late then never.
I’d like somebody to set up a bounty pool, not just for this cock sucker, but for all the cocksuckers in africa doing this sort of thing. I’d call it ‘Big game Hunting’ and I would donate. [/quote]
Ah, I see some American’s ARE willing to war with all of Africa.
I feel like this should surprise me more than it does. [/quote]
Who said anything about war with ‘all of Africa’? You apparently don’t know anything about what going on there. You think the whole continent is just a bunch of warring tribes? I suppose you think the woman all have bones in their noses and ride giraffes too.
This issue is not new, it’s old. We’re not talking about a couple dozen people here, we’re talking about millions of woman, children and even infants getting gang raped, murdered, dismembered, beaten against trees, entire villages getting set of fire, abominations you couldn’t even come up with in imagination.
The UN has been trying half-ass to sorta, kinda deal with the issue a little bit for years.
There is a humanitarian crisis there, but apparently you could give a shit less. No law says you have to I guess.