[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Legionary wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Legionary wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Legionary wrote:<<< a holder of a PhD in History who also happens to be a devout Christian and ordained Baptist minister.[/quote]Forgive me man, but a cereal box is more reliable than many people allegedly educated in history and being ordained means almost nothing anymore. In fact, you may think I’m blaming the non Christian citizenry of this nation for her ills. No sir. The CHURCH, who has forsaken the very gospel that was utterly mainstream in the 18th and 19th centuries here, the one I preach, has been seduced by every imaginable form of compromise modernistic heresy and immorality. WE are the salt and the light of the earth. Jesus said so. He also said that if the salt loses it’s saltiness it is useless. Salt is a metaphor for preserving from rot. We have lost our saltiness. With continued civility and respect, the fact you and dozens of others here call just about anything Christian demonstrates my point. I’m not being sarcastic. “Christian” meant something then that just everybody agreed on in the essentials. The essentials that I talk about here every day. I’m simply what they were. Ya’ll are the weird ones by the standard of our early history. I’m not being a jackass man. That is the truth though.
[/quote]
Yes, a PhD holder who has published a plethora of academic work on Christianity in America and is incredibly involved in ministry is surely not credible. Not to mention his professional expertise as a Intelligence Analyst both in the military and the Central Intelligence Agency, as well as numerous postings as an American Ambassador. You obviously come out on top with your divinely revealed knowledge of scripture in spite of of such incredibly rigorous training and professional experience.[/quote]That’s entirely possible. “Incredibly rigorous training and professional experience” prove nothing in these kinds of topics by themselves. None of that necessarily gets me excited and ministry means what? The worst enemies of the gospel today are ministers allegedly of it. I’m only being honest. Bring him here. I’d be happy to talk to him. However, I don’t have any unique extra sanctified “divinely revealed knowledge of scripture”. I simply see what millions of other historic Christians have and do see there.
[/quote]
Ummm they really, really do. I’m sure you also think your knowledge surpasses his own concerning foreign affairs and the national security apparatus due to the “ton of studying on your own.” I just read the wiki-page on theoretical physics. I’m ready for Steven Hawking now.
[/quote]Ummm, but they really don’t. I’m ready for Stephen Hawking even if I never heard of theoretical physics. You really do not pay attention. I’ll debate Him, Dawkins, Dennet, Miller, Nye and any 5 other guys you find along with everybody on this site at the same time, have them all cornered and never have to discuss anything beyond 2+2 equaling 4. Not because I’m the most invincible intellect ever to be spawned from father Adam. Not at all.
My position has been authored in eternity by an all wise all knowing God who has equipped me to present and defend it. I do and I will. The results are His problem. Mine is to obey Him. If he uses me to save some then I am most humbly grateful indeed for having been of service to Him. If NOBODY listens? I am most humbly grateful indeed and bow before Him in adoring worship that He has counted me among His own and blessed me with gifts to do His will.
Your scholars, while surely brilliant and highly capable fellers, have almost to a man never once considered the foundations of thought itself. Especially their own. I see it in the bible and everywhere else. Including here. A tattooed, scarred, former junkie and 10th grade dropout + the most high God = victory for His name’s sake. Whether you or your academics like it or not. Please start reading at verse 18 to the end of the chapter. 1 Corinthians 1 ESV
EDIT: Let’s take this to Hijack Haven. My fault.
[/quote]
“Your scholars, while surely brilliant and highly capable fellers, have almost to a man never once considered the foundations of thought itself. Especially their own.” Oh, do you have first hand knowledge of the philosophical foundations and innermost thoughts of the world’s foremost academics? You simply cannot make such a ludicrous assertion without proof. Unless you can read minds. Can you read minds Trib? What makes you capable of having a meaningful debate concerning Intelligence Analysis to a CIA Intelligence Analyst? Or Diplomacy with a State Department Diplomat? Or History with someone with a PhD from one of the top departments in the world? It is simply deluded hubris on your part.