How Relevant is Marx Today?

[quote]BonnotGang wrote:

Also before someone goes no private property, so people will just steal toothbrushes FTW , private property relates to the acquisition and domination of wealth, does not mean people wont own their own house or car or photos or clothes.[/quote]

But what about dual use goods?

If I own a cab I could moonlight as a cab driver.

If I own a guitar I might play for money or favors.

If I was a reasonable attractive woman I could even rent out my vagina for the same.

There being no police force, who is going to stop me?

Bump.

Because I really want to know what BonnotGang has to say.

marx is very relevant…

imo there needs to be a wealth transfer from the rich to the middle class to spur consumption because incomes will remain stagnant and consumer credit is nearly maxed…The rich have more capital than ever right now, and they are sitting on it…I understand that the rich are suffering from a lack of confidence right now due to structural issues in the global economy, but it would better for them and us if they put it to work…because they will eventually lose it one way or the other…

whether the fed inflates their money away or they get hit by larger more progressive taxes…the wealth transfer must occur as their capital can be greatly magnified if it were to be put to use

Last yr, I wrote about how capital in our society was being misallocated on entitlements, and I thought that was the biggest issue in our economy …But I now believe the greatest misallocation is the sheer amount of wealth that is held by the rich in our country which is just being shifting around among each other rather than being distributed to productive assets like human labor…it is such a waste of capital to shift risk in the form of derivatives…we have people shifting trillions of dollars of risk around for no reason…It does not make any sense at all because the risk never disappears and does nothing for our society…

and as far as the budget constraint…I’m not concerned…

If you think about it…our nation’s debt is nothing compared to the value of the United States of America(greatest country in the existence of this world)…If we opened this country up to more foreigners, and we utilized our existing labor…it is very possible that we could handle the entitlements…It is inaction that is the greatest threat to our nation…not debt…

[quote]LoRez wrote:

Bump.

Because I really want to know what BonnotGang has to say.[/quote]

Bonnotgang has many, many unanswered questions.

[quote]D Public wrote:
marx is very relevant…

imo there needs to be a wealth transfer from the rich to the middle class to spur consumption because incomes will remain stagnant and consumer credit is nearly maxed…The rich have more capital than ever right now, and they are sitting on it…I understand that the rich are suffering from a lack of confidence right now due to structural issues in the global economy, but it would better for them and us if they put it to work…because they will eventually lose it one way or the other…

whether the fed inflates their money away or they get hit by larger more progressive taxes…the wealth transfer must occur as their capital can be greatly magnified if it were to be put to use

Last yr, I wrote about how capital in our society was being misallocated on entitlements, and I thought that was the biggest issue in our economy …But I now believe the greatest misallocation is the sheer amount of wealth that is held by the rich in our country which is just being shifting around among each other rather than being distributed to productive assets like human labor…it is such a waste of capital to shift risk in the form of derivatives…we have people shifting trillions of dollars of risk around for no reason…It does not make any sense at all because the risk never disappears and does nothing for our society…

and as far as the budget constraint…I’m not concerned…

If you think about it…our nation’s debt is nothing compared to the value of the United States of America(greatest country in the existence of this world)…If we opened this country up to more foreigners, and we utilized our existing labor…it is very possible that we could handle the entitlements…It is inaction that is the greatest threat to our nation…not debt…
[/quote]

Taking capital out of the hands of people who can decide on its most productive use does not help an economy.

It is the US government’s propping up the financial sector that is allowing all this “shifting of paper” in the economy that does not create new wealth.

It is not the fault of capitalists that they must take advantage of the system.

Normally, I would agree with you, but they are not using their capital…The main problem is that business owners don’t know which way things are going to go, so we are stuck in this stagnation…If you were to talk to a CEO of a large company, they will tell you “something just doesn’t feel right…”, so they don’t feel confident about taking on new projects or hiring more workers…This has a tremendous drag on our economy as demand is created from supply and supply is driven largely by employment…So, They are holding large reserves of cash waiting for someone to fix the problem, but the problem really doesn’t exist…as it is a confidence problem…

So, basically there must be a concerted effort by several people in the economy to start things up again…No company has enough influence to do this…So, they need the federal government to do it for them…The government doesn’t even need to use a lot of money to do this…It has more to do with leadership and communication than spending…It has to do with showing people we can get things through the door and fix problems in our society…The exact opposite of what is occuring in washington right now…

And as far as the bail out…We needed to save the banks…The fed gov has been paid back in full by every bank except allied…i would prefer if they had broken up the banks into segregated components(investment banks vs commercial banks)…but to let them fail would cost us more than if we even took a small loss on saving them which we didn’t(we had a gain)…

Now in regards to shifting paper, What I’m talking about is the $600 trillion derivative market where people just shift credit and interest rate risk around…The problem is that there is nobody on earth that knows which way interest rates are going to go at any given point in time…not even bernanke…There is always a counter party who takes the other side of the trade, and thus someone always loses…And interest rate swaps are tame compared to credit swaps…Nobody should be selling credit protection…it makes no sense and should not be allowed…It is not hedging…It is speculation…it only creates fear when things go bad and does nothing to improve our society when things are not bad…

so substantial amounts of capital have been allocated into this type of finance, and it is truly not productive at all…

anyway…Here is an interesting vid on marxism and the economic crisis…it explains things much better than I can…

[quote]D Public wrote:
Normally, I would agree with you, but they are not using their capital…The main problem is that business owners don’t know which way things are going to go, so we are stuck in this stagnation…If you were to talk to a CEO of a large company, they will tell you “something just doesn’t feel right…”, so they don’t feel confident about taking on new projects or hiring more workers…This has a tremendous drag on our economy as demand is created from supply and supply is driven largely by employment…So, They are holding large reserves of cash waiting for someone to fix the problem, but the problem really doesn’t exist…as it is a confidence problem…

So, basically there must be a concerted effort by several people in the economy to start things up again…No company has enough influence to do this…So, they need the federal government to do it for them…The government doesn’t even need to use a lot of money to do this…It has more to do with leadership and communication than spending…It has to do with showing people we can get things through the door and fix problems in our society…The exact opposite of what is occuring in washington right now…

And as far as the bail out…We needed to save the banks…The fed gov has been paid back in full by every bank except allied…i would prefer if they had broken up the banks into segregated components(investment banks vs commercial banks)…but to let them fail would cost us more than if we even took a small loss on saving them which we didn’t(we had a gain)…

Now in regards to shifting paper, What I’m talking about is the $600 trillion derivative market where people just shift credit and interest rate risk around…The problem is that there is nobody on earth that knows which way interest rates are going to go at any given point in time…not even bernanke…There is always a counter party who takes the other side of the trade, and thus someone always loses…And interest rate swaps are tame compared to credit swaps…Nobody should be selling credit protection…it makes no sense and should not be allowed…It is not hedging…It is speculation…it only creates fear when things go bad and does nothing to improve our society when things are not bad…

so substantial amounts of capital have been allocated into this type of finance, and it is truly not productive at all…

anyway…Here is an interesting vid on marxism and the economic crisis…it explains things much better than I can…

[/quote]

First, it is precisely because the uncertainty is caused by the government that more government action wont do any good because it causes more uncertainty.

Second, those derivate markets do something, if anything they make interest rates more stable than they would otherwise be, as does any other for of speculation for the base product.

Also, I have no problem if people want to bet the farm on soy beans, pork bellies or derivatives, IF I do not have to bail them out when they tank.

Finally, precisely because noone knows tomorrows interest rates, except of course Goldman Sachs employees sitting in on Fed meetings, the real economy needs a market where it can hedge the risk.

I will just have to disagree…

the risk never disapears…you can not eliminate it…you can reduce the concentration of risk among firms, but you can not get rid of it…

The interest rate mkt is is not inherently dangerous, but I don’t see too much value in its existence…

Now the credit swap mkt is inherently dangerous…

Many bond holders purchase credit protection when they purchase their bonds and then attempt to force default rather than settle because they will get 100 cents on the dollar if they trigger a credit event rather than settling out of court…by their nature, they cause severe outcomes rather than negotiation…

They also create bad information in regards to credit quality…they distort the true economic risks due to their speculative nature…This has occurred over and over again…

As far as gov action causing further uncertainity, I think strong leadership and communication can steer the economy in the right direction…

[quote]checkkk wrote:
As far as gov action causing further uncertainity, I think strong leadership and communication can steer the economy in the right direction…
[/quote]

How much of history do we have to ignore to come to this conclusion?

well I don’t have too much faith in our current government, but it has been done at certain points in time…

It is usually triggered by war…Now I hope we don’t need a war to fix this situation…

[quote]D Public wrote:
well I don’t have too much faith in our current government, but it has been done at certain points in time…

It is usually triggered by war…Now I hope we don’t need a war to fix this situation…[/quote]

War never fixes anything.

It just gives the overlords a screen behind which they can steal from and enslave a population.

[quote]checkkk wrote:
I will just have to disagree…

the risk never disapears…you can not eliminate it…you can reduce the concentration of risk among firms, but you can not get rid of it…

The interest rate mkt is is not inherently dangerous, but I don’t see too much value in its existence…

Now the credit swap mkt is inherently dangerous…

Many bond holders purchase credit protection when they purchase their bonds and then attempt to force default rather than settle because they will get 100 cents on the dollar if they trigger a credit event rather than settling out of court…by their nature, they cause severe outcomes rather than negotiation…

They also create bad information in regards to credit quality…they distort the true economic risks due to their speculative nature…This has occurred over and over again…

As far as gov action causing further uncertainity, I think strong leadership and communication can steer the economy in the right direction…

[/quote]

Look, there are businesses out there that make, maybe 5% net profit from their gross sales and they have to plan for years before their money comes in.

You bet that they want to hedge against interest rates rising and while the risk does not disappear it certainly disappears for them.

For a price, yes, but some people prefer that and they need a derivate market.

[quote]checkkk wrote:

As far as gov action causing further uncertainity, I think strong leadership and communication can steer the economy in the right direction…

[/quote]

I think the only examples I could possibly come up with is when the government made it perfectly clear that it does not give a fuck and that everyone is on his own.