Hate Crimes - LA

Any chance we might do something about illegal immigration? Almost looks like a racial civil war in LA. If blacks were dying so often at the hands of racist white men, would the government have already done something dramatic to combat this? Sorry if it seems as if I’m stereotyping, but would any actually bet against me if I wagered that the majority of the latino perps are here illegaly, or are the children of illegals? Maybe I’ll get hammered over this, but ignoring it won’t make it go away, will it?

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-barricade22feb22,0,2198361.story

Most of the blacks have left already thanks to this.

In another era, this would be known as “Manifest Destiny.” Only now, it’s blacks rather than Indians, and Latinos rather than whites.

The Latinos call it “Reconquista,” a term that is an ironic throwback to the 15th century, when the Spaniards kicked the Moors back across the Straits of Gibraltar into Africa. The choice of phrase is deliberate. California used to be Mexico, and the Mexicans are slowly but surely repossessing it, by force of arms and brute force demographics.

And the perps are smart. If they targeted whites, they would be hunted down by the LAPD, and deported en masse. By targeting blacks, they can count on a lukewarm government response at best, and what few whites are in their de facto territory will just move out without a fight. Southern California will eventually become Nortemexico, and there probably isn’t a damn thing we can do about it, unless Governor Schwarzenegger (it’s always a kick to write that) ever decides to mobilize the National Guard.

Here I’ll just interject that I find it extremely amusing that people can consider a handful of Muslim women asking for a few “women only” hours at a single gym at Harvard to be evidence of the creeping invasion of Islam, and yet view the overt armed invasion of American territory and murder of American citizens by foreign nationals as an “illegal alien problem.” This is normally considered an act of war.

We at least tried to do something about Pancho Villa. Can we not at least try to do something about these vatos?

Thunderbolt? Any ideas? If only the guy on your avatar was alive today, he’d do something about it.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Here I’ll just interject that I find it extremely amusing that people can consider a handful of Muslim women asking for a few “women only” hours at a single gym at Harvard to be evidence of the creeping invasion of Islam, and yet view the overt armed invasion of American territory and murder of American citizens by foreign nationals as an “illegal alien problem.” This is normally considered an act of war.

We at least tried to do something about Pancho Villa. Can we not at least try to do something about these vatos?

Thunderbolt? Any ideas? If only the guy on your avatar was alive today, he’d do something about it.[/quote]

I say stop spending troops and money on protecting the borders of others. Stop trying to police potential civil/sectarian wars in other nations. Stop sending out the foreign aid money. Basically, stop policing the world. Send the money saved back to border states and DEMAND they police their borders with it. Isn’t that the whole point of the the “well-regulated” militia?

Everything is backwards nowadays. I just read a article that we’ll be spending about 12 billion a month in Iraq while we can’t even secure our own borders. Unbelievable.

Don’t you guys know that our silly desire to enforce the border is just a cover for our racist hatred for poor brown people? What we need is open borders, since those poor mexicans are HELPING America by doing the jobs that nobody else wants to do. Like killing black people in California, apparently. Nobody wants to do that, we just want them gone because again, we’re all terribly racist. Remember that the next time you want some stupid, obscure law enforced - you are a racist.

We need to enforce our laws, deport those that need to be deported, have our local and state municipalities share info and not hide illegal immigrants, punish their employers, freeze their assets, not allow them to move money freely and any number of other draconian steps that would have you guys screaming about lost freedoms.

No matter how much money we waste on border security people will cross.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
In another era, this would be known as “Manifest Destiny.” Only now, it’s blacks rather than Indians, and Latinos rather than whites.

The Latinos call it “Reconquista,” a term that is an ironic throwback to the 15th century, when the Spaniards kicked the Moors back across the Straits of Gibraltar into Africa. The choice of phrase is deliberate. California used to be Mexico, and the Mexicans are slowly but surely repossessing it, by force of arms and brute force demographics.

And the perps are smart. If they targeted whites, they would be hunted down by the LAPD, and deported en masse. By targeting blacks, they can count on a lukewarm government response at best, and what few whites are in their de facto territory will just move out without a fight. Southern California will eventually become Nortemexico, and there probably isn’t a damn thing we can do about it, unless Governor Schwarzenegger (it’s always a kick to write that) ever decides to mobilize the National Guard.

[/quote]

They did target whites. East LA was a white area in the 70s. Then white business owners began hiring Mexicans to work in the factories in Los Angeles, the area became Spanish-speaking, shootings began and gangs sprang up. The whites left. I’ve had to move myself because of Mexicans shooting at one another. This is a real eye-opener:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Here I’ll just interject that I find it extremely amusing that people can consider a handful of Muslim women asking for a few “women only” hours at a single gym at Harvard to be evidence of the creeping invasion of Islam, and yet view the overt armed invasion of American territory and murder of American citizens by foreign nationals as an “illegal alien problem.” This is normally considered an act of war.

We at least tried to do something about Pancho Villa. Can we not at least try to do something about these vatos?

Thunderbolt? Any ideas? If only the guy on your avatar was alive today, he’d do something about it.[/quote]

Blackjack Pershing, call your office.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Here I’ll just interject that I find it extremely amusing that people can consider a handful of Muslim women asking for a few “women only” hours at a single gym at Harvard to be evidence of the creeping invasion of Islam, and yet view the overt armed invasion of American territory and murder of American citizens by foreign nationals as an “illegal alien problem.” This is normally considered an act of war.

We at least tried to do something about Pancho Villa. Can we not at least try to do something about these vatos?

Thunderbolt? Any ideas? If only the guy on your avatar was alive today, he’d do something about it.[/quote]

We should militarize the border.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
… I just read a article that we’ll be spending about 12 billion a month in Iraq while we can’t even secure our own borders. Unbelievable. [/quote]

There is a huge difference between “can’t” and “won’t”.

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
Sloth wrote:
… I just read a article that we’ll be spending about 12 billion a month in Iraq while we can’t even secure our own borders. Unbelievable.

There is a huge difference between “can’t” and “won’t”.[/quote]

Can you elaborate on this? Do you mean that there is some sort of conspiracy in Washington? Because last I checked, money and the overseas (over)deployment of US military personnel was the only limiting factor here. And it goes without saying that most Americans want secure borders.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Here I’ll just interject that I find it extremely amusing that people can consider a handful of Muslim women asking for a few “women only” hours at a single gym at Harvard to be evidence of the creeping invasion of Islam, and yet view the overt armed invasion of American territory and murder of American citizens by foreign nationals as an “illegal alien problem.” This is normally considered an act of war.

We at least tried to do something about Pancho Villa. Can we not at least try to do something about these vatos?

Thunderbolt? Any ideas? If only the guy on your avatar was alive today, he’d do something about it.[/quote]

Look up Oklahoma House Bill 1804, which went into effect last fall. Some states are no longer sitting by and allowing illegals to flaunt their disrespect of the law. Early results have suggested that illegals are fleeing the state en masse.

Oklahoma will also be an interesting case study to see which theory is right-er: that illegals keep prices down by doing work cheaply that Americans won’t or that illegals are hurting the economy by leaching resources without paying anything back in.

It’s only been a few months in a single state, but thus far in Oklahoma, the answer seems to be the latter.

The view from up north doesn’t show the Mexicans taking anything. I shows the Americans giving it to them. I would say your turn at the plate is long over due. A passive invasion is still an invasion. What ever you plan to do you better get to doing it or the next governor of New Mexico will be an illegal immagrant.

[quote]lixy wrote:
There is a huge difference between “can’t” and “won’t”.

Can you elaborate on this? Do you mean that there is some sort of conspiracy in Washington? Because last I checked, money and the overseas (over)deployment of US military personnel was the only limiting factor here. And it goes without saying that most Americans want secure borders.[/quote]

Once again, you prove your ignorance of how it works over here.

Hispanics are votes. The fastest growing voting block in the country.

Neither side wants to do shit to piss off the hispanic vote - votes they both think they can get if they are nice enough.

It has nothing to do with the war in the middle east. It is all about courting the hispanic vote, and turning a blind eye to any problem that may exist.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
lixy wrote:
There is a huge difference between “can’t” and “won’t”.

Can you elaborate on this? Do you mean that there is some sort of conspiracy in Washington? Because last I checked, money and the overseas (over)deployment of US military personnel was the only limiting factor here. And it goes without saying that most Americans want secure borders.

Once again, you prove your ignorance of how it works over here.

Hispanics are votes. The fastest growing voting block in the country.

Neither side wants to do shit to piss off the hispanic vote - votes they both think they can get if they are nice enough.

It has nothing to do with the war in the middle east. It is all about courting the hispanic vote, and turning a blind eye to any problem that may exist. [/quote]

This is especially true in the border states, with candidates for mayoral and gubernatorial elections increasingly addressing their prospective constituents in Spanish.

We’ve had the British-Canuck view, RJ, what about the Texan view? Have we lost the war already, or is there still time to turn things around?

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
rainjack wrote:
lixy wrote:
There is a huge difference between “can’t” and “won’t”.

Can you elaborate on this? Do you mean that there is some sort of conspiracy in Washington? Because last I checked, money and the overseas (over)deployment of US military personnel was the only limiting factor here. And it goes without saying that most Americans want secure borders.

Once again, you prove your ignorance of how it works over here.

Hispanics are votes. The fastest growing voting block in the country.

Neither side wants to do shit to piss off the hispanic vote - votes they both think they can get if they are nice enough.

It has nothing to do with the war in the middle east. It is all about courting the hispanic vote, and turning a blind eye to any problem that may exist.

This is especially true in the border states, with candidates for mayoral and gubernatorial elections increasingly addressing their prospective constituents in Spanish.

We’ve had the British-Canuck view, RJ, what about the Texan view? Have we lost the war already, or is there still time to turn things around?
[/quote]

Dunno. I think if they quit offering illegals free health care, social security, and allow the border patrol to deport the illegals, we can at least get back to the way it was in the 80’s.

Who knows? The way the dollar is falling, jobs may get pretty scarce for the lazy white man, and he might be forced to actually do some fucking work - taking the jobs away from the illegals.

What’s odd is that, back in the day, border ranchers used to have “wet shacks”. The illegals would cross on the ranch, make it to the wet shack, and work for the rancher for a week or two - then head on out. It was quite a symbiotic relationship: we scratch your back, and you scratch ours.

But then the government had to get involved. Throw on top of that the “war on drugs”, and now the rancher pulls out is .30-.06 instead of offering to help. And the illegal would rather steal you blind than offer to help with anything.

You guys got it wrong the, Latino immigrants were targeted by the organized black gangs from the beginning becuz of their vulnerable status as eternal criminals.

Even in just working and eating they couldn’t go to the cops when the blacks would steal their paychekcs.

The backlash has occured when they decided to strike back.

We’ve got it wrong? Let’s recap.

Latinos are entering the United States illegally.

They are murdering American citizens.

This has resulted in both “white flight” and “black flight” from the areas in which this occurs.

Those areas are now predominantly Hispanic.

Which part is incorrect?

You fuckers entered Puerto Rico and occupied it and it was all Latinos lol.

I don’t see how Latinos living on occupied Mexican land is illegal.

The original mexican landowners who lived there were robbed of their land. They were oppressed by the police, Zoot Suit Riots anyone?

The illegals who entered the occupied land, were terrorized by your neo-slave gangs despite just trying to work.

Most of them were invited ruing WW2 originally, and learned to retaliate since the police wouldn’t give them any solace.

The Latinos are violent here, but we are talking Balkan level beef and not raw nascient racism.