It’s irrelevant. In incident/incidents on the border doesn’t explain why a helicopter just invaded US airspace and fired on border guards.
Since 2000 ALL job growth went to immigrants. Kind of destroys the argument that we have a labor shortage.
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
This surge of illegals are coming across my ranch, in small part.
They cut my fence and kill cows to eat. Rustling is a damn good way to get yourself shot in the west, and I think we will see a marked increase in private enforcement, which I fully support.
This is caused by RINOS who are beholden to giant corps that want pseudo-slave labor and Democrats who want 11 million peasants they can keep ignorant and voting for government largess, most of which is stolen by Democrat elites and their cronies.
The support for this surge of illegals tells you how corrupt the “black leadership” is in the Democrat party, in that the illegals are here to replace blacks and push them even farther into poverty and to the margins of society. No wonder Democrats support abortion – it’s the elite Democrat solution for the “Black Problem.”
Anyway, it’s time for “TEA Party Democrats” to rise up and seize their party back from the crooks, just like the grass roots is slowly doing in the Republican Party.
We can meet, gather torches, pitchforks, and burn down Washington DC.
[/quote]
I’d be down except that the tea party isn’t grass roots. It was propped up and given life by the Koch brothers… Only thing they want is freedom to exploit, and they aim to do things like eliminate rates for farmers, and ultimately eliminate minimum wage in general.
If you equate that to freedom and grass roots, I equate that to roundup and roundup ready poison.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]Severiano wrote:
have rich copper resources that are controlled by the U.S. In that one way or another we are in control of those mines and resources.
[/quote]
Interesting take…link?[/quote]
Here, no real data, just overt information. http://www.mbendi.com/indy/ming/cppr/sa/p0005.htm
You should be able to conclude quiet a bit from this…
So, while Copper is being mined successfully, higher yields to support higher demands those nations are just getting poorer and poorer. Those are the natural resources that should be going to those people. It’s in part about how the market is controlled and where things are refined, but really the meat and potatoes of the value is the raw resource… Yet every time we go into countries to try to bring them up to snuff we end up putting them in debt with the exception of maybe S. Korea. Also the only country off the top of my head that our form of capitalism has worked for. Look to the other nations who we have imposed, or who have attempted to addopt our ways… Look at say Thailand…
Also if you research minerals in the Congo you might see an even bigger picture.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It’s irrelevant. In incident/incidents on the border doesn’t explain why a helicopter just invaded US airspace and fired on border guards.[/quote]
If you listen to my point , it is it could be deemed that America invaded Mexico’s air space by launching bullets . The boy was several hundred feet on the Mexican side . You have to wrap your head around that America must play by the same rules we require others to play by
[quote]Brett620 wrote:
Since 2000 ALL job growth went to immigrants. Kind of destroys the argument that we have a labor shortage.
http://cis.org/all-employment-growth-since-2000-went-to-immigrants[/quote]
I saw it when I moved from OH to AZ back in 1985. I left OH hanging Dry wall was $.08 a foot , AZ was $.045 a ft. there were rumored crews doing it for $.02
I don’t know what it pays today but I will bet it is not even what OH paid back in the 80’s
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It’s irrelevant. In incident/incidents on the border doesn’t explain why a helicopter just invaded US airspace and fired on border guards.[/quote]
If you listen to my point , it is it could be deemed that America invaded Mexico’s air space by launching bullets . The boy was several hundred feet on the Mexican side . You have to wrap your head around that America must play by the same rules we require others to play by
[/quote]
If you listen to my point, it could be deemed that Mexico invaded the US by launching rocks.
The rocks were thrown first. Let me throw a rock at your head, tell me if you feel your life being threatened.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It’s irrelevant. In incident/incidents on the border doesn’t explain why a helicopter just invaded US airspace and fired on border guards.[/quote]
If you listen to my point , it is it could be deemed that America invaded Mexico’s air space by launching bullets . The boy was several hundred feet on the Mexican side . You have to wrap your head around that America must play by the same rules we require others to play by
[/quote]
If you listen to my point, it could be deemed that Mexico invaded the US by launching rocks.
The rocks were thrown first. Let me throw a rock at your head, tell me if you feel your life being threatened.
[/quote]
the thing about rock throwing is that it has a limited range , you back out of range and at least wait till they are on your side of the border before shooting
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It’s irrelevant. In incident/incidents on the border doesn’t explain why a helicopter just invaded US airspace and fired on border guards.[/quote]
If you listen to my point , it is it could be deemed that America invaded Mexico’s air space by launching bullets . The boy was several hundred feet on the Mexican side . You have to wrap your head around that America must play by the same rules we require others to play by
[/quote]
If you listen to my point, it could be deemed that Mexico invaded the US by launching rocks.
The rocks were thrown first. Let me throw a rock at your head, tell me if you feel your life being threatened.
[/quote]
the thing about rock throwing is that it has a limited range , you back out of range and at least wait till they are on your side of the border before shooting
[/quote]
The thing about rock throwing is that it is an act of aggression that can cause serious harm or death, end of story. It is the individual who chooses to throw rocks for whatever reason they have.
It is not my fault for using a superior weapon to respond to a direct assault against me.
Stop being stupid, you are turning this argument into a Saturday morning cartoon.
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
140k is about 0.003% of our total population of just over 318 mil. That’s not a compelling story in and of itself.
james [/quote]
Really, that is 140k of unemployed people. That is 140k of people we have to pay for, and that is 140k of kids who are separated from their parents. We are not the country of run aways.
Plus, 140k of enemy combatants (not saying the kiddies are enemy combatants, but just pointing out the obvi.) entering America would be a huge deal, the fact that they are kiddies with no parental supervision and has led to ICE and Homeland Security becoming baby sitters is ridiculous.
[quote]NorCal916 wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
140k is about 0.003% of our total population of just over 318 mil. That’s not a compelling story in and of itself.
james [/quote]
That one billion dollars isn’t really much to a rich nation like ours, either, I guess.
But I sure know some American school kids who could benefit from it.
And it could very well be 2 billion next year.
1 billion? And they are wanting another $1B?
This can’t be accurate. A billion dollars? That’s 1/17th of the deficit!
[/quote]
You wish, 1/17000.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It’s irrelevant. In incident/incidents on the border doesn’t explain why a helicopter just invaded US airspace and fired on border guards.[/quote]
If you listen to my point , it is it could be deemed that America invaded Mexico’s air space by launching bullets . The boy was several hundred feet on the Mexican side . You have to wrap your head around that America must play by the same rules we require others to play by
[/quote]
If you listen to my point, it could be deemed that Mexico invaded the US by launching rocks.
The rocks were thrown first. Let me throw a rock at your head, tell me if you feel your life being threatened.
[/quote]
the thing about rock throwing is that it has a limited range , you back out of range and at least wait till they are on your side of the border before shooting
[/quote]
The thing about rock throwing is that it is an act of aggression that can cause serious harm or death, end of story. It is the individual who chooses to throw rocks for whatever reason they have.
It is not my fault for using a superior weapon to respond to a direct assault against me.
Stop being stupid, you are turning this argument into a Saturday morning cartoon. [/quote]
I am sorry , rock throwing does not compete with a 5.65
It would be like me looking at you wrong and me blowing your brains out .
Read that ^ again Pitt. Slowly. If you didn’t catch it, read it when you haven’t had a toke.
Giving a wrong look and throwing rocks at them is a failed comparison.
You are better than this, I’m going to assume you smoked some shag weed when responding to this.
The idea of self defence is not to “compete” with your attacker. But anyway, what does this incident have to do with a Mexican military helicopter invading US airspace and firing on border guards? Are you suggesting this was retaliation for the shooting of the rock thrower?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It’s irrelevant. In incident/incidents on the border doesn’t explain why a helicopter just invaded US airspace and fired on border guards.[/quote]
If you listen to my point , it is it could be deemed that America invaded Mexico’s air space by launching bullets . The boy was several hundred feet on the Mexican side . You have to wrap your head around that America must play by the same rules we require others to play by
[/quote]
If you listen to my point, it could be deemed that Mexico invaded the US by launching rocks.
The rocks were thrown first. Let me throw a rock at your head, tell me if you feel your life being threatened.
[/quote]
the thing about rock throwing is that it has a limited range , you back out of range and at least wait till they are on your side of the border before shooting
[/quote]
The thing about rock throwing is that it is an act of aggression that can cause serious harm or death, end of story. It is the individual who chooses to throw rocks for whatever reason they have.
It is not my fault for using a superior weapon to respond to a direct assault against me.
Stop being stupid, you are turning this argument into a Saturday morning cartoon. [/quote]
I am sorry , rock throwing does not compete with a 5.65
It would be like me looking at you wrong and me blowing your brains out .
[/quote]
Pit, you are being fucking stupid. LOOKING AT YOU WRONG does NOT equal THROWING A PROJECTILE at my head.
What if some Mexican kid came to your house, and started throwing rocks at you and your family? What would you do? Call the cops, right? When the cops show up and tell him to drop the rock, and he starts to throw one, what’s gonna happen? THEY WILL SHOOT HIM.
They would NOT shoot him if he looked at them wrong.
Smoke less, bro.
Since when is assaulting someone with a rock not a crime?
Maybe it’s not in Mexico?
[quote]Brett620 wrote:
Since when is assaulting someone with a rock not a crime?
Maybe it’s not in Mexico?[/quote]
Because according to Pitt, assaulting someone with a rock is equal to a dirty look.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I am sorry , rock throwing does not compete with a 5.65
[/quote]
It does if you’re Scottish.
And it’s 5.56.
I am not being stupid , I am making no judgement , I am stating the border is a contentious place and why