Jefferson's Quran

[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
hedo wrote:
For example “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, of which JTF has based his life’s work on, was written by the Russian NKVD rather then Jews.

I’m sure it probably was the Russians
http://www.codoh.com/zionweb/zionchurch.html

But what the hell would Winston Churchill know about anything…[/quote]

Those Jews are tricky you know.

Better watch out or the Mossad will turn up the beam they are controlling you with…that would be very bad for you.

You failed to mention who posted the source you cited, wonder why?:

“Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, Bradley R. Smith, Director”

Sounds like a real reasonable bunch of fellows. Didn’t they recently have a conference in Tehran?

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Predictably, JustTheFacts chimed in with yet another batch of anti-Jewish quotes.

However, that was kind of the point I was making earlier. Even though most Christians, and Westerners in general, probably will reject the idea, there’s not a dinar’s worth of difference between the Quran and the Hebrew Bible, nor, by extension between Islam and Judaism.[/quote]

There are a lot of differences between Islam and Judaism and between Quran and Torah (while they do share the basic premise of strict monotheism).
Here are some differences which are responsible for different culture/behavior of 2 groups:
Not a single person have been forces to convert to Judaism (which is not an easy process itself).
Judaism puts very little emphasis on afterlife unlike Islam.
One can convert from Judaism to Islam without death penalty
Differences are vast. This was just the tip of an iceberg.

Any majority oppressed minorities in one way or another. Just don’t forger that Israel had no financial support from US until after 1967.

[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
hedo wrote:
For example “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, of which JTF has based his life’s work on, was written by the Russian NKVD rather then Jews.

I’m sure it probably was the Russians
http://www.codoh.com/zionweb/zionchurch.html

But what the hell would Winston Churchill know about anything…[/quote]

Interesting read, JTF!

[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Maybe you should be asking why such a small group of people are so overwhelmingly represented in practically every area except sports and labor - being that they’ve been so hated and all over the centuries.
[/quote]

A possible answer is incredible emphasis on education. Jewish children had to learn how to read very early on in order to read Torah. That will propel you forward.

Add to that prohibition of banking for Christians in Middle Age Europe and you get “Jewish bankers”.
Add a very strong emphasis on family in Judaism. Add rather strict hygienic laws (including Kashrut) which prevented spread of decease.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
jarvis wrote:

Calling the Qu’ran the ‘Muslim book of Jihad’ is no more apposite than calling the Bible the ‘Christian book of Holy Crusades’. Extreme interpretations of either book can lead to irrational behaviour by their followers.

It is a shame that intelligent discussion should be marred by frivolous rhetoric.

I understand your point, but the substantive difference is that the Bible does not call for military crusades, nor was Jesus a military leader famous for spreading his word by the sword. Contrast that to the Qu’ran, which textually affirms both for the religion of Islam.
[/quote]

Have you ever read the Bible ?

Some quotes from the New American Standard Bible :

Isaiah 34:6
The sword of the LORD is filled with blood,
It is sated with fat, with the blood of lambs and goats,
With the fat of the kidneys of rams.
For the LORD has a sacrifice in Bozrah
And a great slaughter in the land of Edom.

Ezekiel 21:4
Because I will cut off from you the righteous and the wicked, therefore
My sword will go forth from its sheath against all flesh from south to north.

Ezekiel 21:5
Thus all flesh will know that I, the LORD, have drawn My sword out of its sheath. It will not return to its sheath again.

Jeremiah 12:12
On all the bare heights in the wilderness
Destroyers have come,
For a sword of the LORD is devouring
From one end of the land even to the other;
There is no peace for anyone.

[quote]k.elkouhen wrote:

Have you ever read the Bible ?

Some quotes from the New American Standard Bible :

Isaiah 34:6
The sword of the LORD is filled with blood,
It is sated with fat, with the blood of lambs and goats,
With the fat of the kidneys of rams.
For the LORD has a sacrifice in Bozrah
And a great slaughter in the land of Edom.

Ezekiel 21:4
Because I will cut off from you the righteous and the wicked, therefore
My sword will go forth from its sheath against all flesh from south to north.

Ezekiel 21:5
Thus all flesh will know that I, the LORD, have drawn My sword out of its sheath. It will not return to its sheath again.

Jeremiah 12:12
On all the bare heights in the wilderness
Destroyers have come,
For a sword of the LORD is devouring
From one end of the land even to the other;
There is no peace for anyone.[/quote]

Have you read the rest of the thread?

Are you aware of the distinction between the Old and New Testaments?

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
k.elkouhen wrote:

Have you ever read the Bible ?

Some quotes from the New American Standard Bible :

Isaiah 34:6
The sword of the LORD is filled with blood,
It is sated with fat, with the blood of lambs and goats,
With the fat of the kidneys of rams.
For the LORD has a sacrifice in Bozrah
And a great slaughter in the land of Edom.

Ezekiel 21:4
Because I will cut off from you the righteous and the wicked, therefore
My sword will go forth from its sheath against all flesh from south to north.

Ezekiel 21:5
Thus all flesh will know that I, the LORD, have drawn My sword out of its sheath. It will not return to its sheath again.

Jeremiah 12:12
On all the bare heights in the wilderness
Destroyers have come,
For a sword of the LORD is devouring
From one end of the land even to the other;
There is no peace for anyone.

Have you read the rest of the thread?

Are you aware of the distinction between the Old and New Testaments?[/quote]

You were talking about the Bible, so…

Anyhow, if you want quotes from the New Testament, here are a couple :

5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

3:7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
3:8 Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance:
3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
3:10 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

6:11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.

10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

[quote]k.elkouhen wrote:

You were talking about the Bible, so…

Anyhow, if you want quotes from the New Testament, here are a couple :

5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

3:7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
3:8 Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance:
3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
3:10 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

6:11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.

10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

[/quote]

Are you just pulling Bible verses out at random? First you quote the Old-Testament, which is a complete non-sequitur here, then you pull out some New-Testament verses that truthfully have nothing to do with the discussion at hand. If you think they do, then you need to read the Bible more carefully, and understand that Jesus relied heavily on figurative language. Jesus was not literally chopping down a tree, nor was he calling for his followers to embark on a violent crusade.

The fact that you obviously need the context here explained to you is pretty condemning evidence that you do not know what you are talking about RE: the Bible.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
I understand your point, but the substantive difference is that the Bible does not call for military crusades, nor was Jesus a military leader famous for spreading his word by the sword. Contrast that to the Qu’ran, which textually affirms both for the religion of Islam. [/quote]

I think this sentence is what you’re trying to challenge. But you will be hard-pressed to challenge this by merely pulling Bible passages out of a hat.

You will also have a hard time challenging that the Bible urges Christians to use violence, because it doesn’t. Nowhere does Jesus call for Christians to spread the word through the use of violence or the sword, and nowhere does Jesus himself use violence to spread his message. In fact, the heart of Jesus’s message was the exact opposite.

It may seem otherwise if you read single passages completely out of context, and this is why you must have a strong understanding of the Bible or the Koran if you try to argue what their message is.

[quote]pookie wrote:

I am not a theologian, I just play one on the internet.
[/quote]

God damn it, Pookie, now you’re stealing my lines! :wink:

[quote]tGunslinger wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
I understand your point, but the substantive difference is that the Bible does not call for military crusades, nor was Jesus a military leader famous for spreading his word by the sword. Contrast that to the Qu’ran, which textually affirms both for the religion of Islam.

I think this sentence is what you’re trying to challenge. But you will be hard-pressed to challenge this by merely pulling Bible passages out of a hat.

You will also have a hard time challenging that the Bible urges Christians to use violence, because it doesn’t. Nowhere does Jesus call for Christians to spread the word through the use of violence or the sword, and nowhere does Jesus himself use violence to spread his message. In fact, the heart of Jesus’s message was the exact opposite.

It may seem otherwise if you read single passages completely out of context, and this is why you must have a strong understanding of the Bible or the Koran if you try to argue what their message is.[/quote]

My point exactly :slight_smile:

The people who are saying that the Koran is violent are guilty of pulling verses out of a hat. Or listening to people doing the same trick.

[quote]k.elkouhen wrote:
The people who are saying that the Koran is violent are guilty of pulling verses out of a hat. Or listening to people doing the same trick.[/quote]

One difference would be that there are very few Christians using quoted verses from the New Testament to incite violence against others; whereas we often see muslim demonstrators using various quotes from the Quran to support violent demonstrations and even assaults, arson and other destructive and criminal acts. Last year’s “Muhammad Cartoons” riot are an example; attacks on nuns and Christians after the Pope’s quoting of a Byzantine emperor are another.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:

the substantive difference is that the Bible does not call for military crusades,

By “Bible,” Thunder, I assume you are referring to the Christian Bible (New Testament), and not the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament).

For certainly, a look at both the Quran and the Hebrew Bible shows that the Allah who called for bloody jihad against idolaters and infidels is the very same god as the Yahweh who, in the books of Deuteronomy, Judges, Samuel etc., commanded Joshua, David and the other Israelites to slaughter the Canaanites and Philistines, smash their idols, enslave their wives and daughters, and occupy their lands.

Yahweh is often referred to as the “Lord of Hosts” (a host, of course, being an army), as is Allah in the Quran.

The old testament god was certainly a cruel motherfucker.

Jesus was more of a peace and love type.[/quote]

For a guy who hates hippies, you sure do love Jesus

[quote]BabyBuster wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:

the substantive difference is that the Bible does not call for military crusades,

By “Bible,” Thunder, I assume you are referring to the Christian Bible (New Testament), and not the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament).

For certainly, a look at both the Quran and the Hebrew Bible shows that the Allah who called for bloody jihad against idolaters and infidels is the very same god as the Yahweh who, in the books of Deuteronomy, Judges, Samuel etc., commanded Joshua, David and the other Israelites to slaughter the Canaanites and Philistines, smash their idols, enslave their wives and daughters, and occupy their lands.

Yahweh is often referred to as the “Lord of Hosts” (a host, of course, being an army), as is Allah in the Quran.

The old testament god was certainly a cruel motherfucker.

Jesus was more of a peace and love type.

For a guy who hates hippies, you sure do love Jesus[/quote]

I like Jesus about as much as I like hippies.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
BabyBuster wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:

the substantive difference is that the Bible does not call for military crusades,

By “Bible,” Thunder, I assume you are referring to the Christian Bible (New Testament), and not the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament).

For certainly, a look at both the Quran and the Hebrew Bible shows that the Allah who called for bloody jihad against idolaters and infidels is the very same god as the Yahweh who, in the books of Deuteronomy, Judges, Samuel etc., commanded Joshua, David and the other Israelites to slaughter the Canaanites and Philistines, smash their idols, enslave their wives and daughters, and occupy their lands.

Yahweh is often referred to as the “Lord of Hosts” (a host, of course, being an army), as is Allah in the Quran.

The old testament god was certainly a cruel motherfucker.

Jesus was more of a peace and love type.

For a guy who hates hippies, you sure do love Jesus

I like Jesus about as much as I like hippies.[/quote]

Damn, that’s cold blooded.

Thomas Jefferson letter to William Baldwin in 1810:

“That but a short time elapsed after the death of the great reformer of the Jewish religion before his principles were departed from by those who professed to be his special servants, and perverted into an engine for enslaving mankind, and aggrandizing their oppressors in church and state: that the purest system of morals ever before preached to man has been adulterated and sophisticated, by artificial constructions, into a mere contrivance to filch wealth and power to themselves, that rational men not being able to swallow their impious heresies, in order to force them down their throats, they raise the hue and cry of infidelity, while themselves are the greatest obstacles to the advancement of the real doctrines of Jesus, and do in fact constitute the real Anti-Christ.”

Phewww, talk about “conspiracy theories”…

The words of Jesus - “perverted into an engine for enslaving mankind” That’s heavy.

are there aany sources for the OP?

[quote]texasguy wrote:
are there aany sources for the OP?[/quote]

Nope. Got it in an email so I don’t know that it is completely accurate.

The references to our conflicts with the Muslim world of Jefferson’s era is very interesting.

These problems have been going on for a hell of a long time.