Illuminati: Fact or Fiction?

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
81

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Yeah, the illuminati have been a real bitch – constantly interfering with evil Joo plots to take over the world.
[/quote]

Everyone know that the illuminati is just a myth created by teh Joos to take the heat of themselves.

Fun fact - Did you know that teh Joos actually sank the titanic?
[/quote]

Oh, shit we’re used to it, I suppose. “Chosen people” does not mean “better.” It means “chosen” – chosen to be fucked so badly by this world we have no where to turn but G-d.

In Eqypt yesterday al-quada (or Hamas or some muslim terroist group) blew up a Coptic Christian Church at the end of a mini-series on TV about evil Chrisitans were. Somehow, muslims killing Christians is the fault of Jews, according to the state run newspaper.

Shark attacks German tourist in Eqypt? Trained Mossad sharks did it. Seriously, so said the ministry of tourism.

A vulture with a tracking tag on it (to study migration) – found in Saudi somewhere, on its normal migratory route? That’s a Jewish spy, so they killed the bird.

So, yeah, we sank the Titanic.

We also flooded Australia, made the dams break in NO, and can cause earthquakes.

George Bush? Burning Bush? Moses? Jewish plot!

82

[quote]jre67t wrote:
…
And also he is a bottom.[/quote]

Thanks for the knowledge.

83

Ok, I have to defend myself one more time…I’ve never met this dude and he is making shit up. He knows I’m from Dallas because of my profile, but that’s it.

Back to our regularly scheduled program :slight_smile:

84

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

Shark attacks German tourist in Eqypt? Trained Mossad sharks did it. Seriously, so said the ministry of tourism.

[/quote]

I read that one when you put up the link. I had to laugh because it was just so damn strange. Comedy writers couldn’t come up with anything nearly as off the wall ridiculous. If it weren’t for the real world resentment that creates a thought like that, it would be hilarious.

Now I know where teh joos get their sense of humor. They stole it from Egypt!

That aside, and loosely related to the topic-

For a couple of years I worked making frames for churches and synagogues. The large majority of the designs were based on sacred iconography and geometry developed by the original free masons (the trade guild, not the secret order) and their predecessors. They were very protective about the techniques used to develop the shapes and the technology of their construction, as it was their stock in trade. It was also a great way for rulers to make a statement as to the grandiosity, power, and intelligence that a society may want to project.

I do believe that this is where the implication of power, mystery and intrigue of secret societies and symbology type of stuff got its start. If you look at the Start of David for its constituent parts, as 2 circumscribed, symmetrically opposed equilateral triangles, it becomes clear that the Jews had a tremendous understanding of geometric constructs and building, and were probably (and understandably) protective of it.

I noticed this as me and another guy in the shop made a frame for a synagogue. It was about 7 ft. in diameter, and up close and personal on it revealed an elegance of design and proportion that I had not previously recognized, and many people probably still don’t. As an icon, it is easily recognizable as the symbol of Israel, but I think a lot of people miss it as a bold statement of contemporary technology.

Back then folks knew that knowledge is power. Two thousand years ago, if you could lay out a proportional arch or other symmetrical design with a compass and string, you were either gifted by God or a sorcerer. Now, we just take for granted that you can look stuff up on the internet or bang something out with a cadd program.

85

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:
I like how you even let a single post define the direction of this thread.[/quote]

Replace the word Jesus with Muhummad & the same people bitching about the post would have got a hard on from it.

BTW, what he said is actually a very apt comparison.[/quote]

I don’t get it, Muhummad was a real person.[/quote]

What’s not to get?

I think you must have misread the post I’m talking about.

Forlife said “They probably exist in a strictly historical sense, minus all the fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts. Kinda like Jesus.”[/quote]

You mean Mohummad really didn’t concur all those places?

86

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Yeah, the illuminati have been a real bitch – constantly interfering with evil Joo plots to take over the world.
[/quote]

Everyone know that the illuminati is just a myth created by teh Joos to take the heat of themselves.

Fun fact - Did you know that teh Joos actually sank the titanic?
[/quote]

Oh, shit we’re used to it, I suppose. “Chosen people” does not mean “better.” It means “chosen” – chosen to be fucked so badly by this world we have no where to turn but G-d.

In Eqypt yesterday al-quada (or Hamas or some muslim terroist group) blew up a Coptic Christian Church at the end of a mini-series on TV about evil Chrisitans were. Somehow, muslims killing Christians is the fault of Jews, according to the state run newspaper.

Shark attacks German tourist in Eqypt? Trained Mossad sharks did it. Seriously, so said the ministry of tourism.

A vulture with a tracking tag on it (to study migration) – found in Saudi somewhere, on its normal migratory route? That’s a Jewish spy, so they killed the bird.

So, yeah, we sank the Titanic.

We also flooded Australia, made the dams break in NO, and can cause earthquakes.

George Bush? Burning Bush? Moses? Jewish plot![/quote]

Wait…I am curious how did the Joos cause the Copt Church and those inside to blow up?

87

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:
Replace the word Jesus with Muhummad & the same people bitching about the post would have got a hard on from it.[/quote]

Utter BS.

The bigger difference is that no one here would throw in an unrelated bash on Muhammad. And further, if someone did, no one would defend them.[/quote]

I disagree.

I haven’t been following the board that closely lately, but when I was posing a bit more often a couple of years ago, every second thread seemed to have an anti Islam theme. Generally it was always Lixy versus about ten “conservatives”. The comments were typically on a completely different level to what has been said in this thread. [/quote]

Swing and a miss. Talking about Christianity or Islam in threads about that subject is not equivalent “to throwing in an unrelated bash” on Jesus or Muhammad. reading fail.[/quote]

Lol, ok. If the thread wasn’t about Islam, any comment making fun of Muhammed would have been vehemently condemned by everyone. What an absurd statement it was that I made!

Im over arguing about nothing. The “hard on” comment was obviously just a joke, although there probably was some truth to it.

88

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:
I like how you even let a single post define the direction of this thread.[/quote]

Replace the word Jesus with Muhummad & the same people bitching about the post would have got a hard on from it.

BTW, what he said is actually a very apt comparison.[/quote]

I don’t get it, Muhummad was a real person.[/quote]

What’s not to get?

I think you must have misread the post I’m talking about.

Forlife said “They probably exist in a strictly historical sense, minus all the fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts. Kinda like Jesus.”[/quote]

You mean Mohummad really didn’t concur all those places?[/quote]

The whole part about being a prophet who receives messages from “god” would probably qualify as “fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts”.

89

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:
I like how you even let a single post define the direction of this thread.[/quote]

Replace the word Jesus with Muhummad & the same people bitching about the post would have got a hard on from it.

BTW, what he said is actually a very apt comparison.[/quote]

I don’t get it, Muhummad was a real person.[/quote]

What’s not to get?

I think you must have misread the post I’m talking about.

Forlife said “They probably exist in a strictly historical sense, minus all the fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts. Kinda like Jesus.”[/quote]

You mean Mohummad really didn’t concur all those places?[/quote]

The whole part about being a prophet who receives messages from “god” would probably qualify as “fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts”.[/quote]

Okay…well I’ll let you know that Prophet Mo during his time was known as Prophet Mo, now if he was an actual Prophet that was instructed by the God of Abraham is a different question and should be reserved theology more than history.

90

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:
I like how you even let a single post define the direction of this thread.[/quote]

Replace the word Jesus with Muhummad & the same people bitching about the post would have got a hard on from it.

BTW, what he said is actually a very apt comparison.[/quote]

I don’t get it, Muhummad was a real person.[/quote]

What’s not to get?

I think you must have misread the post I’m talking about.

Forlife said “They probably exist in a strictly historical sense, minus all the fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts. Kinda like Jesus.”[/quote]

You mean Mohummad really didn’t concur all those places?[/quote]

The whole part about being a prophet who receives messages from “god” would probably qualify as “fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts”.[/quote]

Okay…well I’ll let you know that Prophet Mo during his time was known as Prophet Mo, now if he was an actual Prophet that was instructed by the God of Abraham is a different question and should be reserved theology more than history.[/quote]

Yeah, I’m aware that some people beleived he was an actual prophet.

Call me crazy, but I don’t believe that he actually saw an angel with seventy thousand heads, each having seventy thousand mouths, each mouth having seventy thousand tongues, each tongue speaking seventy thousand languages, each tongue singing Allah’s praises.

It does sound like a pretty likely story though.

91

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:
I like how you even let a single post define the direction of this thread.[/quote]

Replace the word Jesus with Muhummad & the same people bitching about the post would have got a hard on from it.

BTW, what he said is actually a very apt comparison.[/quote]

I don’t get it, Muhummad was a real person.[/quote]

What’s not to get?

I think you must have misread the post I’m talking about.

Forlife said “They probably exist in a strictly historical sense, minus all the fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts. Kinda like Jesus.”[/quote]

You mean Mohummad really didn’t concur all those places?[/quote]

The whole part about being a prophet who receives messages from “god” would probably qualify as “fiction that has been created to supplement the actual facts”.[/quote]

Okay…well I’ll let you know that Prophet Mo during his time was known as Prophet Mo, now if he was an actual Prophet that was instructed by the God of Abraham is a different question and should be reserved theology more than history.[/quote]

Yeah, I’m aware that some people beleived he was an actual prophet.

Call me crazy, but I don’t believe that he actually saw an angel with seventy thousand heads, each having seventy thousand mouths, each mouth having seventy thousand tongues, each tongue speaking seventy thousand languages, each tongue singing Allah’s praises.

It does sound like a pretty likely story though. [/quote]

I’m not saying all that stuffs true, but historically speaking from the time of Prophet Mo, people believed he was Prophet Mo. Now the other stuff, theological. Same as I see Jesus, did people believe he was the Son of Man? Yeah, they thought he was the Son of Man, that is historical. Was he actually what he said he was…theological.

See what I am saying? Did the people believe Prophet Mo was what he said he was, or was that made up later…I ain’t sure, because I don’t know everything about Mo, but was Jesus believed to be what he said he said he was…yeah…other stuff can’t argue about if he was or was not actually Son of Man, Son of God, the Second person of the Triune God. Can’t that sticks in the realm of Theology, because physical sciences can’t argue the non-physical world.

92

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:
The “hard on” comment was obviously just a joke, although there probably was some truth to it.

[/quote]

Well, in the right light, Muhammad is kinda sexy, it’s hard to deny.

93

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Yeah, the illuminati have been a real bitch – constantly interfering with evil Joo plots to take over the world.
[/quote]

Everyone know that the illuminati is just a myth created by teh Joos to take the heat of themselves.

Fun fact - Did you know that teh Joos actually sank the titanic?
[/quote]

Oh, shit we’re used to it, I suppose. “Chosen people” does not mean “better.” It means “chosen” – chosen to be fucked so badly by this world we have no where to turn but G-d.

In Eqypt yesterday al-quada (or Hamas or some muslim terroist group) blew up a Coptic Christian Church at the end of a mini-series on TV about evil Chrisitans were. Somehow, muslims killing Christians is the fault of Jews, according to the state run newspaper.

Shark attacks German tourist in Eqypt? Trained Mossad sharks did it. Seriously, so said the ministry of tourism.

A vulture with a tracking tag on it (to study migration) – found in Saudi somewhere, on its normal migratory route? That’s a Jewish spy, so they killed the bird.

So, yeah, we sank the Titanic.

We also flooded Australia, made the dams break in NO, and can cause earthquakes.

George Bush? Burning Bush? Moses? Jewish plot![/quote]

Wait…I am curious how did the Joos cause the Copt Church and those inside to blow up?[/quote]

Yeah, I couldn’t figure it out, either. You had: (1) Egypt TV doing one of its “Christians-are-bad” weeks (bit like Shark Week on Discovery, but with evil Christians) and (2) at the height of the week, some muslims, conntected with known terrorists, went in and blew up a bunch of Christians.

The only logical explaination in Eqypt was, of course, that the Jooooos are at fault.

Dry? Joooos fault.

Wet? Joooos fault.

All I know is, if my Tribe was actually as powerful as the world thinks, the Mets would win the World Series every year.

Also, we’d program Mel Gibson to implode, become a raging drunk, divorce his lovely wife and get some skank Russian whore who will take all his money pregnant, and record bizarre violent rants on tape, all on his road to complete self-destruction.

Hmmmmmm.

94

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Yeah, the illuminati have been a real bitch – constantly interfering with evil Joo plots to take over the world.
[/quote]

Everyone know that the illuminati is just a myth created by teh Joos to take the heat of themselves.

Fun fact - Did you know that teh Joos actually sank the titanic?
[/quote]

Oh, shit we’re used to it, I suppose. “Chosen people” does not mean “better.” It means “chosen” – chosen to be fucked so badly by this world we have no where to turn but G-d.

In Eqypt yesterday al-quada (or Hamas or some muslim terroist group) blew up a Coptic Christian Church at the end of a mini-series on TV about evil Chrisitans were. Somehow, muslims killing Christians is the fault of Jews, according to the state run newspaper.

Shark attacks German tourist in Eqypt? Trained Mossad sharks did it. Seriously, so said the ministry of tourism.

A vulture with a tracking tag on it (to study migration) – found in Saudi somewhere, on its normal migratory route? That’s a Jewish spy, so they killed the bird.

So, yeah, we sank the Titanic.

We also flooded Australia, made the dams break in NO, and can cause earthquakes.

George Bush? Burning Bush? Moses? Jewish plot![/quote]

Wait…I am curious how did the Joos cause the Copt Church and those inside to blow up?[/quote]

Yeah, I couldn’t figure it out, either. You had: (1) Egypt TV doing one of its “Christians-are-bad” weeks (bit like Shark Week on Discovery, but with evil Christians) and (2) at the height of the week, some muslims, conntected with known terrorists, went in and blew up a bunch of Christians.

The only logical explaination in Eqypt was, of course, that the Jooooos are at fault.

Dry? Joooos fault.

Wet? Joooos fault.

All I know is, if my Tribe was actually as powerful as the world thinks, the Mets would win the World Series every year.

Also, we’d program Mel Gibson to implode, become a raging drunk, divorce his lovely wife and get some skank Russian whore who will take all his money pregnant, and record bizarre violent rants on tape, all on his road to complete self-destruction.

Hmmmmmm.[/quote]

So…we agree, Mel Gibson is an asshole.

95

Take a look at this book written by John Robison in 1797:

“Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, carried on in the Secret Meetings of Free-Masons, Illuminati and Reading Societies, etc., collected from good authorities.”

96

I love how you guys derailed the thread with righteous indignation condemning forlife for derailing the thread.

Whats the matter guys? forlife wasnt politically correct and didn’t respect your religion?

PWI is very childish.

97

I like your style of commenting on how other people commented on a given persons comment.

98

Yo dawg, I heard you like comments. So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment.

99

[quote]forbes wrote:
Yo dawg, I heard you like comments. So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment.[/quote]

Yo dawg, I heard you like to Yo dawg, I heard you like comments. So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment. So we put a Yo dawg, I heard you like comments. So we put a “So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment” while you, “So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment.”

100

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]forbes wrote:
Yo dawg, I heard you like comments. So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment.[/quote]

Yo dawg, I heard you like to Yo dawg, I heard you like comments. So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment. So we put a Yo dawg, I heard you like comments. So we put a “So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment” while you, “So we put a comment in yo comment so you can comment on a comment while you comment on a comment.”[/quote]

WTF!!!