Iran Nuclear Deal

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Zeb:

For you, many Conservatives (and for anyone else, for or against him…); you’re going to see what you’re going to see in the President…and nothing anybody writes or says is going to change that.

To do otherwise is a waste of time and effort.

Mufasa[/quote]

Do you truly believe this outcome was the best it could be? Allowing Iran 24 days warning for inspections and lifting sanctions against conventional weapons acquisition, a part of the deal that was supposed to be non-negotiable?

Do you really believe this deal is good, or do you just trust obama at his word?

Found it. Here is the text of the Iran nuclear deal.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I try to be respectful when speaking about President Obama, but it is becoming more and more difficult. I’ll be extremely surprised if this deal doesn’t directly lead to boots on the ground in 5-10 years. How we haven’t gotten these hostages back, and that’s exactly what they are, is disgraceful. [/quote]

I used to say that he was the worst modern day President far exceeding Jimmy Carter. But after a little research I’m thinking he might be the worst President in the our history. I’m not sure yet but I am leaning that way.[/quote]

Carter was dumb, but he wasn’t that dumb. The negotiations he did have at least had some level of give and take and at least partially successful.
Obama is the smartest man in the room, and if you disagree with him then ‘fuck you’. What pushed me over the line was that whole ‘Climate change is our worst national security issue’ crap. It’s beyond words how stupid that is, especially in the context of what is going on. Hell, even in complete peace, that would have been a stupid thing to say, much less in the face of all the islamic extremist attacks. Not sure how many people have to die for him to acknowledge the problem, but clearly not enough for reality to sink in.
There are cases where keeping you enemies closer is a bad idea. This is one of those cases.
Hell, I could have negotiated a deal where a sworn enemy practically gets everything they want and we get nothing. That’s not hard to negotiate.
“Here, we’ll give you anything you want, just promise you won’t make a bomb,OK?” What a fucking retard.
Never thought I would miss Bush, but boy do I miss Bush. He may not have been the best, but there would be no ISIS and Iran would not get shit, but a middle finger.[/quote]

Just to show you how pathetic trying to control carbon levels is, after 9 years of our Cap and Trade law, California reduced emissions just 0.3%.

Not weighing in on the Iran Nuclear Deal, but I’d like to comment on the debated Pro-West stance among the general Iranian populace. It seems folks like to lump the Iranian Government and the Iranian People together. Maybe I can help clear up some misconceptions about Iranians/Persians:

  • loppar summed it up quite nicely (see page 1): Iranians are very different from other muslim nations
  • Iran used to be Pro-West back before the Cultural Revolution (wealth distro was still pretty shite)
  • Iran and the US got along quite well before the Cultural Revolution
  • although nominally muslims, a sizeable number of Iranians still adheres to Zoroastrianism (Persia’s primary religion before its Islamization)
  • before the Cultural Revolution, women did quite OK

To get a good idea about how Iranians tick, take a look at the Iranian Diaspora

  • globally, the Iranian Diaspora is known to integrate quite well (re: people, intermarriage, culture, mores, languages etc. of the respective countries) whilst doing quite well academically (both compared to natives and other immigrant groups)
  • your run of the mill Iranian is very adaptable and favors reputation, knowledge and wealth well over ‘honor’ (and the brutality required to achieve it) and standstill
  • if you happen to be in the Los Angeles area, go to a Persian Party/Disco and see for yourself: very welcoming people who definitely know how to have a good time - you’d encounter very similar stuff in Teheran (albeit more private or underground-ish)

For the record: I’m no lefty. I simply believe in knowing my facts before basing my worldview on assumptions.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I try to be respectful when speaking about President Obama, but it is becoming more and more difficult. I’ll be extremely surprised if this deal doesn’t directly lead to boots on the ground in 5-10 years. How we haven’t gotten these hostages back, and that’s exactly what they are, is disgraceful. [/quote]

I used to say that he was the worst modern day President far exceeding Jimmy Carter. But after a little research I’m thinking he might be the worst President in the our history. I’m not sure yet but I am leaning that way.[/quote]

Carter was dumb, but he wasn’t that dumb. The negotiations he did have at least had some level of give and take and at least partially successful.
Obama is the smartest man in the room, and if you disagree with him then ‘fuck you’. What pushed me over the line was that whole ‘Climate change is our worst national security issue’ crap. It’s beyond words how stupid that is, especially in the context of what is going on. Hell, even in complete peace, that would have been a stupid thing to say, much less in the face of all the islamic extremist attacks. Not sure how many people have to die for him to acknowledge the problem, but clearly not enough for reality to sink in.
There are cases where keeping you enemies closer is a bad idea. This is one of those cases.
Hell, I could have negotiated a deal where a sworn enemy practically gets everything they want and we get nothing. That’s not hard to negotiate.
“Here, we’ll give you anything you want, just promise you won’t make a bomb,OK?” What a fucking retard.
Never thought I would miss Bush, but boy do I miss Bush. He may not have been the best, but there would be no ISIS and Iran would not get shit, but a middle finger.[/quote]

What makes you think that Iran is a sworn enemy of Obama? People need to start putting the pieces together.

  1. Obama distances himself from Israel almost from his first day in office.

  2. Obama is basically allowing Iran to have the bomb and gives the farm away during the negotiations.

  3. Obama does very little to stop ISIS. He certainly does not bring the full force of the US military to bear on them.

  4. Obama was raised as a Muslim and in fact said that he was still a Muslim in an early interview with George Snuffilupagus…but then corrected himself. (yeah that happens to me every day).

Do I have to continue?

There is no crisis in Obama’s eyes, no enemy to fight, other than white American patriots. And by allowing millions of illegal Mexicans through the border he is attempting to correct that.

At this point the only other alternative is to believe that he is actually a stupid man, or exceptionally naive, and I highly doubt that.

Someone tell me I’m wrong because I really don’t want to believe what I am seeing year after year. But at this point I cannot think of a better reason for what he’s doing.[/quote]

Well I meant a sworn enemy of the United States. Obama wants to be their best friends. Only problem is they don’t like him anywhere nears as much as he likes them. An enemy of the United States is a friend of obama. [/quote]

Not according to Mufasa.

From what I can tell Mufasa believes that we are so conservative that we just don’t understand the brilliant (left wing) mind of Obama.

Now…if I have this wrong Mufasa please explain it for me.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Zeb:

For you, many Conservatives (and for anyone else, for or against him…); you’re going to see what you’re going to see in the President…and nothing anybody writes or says is going to change that.

To do otherwise is a waste of time and effort.

Mufasa[/quote]

Do you truly believe this outcome was the best it could be? Allowing Iran 24 days warning for inspections and lifting sanctions against conventional weapons acquisition, a part of the deal that was supposed to be non-negotiable?

Do you really believe this deal is good, or do you just trust obama at his word? [/quote]

Well…it’s not like Obama has ever lied about anything in the past…Oh wait he lies all the time and the left wing media let’s it slide.

Then again I might be too conservative and don’t fully understand the great and wonderful mind of Obama.

[quote]FattyFat wrote:
Not weighing in on the Iran Nuclear Deal, but I’d like to comment on the debated Pro-West stance among the general Iranian populace. It seems folks like to lump the Iranian Government and the Iranian People together. Maybe I can help clear up some misconceptions about Iranians/Persians:

  • loppar summed it up quite nicely (see page 1): Iranians are very different from other muslim nations
  • Iran used to be Pro-West back before the Cultural Revolution (wealth distro was still pretty shite)
  • Iran and the US got along quite well before the Cultural Revolution
  • although nominally muslims, a sizeable number of Iranians still adheres to Zoroastrianism (Persia’s primary religion before its Islamization)
  • before the Cultural Revolution, women did quite OK

To get a good idea about how Iranians tick, take a look at the Iranian Diaspora

  • globally, the Iranian Diaspora is known to integrate quite well (re: people, intermarriage, culture, mores, languages etc. of the respective countries) whilst doing quite well academically (both compared to natives and other immigrant groups)
  • your run of the mill Iranian is very adaptable and favors reputation, knowledge and wealth well over ‘honor’ (and the brutality required to achieve it) and standstill
  • if you happen to be in the Los Angeles area, go to a Persian Party/Disco and see for yourself: very welcoming people who definitely know how to have a good time - you’d encounter very similar stuff in Teheran (albeit more private or underground-ish)

For the record: I’m no lefty. I simply believe in knowing my facts before basing my worldview on assumptions.[/quote]

It actually doesn’t matter how “pro west” the Iranian people are. They have absolutely no say in who runs their government. And if they get out of line they are removed from their home and taken to prison, shot or tortured.

But we can trust the Iranians to keep their end of the bargain. They’re a bunch of swell fella’s.

Someone tell me is Obama naïve, stupid, or is he now hitting for the other side? It has to be one of the three. Unless I am so conservative I just don’t understand how a far left President gets things done.

  1. Allowing in millions of illegals

  2. Giving Cuba new status

  3. Signing a nuclear deal with Iran essentially allowing them the bomb

  4. Not going after ISIS with the full military power of the US

  5. Not acknowledging that Muslims are perpetrating 99% of all terrorist activities.

  6. Pulling out of Iraq early which turned Iraq into a safe haven for more terrorist activities.

  7. Treating Israel like an enemy

And lets not forget Obama’s horrendous domestic record like creating more racial tension in the US than we have had since the 1960’s. One would almost think that we elected a rabble rousing community organizer rather than a legitimate President…oh wait…

The list is virtually endless. Everything that this guy has touched has turned to crap.

I am either witnessing the worst President in American history, or I am somehow missing the brilliant moves of our far left wing President.

Which is it?

[quote]FattyFat wrote:
Not weighing in on the Iran Nuclear Deal, but I’d like to comment on the debated Pro-West stance among the general Iranian populace. It seems folks like to lump the Iranian Government and the Iranian People together. Maybe I can help clear up some misconceptions about Iranians/Persians:

  • loppar summed it up quite nicely (see page 1): Iranians are very different from other muslim nations
  • Iran used to be Pro-West back before the Cultural Revolution (wealth distro was still pretty shite)
  • Iran and the US got along quite well before the Cultural Revolution
  • although nominally muslims, a sizeable number of Iranians still adheres to Zoroastrianism (Persia’s primary religion before its Islamization)
  • before the Cultural Revolution, women did quite OK

To get a good idea about how Iranians tick, take a look at the Iranian Diaspora

  • globally, the Iranian Diaspora is known to integrate quite well (re: people, intermarriage, culture, mores, languages etc. of the respective countries) whilst doing quite well academically (both compared to natives and other immigrant groups)
  • your run of the mill Iranian is very adaptable and favors reputation, knowledge and wealth well over ‘honor’ (and the brutality required to achieve it) and standstill
  • if you happen to be in the Los Angeles area, go to a Persian Party/Disco and see for yourself: very welcoming people who definitely know how to have a good time - you’d encounter very similar stuff in Teheran (albeit more private or underground-ish)

For the record: I’m no lefty. I simply believe in knowing my facts before basing my worldview on assumptions.[/quote]

And I want evidence for these assertions. I am not saying they are wrong, I just want to see some evidence that this is true circa 2015. I know Iran was once pro-west and progressive, but mullahs and Ayatollahs are not dancing in the streets burning American / Israeli flags while chanting various death chants, people are.
I do also know that they did have a few large rallies calling for reform, but I am not quite sure that qualifies as ‘pro-western’. Like I said, I would like to see some evidence backing up these assertions.

On the other hand, while it’s true that increased personal wealth and well being of the populace may increase a desire for reform, they are also going to be dealing with an enriched and more powerful government. So that could all be a wash in the end.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I try to be respectful when speaking about President Obama, but it is becoming more and more difficult. I’ll be extremely surprised if this deal doesn’t directly lead to boots on the ground in 5-10 years. How we haven’t gotten these hostages back, and that’s exactly what they are, is disgraceful. [/quote]

I used to say that he was the worst modern day President far exceeding Jimmy Carter. But after a little research I’m thinking he might be the worst President in the our history. I’m not sure yet but I am leaning that way.[/quote]

Carter was dumb, but he wasn’t that dumb. The negotiations he did have at least had some level of give and take and at least partially successful.
Obama is the smartest man in the room, and if you disagree with him then ‘fuck you’. What pushed me over the line was that whole ‘Climate change is our worst national security issue’ crap. It’s beyond words how stupid that is, especially in the context of what is going on. Hell, even in complete peace, that would have been a stupid thing to say, much less in the face of all the islamic extremist attacks. Not sure how many people have to die for him to acknowledge the problem, but clearly not enough for reality to sink in.
There are cases where keeping you enemies closer is a bad idea. This is one of those cases.
Hell, I could have negotiated a deal where a sworn enemy practically gets everything they want and we get nothing. That’s not hard to negotiate.
“Here, we’ll give you anything you want, just promise you won’t make a bomb,OK?” What a fucking retard.
Never thought I would miss Bush, but boy do I miss Bush. He may not have been the best, but there would be no ISIS and Iran would not get shit, but a middle finger.[/quote]

Just to show you how pathetic trying to control carbon levels is, after 9 years of our Cap and Trade law, California reduced emissions just 0.3%.[/quote]

Well, it’s also interesting that ‘climate change’ is apparently our greatest threat to national security, yet, Iran is one of the most offending polluters per capita and yet, not a single demand for Iran to reduce emissions was made during this deal. It begs the question, then, is ‘climate change’ a national security threat or not and if so, why was nothing included in the deal to reduce Iran’s commitment to global pollution?

[quote]pat wrote:
[And I want evidence for these assertions. I am not saying they are wrong, I just want to see some evidence that this is true circa 2015. I know Iran was once pro-west and progressive, but mullahs and Ayatollahs are not dancing in the streets burning American / Israeli flags while chanting various death chants, people are.
a wash in the end.[/quote]

The pro-West shift among the general population is steadily gaining momentum in Iran, especially in the last couple of years. I would venture to say that the changes are indeed dramatic, that’s why the regime has to make constant consessions to the moderates, despite the supressions, murders and arrests. You cannot rule tens of millions of people by sheer terror alone.

The Green revolution was in large part confined to the big city middle-class urbanites, but now things have changed, encompassing all social strata.

If you haven’t been to an Arab country (Iranians are not Arabs but Persians which they constantly bring up) it may be difficult to explain, but differences are mind boggling.

First of all, the role of women - in the Gulf Arab states women are invisible shadows clad mainly in burqas, sometimes chadors or hijabs which you occasionally glimpse on the street. Very often they cannot even walk on the street without a legal guardian.

I once witnessed a famous and regular scene from Saudi daily life - an elaborate sting operation in a shopping mall by regular police/religious police involving dozens of troopers clad in riot gear and police dogs. The reason was that one teenager allegedly waved to a burqa clad teenage girl from across the hallway. Even glancing at a woman can get you in a LOT of trouble.

It is not uncommon for family members to straight up murder their daughters for such “horrible” crimes such as waving to a member of the opposite sex.

The situation is very different in Iran - I was shocked that you can even strike up a conversation with women in the street (mind you, mostly in middle/upper class urban neighbourhoods).

Women play an active part in the society - they’re doctors, nurses, computer programmers (over 90% of engineers in Iran are female) and have no qualms interacting with men/foreigners in a business setting).

For example, Iranian hospitals have a very good reputation (mostly due to many US educated doctors in Iran) and rich Gulf Arabs tend to fly there for medical treatment as it is cheaper and better than in their theocracies. Usually they completely freak out when confronted with Iranian female nurses during their medical examinations and start ranting against the “decadent heretics”

Women play a more assertive role in public life and are completely dominant in the private sphere, something unthinkable even in many “progressive” sunni muslim countries.

Also, underground nightlife in Tehran is really amazing, virtually unparalleled anywhere else. Women are incredibly hot, assertive, smart and self confident.

Of course, none of this should not paint to much of a rosy picture, as Iran is a dictatorship where dissidents and opponents of the regime as well as those who transgress on the “public morality” are arrested, beaten, tortured and often killed. However, things are changing at a rapid pace.

When the nuclear deal was signed, the state TV broadcasted live Obama’s speech and the religious police were ordered to look the other way during the celebrations, something unthinkable a year ago.

[quote]loppar wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
[And I want evidence for these assertions. I am not saying they are wrong, I just want to see some evidence that this is true circa 2015. I know Iran was once pro-west and progressive, but mullahs and Ayatollahs are not dancing in the streets burning American / Israeli flags while chanting various death chants, people are.
a wash in the end.[/quote]

The pro-West shift among the general population is steadily gaining momentum in Iran, especially in the last couple of years. I would venture to say that the changes are indeed dramatic, that’s why the regime has to make constant consessions to the moderates, despite the supressions, murders and arrests. You cannot rule tens of millions of people by sheer terror alone.

The Green revolution was in large part confined to the big city middle-class urbanites, but now things have changed, encompassing all social strata.

If you haven’t been to an Arab country (Iranians are not Arabs but Persians which they constantly bring up) it may be difficult to explain, but differences are mind boggling.

First of all, the role of women - in the Gulf Arab states women are invisible shadows clad mainly in burqas, sometimes chadors or hijabs which you occasionally glimpse on the street. Very often they cannot even walk on the street without a legal guardian.

I once witnessed a famous and regular scene from Saudi daily life - an elaborate sting operation in a shopping mall by regular police/religious police involving dozens of troopers clad in riot gear and police dogs. The reason was that one teenager allegedly waved to a burqa clad teenage girl from across the hallway. Even glancing at a woman can get you in a LOT of trouble.

It is not uncommon for family members to straight up murder their daughters for such “horrible” crimes such as waving to a member of the opposite sex.

The situation is very different in Iran - I was shocked that you can even strike up a conversation with women in the street (mind you, mostly in middle/upper class urban neighbourhoods).

Women play an active part in the society - they’re doctors, nurses, computer programmers (over 90% of engineers in Iran are female) and have no qualms interacting with men/foreigners in a business setting).

For example, Iranian hospitals have a very good reputation (mostly due to many US educated doctors in Iran) and rich Gulf Arabs tend to fly there for medical treatment as it is cheaper and better than in their theocracies. Usually they completely freak out when confronted with Iranian female nurses during their medical examinations and start ranting against the “decadent heretics”

Women play a more assertive role in public life and are completely dominant in the private sphere, something unthinkable even in many “progressive” sunni muslim countries.

Also, underground nightlife in Tehran is really amazing, virtually unparalleled anywhere else. Women are incredibly hot, assertive, smart and self confident.

Of course, none of this should not paint to much of a rosy picture, as Iran is a dictatorship where dissidents and opponents of the regime as well as those who transgress on the “public morality” are arrested, beaten, tortured and often killed. However, things are changing at a rapid pace.

When the nuclear deal was signed, the state TV broadcasted live Obama’s speech and the religious police were ordered to look the other way during the celebrations, something unthinkable a year ago.[/quote]

My god, man. You make the Iranians sound almost… human.

We cannot have that. It disrupts the narrative. Humanization of the sworn enemies of Murica is one thing up with we will not put on this forum.

[quote]loppar wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
[And I want evidence for these assertions. I am not saying they are wrong, I just want to see some evidence that this is true circa 2015. I know Iran was once pro-west and progressive, but mullahs and Ayatollahs are not dancing in the streets burning American / Israeli flags while chanting various death chants, people are.
a wash in the end.[/quote]

The pro-West shift among the general population is steadily gaining momentum in Iran, especially in the last couple of years. I would venture to say that the changes are indeed dramatic, that’s why the regime has to make constant consessions to the moderates, despite the supressions, murders and arrests. You cannot rule tens of millions of people by sheer terror alone.

The Green revolution was in large part confined to the big city middle-class urbanites, but now things have changed, encompassing all social strata.

If you haven’t been to an Arab country (Iranians are not Arabs but Persians which they constantly bring up) it may be difficult to explain, but differences are mind boggling.

First of all, the role of women - in the Gulf Arab states women are invisible shadows clad mainly in burqas, sometimes chadors or hijabs which you occasionally glimpse on the street. Very often they cannot even walk on the street without a legal guardian.

I once witnessed a famous and regular scene from Saudi daily life - an elaborate sting operation in a shopping mall by regular police/religious police involving dozens of troopers clad in riot gear and police dogs. The reason was that one teenager allegedly waved to a burqa clad teenage girl from across the hallway. Even glancing at a woman can get you in a LOT of trouble.

It is not uncommon for family members to straight up murder their daughters for such “horrible” crimes such as waving to a member of the opposite sex.

The situation is very different in Iran - I was shocked that you can even strike up a conversation with women in the street (mind you, mostly in middle/upper class urban neighbourhoods).

Women play an active part in the society - they’re doctors, nurses, computer programmers (over 90% of engineers in Iran are female) and have no qualms interacting with men/foreigners in a business setting).

For example, Iranian hospitals have a very good reputation (mostly due to many US educated doctors in Iran) and rich Gulf Arabs tend to fly there for medical treatment as it is cheaper and better than in their theocracies. Usually they completely freak out when confronted with Iranian female nurses during their medical examinations and start ranting against the “decadent heretics”

Women play a more assertive role in public life and are completely dominant in the private sphere, something unthinkable even in many “progressive” sunni muslim countries.

Also, underground nightlife in Tehran is really amazing, virtually unparalleled anywhere else. Women are incredibly hot, assertive, smart and self confident.

Of course, none of this should not paint to much of a rosy picture, as Iran is a dictatorship where dissidents and opponents of the regime as well as those who transgress on the “public morality” are arrested, beaten, tortured and often killed. However, things are changing at a rapid pace.

When the nuclear deal was signed, the state TV broadcasted live Obama’s speech and the religious police were ordered to look the other way during the celebrations, something unthinkable a year ago.[/quote]

First, we’re all aware of the difference between Persians and Arabs, you don’t have to explain it.
Second, are you speaking from experience, I.E. you have spent time in Saudi Arabia and Tehran and you witnessed and experienced the life and culture first hand? Certainly, witnessing it is better than reading about it.
All I want to know is how you are making your determinations.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]loppar wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
[And I want evidence for these assertions. I am not saying they are wrong, I just want to see some evidence that this is true circa 2015. I know Iran was once pro-west and progressive, but mullahs and Ayatollahs are not dancing in the streets burning American / Israeli flags while chanting various death chants, people are.
a wash in the end.[/quote]

The pro-West shift among the general population is steadily gaining momentum in Iran, especially in the last couple of years. I would venture to say that the changes are indeed dramatic, that’s why the regime has to make constant consessions to the moderates, despite the supressions, murders and arrests. You cannot rule tens of millions of people by sheer terror alone.

The Green revolution was in large part confined to the big city middle-class urbanites, but now things have changed, encompassing all social strata.

If you haven’t been to an Arab country (Iranians are not Arabs but Persians which they constantly bring up) it may be difficult to explain, but differences are mind boggling.

First of all, the role of women - in the Gulf Arab states women are invisible shadows clad mainly in burqas, sometimes chadors or hijabs which you occasionally glimpse on the street. Very often they cannot even walk on the street without a legal guardian.

I once witnessed a famous and regular scene from Saudi daily life - an elaborate sting operation in a shopping mall by regular police/religious police involving dozens of troopers clad in riot gear and police dogs. The reason was that one teenager allegedly waved to a burqa clad teenage girl from across the hallway. Even glancing at a woman can get you in a LOT of trouble.

It is not uncommon for family members to straight up murder their daughters for such “horrible” crimes such as waving to a member of the opposite sex.

The situation is very different in Iran - I was shocked that you can even strike up a conversation with women in the street (mind you, mostly in middle/upper class urban neighbourhoods).

Women play an active part in the society - they’re doctors, nurses, computer programmers (over 90% of engineers in Iran are female) and have no qualms interacting with men/foreigners in a business setting).

For example, Iranian hospitals have a very good reputation (mostly due to many US educated doctors in Iran) and rich Gulf Arabs tend to fly there for medical treatment as it is cheaper and better than in their theocracies. Usually they completely freak out when confronted with Iranian female nurses during their medical examinations and start ranting against the “decadent heretics”

Women play a more assertive role in public life and are completely dominant in the private sphere, something unthinkable even in many “progressive” sunni muslim countries.

Also, underground nightlife in Tehran is really amazing, virtually unparalleled anywhere else. Women are incredibly hot, assertive, smart and self confident.

Of course, none of this should not paint to much of a rosy picture, as Iran is a dictatorship where dissidents and opponents of the regime as well as those who transgress on the “public morality” are arrested, beaten, tortured and often killed. However, things are changing at a rapid pace.

When the nuclear deal was signed, the state TV broadcasted live Obama’s speech and the religious police were ordered to look the other way during the celebrations, something unthinkable a year ago.[/quote]

My god, man. You make the Iranians sound almost… human.

We cannot have that. It disrupts the narrative. Humanization of the sworn enemies of Murica is one thing up with we will not put on this forum.[/quote]

The Germans were human too, many of them. And many weren’t Nazi’s and didn’t support the regime, and it wasn’t relevant. I don’t think anybody is espousing a narrative where we want to kill Iranians, nor go to war with Iran.
I don’t think our only options on the table were to either make a shitty deal with Iran that not only helps their economy but gives a big boost to their war machine, or go to war. There were other options like crippling their economy and let the Mossad take care of their nuclear ambitions.
I’ve gotten through about half of the actual text. It’s actually not been enlightening nor comforting so far. So far it’s as bad as it seems.

[quote]pat wrote:

Second, are you speaking from experience, I.E. you have spent time in Saudi Arabia and Tehran and you witnessed and experienced the life and culture first hand? Certainly, witnessing it is better than reading about it.
All I want to know is how you are making your determinations.[/quote]

I have worked for an Euro based multinational company and have traveled extensively on business in the region, so I am speaking from direct experience.

Your apocalyptic warnings in this thread are correct, with a small caveat - they should be applied to Saudi Arabia and an existing nuclear power that is virulently anti-American - Pakistan.

If there’s something you should fear from the muslim world, that is Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the Chechens.

Saudi Arabia is a horrible place, words simply cannot describe it.

Your run-of-the-mill middle class Saudi is completely ignorant about everything, hates the West with a passion, despises and abuses his slaves (the PC phrase is “domestic servants”, usually from the Philippines) and admires ISIS. After all, they adhere to the purest form of islam, as the most recent opinion poll in SA. A tribal mentality from the 7th century pervades.

Saudi men saunter around in western designed shopping malls, drive around town in their brand new western designed SUVs (there’s nothing else to do in Saudi Arabia except maybe hunt with falcons) and spew hatred against anything “decadent” from the West.

Also, many believe Jews have horns. Seriously. Do a youtube search on a Saudi preacher questioning the Earth’s rotation .

Even long periods of sojourn in the West do not dampen their fervor. I’ve met Saudis who went to MIT or Caltech and still rant about “immoral Western whores” and “godless consumerism”. Of course, that doesn’t stop them flying to Dubai to visit illegal brothels, drink and do coke.

They absolve these sins by supporting terrorists, at least verbally although on supporting islamic terrorism by all means there is an unspoken consensus among the governing elite and the rest of the population.

Qatar is no different, although with an elaborate facade that covers up the role of their “charities”.

Iran (who is an oppressive dictatorship, let’s not forget) seems more like Las Vegas after spending a week in Saudi Arabia.

I’ve written before about the drastically different role that women play in Iran. Even the hardline pro-government conservatives are somehow more, I dunno, “saner”. This is mainly to the more flexible doctrinal nature of shia islam as well as the surprisingly resilient Persian culture.

Besides the young middle-class urbanites, a lot of people are simply going through the motions by following the regime line in public discourse “Yes, yes, death to America, I have to go now, my cousins from Pasadena are arriving tonight and I have to go pick them up” is an actual line I’ve heard.

People are very, very, very hospitable, cool and are simply tired of living in a dictatorship - they want to travel abroad, download music from itunes, watch non-bootlegged movies and go to hip hop concerts that are being held outside and not in someone’s living room as is now the case.

And the dictatorship has to adapt to survive - it simply cannot go constantly against the wishes of their population, especially the young who are clamoring for a change. They do try, make no mistake about it - imprison, torture and murder people as an “example to others” yet the change simply cannot be stopped. Although, as I’ve written in other posts, Iranian leaders are behaving much more reasonably that ruling elites running Gulf theocracies.

And as I’ve said it before, they are the most pro-American of the ME countries.

A Saudi will spew nasty shit how the Kurds or Yazids “deserved” extermination by the hands of ISIS while boringly flipping through his smartphone, while the average middle-class Iranian is more often than not genuinely upset that the US does not want them as allies.

[quote]pat wrote:

I don’t think our only options on the table were to either make a shitty deal with Iran that not only helps their economy but gives a big boost to their war machine, or go to war. There were other options like crippling their economy and let the Mossad take care of their nuclear ambitions.
I’ve gotten through about half of the actual text. It’s actually not been enlightening nor comforting so far. So far it’s as bad as it seems. [/quote]

If you want to be unsettled, remember that Pakistan has the bomb and hundred or so million of piss-poor people increasingly brainwashed by propaganda emanating from Saudi mosques who regularly burn atheists and christians, perform honor killings and stoning for minor infractions of their concept of “morality” and throw acid in the faces of teenage girls who want to educate themselves.

And a corrupt quasi-democracy that has to pander to the above mentioned hundred million. Now that’s unsettling.

[quote]loppar wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

Second, are you speaking from experience, I.E. you have spent time in Saudi Arabia and Tehran and you witnessed and experienced the life and culture first hand? Certainly, witnessing it is better than reading about it.
All I want to know is how you are making your determinations.[/quote]

I have worked for an Euro based multinational company and have traveled extensively on business in the region, so I am speaking from direct experience.

Your apocalyptic warnings in this thread are correct, with a small caveat - they should be applied to Saudi Arabia and an existing nuclear power that is virulently anti-American - Pakistan.

If there’s something you should fear from the muslim world, that is Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the Chechens.

Saudi Arabia is a horrible place, words simply cannot describe it.

Your run-of-the-mill middle class Saudi is completely ignorant about everything, hates the West with a passion, despises and abuses his slaves (the PC phrase is “domestic servants”, usually from the Philippines) and admires ISIS. After all, they adhere to the purest form of islam, as the most recent opinion poll in SA. A tribal mentality from the 7th century pervades.

Saudi men saunter around in western designed shopping malls, drive around town in their brand new western designed SUVs (there’s nothing else to do in Saudi Arabia except maybe hunt with falcons) and spew hatred against anything “decadent” from the West.

Also, many believe Jews have horns. Seriously. Do a youtube search on a Saudi preacher questioning the Earth’s rotation .

Even long periods of sojourn in the West do not dampen their fervor. I’ve met Saudis who went to MIT or Caltech and still rant about “immoral Western whores” and “godless consumerism”. Of course, that doesn’t stop them flying to Dubai to visit illegal brothels, drink and do coke.

They absolve these sins by supporting terrorists, at least verbally although on supporting islamic terrorism by all means there is an unspoken consensus among the governing elite and the rest of the population.

Qatar is no different, although with an elaborate facade that covers up the role of their “charities”.

Iran (who is an oppressive dictatorship, let’s not forget) seems more like Las Vegas after spending a week in Saudi Arabia.

I’ve written before about the drastically different role that women play in Iran. Even the hardline pro-government conservatives are somehow more, I dunno, “saner”. This is mainly to the more flexible doctrinal nature of shia islam as well as the surprisingly resilient Persian culture.

Besides the young middle-class urbanites, a lot of people are simply going through the motions by following the regime line in public discourse “Yes, yes, death to America, I have to go now, my cousins from Pasadena are arriving tonight and I have to go pick them up” is an actual line I’ve heard.

People are very, very, very hospitable, cool and are simply tired of living in a dictatorship - they want to travel abroad, download music from itunes, watch non-bootlegged movies and go to hip hop concerts that are being held outside and not in someone’s living room as is now the case.

And the dictatorship has to adapt to survive - it simply cannot go constantly against the wishes of their population, especially the young who are clamoring for a change. They do try, make no mistake about it - imprison, torture and murder people as an “example to others” yet the change simply cannot be stopped. Although, as I’ve written in other posts, Iranian leaders are behaving much more reasonably that ruling elites running Gulf theocracies.

And as I’ve said it before, they are the most pro-American of the ME countries.

A Saudi will spew nasty shit how the Kurds or Yazids “deserved” extermination by the hands of ISIS while boringly flipping through his smartphone, while the average middle-class Iranian is more often than not genuinely upset that the US does not want them as allies.

[/quote]

Well, that’s pretty cool. I appreciate your insight. Being there is vastly different than ‘reading and article’ about it.
Your insight about Saudi Arabia seems about right in line with my stereotypes about them. The coolness of the people of Iran not withstanding, I am still genuinely concerned about lifting the conventional weapons embargo. The people may be cool, but the regime is not and I do not trust them not to reek havoc with their increased capabilities. Granted I do not want them to have a nuclear weapon, but having one is virtually useless since it’s a near guarantee of mutually assured destruction. They can do much worse with conventional weapons.
I agree with your insights on Pakistan and Saudi, not our friends. Neither is China or Russia.

For anyone interested, here’s an article from almost two years ago outlining Iran’s regime first tentative steps towards brokering the deal.

The article touches two major points - the murky, complex convoluted doublespeak usually publicly used in Iranian domestic political arena and the hugely important shia doctrinal background that differentiates them from sunnis and which had (and has) huge cultural ramifications throughout the centuries.

Thanks for the insights, loppar.

Good stuff.

Something I’ve always wondered about. With the most Holy sights of Islam being on Saudi soil; how much does that reduce the likelihood that there would ever be the kind of destruction and carnage done by Muslims in other parts of the Middle East?

In other words; is it likely that we would ever see all-out war on Saudi soil?

Mufasa

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Thanks for the insights, loppar.

Good stuff.

Something I’ve always wondered about. With the most Holy sights of Islam being on Saudi soil; how much does that reduce the likelihood that there would ever be the kind of destruction and carnage done by Muslims in other parts of the Middle East?

In other words; is it likely that we would ever see all-out war on Saudi soil?

Mufasa[/quote]

Actually, this is a great example how one from the West cannot even comprehend the insanity of wahabbism.

One’s logic would be that a presence of a holy place would reduce the risk of major confrontation as the warring parties wouldn’t want to risk damage to the holy sites, right?

Well, that would be correct if the Saudi’s didn’t dynamite their mosques and graves as well intentionally desecrate and destroy the graves of Mohammad’s family.

See, due to the fear from “idolatry”, Saudi Arabia is effectively waging a war against archaeology and any physical remains of 7th century Mecca and Medina. Houses and graves can be “idolatrous”, even if they’re Mohammad’s or his parents’.

They’ve bulldozed and set on fire the grave of Mohammad’s mother to make way for a parking lot.

Insane. Worth a read:

By the way, I’ve been told Mecca from afar looks kind of like Vegas, only more white-ish.

Also, during WW1 the Ottoman Empire who controlled the Arab peninsula was a belligerent, and if I recall correctly some military engagements were fought on the Red Sea close to the actual sites, so it wouldn’t be the first time.

Mind you, the conflict in Yemen has probably spread to Saudi Arabia, as there is an shia minority kept under strict government control in the south-west corner of SA, Gary Brecher explained this in length in one of his columns.

[quote]loppar wrote:

while the average middle-class Iranian is more often than not genuinely upset that the US does not want them as allies.

[/quote]

We don’t want THEM as allies? They were our allies…they threw US out, remember? I don’t recall anyone in America burning an Iranian flag while chanting Death to Iran, do you?