Iran Captures British Sailors

[quote]lixy wrote:
pat36 wrote:
Something I assume you support? As any enemy of the U.S. is a friend of yours.

I don’t support violence. I might find an Iranian retaliation in case of an attack on their sovereignty justifiable but that depends on the case the US presents against Iran.

If you can prove that Tehran is making nukes then, let them have it. If not, leave them be.

Sidenote: I have no sympathy whatsoever for the conservative freaks ruling Iran at the moment.[/quote]

You’d attack Iran for having nuclear weapons? I wouldn’t I’d attacked them for taking hostages though. Damn your violent.

[quote]hedo wrote:
How would China resist a US invasion of Iran? With what? I don’t think anyone is talking about an invasion by the way, they are talking about the destruction of it’s military. As can be scene from the first GW a big gap remains the US military and third world middle east armies. The Chinese have a lot more at stake with regards to US investment and commerce then with Iran and the Chinese are pragmatic and mecantile.[/quote]

I beg to differ on this. Only way to find out would be to launch an attack then…

I don’t think the US is worried about the safety of its own people either. Seriously though, the US is the 1st military power, it isn’t worried about anyone. With all the defiance Iran displayed, why didn’t you attack them then? My guess is that you know there will substantial resistance.

It wouldn’t surprise me to see you throw baseless statements either.

[quote]pat36 wrote:
The UK (that’s Brittan) conceded to opening up diplomatic channels with Iran. Channels that were severed but the Iran’s nuclear “program”. They also forced an apology out of Brittan (that’s England) for something it did not do.[/quote]

I didn’t get the “Brittan” bits. Inside joke?

Anyhow, Britain didn’t apologize for shit; The captured sailors did.

[quote]Also, I guess forcing those soldiers to repeat over and over again how sorry they were for entering the waters of Iran and forcing them to write statements on how they were used as puppets to carry out this unjust war in Iraq and requesting the UK leave Iraq is not humiliating them. I am sure they meant every word of it, no coercion there.
I am sure they are proud of those statements.[/quote]

Again, I have no idea what really went on and I’ll wait for their statements now that they’re released to judge how humiliated and mistreated they really felt.

[quote]pat36 wrote:
You’d attack Iran for having nuclear weapons? I wouldn’t I’d attacked them for taking hostages though. Damn your violent.[/quote]

Yep. Unless they withdraw from the NPT, they don’t have the right to make nukes.

The captured sailors isn’t enough ground for an attack as you can’t prove they weren’t trespassing into Iranian waters. What the fuck are the brits doing in Iraq anyway? I thought Iraqis were “granted” independence half a century ago.

[quote]lixy wrote:
hedo wrote:
How would China resist a US invasion of Iran? With what? I don’t think anyone is talking about an invasion by the way, they are talking about the destruction of it’s military. As can be scene from the first GW a big gap remains the US military and third world middle east armies. The Chinese have a lot more at stake with regards to US investment and commerce then with Iran and the Chinese are pragmatic and mecantile.

I beg to differ on this. Only way to find out would be to launch an attack then…

I don’t think the US is worried about an Iranian military response. Simply hoping for a capability doesn’t give you one.

I don’t think the US is worried about the safety of its own people either. Seriously though, the US is the 1st military power, it isn’t worried about anyone. With all the defiance Iran displayed, why didn’t you attack them then? My guess is that you know there will substantial resistance.

It would not suprise me or anyone else here if you are in the ME.

It wouldn’t surprise me to see you throw baseless statements either.[/quote]

News flash for you sparky…you are the king of baseless statements, but since you are nothing more then a bigot we hold you to a lower standard. Much lower. Plus it’s fun to mock you for your one dimensional bias and anti-American worldview.

You do seem to protest when you are accused of spreading your drivel, on the political forum of a US bodybuilding site, in accordance with the guidelines set out in a jihadist website. Fascinating. I hope you realize that ultimately your efforts are pointless.

Most sites screen out trolls that don’t have an interest in keeping with the core purpose of site in question. You seem to have identified T Nation as one that doesn’t. Those that show no interest in bodybuilding or training get dismissed quickly…like you.

Iran will be dealt with. They will not be permitted to have nuclear weapons and they wouldn’t dare to go after a US Naval vessel. You understanding of what China would do in such a confrontation is naive and not based on anything other then wishful thinking. It’s all about logisitics and the ability to project force. The Chinese military is land based and defensive in nature. Try again.

[quote]hedo wrote:
News flash for you sparky…[/quote]

Low and uncalled for personal attacks. But we all know that’s what you do best.

Of course they wouldn’t. Did you think they’re suicidal or like putting their people in harm’s way?

Actually you’re wrong. I wouldn’t wish China to get involved for the obvious reason that escalating into a 3rd WW would make sure it’s our last. I’m not saying they will intervene but merely alluded at the possibility that China might get pissed if you laid a finger on their brand new investments in Iran.

I don’t think the Chinese command themselves know what their response would be.

As opposed to the mobile and offensive exorbitant US military. Goes to show who’s interested in peace.

You can’t intimidate Iran. You definitely can’t intimidate China.

[quote]lixy wrote:
hedo wrote:
News flash for you sparky…

Low and uncalled for personal attacks. But we all know that’s what you do best.

They will not be permitted to have nuclear weapons and they wouldn’t dare to go after a US Naval vessel.

Of course they wouldn’t. Did you think they’re suicidal or like putting their people in harm’s way?

You understanding of what China would do in such a confrontation is naive and not based on anything other then wishful thinking.

Actually you’re wrong. I wouldn’t wish China to get involved for the obvious reason that escalating into a 3rd WW would make sure it’s our last. I’m not saying they will intervene but merely alluded at the possibility that China might get pissed if you laid a finger on their brand new investments in Iran.

I don’t think the Chinese command themselves know what their response would be.

The Chinese military is land based and defensive in nature.

As opposed to the mobile and offensive exorbitant US military. Goes to show who’s interested in peace.

You can’t intimidate Iran. You definitely can’t intimidate China. [/quote]

Iran is intimidated now. China knows better then to piss off it’s largest customer. Anyone knows that.

More wishful thinking on your part. Your arguments are tangental to the point being discussed. Try again.

Or:

As the great American philospher Ron White stated"You can’t fix stupid". Seems to fit when addressing lixy.

What time does you gym open…you know the thing with the weights.

Lixy,

“Attacking Iran will guarantee US metropoles being hit by suicide bombers and bacteriological agents.”

How would you know this? When I posted an article about it in another thread, you dismissed it as “zionist propaganda”, now you state it like it is fact.

If that is true, then Iran deserves to be hit.

You may very well be in Tehran, or Sadr City for that matter.

[quote]lixy wrote:
hedo wrote:
China will not lift a finger to defend Iran, or any other nation for that matter. The Chinese economy would disintegrate if it could not export to the US. You are clueless on this subject.

I wouldn’t bet on that. They have invested a lot in Iran and would very likely resist a US invasion.

[/quote]

China and the USA are partners; don’t you see that? They have almost a trillion of our government debt. We’re their largest market.

Much like Britain prepped the USA for the world stage, we are prepping the Chinese for the world stage. I don’t think we’ll be as overshadowed by them as Britain was by us, but clearly they are going to be put in charge of Asia. They may have to partner up with India, but what are Iran or Iraq to these behemoths? Face it, China (mostly) will run Asia and Iran will be crushed under its heel.

Islam will also eventually die out. Mumbo-jumbo from the 7th century, which urges its followers to kill everybody, won’t be tolerated by the Chinese.

[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Lixy,

“Attacking Iran will guarantee US metropoles being hit by suicide bombers and bacteriological agents.”

How would you know this? When I posted an article about it in another thread, you dismissed it as “zionist propaganda”, now you state it like it is fact.

If that is true, then Iran deserves to be hit.

You may very well be in Tehran, or Sadr City for that matter. [/quote]

I have to wonder about his claim to be in Sweden. My students from the Middle East complain about Cleveland weather all the time — and he claims to be Moroccan living in Sweden. People tend to go where they are comfortable.

[quote]hedo wrote:
Iran is intimidated now.[/quote]

It’s defiant as hell, is what it is. Heck, even Venezuela with its fraction of Iranian military power is doing the same.

Respect is earned, not coerced.

Can it be wishful thinking on your part? I can’t say for sure.

[quote]What time does you gym open…you know the thing with the weights.
[/quote]

Easter break. The bastards are closed.

[quote]Gkhan wrote:
How would you know this? When I posted an article about it in another thread, you dismissed it as “zionist propaganda”, now you state it like it is fact.[/quote]

Think again. I never saw you post anything like that ever. Plus, I heard Mahmoud say it himself. I didn’t state it as fact, but as something I firmly believe will happen.

I’m not following your logic. You’re saying that since the US attacks tehran and Iran retaliate by striking mainland targets, then it makes the attack even more justifiable. I’m not sure such argument sells anywhere.

Sigh.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
China and the USA are partners; don’t you see that? They have almost a trillion of our government debt. We’re their largest market.[/quote]

They sure trade a lot with the US, but saying you’re their largest market is not entirely accurate. If you can back that claim up with stats, feel free to shut me up.

With Saudi Arabia’s regime being a satellite of Washington, Iran and Iraq might just be the last chance for the Chinese to ensure their thirst for oil is fulfilled.

Do you seriously believe Islam condones killing people or are you just trying to piss me off?

[quote]lixy wrote:

Here’s a newsflash for you: All states practice terrorism. The most notorious one to date being the US.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_terrorism_by_United_States_of_America[/quote]

If you really believe the US is a terrorist state, you ought to leave and not come back. This is an American site, run by Americans and American made servers. Your patronage is supporting terrorism after all.

Sound like those Brittish soldiers had a ball. No mistreatment there, nope. Not at all.

[quote]pat36 wrote:
If you really believe the US is a terrorist state, you ought to leave and not come back. This is an American site, run by Americans and American made servers.[/quote]

Make me!

Seriously, lots of Americans hold the same belief. Why don’t you start with them?Your

Whose terrorism? Yours I surely don’t. Al-Qaeda and the other freaks get no love from me either.

[quote]pat36 wrote:

Sound like those Brittish soldiers had a ball. No mistreatment there, nope. Not at all.[/quote]

I, for one, condemn Iranians for their brutality. I was honestly hoping they would get the captured into a Hilton suite.

Here’s my favorite bit though:

“The officer in charge Lt Carman said they were taken to a prison in Tehran where they were stripped and dressed in pyjamas.”

Has a surreal dimension to it…

I’m not questionning their honesty or say they were pressured by the UK to lie, but was it necessary for them to read their statements out of a piece of paper?

[quote]hedo wrote:

What time does you gym open…you know the thing with the weights.
[/quote]

Lixy trains but at a CAMP, not at a gym. Haven’t you seen those videos of the camps where they train, kicking down doors, shooting into the air, while they all yell: “This is for the virgins!!”

:smiley:

[quote]lixy wrote:

Do you seriously believe Islam condones killing people or are you just trying to piss me off?[/quote]

Hi Lixy,
You may have noticed that I have a fairly reasoned and “liberal” opinion of things in comparison to the knee-jerk “kill them all” kind of attitude that is often expressed here. I would like to respond to your statement above about Islam and violence. I did my undergraduate degree in anthropology and started my graduate work in same before circumstances forced me to stop.

I look carefully at things from both and emic and etic perspectives and factor in my own biases when studying a subject. I must say that the association of Islam with violence hasn’t occurred without reason. First actions speaking louder than words, we have plenty of evidence of violence perpetrated in the name of Islam.

This occurs on a scale exponentially greater than the random violent acts of “wackos” in other religions burning abortion clinics and doing other heinous deeds. The mandate to act violently is a de facto part of Islam today, as practiced by millions of individuals. When something pisses of Moslems we get to see not a reasoned argument in a press conference but hundreds or thousands of people rioting and throwing and burning things: pure rage and hate and violence. That is how they express themselves a lynch mob mentality.

There are numerous quotes from the Koran floating around that attest to the violent nature of Mohammed and his religion. You may rightly point out that the Old Testament of the other Abrahamic religions isn’t exactly kid reading either and you would be right. The difference, I would argue, is in the praxis. Western countries seem to have a more laid back approach to religion and have detached it from other parts of their world view/culture.

Many, if not most of those claiming a religion in the West aren’t going around day to day dwelling on the INFIDEL UNBELIEVER and getting all of humanity under the yoke of there own belief system/law by ANY means necessary. There are some, even on this site who are real rabid BELIEVERS but their presence is leavened by those of us with a more open mindset. That doesn’t happen to nearly such an extent in the Islamic countries because the very nature of not being a fervent BELIEVER can get you punished.

Now, it seems as if much of Islam is sort of locked into the 7th century mindset of raiding and reprisals. There are scholars, some of whom are former Moslems, who will attest to this. Some (or even most) of those Westerners following Islam in Western countries are moderate, sure, because of their culturization.

But we have plenty of data on the practices of those Islamic immigrants to Western nations who refuse to adapt to the new culture and insist on practicing repugnant things like preaching hate and violence against non-BELIEVERS using women as basically slaves or otherwise harming them (slashing girls in Swedish discos or violently beating and raping them because they must be sluts for being out in public without covering and male escorts, forced marriage to very young girls (Mohammed did it, so why not?).

We in the Western cultures have as our greatest strength and weakness a great concern with TOLERANCE that contrasts greatly with non-westernized Islam. I can think through the perspective of others very well (emic perspective) as well as seeing the strangeness of a culture from an outsiders etic viewpoint and that is all well and good for writing a paper, leading a discussion or negotiation between cultures, but we all have to live together on the finite space of this planet and those who insist that we submit to their religion or die are clearly in the wrong.

If Islam wishes to gain the respect of the rest of the world (and not just take everything as spoils of conquest as Mohammed would) then they must mature, adapt and learn to behave in a less violent and unrestrained manner.

[quote]lixy wrote:
pat36 wrote:
If you really believe the US is a terrorist state, you ought to leave and not come back. This is an American site, run by Americans and American made servers.

Make me!

Seriously, lots of Americans hold the same belief. Why don’t you start with them?Your

Your patronage is supporting terrorism after all.

Whose terrorism? Yours I surely don’t. Al-Qaeda and the other freaks get no love from me either.[/quote]

You should read this week’s Atomic Dog column. It’s on the home page at the top. Right before the articles on training…just so you know.

Pat doesn’t have to make you. You should police yourself or others will do it for you.