
Looked at how ripped and shredded Harry Potter is… I can’t wait until Men’s Health does an interview with him. I need to know what his training and diet is like. I think I’ll just lift heavy weights until then.

Looked at how ripped and shredded Harry Potter is… I can’t wait until Men’s Health does an interview with him. I need to know what his training and diet is like. I think I’ll just lift heavy weights until then.
He looks like a foetus, albeit one with magic powers.
Considering that he has two movies left to film, looking as young as possible is necessary for him and staying skinny will do that. His character is supposed to be skinny anyway.
Mantastic.
Even if I might be stronger (a big might), being that lean must kick ass. He would probably be getting laid all the time even without being a movie star.
He definitely looks like he has the potential to get jacked with some work and food. It probably doesn’t matter much to him because he’ll get paid either way.
OMG!
He looks like Brad Pitt in fight club!
Isn’t this a screen shot from his performance in Equus, in which he plays a disturbed young man? Perhaps he is that scrawny because he equates the condition with “disturbed” and therefore puts on meat in the future for more “healthy” roles.
Not that a kid worth $50,000,000 needs to care what I think.
[quote]orion wrote:
OMG!
He looks like Brad Pitt in fight club!
[/quote]
Haha, awesome.
The circumference of his head is greater than his waist.
[quote]TShaw wrote:
Not that a kid worth $50,000,000 needs to care what I think.[/quote]
Yeah, I don’t think anyone in his life really cares that he’s not very muscular. If he outlives us all he has won the game.
I’d rather be him then anyone on this board… The kid’s got millions to spend on what ever he wants.
OK, these threads are getting ridiculous.
1)He is about to be 18. Some people (myself included) take a while to develop.
2)His role as a child wizard wouldn’t really make sense if he looked like Arnold. Would it?
3)Is it necessary for everyone to be huge. No. What about rock climbers, jockeys, gymnasts, distance runners… The list goes on.
Just because someone doesn’t look “jacked” doesn’t mean sh!t. I sometimes wonder what some of these posters are thinking when they make posts like this. Are you spending all day checking out other male physiques?
[quote]beebuddy wrote:
The circumference of his head is greater than his waist.[/quote]
A thin waist is a serious asset to bodybuilders; Arnold taped out at 27". This allows for a much more pronounced lat spread, among other things.
Regarding those who say his physique doesn’t matter, that’s true. Being muscular has nothing to do with the way he’s living his life (parts of which make ALL of us drool with envy.) But the fact of the matter is, he did a shirtless glam shot.
Presumably, this is the film industry’s rough approximation of a “most muscular” pose, given what passes for jacked, these days. So I’d say our petty sniping is perfectly fair.
[quote]Chewie wrote:
OK, these threads are getting ridiculous.
1)He is about to be 18. Some people (myself included) take a while to develop.
2)His role as a child wizard wouldn’t really make sense if he looked like Arnold. Would it?
3)Is it necessary for everyone to be huge. No. What about rock climbers, jockeys, gymnasts, distance runners… The list goes on.
Just because someone doesn’t look “jacked” doesn’t mean sh!t. I sometimes wonder what some of these posters are thinking when they make posts like this. Are you spending all day checking out other male physiques? [/quote]
No, actually I was watching Best Week Ever and they had a segment on how he is trying to separate himself from the Harry Potter role doing these half naked photo shoots and plays.
I figure if you are going to do something like this, then you should at least look like you exercise. He looks like every other skinny teenager. I was the same, if not worse when I his age.
I’ll agree that Harry Potter doesn’t need to be jacked but the same kid shouldn’t be taking his shirt off to do a photo shoot. It’s like anorexic models. I don’t find rib cages sexy and I don’t think those girls should be in swimsuits.
And no everyone doesn’t need to be huge. I think people should go after their goals. Myself, I don’t aspire to be huge. I have my own goals and I’m working towards them.
I’m sorry that you are taking this thread seriously. It was suppose to be for a laugh. If I had Harry Potter’s number, I would call and apologize for picking on him.
[quote]Dragonvash wrote:
I’m sorry that you are taking this thread seriously. It was suppose to be for a laugh. If I had Harry Potter’s number, I would call and apologize for picking on him.
[/quote]
Send an owl…
[quote]Dragonvash wrote:
Chewie wrote:
OK, these threads are getting ridiculous.
1)He is about to be 18. Some people (myself included) take a while to develop.
2)His role as a child wizard wouldn’t really make sense if he looked like Arnold. Would it?
3)Is it necessary for everyone to be huge. No. What about rock climbers, jockeys, gymnasts, distance runners… The list goes on.
Just because someone doesn’t look “jacked” doesn’t mean sh!t. I sometimes wonder what some of these posters are thinking when they make posts like this. Are you spending all day checking out other male physiques?
No, actually I was watching Best Week Ever and they had a segment on how he is trying to separate himself from the Harry Potter role doing these half naked photo shoots and plays.
I figure if you are going to do something like this, then you should at least look like you exercise. He looks like every other skinny teenager. I was the same, if not worse when I his age.
I’ll agree that Harry Potter doesn’t need to be jacked but the same kid shouldn’t be taking his shirt off to do a photo shoot. It’s like anorexic models. I don’t find rib cages sexy and I don’t think those girls should be in swimsuits.
And no everyone doesn’t need to be huge. I think people should go after their goals. Myself, I don’t aspire to be huge. I have my own goals and I’m working towards them.
I’m sorry that you are taking this thread seriously. It was suppose to be for a laugh. If I had Harry Potter’s number, I would call and apologize for picking on him.
[/quote]
Well, that is a good defense. I was unaware that he was doing a nude photo shoot. That is unacceptable considering he is starring in movies geared for children. Flame away!
My point is that these threads keep popping up.
my sisters laughed when they saw that picture in the free rag we get on the train and the underlying caption ‘…muscular look for the harry potter star…’ and brought it home to show it me, i to laughed at the caption-even though id just began actual proper training i was significantly bigger than him (though fatter granted lol) what struck me was that as a stable boy, he should be more developed from lugging horse poo and kit around and wranggling all day no?
The funny thing is, the common response in the media (over here at least) is that he is jacked. Look at the picture again.
Come on now, that’s ridiculous.
He should use some of that magic to get some muscles.