Help Me Get Out of This Ticket

[quote]Damici wrote:
I’m talking about 2 things:

(1.) Rules that are NOT set to accomplish anything in a way that actually serves the public good, such as the laws barring murder, rape, theft, etc. Speed limits are set ARTIFICIALLY low, i.e. they might be set at 55 on a rode where the natural state of traffic flow is more like 70. There have been scientific studies done on traffic patterns and natural rates of speed on given roads, and why it is actual SAFEST to set speed limits accordingly, NOT below that level.

A limit is meant to be just that – an UPPER LIMIT. These artifically low speed limits often create situations that are MORE DANGEROUS because people do slam on the brakes when they glimpse a police car, disrupting the traffic pattern rather violently at times. THAT’S BAD.

(2.) Antisocial behavior?? Uh, no, sorry. There’s nothing “antisocial” about doing 70 when aaaaaall of the traffic on that highway is doing 70, despite the speed limit being stupidly set at 55. That’s actually SOCIAL, not antisocial. The idea of randomingly choosing willy-nilly which laws to obey and which not to obey is obviously one that could be problematic if applied liberally – no argument there!

The point is that speed limits are SOOOOO assinine in this country that NO ONE obeys them. ZERO. And EVERYONE knows it and admits it. You cannot tell me that you yourself always obey the speed limit, especially in highway driving. (And if you try to tell me that you do, you’re lying. And if you try to tell me that you do but that you’d then “deserve” a ticket, I’d call you pathetic).

Laws that don’t serve the public good, and that are so patently ludicrous that NO ONE follows them (and everyone acknowledges it) are not good laws. They’re actually counterproductive, in this case. Such is NOT the case for the laws barring murder, rape, theft, fraud, etc. That’s why speeding laws in this country stand out – they’re so inane that no one obeys them to the point where everyone acknowledges it.

I’ve even been pulled over once on a 65 mph highway where the cop told me, quote, “You don’t have to do 65. Just keep it under 76 and you won’t get a ticket.” What does that tell you?

Fucking ludicrous. These laws were designed to line the towns’ coffers. What about that is hard to understand? If your trying to make a moral high ground “be a man, take it on the chin” type of argument, the single worst context in which you could possibly try to make it is in the context of a speeding ticket incident. Give me a fucking break.

[/quote]

I don’t think anyone has contended with the point that not everyone obeys the speed limit all the time, and that cops aren’t out enforcing the speed limits all the time.

I think what’s in contention here is how you behave once you’re caught.

I can speak from experience because I’ve been caught doing shit I wasn’t supposed to be doing o’ plenty, and learned the hard way how to act. My initial post about taking it on the chin wasn’t coming from a bible thumpin moral high road stance, but more of a stance of “hey I’ve been there a couple times and have learned the hard way.”

You can scream all day long about how the laws are fucked and the country is fucked and the police are dirty and fucked, and the speed limits are fucked.

However, none of that shit matters.

The judge doesn’t care about your personal views or interpretations of the law. All he or she cares about is that an officer of the law caught you BREAKING the law. Hell, if you man up and accept responsibility for getting caught, the judge might throw it out, or grant leniency by reducing the fine, or by not taking points off of your liscence. You’re bent over the barrel at that point and it’s useless to continue the whole “speed limits are fucked and so are your cops!!” tirade in front of the judge.

You’re busted, you’re caught. Not your day, wrong place at the wrong time, wrong lane change at the wrong time, New York Giants sticker on your window while the cop is a Redskins fan. No matter what the circumstance was, you got the cops’ attention and he or she busted you.

Be a man, take it on the chin, be accountable, and carry on.

B.

man up and pay your bills. you broke the law, you got caught. stop trying to rationalize it.

If by “man up” you mean “Deal with it, what’s done is done,” then I see what you’re saying and have no problem with that. If however, by “man up” you are trying to imply that he would be less of a man if he were to try to fight it with a lawyer, fight it in court, etc., then that’s where we differ. I find the idea of putting up a stiff fight against tyranny (albeit low-level tyranny in the case of a speeding ticket) to be much more “manly.”

Fight it if you can, Shaved.

[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
Damici wrote:
I’m talking about 2 things:

(1.) Rules that are NOT set to accomplish anything in a way that actually serves the public good, such as the laws barring murder, rape, theft, etc. Speed limits are set ARTIFICIALLY low, i.e. they might be set at 55 on a rode where the natural state of traffic flow is more like 70. There have been scientific studies done on traffic patterns and natural rates of speed on given roads, and why it is actual SAFEST to set speed limits accordingly, NOT below that level.

A limit is meant to be just that – an UPPER LIMIT. These artifically low speed limits often create situations that are MORE DANGEROUS because people do slam on the brakes when they glimpse a police car, disrupting the traffic pattern rather violently at times. THAT’S BAD.

(2.) Antisocial behavior?? Uh, no, sorry. There’s nothing “antisocial” about doing 70 when aaaaaall of the traffic on that highway is doing 70, despite the speed limit being stupidly set at 55. That’s actually SOCIAL, not antisocial. The idea of randomingly choosing willy-nilly which laws to obey and which not to obey is obviously one that could be problematic if applied liberally – no argument there!

The point is that speed limits are SOOOOO assinine in this country that NO ONE obeys them. ZERO. And EVERYONE knows it and admits it. You cannot tell me that you yourself always obey the speed limit, especially in highway driving. (And if you try to tell me that you do, you’re lying. And if you try to tell me that you do but that you’d then “deserve” a ticket, I’d call you pathetic).

Laws that don’t serve the public good, and that are so patently ludicrous that NO ONE follows them (and everyone acknowledges it) are not good laws. They’re actually counterproductive, in this case. Such is NOT the case for the laws barring murder, rape, theft, fraud, etc. That’s why speeding laws in this country stand out – they’re so inane that no one obeys them to the point where everyone acknowledges it.

I’ve even been pulled over once on a 65 mph highway where the cop told me, quote, “You don’t have to do 65. Just keep it under 76 and you won’t get a ticket.” What does that tell you?

Fucking ludicrous. These laws were designed to line the towns’ coffers. What about that is hard to understand? If your trying to make a moral high ground “be a man, take it on the chin” type of argument, the single worst context in which you could possibly try to make it is in the context of a speeding ticket incident. Give me a fucking break.

I don’t think anyone has contended with the point that not everyone obeys the speed limit all the time, and that cops aren’t out enforcing the speed limits all the time.

I think what’s in contention here is how you behave once you’re caught.

I can speak from experience because I’ve been caught doing shit I wasn’t supposed to be doing o’ plenty, and learned the hard way how to act. My initial post about taking it on the chin wasn’t coming from a bible thumpin moral high road stance, but more of a stance of “hey I’ve been there a couple times and have learned the hard way.”

You can scream all day long about how the laws are fucked and the country is fucked and the police are dirty and fucked, and the speed limits are fucked.

However, none of that shit matters.

The judge doesn’t care about your personal views or interpretations of the law. All he or she cares about is that an officer of the law caught you BREAKING the law. Hell, if you man up and accept responsibility for getting caught, the judge might throw it out, or grant leniency by reducing the fine, or by not taking points off of your liscence. You’re bent over the barrel at that point and it’s useless to continue the whole “speed limits are fucked and so are your cops!!” tirade in front of the judge.

You’re busted, you’re caught. Not your day, wrong place at the wrong time, wrong lane change at the wrong time, New York Giants sticker on your window while the cop is a Redskins fan. No matter what the circumstance was, you got the cops’ attention and he or she busted you.

Be a man, take it on the chin, be accountable, and carry on.

B.

[/quote]

just remember if you go to court and the cop shows up he and the judge are gonna stick up your ass for wasting thier time.

Plead not guilty for sure, see where it goes from there. Try the reschedule thing as well, and if none of that works try to work something out w/ the prosecutor.

Did you CHOOSE to put that stick up your ass or did someone place it there for you?

[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
I was never a “poor college student,” even though I paid my own way through college and had a very poor family. Why not?

Because I didn’t sit around on my ass goofing off at online message boards. I worked at least 20 hours a week waiting tables, and I was also in the National Guard. Factoring in the GI Bill, I did well enough that I could pay my bills, and even afford a $100 worth of Biotest supplements a month.

Thus, I have no sympathy for you. You are broke because you are making the CHOICE to screw around instead of work. If you have the time to goof off online, then you have the time to WORK.

Shaved wrote:
I am but a poor poor college student and can’t afford this ticket. Help me Obi Wan, you’re my only hope.

[/quote]

Every man dies… not every man really lives. FREEEEEDOM!!!

[quote]Damici wrote:
What state are you in?

[/quote]

My guess? A bit depressed atm.

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Damici wrote:
What state are you in?

My guess? A bit depressed atm.[/quote]

lol… well played sir, well played.

Oregon. There is a reason the highways in Oregon are so perfect. 65 mph speed limit and heavily patroled = lots of revenue. I was driving through one time, a cop picked me out of the pack and wrote a ticket.

Since I was out of state I couldn’t fight but I did write a nasty letter I included with my check. I accused the cop of picking me out of the group because I had California plates.

I wasn’t expecting anything from the letter, really just venting. Appearently it got me something with who ever read it. They cashed the check but didn’t record the infraction so insurance never saw it.

BTW, changing the date accidently worked for me once and a friend answered one of those “we’ll get any infraction reduced to a non moving violation” adds. Sure enough they did it and it wasn’t even in Mexico.

Ask for the source code of the radar gun.

[quote]robs wrote:

Ask for the source code of the radar gun.
[/quote]

Good idea, but in this case I bet the cop was pacing him rather than beaming him.

Do what women do when they want to get away with murder. Say you where abused and you had all the rights in the world to do what you wanted.

This thread = bull fucking shit

What a bunch of self-righteous, pretentious, holier-than-thou crap.

[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
robs wrote:

Ask for the source code of the radar gun.

Good idea, but in this case I bet the cop was pacing him rather than beaming him.

[/quote]

He was beaming on the side of the road which is confusing to me. If he is pointing a radar gun at traffic isn’t it hard to say for sure if it was my car or the car behind me that the gun picked up? It just seems like bullshit to point a radar gun at a mob of traffic and then cruise in on your bike to pull over a random person from the mob.

[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
You can scream all day long about how the laws are fucked and the country is fucked and the police are dirty and fucked, and the speed limits are fucked.

However, none of that shit matters.

The judge doesn’t care about your personal views or interpretations of the law. All he or she cares about is that an officer of the law caught you BREAKING the law.
[/quote]

If the judge was worth a damn, he might wonder why the prosecutor is also the star witness.

Dude, I was just trying to start a pissing match. I speed, to keep pace with the traffic. If you feel that wronged, and that is personal, look to a fix it ticket lawyer. See if defensive driving is an alt. look for deferred adjudication. It may be BS, but you just got unlucky. When you go fishing, you don’t aim to catch every fish. Ya just grab a few. Depending on your record, you may get lucky.

Have a kegger to pay for the lawyer, get a sympathy lay, get the ticket adjusted and post what happened here. Do her from behind with a tennis shoe on her back and use a camera phone.

[quote]jp_dubya wrote:
Do her from behind with a tennis shoe on her back and use a camera phone.[/quote]

Unless, of course, she reads this site, as she’ll probably get self-conscious about the shoe and say, “oh, no! Everyone will be able to tell my body fat %!”

[quote]Alex630 wrote:
BradTGIF wrote:
You can scream all day long about how the laws are fucked and the country is fucked and the police are dirty and fucked, and the speed limits are fucked.

However, none of that shit matters.

The judge doesn’t care about your personal views or interpretations of the law. All he or she cares about is that an officer of the law caught you BREAKING the law.

If the judge was worth a damn, he might wonder why the prosecutor is also the star witness.
[/quote]

The traffic court judges know their role is to raise money. They usually don’t care about the truth.

Traffic courts are one of the biggest scams perpetrated by the government on the American people. It truly is a form of highway robbery.