Gun Control

[quote]vroom wrote:
Al, I had actually posted my wisecrack at a previous poster, but you echo’d similar sentiments anyway before it got posted…

Apparently, the shoe did fit anyway.

:wink:

I would say that children do deserve some protection in our society, because we don’t in fact hold them responsible as adults and we can’t count on their parents to be reasonable people – and it isn’t their fault if they have crappy parents.
[/quote]

I wholehearted agree that children do deserve a great deal of protection in our society. There are some real idiots that are allowed to have children. But the Catch-22 of a free society is that idiots are allowed to reproduce too.

[quote]vroom wrote:
Al, I had actually posted my wisecrack at a previous poster, but you echo’d similar sentiments anyway before it got posted…

Apparently, the shoe did fit anyway.

:wink:

I would say that children do deserve some protection in our society, because we don’t in fact hold them responsible as adults and we can’t count on their parents to be reasonable people – and it isn’t their fault if they have crappy parents.
[/quote]

BTW, after re-reading the post above, I can see where the mistake was drawn. But you are right, the shoe did fit. :wink:

[quote]AZMojo wrote:
snipeout wrote:
Your last paragraph is a joke right? Do you know how many times I run into people on the streets? If you had any clue how many people out on the street have actually been to jail for more than just a traffic ticket your jaw would drop. Not a week goes by where I don’t see at least 3 people.

Do you not see the immediacy of them recognizing me and possibly having some problem with me? The home is one thing but running into an inmate on the street is where you are at your biggest disadvantage now throw in my wife or my nephew being with me and try and understand why I NEED to carry an off suty weapon. You being an average joe don’t really have to worry about angry inmate X because it’s just another face to you.

-What kind of town do you live in snipe? You paint a pretty dark picture of it. I live in one of the largest cities in the country and know a few police officers, and can’t think of one who regularly carries while off duty. Keep in mind this is in a state where it’s legal for ANYONE to carry.

Are you in a really small crime-ridden town?
How do you keep running into previous lock-ups? I mean, if the number of inmates is jaw-dropping, I would expect you to be in a good-sized city.

In a previous thread, you mentioned you were a corrections officer, right? Have you had run-ins on the street before, with previous inmates?

[/quote]

I have been a police officer before a corrections officer. As a corrections officer I see every single person that is arrested and doesn’t bail out from the municipality. In a county with over 1million people in it that tends to be alot of people yearly. Although the street cop is the one who arrests them they see me 8-16 hours a day, they learn my first and last name and if they feel wronged you better believe there best bet for retaliation is on the street where they have a leg up. I have never had a negative run in on the street, but you better believe I hear “Yo C.O.” way to often on the street. We have 140 officers in my jail, 130 of them carry off duty, any CO with a shred of common sense carries off duty.

[quote]snipeout wrote:
I have been a police officer before a corrections officer. As a corrections officer I see every single person that is arrested and doesn’t bail out from the municipality. In a county with over 1million people in it that tends to be alot of people yearly. Although the street cop is the one who arrests them they see me 8-16 hours a day, they learn my first and last name and if they feel wronged you better believe there best bet for retaliation is on the street where they have a leg up. I have never had a negative run in on the street, but you better believe I hear “Yo C.O.” way to often on the street. We have 140 officers in my jail, 130 of them carry off duty, any CO with a shred of common sense carries off duty. [/quote]

-How many run-ins have your co-workers had? Not being in law enforcement myself, I’m unfamiliar with the actual off the job risks. What kind of arrest powers do you have, if any, while off duty?

It seems to me that carrying while off-duty wouldn’t provide that much more security against a street criminal that recognizes and has it out for you. I mean it’s not like he’s gonna challenge you to a duel or anything. Most likely he’d have the drop on you, and you reaching for your weapon at that point would increase the chance of you or your family members getting shot. I don’t image you’re planning on strolling the mall with your thumb on the latch, are you?

I know it’s better to have one and not need it rather than need one and not have it. I’m just asking what the actual threat is, based on your and your co-worker’s experience.

What is your officer to inmate ratio, like 1 to 4? I wish the school system could afford that.

I dont like guns either really. The more prominent guns are in a society the more often they will be used for murder. That said, im going to be a hypocrite and purchase a pistol myself as well as concealed handgun training. I’ve recently wished that the gov would ban anything but rifles in the hands of civilians but i cant get everything i wish for.

Only the government should have guns, because you can always trust the government.

You should rely on the cops for your safety because they’re always available to protect and serve.

The crime rates in Canada, Uk, France (fucking French) and all the other places with strict gun laws were the exact same as Americas before the laws.

The crime rates plummeted drastically after the laws, creating crime free paradises. (Fucking faggot-ass French)

Children and guns do not mix. All those kids who learned to shoot in America back in the day shot their eyes out. That’s where all the blind people come from.

All rifles are assault rifles. (Well, you could assault someone with any rifle, couldn’t you?)

Gun laws work because criminals enjoy obeying laws.

Handguns are evil. Just look into their beedy little eyes. (FRENCH!)

[quote]WMD wrote:
Only the government should have guns, because you can always trust the government.

You should rely on the cops for your safety because they’re always available to protect and serve.

The crime rates in Canada, Uk, France (fucking French) and all the other places with strict gun laws were the exact same as Americas before the laws.

The crime rates plummeted drastically after the laws, creating crime free paradises. (Fucking faggot-ass French)

Children and guns do not mix. All those kids who learned to shoot in America back in the day shot their eyes out. That’s where all the blind people come from.

All rifles are assault rifles. (Well, you could assault someone with any rifle, couldn’t you?)

Gun laws work because criminals enjoy obeying laws.

Handguns are evil. Just look into their beedy little eyes. (FRENCH!)[/quote]

Oh shit, thanks for the good laugh. Funny shit.

[quote]BIGRAGOO wrote:
WMD wrote:
Only the government should have guns, because you can always trust the government.

You should rely on the cops for your safety because they’re always available to protect and serve.

The crime rates in Canada, Uk, France (fucking French) and all the other places with strict gun laws were the exact same as Americas before the laws.

The crime rates plummeted drastically after the laws, creating crime free paradises. (Fucking faggot-ass French)

Children and guns do not mix. All those kids who learned to shoot in America back in the day shot their eyes out. That’s where all the blind people come from.

All rifles are assault rifles. (Well, you could assault someone with any rifle, couldn’t you?)

Gun laws work because criminals enjoy obeying laws.

Handguns are evil. Just look into their beedy little eyes. (FRENCH!)

Oh shit, thanks for the good laugh. Funny shit.
[/quote]

I live to serve.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
snipeout wrote:
As for your reference to society deeming metal detectors only necessary “over there in that school”(or however you stated it) I would have you pegged for the type of liberal that wouldn’t want any metal detectors anywhere because it would interfere with peoples rights to carry on them what they please.

Dude, who said I was a liberal? I’m in the military, why would I be against anyone carrying a weapon? I am against EVERYONE carrying a weapon, therefore I am for some restrictions. Quit listening to other people about what my political stance is. That is what I meant by only seeing all black or all white. You don’t even bother to listen to anyone’s point, you just assume their stance based on a label.[/quote]

This is a gun issue not a racial issue get it straight.

[quote]lumbernac wrote:
Professor X wrote:
snipeout wrote:
As for your reference to society deeming metal detectors only necessary “over there in that school”(or however you stated it) I would have you pegged for the type of liberal that wouldn’t want any metal detectors anywhere because it would interfere with peoples rights to carry on them what they please.

Dude, who said I was a liberal? I’m in the military, why would I be against anyone carrying a weapon? I am against EVERYONE carrying a weapon, therefore I am for some restrictions. Quit listening to other people about what my political stance is. That is what I meant by only seeing all black or all white. You don’t even bother to listen to anyone’s point, you just assume their stance based on a label.

This is a gun issue not a racial issue get it straight.[/quote]

You can’t be that stupid. Then again…

Maybe you were joking. In which case I shall lay out a quiet “he he” and continue onward.

[quote]WMD wrote:
Only the government should have guns, because you can always trust the government. [/quote]

See, now I’m confused. I thought the Patriot Act had a basis in the concept of us having MUCH trust in the government? They wouldn’t do anything that wasn’t in our individual best interest, right? Ever?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
WMD wrote:
Only the government should have guns, because you can always trust the government.

See, now I’m confused. I thought the Patriot Act had a basis in the concept of us having MUCH trust in the government? They wouldn’t do anything that wasn’t in our individual best interest, right? Ever?
[/quote]

Never. The government loves us. And anything they did do would only be to take good care of us.

[quote]AZMojo wrote:
snipeout wrote:
I have been a police officer before a corrections officer. As a corrections officer I see every single person that is arrested and doesn’t bail out from the municipality. In a county with over 1million people in it that tends to be alot of people yearly. Although the street cop is the one who arrests them they see me 8-16 hours a day, they learn my first and last name and if they feel wronged you better believe there best bet for retaliation is on the street where they have a leg up. I have never had a negative run in on the street, but you better believe I hear “Yo C.O.” way to often on the street. We have 140 officers in my jail, 130 of them carry off duty, any CO with a shred of common sense carries off duty.

-How many run-ins have your co-workers had? Not being in law enforcement myself, I’m unfamiliar with the actual off the job risks. What kind of arrest powers do you have, if any, while off duty?

It seems to me that carrying while off-duty wouldn’t provide that much more security against a street criminal that recognizes and has it out for you. I mean it’s not like he’s gonna challenge you to a duel or anything. Most likely he’d have the drop on you, and you reaching for your weapon at that point would increase the chance of you or your family members getting shot. I don’t image you’re planning on strolling the mall with your thumb on the latch, are you?

I know it’s better to have one and not need it rather than need one and not have it. I’m just asking what the actual threat is, based on your and your co-worker’s experience.

What is your officer to inmate ratio, like 1 to 4? I wish the school system could afford that.

[/quote]

Lets start off with inmate to officer ratio in my jail, for my shift we staff 22 people and we have 530+ inmates. Now of those 22 people 8 are in areas that they can not leave because they would breach our security and allow people to walk right out. We have 14 people working as some sort of rover(i.e. available to respond to an incident). If I work our east wing or west wing as the floor officer we have 5 dorms adding up to roughly 130 inmates. On a bad day my ratio is 140 to 1 and on a good day I am 50 to 1.

As for arrest powers, we are police officers. Off duty we are REQUIRED to act if a crime is being committed, failing to do so is official misconduct(a second degree crime) punishable by 5 to 10 years in prison. As for altercations on the street, it is a rarity but if I am carrying I feel way more secure if something were to happen.

As for the inmate who has made bail on the street having the drop on me, you are right. Why should I be unarmed and have no way to protect myself, unlike people in normal jobs my awareness of my surroundings both in and out of the jail is probably 1000 times greater. For example, in a restaraunt I do not sit with my back to the door. Being a corrections officer( even more so than a street cop) makes you way more aware that there are more scumbags out there than most people think.

As for carrying off duty not providing much more protection I am definitely going to have to disagree, in my circumstance being a CO and having 6 years military experience in a specialized unit gives me way more training and the ability to keep my cool when the shots re going off around me, when that con misses with his first shot or so he’s gonna end up with 2 .40 cal hollow points buried in his chest.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
lumbernac wrote:
Professor X wrote:
snipeout wrote:
As for your reference to society deeming metal detectors only necessary “over there in that school”(or however you stated it) I would have you pegged for the type of liberal that wouldn’t want any metal detectors anywhere because it would interfere with peoples rights to carry on them what they please.

Dude, who said I was a liberal? I’m in the military, why would I be against anyone carrying a weapon? I am against EVERYONE carrying a weapon, therefore I am for some restrictions. Quit listening to other people about what my political stance is. That is what I meant by only seeing all black or all white. You don’t even bother to listen to anyone’s point, you just assume their stance based on a label.

This is a gun issue not a racial issue get it straight.

You can’t be that stupid. Then again…

Maybe you were joking. In which case I shall lay out a quiet “he he” and continue onward.[/quote]

Hey prox , apparantly the guy was confused about some comments that you made previously and just didnt get the point. That and if you are calling me stupid for pointing out the obvious then you have a problem yourself. I think i know what that is…

[quote]lumbernac wrote:
Hey prox , apparantly the guy was confused about some comments that you made previously and just didnt get the point. That and if you are calling me stupid for pointing out the obvious then you have a problem yourself. I think i know what that is…[/quote]

Your timing was bad. Don’t get mad at me because your post lacked a punchline.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
lumbernac wrote:
Hey prox , apparantly the guy was confused about some comments that you made previously and just didnt get the point. That and if you are calling me stupid for pointing out the obvious then you have a problem yourself. I think i know what that is…

Your timing was bad. Don’t get mad at me because your post lacked a punchline. [/quote]

Do you even have a point or are you just trying to start talking $hit?