Isolationism

I am for a degree of isolationism . we could do it with the tax code and fines fuck the fense

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

However the real silliness is point number .3) - Arguing that imposing U.S. designs on the rest of the world via military aggression is what makes Republicans isolationists? I mean what can you say to something like that?[/quote]

Yep. The US is isolationist because it is an aggressive interventionist in the world.

Dumb as a fencepost.
[/quote]

Nobody like a bully…
[/quote]

and you missed the point.

[quote]Gkhan wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

However the real silliness is point number .3) - Arguing that imposing U.S. designs on the rest of the world via military aggression is what makes Republicans isolationists? I mean what can you say to something like that?[/quote]

Yep. The US is isolationist because it is an aggressive interventionist in the world.

Dumb as a fencepost.
[/quote]

Nobody like a bully…
[/quote]

and you missed the point.[/quote]

I dont think so.

You can of course meddle in other peoples affairs till the cows come home, but that does not leave you with friends or allies, but with vassals and enemies.

That is as isolated as you can get when you truly need help.

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

  1. You do not want trade with the entire world (and simultaneously confuse the government’s of other nations for the people they oppress).

[/quote]

Let’s elaborate :wink:

So someone remind what the problem with keeping illegal aliens out of the country and taking up my tax dollars to go to school is?

CS

[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
So someone remind what the problem with keeping illegal aliens out of the country and taking up my tax dollars to go to school is?

CS[/quote]

There is no problem with this whatsoever just like you have the right to keep anyone you want off of your private property; however, these are two separate issues:

  1. why are you being taxed to fund welfare in the first place?

  2. barring violation of property shouldn’t people be free to move where their interests are most benefited?