I wasn’t aware of that option. Not that I’d ever take advantage of it. I’d sooner not even come here before activating some “ignore” function. Nobody here bothers me THAT much. I do have a life.
lol
I’m afraid of what I’ll miss if I start ignoring people.
Not enough estrogen in my system to use the function.
jack urboady is the only one, /clap
Jack Urabody annoyed me, rather than making retarded posts back at him all the time, I ignored him.
It’s so efficient I actually thought he left the boards until I saw someone quote one of his posts.
[quote]WP wrote:
Jack Urabody annoyed me, rather than making retarded posts back at him all the time, I ignored him.
It’s so efficient I actually thought he left the boards until I saw someone quote one of his posts.[/quote]
Getting annoyed lol. What a weird creepy non entity you must be. Man the fuck up mate and stop gettin angry at someone you’ve never met.
Isn’t geeting annoyed on the net a wee bit too ‘emo’?
[quote]WP wrote:
Jack Urabody annoyed me, rather than making retarded posts back at him all the time, I ignored him.
It’s so efficient I actually thought he left the boards until I saw someone quote one of his posts.[/quote]
Why not report his posts, in the hopes they disappear?
I imagine the same will happen to this one…
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
Beast Status wrote:
ignore is for sensitive people
I have no one on ignore. but a poster named forliar has me on ignore…but he’s a sensitive gay man so…[/quote]
Ur last sentence sums that up. Take it as a compliment. Plus…being ignored by a ghey man is probably a good thing. If u piss them off, ur probably doing somthing cool.
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
I’ve never put anyone on Ignore for having a differing view.[/quote]
So if Alan Aragon had/has a name on here you wouldn’t ignore him?
Aragon has posted here and I did not ignore him, but replied immediately to his posts. (Which were not, as he claims, moderated out at the time, though the thread was later deleted, which I wouldn’t have done, after having been up for at least a week.
What he was posting was not “inane,” which was the criteria I gave in the earlier post. He wasn’t correct in citing studies looking at administration of quite different (much lesser) amounts of fructose according to quite different protocols in different situations, but all that takes is a reply, which I provided.
However, if hypothetically the guy started becoming a ridiculous back-and-forther who absolutely never acknowledged what was just said to him but constantly posted as if what was just written to him had not been, then it could get to where over time I would decide he was a total waste of time. That is a hypothetical though.
In the case of the thread where he did participate, or the recent one in which the chocolate-milkers / Butt’s Ceiling crowd came here to decry I, BODYBUILDER, in fact I did not put any of those on Ignore, and there has never been a situation of that sort where I have. No need. That isn’t why I use it. I use it to avoid completely time-wasting inanity.
[quote]Jack Urboady wrote:
Isn’t geeting annoyed on the net a wee bit too ‘emo’?
[/quote]
English motherfucker, do you speak it?
I added countingbeans to my ignore list today after seeing a shitload of unproductive posts by him against a poster named Guardian. He never really gave out good training/nutrition advice so his posts weren’t conductive to the reason I’m here.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Jack Urboady wrote:
Isn’t geeting annoyed on the net a wee bit too ‘emo’?
English motherfucker, do you speak it?[/quote]
Very well actually. Probably better than most. I thought someone with your username would at least be able to understand laguage steeped in celtic tradition
However you’re more than likely a plastic paddy.
Top o the morning to ya big man:-)
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
Aragon has posted here and I did not ignore him, but replied immediately to his posts. (Which were not, as he claims, moderated out at the time, though the thread was later deleted, which I wouldn’t have done, after having been up for at least a week.
What he was posting was not “inane,” which was the criteria I gave in the earlier post. He wasn’t correct in citing studies looking at administration of quite different (much lesser) amounts of fructose according to quite different protocols in different situations, but all that takes is a reply, which I provided.
However, if hypothetically the guy started becoming a ridiculous back-and-forther who absolutely never acknowledged what was just said to him but constantly posted as if what was just written to him had not been, then it could get to where over time I would decide he was a total waste of time. That is a hypothetical though.
In the case of the thread where he did participate, or the recent one in which the chocolate-milkers / Butt’s Ceiling crowd came here to decry I, BODYBUILDER, in fact I did not put any of those on Ignore, and there has never been a situation of that sort where I have. No need. That isn’t why I use it. I use it to avoid completely time-wasting inanity.
[/quote]
I can see why you wrote this to give a better insight into your thinking, so thank you, however I would of just sufficed for a “No”
I also agree with avoiding completely time-wasting inanity.
[quote]WP wrote:
I added countingbeans to my ignore list today after seeing a shitload of unproductive posts by him against a poster named Guardian. He never really gave out good training/nutrition advice so his posts weren’t conductive to the reason I’m here.[/quote]
Beans is one of the funnier guys on here
[quote]WP wrote:
I added countingbeans to my ignore list today after seeing a shitload of unproductive posts by him against a poster named Guardian. He never really gave out good training/nutrition advice so his posts weren’t conductive to the reason I’m here.[/quote]
God forbid someone disagrees with your opinion, you might learn something.
Fucking LOL.
[quote]Jack Urboady wrote:
WP wrote:
I added countingbeans to my ignore list today after seeing a shitload of unproductive posts by him against a poster named Guardian. He never really gave out good training/nutrition advice so his posts weren’t conductive to the reason I’m here.
Beans is one of the funnier guys on here
[/quote]
Nah, it all started in another thread where he was assuming shit, and then got all butt hurt when I disagreed with him.
He must have cried to someone, because my posts magically disappeared.
At least now I can disagree with him without the opposing opinion getting deleted.
[quote]RSGZ wrote:
Not me.
I’m not a fan of censorship.[/quote]
[quote]Jack Urboady wrote:
WP wrote:
Jack Urabody annoyed me, rather than making retarded posts back at him all the time, I ignored him.
It’s so efficient I actually thought he left the boards until I saw someone quote one of his posts.
Getting annoyed lol. What a weird creepy non entity you must be. Man the fuck up mate and stop gettin angry at someone you’ve never met.
Isn’t geeting annoyed on the net a wee bit too ‘emo’?
[/quote]
LOL, dude, he just said he puts you on ignore, he can’t see your reply.
I’ve never knew the function existed, even if did, I won’t use it because I don’t get annoyed easily. I think.