Homosexual Propaganda Exposed

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It’s irrational to support family values and be concerned about the normalisation of transsexualism and cross dressing in schools?[/quote]

What do you mean with family values? The lesbian couples I know have relationships based on mutual love and respect. Would them finding some men to marry (perhaps gay men) to match the male female model be better?

Why care about how youth dresses? It will only lead to frustration, regardless of cross dressing or not.

[quote]espenl wrote:

What do you mean with family values?

[/quote]

Marriage, monogamy and child rearing?

Women should marry men. Crazy idea I know.

[quote]

Why care about how youth dresses? It will only lead to frustration, regardless of cross dressing or not.[/quote]

A school boy not being able to wear a mini skirt, panty hose and make up to school leads to “frustration?” Please give me a break! I’m tired of this bullshit.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Marriage, monogamy and child rearing?
[/quote]
Like most lesbian couples I know. I know some hetero couples that chose not to have kids, Ill tell them to get to it and start producing.

I’ll tell them to marry some men, just to entertain your idea.

[quote]
A school boy not being able to wear a mini skirt, panty hose and make up to school leads to “frustration?” Please give me a break! I’m tired of this bullshit.[/quote]
I dont think anyone should wear a mini skirt to school, but Im just old fashioned :slight_smile:

More proof of the homosexual agenda.

Edit: Fixed Link

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Severiano wrote:

I think it’s suspect that he posts so much about it, but that doesn’t make him gay. Me calling him such would just piss him off and likely drive him to dislike gays more.

[/quote]

Lol. I could care less what you call me.

[quote]
I think he searches for reason to back up the way he feels. The thing is this is meta-ethically the wrong order. Rather he should use reason to understand his feelings and why they are irrational. [/quote]

It’s irrational to support family values and be concerned about the normalisation of transsexualism and cross dressing in schools?[/quote]

Your reasoning is flawed. You reason to maintain whatever constructs you are comfortable with. What’s interesting is how those constructs perfectly mirror old school church ideals, ideals which you claim are completely independent of gospel and completely your own. Convenient isn’t it?

From here you look for reasons to back up the constructs you are comfortable with, rather than using reason to examine whether the constructs are rational at all in the first place.

That’s your folly of thought and processes that I have recognized. You could be a self hating gay person but that’s not how I’ve pinned you. I more see you scrambling around thought viruses in order go justify your beliefs.

Did you know high heels used to be worn by rich, affluent men? Now, it seems its a woman thing.

I find it interesting you are concerned with social features of masculine and femininity, but don’t acknowledge how those views change over the years.

[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
Did you know high heels used to be worn by rich, affluent men? Now, it seems its a woman thing.

[/quote]

I have no idea what that has to do with drag queens.

[quote]

I find it interesting you are concerned with social features of masculine and femininity, but don’t acknowledge how those views change over the years. [/quote]

The reason it hasn’t been ackowledged is because it has nothing to do with what I’m talking about. Drag queens aren’t normal straight guys who are ahead of fashion trends - they are perverts, exhibitionists and profoundly mentally ill.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
Did you know high heels used to be worn by rich, affluent men? Now, it seems its a woman thing.

[/quote]

I have no idea what that has to do with drag queens.

[quote]

I find it interesting you are concerned with social features of masculine and femininity, but don’t acknowledge how those views change over the years. [/quote]

The reason it hasn’t been ackowledged is because it has nothing to do with what I’m talking about. Drag queens aren’t normal straight guys who are ahead of fashion trends - they are perverts, exhibitionists and profoundly mentally ill.[/quote]

Sometimes I hope you are a troll, because I cant phantom how a educated person as yourself can have so many reactionary thoughts and sentiments. Your last sentence there are nothing else than pure irrational hate.

[quote]florelius wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
Did you know high heels used to be worn by rich, affluent men? Now, it seems its a woman thing.

[/quote]

I have no idea what that has to do with drag queens.

[quote]

I find it interesting you are concerned with social features of masculine and femininity, but don’t acknowledge how those views change over the years. [/quote]

The reason it hasn’t been ackowledged is because it has nothing to do with what I’m talking about. Drag queens aren’t normal straight guys who are ahead of fashion trends - they are perverts, exhibitionists and profoundly mentally ill.[/quote]

Sometimes I hope you are a troll, because I cant phantom how a educated person as yourself can have so many reactionary thoughts and sentiments. Your last sentence there are nothing else than pure irrational hate.[/quote]

I think you hope in vain :slight_smile:

I am not sure if some one posted this , but it is very incriminating

[quote]florelius wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
Did you know high heels used to be worn by rich, affluent men? Now, it seems its a woman thing.

[/quote]

I have no idea what that has to do with drag queens.

[quote]

I find it interesting you are concerned with social features of masculine and femininity, but don’t acknowledge how those views change over the years. [/quote]

The reason it hasn’t been ackowledged is because it has nothing to do with what I’m talking about. Drag queens aren’t normal straight guys who are ahead of fashion trends - they are perverts, exhibitionists and profoundly mentally ill.[/quote]

Sometimes I hope you are a troll, because I cant phantom how a educated person as yourself can have so many reactionary thoughts and sentiments. Your last sentence there are nothing else than pure irrational hate.[/quote]

I can understand a gay person just trying to get by in the world but a drag queen is something different. There is absolutely no reason for a biologically normal man to dress as a woman. It’s purely public exhibitionism. They actually get off on being the centre of attention and having people stare at them. That’s why they do it. They are in fact mentally ill.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
Did you know high heels used to be worn by rich, affluent men? Now, it seems its a woman thing.

[/quote]

I have no idea what that has to do with drag queens.

LO(L

Have to say good job defending your position sexmachine , very patient lol

27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.

29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips,

30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless.

32 Though they know God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.

[quote]Creme brulee wrote:
Have to say good job defending your position sexmachine , very patient lol

27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.

29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips,

30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless.

32 Though they know God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.
[/quote]

TROLL

[quote]xXSeraphimXx wrote:

[quote]Creme brulee wrote:
Have to say good job defending your position sexmachine , very patient lol

27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.

29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips,

30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless.

32 Though they know God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.
[/quote]

TROLL
[/quote]

No

[quote]Creme brulee wrote:
Have to say good job defending your position sexmachine , very patient lol

27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.

29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips,

30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless.

32 Though they know God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.
[/quote]

This is after old Paul heard voices in his head, right? And it’s much after the part with the talking snake and the other part where the guy hopped out of a fish’s belly after three days therein, right?

Just making sure I have my truths in correct order.

Governor of Maryland signs bill into law that allows drag queens to use female toilets:

“we are closer today to creating that open, respectful, inclusive world that we want for all of our children.”


I don’t know about everyone else but if I have a daughter I’d like her to be able to use a public toilet without encountering a fucking drag queen taking his dick out.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

I don’t know about everyone else but if I have a daughter I’d like her to be able to use a public toilet without encountering a fucking drag queen taking his dick out.[/quote]

Agreed.

And this proves one thing: A law is stupid.

That is, I don’t make the leap from the above to “homosexual sex is immoral” or some other such insupportable jerk of the knee.

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

I don’t know about everyone else but if I have a daughter I’d like her to be able to use a public toilet without encountering a fucking drag queen taking his dick out.[/quote]

Agreed.

And this proves one thing: A bill is stupid.

That is, I don’t make the leap from the above to “homosexual sex is immoral” is some other such insupportable jerk of the knee.[/quote]

I blame Ally McBeal

I think that we need to change all toilets to public or private . IMO you should be able to go into the toilet or at least stand guard if you like .

Europe’s toilets are designed in a way where the urinals are on one side so the men’s backs are to the public and the stalls that fit 1 person are the other side and they are unisex . You could stand guard or there really would be no need because it would be hard to assault some one in that limited space and in the crowd . Public Toilets are limited and (NOT FREE)