Just so you dipshits know - the original subject of the original post is, as most things that neocons are scared of, totally fabricated.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Just so you dipshits know - the original subject of the original post is, as most things that neocons are scared of, totally fabricated.
[/quote]
Yeah dude, well established a while ago.
Sorry for offending you.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Just so you dipshits know - the original subject of the original post is, as most things that neocons are scared of, totally fabricated.
[/quote]
Neocons?
In their brochure announcing the Jumu’ah at the DNC, this statement appears: “BIMA has been authorized by the Democratic National Convention [DNC] to conduct Jumah prayer as well as host festivities and Islamically-related functions.”
Here is their brochure:
http://muslimbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/DNC-BROCHURE-FINAL.pdf
So they say themselves on their own flyer for “Jumah at the DNC” that they are “authorized by the Democratic National Convention.”
As I already explained the DNC contracted the host committee to organise these events for them. Also, your source claims that similar events were scheduled for the RNC. Can you show me where and when those events were/are being held?
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Just so you dipshits know - the original subject of the original post is, as most things that neocons are scared of, totally fabricated.
[/quote]
Soooo, what is it you dont like about neocons?
The social engineering?
The wars of choice?
The supposed “compassion”?
If they turned their Jesus down a notch they could be running as Democrats!
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Just so you dipshits know - the original subject of the original post is, as most things that neocons are scared of, totally fabricated.
[/quote]
Soooo, what is it you dont like about neocons?
The social engineering?
The wars of choice?
The supposed “compassion”?
If they turned their Jesus down a notch they could be running as Democrats![/quote]
I think both of you are confused about what a ‘neocon’ is. ‘Neocons’ were originally followers of Irving Kristol(Bill Kristol’s father) and later students of Chicago University Professor Leo Strauss. They are mostly secular and socially liberal. Later, the major players in dubya’s administration, some of whom were students of Strauss became known as neocons. Neocons by and large are secular, socially liberal and hawkish on foreign policy. I think you’ll find most the conservatives posting here are traditional conservatives.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Just so you dipshits know - the original subject of the original post is, as most things that neocons are scared of, totally fabricated.
[/quote]
Soooo, what is it you dont like about neocons?
The social engineering?
The wars of choice?
The supposed “compassion”?
If they turned their Jesus down a notch they could be running as Democrats![/quote]
I think both of you are confused about what a ‘neocon’ is. ‘Neocons’ were originally followers of Irving Kristol(Bill Kristol’s father) and later students of Chicago University Professor Leo Strauss. They are mostly secular and socially liberal. Later, the major players in dubya’s administration, some of whom were students of Strauss became known as neocons. Neocons by and large are secular, socially liberal and hawkish on foreign policy. I think you’ll find most the conservatives posting here are traditional conservatives.[/quote]
Sooo…
We have social engineering… check.
Supposed compassion… check.
Wars of choice… check, check, check and check.
And they are politicians so maybe they just have Jesusgasms if they pander to a more conservative crowd… not quite a check.
Hey, 3 out of 4, thats not too bad.
[quote]orion wrote:
Sooo…
We have social engineering… check.
[/quote]
Yeah I guess Dick Cheney’s support for gay marriage was pretty bad. Good point.
Skip that one.
You mean like Obama’s war in Libya?
Skip that one too.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
You mean like Obama’s war in Libya?
[/quote]
Sure, they are like cynical progressives with a brain!
I know, a concept that seems unlikely, but there they are!
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
It is funny that my communication skills have kept up with your obvious superiority
[/quote]
Um, no.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
In RE: to marijuana , I think you should appose it because it would match the intelligence of the rest of your posts [/quote]
Gotta love the irony of this one.
appose (ã?»pozï½´) verb, transitive
apposed, apposing, apposes
To place in proximity; juxtapose.
The American Heritageｮ Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition � copyright ｩ 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation. All rights reserved.[/quote]
what the fuck are you my spelling teacher Jeez
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
It is funny that my communication skills have kept up with your obvious superiority
[/quote]
Um, no.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
In RE: to marijuana , I think you should appose it because it would match the intelligence of the rest of your posts [/quote]
Gotta love the irony of this one.
appose (�£?�»poz�¯�½�´) verb, transitive
apposed, apposing, apposes
To place in proximity; juxtapose.
The American Heritage�¯�½�® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition �¯�¼? copyright �¯�½�© 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation. All rights reserved.[/quote]
what the fuck are you my spelling teacher Jeez[/quote]
I see the irony, no apology needed , ever 