[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
Please explain?[/quote]
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
Please explain?[/quote]
[/quote]
Prone with a hand gun, come on…
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
Please explain?[/quote]
More small arm owners + more small arms = greater overall security.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
Please explain?[/quote]
[/quote]
Prone with a hand gun, come on…[/quote]
edit - already answered.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
Please explain?[/quote]
More small arm owners + more small arms = greater overall security.[/quote]
Agreed.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
I think he is trying to say is hanging people is a wee-bit of an overreaction to what amounts to a really shitty law.
Laws can be repealed, people cannot be brought back from the dead for making a foolish mistake based on politics.
Plus, the whole notion of lynching political opponents should be reserved for the left. (By left I mean you know, leftys, progressives, totalitarians, etc. Not Bill “I got a BJ and lied about it, W was WAAAAYYY worse” Clinton.)
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
So hanging legislators and police officers along the streets of New York enjoys constitutional support, where exactly? Clearly they were engaging in an insurgency.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
So hanging legislators and police officers along the streets of New York enjoys constitutional support, where exactly? Clearly they were engaging in an insurgency.
[/quote]
Perhaps you took the hyperbole literally…
I on the other hand, took it as the rant/joke that it was. And proceeded to quote Boondock Saints
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
A policy that is freely shitting on our constitution. Also it is not merely poor and misinformed, these are smart people that know exactly what they are doing. And purposely stripping law abiding citizens of an inalienable right and dictating terms of compliance against their will and rights falls under waging war. War on the constitution and those who support it.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
So hanging legislators and police officers along the streets of New York enjoys constitutional support, where exactly? Clearly they were engaging in an insurgency.
[/quote]
Dude, you aren’t getting it. I’m not agreeing with Bauber. I don’t think it’s treason.
You wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
[/quote]
I asked for you to explain what amendments 5-8 has to do with Baubers statement?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I think he is trying to say is hanging people is a wee-bit of an overreaction to what amounts to a really shitty law.
Laws can be repealed, people cannot be brought back from the dead for making a foolish mistake based on politics. [/quote]
I guess, I just wanted an explanation.
[quote]Aragorn wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
So hanging legislators and police officers along the streets of New York enjoys constitutional support, where exactly? Clearly they were engaging in an insurgency.
[/quote]
Perhaps you took the hyperbole literally…
I on the other hand, took it as the rant/joke that it was. And proceeded to quote Boondock Saints[/quote]
Yeah he took it too literally, but these people need to be informed this kind of bullshit is not okay. They need to never hold office again and go work at McDonald’s where they might be qualified.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
So hanging legislators and police officers along the streets of New York enjoys constitutional support, where exactly? Clearly they were engaging in an insurgency.
[/quote]
Dude, you aren’t getting it. I’m not agreeing with Bauber. I don’t think it’s treason.
You wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
[/quote]
I asked for you to explain what amendments 5-8 has to do with Baubers statement?
[/quote]
Sarcasm travels poorly it seems. Bauber’s form of “justice” requires that those amendments be tossed out of the window in favor of the 2nd.
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Aragorn wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
So hanging legislators and police officers along the streets of New York enjoys constitutional support, where exactly? Clearly they were engaging in an insurgency.
[/quote]
Perhaps you took the hyperbole literally…
I on the other hand, took it as the rant/joke that it was. And proceeded to quote Boondock Saints[/quote]
Yeah he took it too literally, but these people need to be informed this kind of bullshit is not okay. They need to never hold office again and go work at McDonald’s where they might be qualified.
[/quote]
This I am perfectly ok with, in all seriousness. I consider this a breach of their oath of office, but not treason. I have long been of the opinion that impeachment of all officials (or recall votes) are far far too sparingly used. They should be in force.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
Sarcasm travels poorly it seems. Bauber’s form of “justice” requires that those amendments be tossed out of the window in favor of the 2nd.[/quote]
Not necessarily.
You can be afforded a speedy trial with due process and be hung for Treason. I don’t think it’s cruel and/or unusual either. Seizure could be justified as well.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
Sarcasm travels poorly it seems. Bauber’s form of “justice” requires that those amendments be tossed out of the window in favor of the 2nd.[/quote]
Not necessarily.
You can be afforded a speedy trial with due process and be hung for Treason. I don’t think it’s cruel and/or unusual either. Seizure could be justified as well. [/quote]
Certainly. But his definition of treason leaves much to be desired.
[quote]Aragorn wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Aragorn wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]
Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]
You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]
Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]
Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]
How does that violate 5-8?[/quote]
I fail to see how the legislation of poor and uninformed policy warrants an act of treason, defined in the U.S. as follows.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Don’t like a policy? Vote with your hand or with your feet. [/quote]
What you just wrote has zero to do with amendments 5-8.[/quote]
So hanging legislators and police officers along the streets of New York enjoys constitutional support, where exactly? Clearly they were engaging in an insurgency.
[/quote]
Perhaps you took the hyperbole literally…
I on the other hand, took it as the rant/joke that it was. And proceeded to quote Boondock Saints[/quote]
Yeah he took it too literally, but these people need to be informed this kind of bullshit is not okay. They need to never hold office again and go work at McDonald’s where they might be qualified.
[/quote]
This I am perfectly ok with, in all seriousness. I consider this a breach of their oath of office, but not treason. I have long been of the opinion that impeachment of all officials (or recall votes) are far far too sparingly used. They should be in force.
[/quote]
My main concern is we all know where the end game is with this mess, complete disarmament of anyone other than the government. That is plain as day and you are naive if you think otherwise. And we know how well that has worked out for countries in history.