Population reduction, lol. More like population collapse. Read above. How many gays do you guys actually think there are? And how many of those want children? And how many of those then would want a multitude of children?! To still not even come remotely close to replacement. Lol. My gosh, admit it guys.
There are a slew of other benefits to being legally married. The downstream effects are society altering, and easily marriageâs most important function.
What a joke. Low single digit % global gay population, but if we let them form a legal tie, weâre going to have population collapse.
Itâs like the worldâs worst doomsday prophecy, brought to you byyyyyyy an ever increasing unsustainable populationnnnn!!!
(America)
(Globe)
But yea. Keep slinging the doomsday stuff. Weâll be seeing population collapse any day now.
Low single digit % of global population
Do you⊠know⊠any gay people?
Itâs to illustrate the utility of heterosexualityâŠper my hypothetical
Homosexuality isnât special to society. It doesnât deserve status and privilege over a friendship of 30 people.
Iâm not entertaining your âheteros vanishâ thing. Itâs childish and Iâm beyond bored talking about for the 50th time
Insert irony here
Oh, yes like rare a diamond. Itâs useless to society. It doesnât merit privileges by the state.
Marriage provides a slew of benefits to the people in it. The people are members of society.
Ergo. JFC man
What? Rofl. That is backwards. I said homosexuality is useless to society. Not marriage.
Homosexuality produced people whom love each other enough to want to get married. Which leads to homosexual marriage, which has a slew of benefits.
QED. JFC
Then everyone should be deemed as married status? So theyâll be special. Lol. Letâs bust out the windows to make work.
If people want to form a legal unity with themselves, thatâd be kinda weird. Thatâs already a law. Property rights n such
Answer the question?
No, everyone should not be deemed married status. The value of marriage lies in the joining of 2 people. The status itself doesnât provide value to an individual (solo) person.
So marriage is to incentivize marriage for the sake of benefits and being specialâŠ
Yes. There are a slew of benefits to marriage. Society impacting benefits.
Actually, by getting married, theyâve become just like everyone else.
So less special.
The value of state recognized marriage is an attaboy? Lol
And why not change some laws? How about 20 people? They canât be a special group?
Do you actually know what marriage is and how it works? Has all of this back and forth been because you donât know what marriage means?
The value of state recognized marriage is not an attaboy for 2 people, while it would be an attaboy for 1.
Sure, if thereâs something special about them?
Marriage is so we can give wedding gifts to each other as citizensâŠBecause, hey, why not.
Yikes. This definitely just got awkward. Weâre gonna have to have a talk.
According to you itâs so we can give 2 people, and only 2, an attaboy and some government wedding gifts.