[quote]orion wrote:
I am secrectly looking forward to Bill Clinton as the First Husband.
[/quote]
Could everyone stop airing their homo-erotic fantasies in public?
It’s not a secret if you tell everyone.
[quote]pookie wrote:
orion wrote:
I am secrectly looking forward to Bill Clinton as the First Husband.
Could everyone stop airing their homo-erotic fantasies in public?
It’s not a secret if you tell everyone.
[/quote]
Getting caught is part of the whole thing.
[quote]orion wrote:
Getting caught is part of the whole thing.
[/quote]
Beats getting stuck I guess…
[quote]pookie wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
texasguy2 wrote:
deadleg wrote:
Hillary Clinton is in bed with the devil. And I am not talking about slick willy…
I have a feeling she probably likes really, really, really hard core ass fucking. It’s a shame she is so ugly.
Yeah, but you wouldn’t see her face. With Bill out on the prowl and her being under scrutiny during the primaries, she probably needs a good drilling. The guy on the bottom WOULD have to see her face though, the poor bastard!!
Interestingly, it appears that those who don’t like Hillary are apparently either pathological liars, or enjoy discussing their vivid anal rape fantasies…
Karl Rove himself couldn’t hand pick a better bunch of loons to “oppose” his candidate. Keep up the good work, guys*.
* Term used loosely.[/quote]
She’s a dirty talking bitch. And who said anything about rape? I believe the quote was that she probably likes really, really, really hard anal sex. It was not that she probably likes getting ass raped. Smarty pants.*
*Term used loosely.
[quote]pookie wrote:
orion wrote:
JeffR wrote:
pookie wrote:
.
Well, well, well.
Look who crawled out from his hole.
I’d say “welcome back.” However, you know I’d be lying.
No problem, I´ll do it for you!
Wellcome back, fireworks and all!
Save your pyrotechnics for when Hillary is elected next year.
I think my passage will be a short one. It’s getting increasingly difficult to find threads that evoke even a modicum of interest on this board.
Even the clowns aren’t funny anymore.
[/quote]
Well, YOU could start a thread on anally raping some wonderful polar (or panda) bears. Just dart the bear and carry on there, Pooks.
Actually, why do WE have to come up with topics that interest you? How about starting one yourself? Or is it safer to not start threads and just stand on the sidelines and jeer? Huh! You should be in Europe.
Time to man up and start a thread, Pookie.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Actually, why do WE have to come up with topics that interest you? How about starting one yourself? Or is it safer to not start threads and just stand on the sidelines and jeer? Huh! You should be in Europe.
Time to man up and start a thread, Pookie.
[/quote]
Already did so. Here: http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=1713026 But apparently, I need to take more dumb pills before starting threads if I want to see some participation.
Didn’t you mention you were interested in cryptography not so long ago? Here’s a great opportunity for you to learn about it.
Besides, whenever there’s a mention of IQ tests on a thread, we get a gaggle of posters commenting on how they score in the 140-180 range… Wouldn’t it be interesting to see those massive intellects actually applied to solving actual problems? Yet, not a single one popped up on that thread.
Don’t you find that fascinating?
[quote]pookie wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Actually, why do WE have to come up with topics that interest you? How about starting one yourself? Or is it safer to not start threads and just stand on the sidelines and jeer? Huh! You should be in Europe.
Time to man up and start a thread, Pookie.
Already did so. Here: http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=1713026 But apparently, I need to take more dumb pills before starting threads if I want to see some participation.
Didn’t you mention you were interested in cryptography not so long ago? Here’s a great opportunity for you to learn about it.
Besides, whenever there’s a mention of IQ tests on a thread, we get a gaggle of posters commenting on how they score in the 140-180 range… Wouldn’t it be interesting to see those massive intellects actually applied to solving actual problems? Yet, not a single one popped up on that thread.
Don’t you find that fascinating?
[/quote]
I honestly never saw the thread. Congratulations on starting one.
I am admittedly very weak with computers. I went to an inner-city high school many years ago and we actually used slide rules. Though the University of Michigan had computer facilities back in the 70s, they were minimal and I was already far behind the suburban kids who had tech exposure.
[quote]pookie wrote:
JeffR wrote:
However, you know I’d be lying.
Tell me, Jeffeminate, when do you ever not lie?
[/quote]
I always lie.
Now, think that one through.
Either I’m telling the truth–aka being honest. Therefore, destroying your theory.
Or, I’m lying, and I tell the truth.
Therefore, destrying your theory.
Checkmate.
I’d feel better if you weren’t such a weakling.
JeffR
[quote]pookie wrote:
orion wrote:
JeffR wrote:
pookie wrote:
.
Well, well, well.
Look who crawled out from his hole.
I’d say “welcome back.” However, you know I’d be lying.
No problem, I´ll do it for you!
Wellcome back, fireworks and all!
Save your pyrotechnics for when Hillary is elected next year.
I think my passage will be a short one. It’s getting increasingly difficult to find threads that evoke even a modicum of interest on this board.
Even the clowns aren’t funny anymore.
[/quote]
Translation for everyone: pookie doesn’t losing most arguments.
JeffR
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Translation for everyone: pookie doesn’t losing most arguments.
JeffR
[/quote]
Calm down there, jeffeminate, you’re forgetting words…
I don’t mind losing arguments. What I miss is being able to actually engage in one. Not with you, of course, but with other MIA members…
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
I am admittedly very weak with computers. I went to an inner-city high school many years ago and we actually used slide rules. Though the University of Michigan had computer facilities back in the 70s, they were minimal and I was already far behind the suburban kids who had tech exposure.[/quote]
You don’t really need much computer skills. Most of the cracking (up to level 6 at least) can be done by hand; and tools to do it on a computer are readily available on the web. Many of them can even be run directly in your browser.
Hell, level 1 requires nothing more than being able to use google and maybe 10 minutes of patience…
Here’s a quote from Hillary some of you may find amusing. My father-in-law’s career has included years spent with US Customs and the Marshalls, so he has friends and aquaitnaces from various law inforcement agencies. One of his friends was doing escort (secret service like) duty for the Clintons on Bill’s first presidential campaign.
After a long speech and after-rally celebration, he was escorting the two to their vehicle through a back hallway, which was set up and guarded just for them to exit. Well, Bill falls down a small flight of stairs and is out cold. The escort immediately rushes to Bill’s aid, notices that not only is he knocked out, but he’s flush and clammy.
This realization gets him nervous and as he’s assessing what to do he looks at Hillary and asks “Is he on any medication?” Hillary says “You don’t worry about what fucking medications he’s on! You just get him up and in the car. And get that fucking gun out of my face!” The man’s gun holster was exposed from squatting after assessing Bill’s condition. He was removed from detail totally the next day.
I know, sounds like bullshit, but I was told this quite some time ago, before she was running for pres, and before all her quotes had been compiled and released. My father-in-law doesn’t bullshit about stories like this.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
Let’s elect the OBVIOUS sleaze. That’ll change the system.
[/quote]
This is the best, most direct and most telling statement of your political views ever.
What’s funny is that as abrasive as she is, people will still think she’s too weak to run the country just cause she’s a woman.
I know I do.
There’s nothing like hating Republicans but still being sexist. I am so fucked in this election.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
There’s nothing like hating Republicans but still being sexist. I am so fucked in this election. [/quote]
I’m a fellow sexist and am lending my support to Ron Paul. You should consider doing the same.
“With time, however, and widowhood, a haughtiness and an overt craving for power and the outward trappings of status came increasingly to the fore. Livia had always been a principal beneficiary of the climate of adulation that Augustus had done so much to create, and which Tiberius despised (“a strong contempt for honours”, Tacitus, Annals 4.37).”
We have our modern day Livia. Bill better watch out — once Hillary wins, what does she need HIM for?
[quote]Nominal Prospect wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
There’s nothing like hating Republicans but still being sexist. I am so fucked in this election.
I’m a fellow sexist and am lending my support to Ron Paul. You should consider doing the same.[/quote]
No. He’s a fucking loon.
I’m voting Green Party.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Nominal Prospect wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
There’s nothing like hating Republicans but still being sexist. I am so fucked in this election.
I’m a fellow sexist and am lending my support to Ron Paul. You should consider doing the same.
No. He’s a fucking loon.
I’m voting Green Party.[/quote]
GP is too conservative! Socialist Workers Party all the way!!!