Gunning for Mormons

[quote]entheogens wrote:

It’s true that homophobia still exists and the Mormon Church
and the Roman Catholic Church pumped big money into exploiting that issue, especially with their lies about how voting “No” on 8 would mean that homosexuality was going to be preached in schools.

[/quote]

I think you are seriously mistaken or completely ignorant of the secular progressive agenda of promoting gay marriage to our children in our schools. Take a look at what has happened in Massachusetts.

http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1352578267/bctid1784521903

[quote]shawnhavoc wrote:

I think you are seriously mistaken or completely ignorant of the secular progressive agenda of promoting gay marriage to our children in our schools. Take a look at what has happened in Massachusetts.

http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1352578267/bctid1784521903
[/quote]

Unbelievable…

Edit: Seriously though, I would be beyond angry. Public schools will decide what is right thinking, what kind of values and morals need to be taught, etc.

Maybe that means making sure the football coach doesn’t lead a team prayer, while the kindergarten teacher reads your child a book about how homosexual relationships are “Super, thanks for asking!” How about it lefties, no government indocrtination of other peoples’ kids, or what?

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
If you believe in evolution, the ultimate goal of life is reproduction, and you have to see homosexuality as a defect.[/quote]

Because evolution is just that simple, right?

[quote]Sloth wrote:
After all, a christian that can’t judge between righteousness and sin can’t preach and convert. To preach and convert requires pointing out how Christians are supposed to live. That means identifying sin and what makes one a sinner. That means making judgements.[/quote]

Or, you could give someone the Good Book and let them figure it out for themselves. Everything else is in the hands of God, right?

[quote]Makavali wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
If you believe in evolution, the ultimate goal of life is reproduction, and you have to see homosexuality as a defect.

Because evolution is just that simple, right?[/quote]

I think the goals of nature are pretty simple, yes.

[quote]apbt55 wrote:
But your argument only holds true if we are an ant colony.[/quote]

Don’t be so fucking arrogant. Human are the equivalent of fungus on this planet. If aliens came here and saw out lush dense beautiful forests and then saw these unnatural blocky dense structures spewing out smoke, then what would they deem to be the problem?

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Makavali wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
If you believe in evolution, the ultimate goal of life is reproduction, and you have to see homosexuality as a defect.

Because evolution is just that simple, right?

I think the goals of nature are pretty simple, yes.[/quote]

LOL

The goals may be simple, but the means never are.

[quote]Makavali wrote:
apbt55 wrote:
But your argument only holds true if we are an ant colony.

Don’t be so fucking arrogant. Human are the equivalent of fungus on this planet. If aliens came here and saw out lush dense beautiful forests and then saw these unnatural blocky dense structures spewing out smoke, then what would they deem to be the problem?[/quote]

I don’t know how that relates to anything, other than I agree that humans are the one creature that can be “unnatural”.

[quote]Makavali wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Makavali wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
If you believe in evolution, the ultimate goal of life is reproduction, and you have to see homosexuality as a defect.

Because evolution is just that simple, right?

I think the goals of nature are pretty simple, yes.

LOL

The goals may be simple, but the means never are.[/quote]

I agree.

[quote]Makavali wrote:
Sloth wrote:
After all, a christian that can’t judge between righteousness and sin can’t preach and convert. To preach and convert requires pointing out how Christians are supposed to live. That means identifying sin and what makes one a sinner. That means making judgements.

Or, you could give someone the Good Book and let them figure it out for themselves. Everything else is in the hands of God, right?[/quote]

Not if you’re Christian, no. From the apostles on, the message was spread.

[quote]forlife wrote:
I thought you just said I was a defect due to my choice and the environment. If someone called you a defect, would you not take that as a personal insult?[/quote]

You are no more defective than the rest of us. The only difference is you gladly embrace your defect and Christians are supposed to at least attempt to get as far away from our defects as possible.

[quote]forlife wrote:
I know, makes me laugh when Mormons lead the charge on protecting “traditional marriage” despite having a history of believing in and practicing polygamy. The only reason they abandoned polygamy was to avoid war with the United States, and even now they continue to believe in polygamy after a person dies.[/quote]

In the bible the Old Testament patriarchs always had more than one wife and concubines too. There weren’t any same sex marriages in the bible. So their position is theologically defensible.

[quote]forlife wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

Are you claiming you’ve already cast the beam out of your eye?[/quote]

Why yes he is. Why yes he is. He hasn’t seemed to figure out the hubris behind that statement yet either. Nor has he connected the simple dots to other biblical stories or texts. Instead he focuses on one line to change what was the obvious point of a story. He even used adultery to claim we should judge others…When Christ himself tells us that only those without sin should cast stones, or condemn.

[i]

[center]Matthew 7 Do Not Judge

1 ?Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. 3 And why do you look at the speck in your brother?s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ?Let me remove the speck from your eye?; and look, a plank is in your own eye? 5 Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother?s eye.
6 ?Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.
[/i][/center]

Obviously the title “Do Not Judge” (new king james) is telling us, “Christians Must Judge” as has been claimed.

You’ve got much more patience than I forlife. You’re a better Christan than I (even if you’re not a christian I’m afraid).

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
forlife wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

Are you claiming you’ve already cast the beam out of your eye?

Why yes he is. Why yes he is. He hasn’t seemed to figure out the hubris behind that statement yet either. Nor has he connected the simple dots to other biblical stories or texts. Instead he focuses on one line to change what was the obvious point of a story. He even used adultery to claim we should judge others…When Christ himself tells us that only those without sin should cast stones, or condemn.

[i]

[center]Matthew 7 Do Not Judge

1 ?Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. 3 And why do you look at the speck in your brother?s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ?Let me remove the speck from your eye?; and look, a plank is in your own eye? 5 Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother?s eye.
6 ?Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.
[/i][/center]

Obviously the title “Do Not Judge” (new king james) is telling us, “Christians Must Judge” as has been claimed.

You’ve got much more patience than I forlife. You’re a better Christan than I (even if you’re not a christian I’m afraid).
[/quote]

If you can’t judge that his homosexuality is a sin, you’ve got a lot of problems with your form of “Christianity.” Let’s take it a step further, though. Is murdering sinful? Adultrey? Can you say that adulterers are sinners? Are you telling me you can’t?! Do you really think the apostles and the earliest christians just said “there’s stuff that is sinful for which we can’t name in order to avoid being judgemental?” Your flaky interpretation makes no sense. None!

Edit: Seriously, I can’t believe this. Moral relativism from a Christian?!

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:

You’re a better Christan than I (even if you’re not a christian I’m afraid).
[/quote]

I’m tempted to agree…Just a joke! Ahem.

Edit: By the way, Gambit. Aren’t you incapable of accusing me of not representing the faith accurately? Aren’t you making a judgement about me and my actions here? Am I in the wrong? Am I sinning by presenting a false message? No, you can’t answer that, can you?

By the way, how do you determine the dogs and pigs, if not by judgement? Did you even think about that?

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
forlife wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

Are you claiming you’ve already cast the beam out of your eye?

Why yes he is. Why yes he is. He hasn’t seemed to figure out the hubris behind that statement yet either. Nor has he connected the simple dots to other biblical stories or texts. Instead he focuses on one line to change what was the obvious point of a story. He even used adultery to claim we should judge others…When Christ himself tells us that only those without sin should cast stones, or condemn.

[i]

[center]Matthew 7 Do Not Judge

1 ?Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. 3 And why do you look at the speck in your brother?s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ?Let me remove the speck from your eye?; and look, a plank is in your own eye? 5 Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother?s eye.
6 ?Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.
[/i][/center]

Obviously the title “Do Not Judge” (new king james) is telling us, “Christians Must Judge” as has been claimed.

You’ve got much more patience than I forlife. You’re a better Christan than I (even if you’re not a christian I’m afraid).
[/quote]

It’s always good to see someone quoting scripture on T-Nation. Let’s take a look at what Jesus meant when he stated those words in Matthew.

If one takes a close look at the scripture in Matthew there is nothing in there which would indicate that we should not make judgements. However, there is a warning, in essence, if you judge you will be judged by that same measure:

“For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you.”

He was particularly talking about the Pharisees and Sadducees who judged the people quite harshly and then in turn committed some of the same sins.

For example, when a politician is exposed for various sexual perversions and that very same politican helped sign into law legislation forbidding gay marriage.

That politician made judgements he had no business making as he had the same plank in his eye, or one equally large.

In addition to this one more verse you quote states “Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces,” Christ is using dogs and swine to describe profane people who treat spiritual matters with contempt. The interesting part is that in order to obey that verse, we obviously have to make a judgment as to who the dogs and swine are.

Certainly Jesus did not intend for us not to make moral judgements of others. This is one way that we steer our own lives (and the Church) away from sin. If you look at an act and the actor and see sin you make a determination from that point.

Many times the Apostles made moral judgements, one such example is when Peter “judged” Sapphira and Ananias:

[b]"But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, and kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.

But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.

And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.

And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him. And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in. And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much.

Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out.

Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband. And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things. Acts 4:32 - 5:11"[/b]

Some may even say he not only judged but was the executioner as well.

It is clear that we are to make all sorts of judgements of situations, people, ideas etc. But, we must do so fairly and in a righteous manner.

As to making these “moral” judgements Jesus said “Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment” (John 7:24). It is a command to judge fairly and on the basis of truth and fact rather than by outward appearances, but nevertheless to judge.

I thank you for the opportunity to speak about these things.

All the best,

Zeb

[quote]ZEB wrote:

It’s always good to see someone quoting scripture on T-Nation. Let’s take a look at what Jesus meant when he stated those words in Matthew.

[/quote]

Great post. And it’s the only reading that makes sense within the context of the rest of the New Testament, too. The alternative presented here doesn’t work, at all.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
I don’t want the homosexual behind bars. [/quote]

That’s a good first step, but making it legal to be gay isn’t the same as granting equal legal rights to gays.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
You are no more defective than the rest of us. The only difference is you gladly embrace your defect and Christians are supposed to at least attempt to get as far away from our defects as possible. [/quote]

Christians are welcome to work on their defects, however they define them.

I’m not a Christian, and I don’t consider homosexuality a defect. I respect your right to believe whatever you want, but please don’t impose your version of Christianity on my life.