That?s a tough one. There are pros and cons on both sides. I do wish that they would get rid of porn sites that mimic non-porn sites. By miss spelling a word or by using .com instead of .gov a kid that doesn?t mean to could see more that just a boob. This is kind of off topic by check out xxxchurch.com.
Me Solomon Grundy
rainjack: Many established porn companies would lose out on such a deal. When new TLDs are introduced, existing companies have to compete with competitors to grab hold of lucrative, non-trademarked domain-names.
[quote]nephorm wrote:
rainjack: Many established porn companies would lose out on such a deal. When new TLDs are introduced, existing companies have to compete with competitors to grab hold of lucrative, non-trademarked domain-names.
[/quote]
Short term - maybe. But porn is like prostitution. It’ll always be here, and always making money.
with rainjacks support the gay porn industry will never fail. he has single handedly ensured they will profit.
now which hand was it?
[quote]mazilla wrote:
with rainjacks support the gay porn industry will never fail. he has single handedly ensured they will profit.
now which hand was it?
[/quote]
Why all the interest in my sexuality, mazilla? Do I threaten your ‘manhood’?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
mazilla wrote:
with rainjacks support the gay porn industry will never fail. he has single handedly ensured they will profit.
now which hand was it?
Why all the interest in my sexuality, mazilla? Do I threaten your ‘manhood’?
[/quote]
only if you try to touch it, again. this is pretty weak jack, i though you would do better than this. i can see there is no point in having a battle of quips, with an unarmed man. now go in peace my son, you have been owned.
[quote]mazilla wrote:
rainjack wrote:
mazilla wrote:
with rainjacks support the gay porn industry will never fail. he has single handedly ensured they will profit.
now which hand was it?
Why all the interest in my sexuality, mazilla? Do I threaten your ‘manhood’?
only if you try to touch it, again. this is pretty weak jack, i though you would do better than this. i can see there is no point in having a battle of quips, with an unarmed man. now go in peace my son, you have been owned.
[/quote]
Owned? By who? Battle of quips? Please. You need to go back to fighting the windmills, little donnie - I graduated from the “you must be gay” level years ago.
Just a hint for your future reference: insinutaing a person is gay is really not owning anything. It just shows that you have no grasp of the subject matter and have to resort to ad hominem attacks.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
It just shows that you have no grasp of the subject matter and have to resort to ad hominem attacks. [/quote]
You mean, like you and doogie calling me an elitist (among other names)?
I agree…
[quote]hspder wrote:
rainjack wrote:
It just shows that you have no grasp of the subject matter and have to resort to ad hominem attacks.
You mean, like you and doogie calling me an elitist (among other names)?
I agree…[/quote]
No - your elitism is proven. And it is the reason I posted. You prove it in the way you write.
I am sure you and your billions of superior brain cells can see the difference in me calling you out for your elitism and some kid getting on here and questioning my sexuality.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
No - your elitism is proven. And it is the reason I posted. You prove it in the way you write. [/quote]
I “prove it in the way I write”? Yeah, that’s real scientific evidence…
If anyone over here is elitist, it is you and other people who continually support the superiority of an elite (business owners) over a majority (workers). THAT is the very definition of elitism, and you are the ones embodying it and defending it, not me.
[quote]hspder wrote:
rainjack wrote:
No - your elitism is proven. And it is the reason I posted. You prove it in the way you write.
I “prove it in the way I write”? Yeah, that’s real scientific evidence…
If anyone over here is elitist, it is you and other people who continually support the superiority of an elite (business owners) over a majority (workers). THAT is the very definition of elitism, and you are the ones embodying it and defending it, not me.
[/quote]
Oh - now you are calling me out as an elitist? C’mon - exercise that massive cerebral mass you brag about incessantly and be fucking original. What next? Gay insinuations? Please.
You are a limo lib. It doesn’t get any more elitist than that.
[quote]hspder wrote:
If anyone over here is elitist, it is you [/quote]
An elitist redneck? I had never considered that, but I suppose that once someone like rainman moves out of the trailer park he can then look down his nose at the “trailer trash”. He’ll have to be careful not to offend the in-laws, though.
[quote]tme wrote:
hspder wrote:
If anyone over here is elitist, it is you
An elitist redneck? I had never considered that, but I suppose that once someone like rainman moves out of the trailer park he can then look down his nose at the “trailer trash”. He’ll have to be careful not to offend the in-laws, though.
[/quote]
Damn - I have missed you tme. No really…I have. What’s it been? A year or so? You finally got the telephoine bill paid, then? Thank the left for the gov’t programs - huh?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
mazilla wrote:
rainjack wrote:
mazilla wrote:
with rainjacks support the gay porn industry will never fail. he has single handedly ensured they will profit.
now which hand was it?
Why all the interest in my sexuality, mazilla? Do I threaten your ‘manhood’?
only if you try to touch it, again. this is pretty weak jack, i though you would do better than this. i can see there is no point in having a battle of quips, with an unarmed man. now go in peace my son, you have been owned.
Owned? By who? Battle of quips? Please. You need to go back to fighting the windmills, little donnie - I graduated from the “you must be gay” level years ago.
Just a hint for your future reference: insinutaing a person is gay is really not owning anything. It just shows that you have no grasp of the subject matter and have to resort to ad hominem attacks. [/quote]
the subject matter? the subject IS your homosexuality. so i fail to see how i have strayed from the point. this is the best you have??? wow, that was easy.
[quote]mazilla wrote:
the subject matter? the subject IS your homosexuality. so i fail to see how i have strayed from the point. this is the best you have??? wow, that was easy.
[/quote]
Why is it an issue? Do homosexuals scare you? Are you admitting to your homophobia?
I thought liberals were supposed to be the champions of the gay movement, and here you are trying to publicly humiliate me because you are affraid I am gay.
