Iran Cures Aids?

http://www.rxpgnews.com/aids-research/AIDS-Vaccine-shows-promising-results-in-non-human-primates_14580.shtml

The way I see it, AIDs is more likely to be eradicated similarly to smallpox than its is going to be cured by munching on some iranian cactus.

[quote]tveddy wrote:
The way I see it, AIDs is more likely to be eradicated similarly to smallpox than its is going to be cured by munching on some iranian cactus.[/quote]

True that.

What they are doing is like treating schitzophernia with a multivitamin.

Bonus points for anyone who guesses where I got that from? Here is a hint: Tom Cruise is nuts. He is a part of it. Hell, it could even be why he is so crazy.

What is it?

[quote]Shoebolt wrote:
gummernaut wrote:
ProjectX wrote:
baretta wrote:
Half the country is still shitting in holes in the ground. Fix that and then you can move up the ladder.

you’re right, they should be shitting in your mouth instead you racist fuck.

Racist Fuck? Interesting use of words. |||They better come up for a cure for AIDS because they only use a woman for procreation, while the rest are ass fucking for Allah.||| But don’t say that out loud or they’ll cut off your fucking head with a dull knife. Facts aren’t racist. Dipshits like you just throw that PC word around for shock value.

Well clearly then your facts are racist, because what you have presented as facts are not true. Research women in Islam carefully, especially from its roots, and you’ll see that feminism in the Dark Ages started from Islam.

And btw anal sex is not permitted in Islam :).[/quote

Wow! Not permitted in Islam. Like not drinking but most do and there are liquior stores all over the middle east. Been there bought it. Islam is the most hippocritical religion out there. Same thing goes for fucking each other.

They just don’t want the west to know about it. And before you call me a racist again or brainwashed. I have fought side by side with Kurds, Sunni’s and Shia and have made friends with alot of them. I speak from experience and its not to demonize them but to highlight that they have moral flaws like the rest of the world. The fanatics should stop judging all other religions and look in a mirror to see the real “infidil”

The U.S. beat them to it. The FDA recently approved a drug named trinoasatal.

[quote]brucevangeorge wrote:
tveddy wrote:
The way I see it, AIDs is more likely to be eradicated similarly to smallpox than its is going to be cured by munching on some iranian cactus.

True that.

What they are doing is like treating schitzophernia with a multivitamin.

Bonus points for anyone who guesses where I got that from? Here is a hint: Tom Cruise is nuts. He is a part of it. Hell, it could even be why he is so crazy.

What is it?[/quote]

Romper Room?

[quote]ProjectX wrote:
hmmmmm… don’t recall saying any of that… perhaps you could find some benefit in a reading comprehension course.[/quote]

I don’t think you quite get it.

The news networks (owned by weapons contractors, which has NOTHING whatsoever to do with the stories they broadcast and nothing whatsoever with the Military-Industrial Complex predicted by Eisenhower…) says that Iranians are bad.

Therefore Iranians are bad.

Every last one of them beats their wife, molests their daughters, stones their mothers to death in the streets, has sex with donkeys, and eats babies!

EVERY LAST ONE!

What is it with you goddamned hippie Liberals and your trying to “look deeper” into these issues?

The United States Government and Mass Media know what’s best for the citizenry. How dare you question them?!

The have never lied to us in the past and they most certainly would not lie to us now! Publicly opposing them should be made illegal (in the name of freedom).

You goddamned, terrorist, hippie, liberal, feminist, soy-eating, global-warming-believing, book-reading, godless antiamerican!

sigh

Seriously, though. Good luck.

– ElbowStrike

[quote]ElbowStrike wrote:
ProjectX wrote:
hmmmmm… don’t recall saying any of that… perhaps you could find some benefit in a reading comprehension course.

I don’t think you quite get it.

The news networks (owned by weapons contractors, which has NOTHING whatsoever to do with the stories they broadcast and nothing whatsoever with the Military-Industrial Complex predicted by Eisenhower…) says that Iranians are bad.

Therefore Iranians are bad.

Every last one of them beats their wife, molests their daughters, stones their mothers to death in the streets, has sex with donkeys, and eats babies!

EVERY LAST ONE!

What is it with you goddamned hippie Liberals and your trying to “look deeper” into these issues?

The United States Government and Mass Media know what’s best for the citizenry. How dare you question them?!

The have never lied to us in the past and they most certainly would not lie to us now! Publicly opposing them should be made illegal (in the name of freedom).

You goddamned, terrorist, hippie, liberal, feminist, soy-eating, global-warming-believing, book-reading, godless antiamerican!

sigh

Seriously, though. Good luck.

– ElbowStrike[/quote]

Nice little theory. How do you explain the US medias opposition to the war in Iraq?

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Nice little theory. How do you explain the US medias opposition to the war in Iraq?[/quote]

Little theory?

NBC: owned by General Electric
CBS: owned by Westinghouse

As for the opposition to the war (which was relatively nonexistent before the war began) it’s too late to pull out and all of the big contracts have already been signed. There’s no reason to convince people anymore.

With growing public opposition to the war, it becomes more profitable to broadcast news programs that put a negative slant on it.

– ElbowStrike

[quote]ElbowStrike wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Nice little theory. How do you explain the US medias opposition to the war in Iraq?

Little theory?

NBC: owned by General Electric
CBS: owned by Westinghouse

As for the opposition to the war (which was relatively nonexistent before the war began) it’s too late to pull out and all of the big contracts have already been signed. There’s no reason to convince people anymore.

With growing public opposition to the war, it becomes more profitable to broadcast news programs that put a negative slant on it.

– ElbowStrike[/quote]

I still don’t understand. They shoud support it to promote more action and sales, not undercut it.

I love a good internet fight!

…as far as the original post goes…

its still in the testing phase from a country that prior to this has no major medical advancements (i.e. its not ‘known’ for thier medical field)

…but its still a good shot in the dark…i’m sure in the back of our head we all hope that it works out for humanity.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
ElbowStrike wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Nice little theory. How do you explain the US medias opposition to the war in Iraq?

Little theory?

NBC: owned by General Electric
CBS: owned by Westinghouse

As for the opposition to the war (which was relatively nonexistent before the war began) it’s too late to pull out and all of the big contracts have already been signed. There’s no reason to convince people anymore.

With growing public opposition to the war, it becomes more profitable to broadcast news programs that put a negative slant on it.

– ElbowStrike

I still don’t understand. They shoud support it to promote more action and sales, not undercut it.[/quote]

Maybe GE and Westinghouse should increase the network execs budgets…of course to do this they’d need more government contracts… which they could get if the damn networks would start backing the government… a fuck it, I’m confused! Scrap this war and start a new one, maybe Cuba again, the time zones won’t be as much of a bitch for primetime coverage!

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
I still don’t understand. They shoud support it to promote more action and sales, not undercut it.[/quote]

The sales are done son!

[quote]beebuddy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
I still don’t understand. They shoud support it to promote more action and sales, not undercut it.

The sales are done son! [/quote]

They need a continual revenue stream, not a one time sale.

[quote]Ruggerlife wrote:
a fuck it, I’m confused! Scrap this war and start a new one…[/quote]

Iran, maybe? :wink:

How can anyone make ground protesting War in Iraq if all the attention is on protesting new war in Iran?

The majority of our apathetic North American people have a memory-span of two weeks. Nobody remembers Afghanistan, just like nobody will remember Iraq after Iran is invaded.

Then the contracts can just keep rolling in.

  • ElbowStrike

[quote]B rocK wrote:
…but its still a good shot in the dark…i’m sure in the back of our head we all hope that it works out for humanity.[/quote]

Well said.

– ElbowStrike

[quote]Digital Chainsaw wrote:
Bonus points for anyone who guesses where I got that from? Here is a hint: Tom Cruise is nuts. He is a part of it. Hell, it could even be why he is so crazy.

What is it?

Romper Room?
[/quote]

Very close,

Its Scientology for those who have not read the thread.

[quote]blok wrote:
baretta wrote:
ProjectX wrote:
gummernaut wrote:
ProjectX wrote:
baretta wrote:
Half the country is still shitting in holes in the ground. Fix that and then you can move up the ladder.

you’re right, they should be shitting in your mouth instead you racist fuck.

Racist Fuck? Interesting use of words. They better come up for a cure for AIDS because they only use a woman for procreation, while the rest are ass fucking for Allah. But don’t say that out loud or they’ll cut off your fucking head with a dull knife. Facts aren’t racist. Dipshits like you just throw that PC word around for shock value.

yes and your reply was full of accurate facts.

way to contradict yourself jackass.

and yes i lived there many years so don’t tell me what the facts are.

dumbass.

Why did you leave? Were you sick of shitting in a hole in the ground? Or was it the religious and political freedom you enjoyed?

i think we should shit nukes on that worthless country[/quote]

You say that, but if somebody put an unlabeled map infront of your face I bet you wouldnt even be able to point out Iran on the map. Idiot.

[quote]DanErickson wrote:
blok wrote:
baretta wrote:
ProjectX wrote:
gummernaut wrote:
ProjectX wrote:
baretta wrote:
Half the country is still shitting in holes in the ground. Fix that and then you can move up the ladder.

you’re right, they should be shitting in your mouth instead you racist fuck.

Racist Fuck? Interesting use of words. They better come up for a cure for AIDS because they only use a woman for procreation, while the rest are ass fucking for Allah. But don’t say that out loud or they’ll cut off your fucking head with a dull knife. Facts aren’t racist. Dipshits like you just throw that PC word around for shock value.

yes and your reply was full of accurate facts.

way to contradict yourself jackass.

and yes i lived there many years so don’t tell me what the facts are.

dumbass.

Why did you leave? Were you sick of shitting in a hole in the ground? Or was it the religious and political freedom you enjoyed?

i think we should shit nukes on that worthless country

You say that, but if somebody put an unlabeled map infront of your face I bet you wouldnt even be able to point out Iran on the map. Idiot.
[/quote]

I shit a nuke earlier this week, but it was cause of super bowl chili. I suppose that if blok gave me a map I could oblige him.

[quote]brucevangeorge wrote:
Digital Chainsaw wrote:
Bonus points for anyone who guesses where I got that from? Here is a hint: Tom Cruise is nuts. He is a part of it. Hell, it could even be why he is so crazy.

What is it?

Romper Room?

Very close,

Its Scientology for those who have not read the thread.[/quote]

Seriously?

Waaaaiit a minute, didn’t L. Ron Hubbard start the whole “Romper-bomper-stomper-boo” thing?

[quote]Digital Chainsaw wrote:
Waaaaiit a minute, didn’t L. Ron Hubbard start the whole “Romper-bomper-stomper-boo” thing?
[/quote]

Yup. What do you think they do at “Church” meetings?