[quote]StrengthDawg wrote:
[quote]batman730 wrote:
Well, I’m not Jewbacca, but here’s my $.02, for what little it may be worth. Long guns in general and shotguns specifically outperform pistols in almost every respect except concealability and close quarter manoeuvrability. [/quote]
I’m NOT picking on Batman but there are some inaccurate statements made here thjat I cannot just let ride. The scenario is home defense so one does not need to concern himself with concealibility. In terms of close quarter combat both weapons mentioned are pretty much equal. I’ll explain. Hold a pistol out at arms length as if you were going to shoot it. Note how far out there the barrel is. Then shoulder an 18" barreled shotgun. The barrels are practically positioned at the same point which makes them pretty much equal in terms of CQB. One thing of note, a ‘little ol’ 20 gage shotgun, shooting a slug, is twice as powerful as a .44 Magnum handgun (look that up if you don’t believe me) I’ll take the shotty with a weapon light on it.
[quote]batman730 wrote:
00 buckshot is less likely to over-penetrate than a large calibre pistol round, making it less likely that you will inadvertently shoot non-combatants.[/quote]
NOT accurate… 00 Buck in a 2 3/4 shell is generally comprised of 9 .33 caliber pellets. A 9mm round is .35 caliber. A 00 Buck shell is basically the same as a 9 round burst from a MP5 but all at once. The FBI 4 layer denim tests consistantly show 00 buck to penetrate the recommended 15-18" in ballistic gel. SO yeah, it will over penetrate walls and shit. THAT"S precisely WHY we use 00 buck. Burglar hiding behind your couch? BLAM, shoot right thru it. So one will say " I’ll use bird shot". Ok so since a shotgun round shot from an 18" barrel expands roughly 1" per yard it goes down range, upclose shots basically are a solid mass of pellets, similar to a slug.
Regardless of ones chosen weapon to defend themselves, GET SOME TRAINING! TRUST ME when I say you probably don’t know shit, or the stuff you do know is wrong or inaccurate. Do NOT rely on bro science and urban legends. There is so much more to this stuff than you think. TRAINING is the key. You will NOT rise to the occasion and be the hero. You will default to the lowest level of training you have MASTERED. When your life is on the line, you had better have your stuff straight. There’s 3 battles… the gun battle, the emotional battle and the Legal battle. You better have a plan for all 3. hope this helps.
[/quote]
Thanks for setting me straight on a few things. If I have, yet again, been talking out of my ass I apologize.
Just to clarify, when mentioning concealability, I wasn’t meaning in a home defence situation, but rather as a general feature of a pistol as opposed to a long gun as my initial statement was the generalization that long guns outperform in EVERY respect.
Regarding manoeuvrability: for starters I don’t think manoeuvrability is super critical to home defence as I believe the safest plan in most situations to take up a static, defensible position, call the police and hold. This won’t always be practical, but generally it’s a good bet IMO. That being said, I respectfully disagree with some of your statements about how a pistol and a shotgun are equal in terms of CQB. If your pistol is punched out at full extension, your statement is true. However, I would submit a pistol can be sucked in close to the body (while still allowing room for the slide to travel) and still be in a position to fire if you suddenly find yourself too close to a threat to punch out and pick up your sights properly. Furthermore, if you should, for some reason, find yourself grappled with an assailant (not a good plan, but shit happens) I would say it’s likely going to be more practical to get pistol shots into him than shotgun at bad breath range. None of this is at all intended as an argument in favour of the pistol as a better choice overall.
Regarding over-penetration, thanks for correcting my misconceptions on the subject. Jewbacca mentioned the “bird shot slug” effect in an earlier post as well.
Regarding training, I couldn’t agree with your statements more. Any weapon system is only as good as the person operating it and there is more to these things than most people realize (myself included). All of the standard “I’m just a dumbass on the internet disclaimers” apply to all of the above statements.