So to ask this on nation you didn’t look up maybe YouTube vids or easy info on internet before asking this question which it explains over maybe 100 videos on the protocol and easier and QUICKER ways to do this ? lol
Lol ok so what ur throwing at me is a Study for SC VS IM for transgenders
Ok that’s what you have …my question is what about anything past 100mg a week?? Did you consider the absorption dynamics of that? I’m totally ok with the study and transgender people such as yourself…we are in 2026 and I hold no negative opinions towards the transgender community I think that you and other trans gender individuals who utilize there right to voice their opinions is totally valid and encouraged!! Get er done 
but let’s analyze the WHOLE document and just ensure we have the facts straight
“That study supports SC dosing around 50–100 mg per week. Which is a Very minor dose let’s be honest
It does not support someonenwhonmay be Doing g 300 mg per week, that’s outside physiologic replacement.
This is the part people conveniently ignore.
IM handles higher volumes better
Muscle has better blood flow for large oil depots
That’s why bodybuilders and clinical protocols both use IM at higher doses
“You’re applying TRT literature to supraphysiologic dosing. That’s not how studies work.”
Comfortable volume per site: ~0.2–0.5 mL
Larger volumes increase risk of:
Lumps
Oil pooling
Irritation
Inconsistent absorption
IM
Comfortable volume per site: 1–3 mL
Muscle tissue disperses oil better
Much more forgiving at higher doses
This alone is why 300 mg/week SC is questionable and 300 mg/week IM is common in non-TRT contexts.
SC is ideal for:
Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT)
Lower to moderate weekly doses
People who want stable levels
Frequent micro-dosing schedules
IM is ideal for:
Higher weekly doses
Larger injection volumes
Situations where peak levels matter
When SC tissue just can’t keep up
And for the mic drop……………..
“SC and IM are both valid routes. SC is better for lower, stable dosing. IM handles higher volumes and higher doses better. Studies don’t support 300 mg/week SC.”
“There’s no clinical evidence supporting subcutaneous testosterone dosing above ~150 mg/week. That’s not an opinion, that’s the current literature.”
TRAIN HARD, WIN EASY!!!
There are other studies that support this. Last time I checked, Transgenders are human beings so I think it’s a valid study.
I thought you were all kumbaya with this community and helping others out. Why so angry?
It’s a Pharma/TRT forum and OP didn’t specify whether he was cycling or replacing.
Let’s assume OP is cycling. He said he is injecting three times per week. If he is cycling, he is probably using UGL. UGL cyp can come dosed much higher than pharm grade. I have seen 400mg per ml mentioned before (obvs, not recommended). Maths indicate .5ml of 400mg is 200mg. Do that three times a week and you are at 600mg - a respectable cycle that should result in supraphysiological levels of testosterone.
In summary, OP asked about sub q without mentioning TRT or supra, I posted a scientific article from a reputable source, you tried to insult me by calling me transgender, you failed at maths, I live in IDGAFistan.
Hope you feel better.