Gun Control II

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/11/10/wash-college-students-face-possible-expulsion-for-using-gun-to-ward-off/[/quote]

I understand, although think it’s total BS, the no guns on campus rules. I think it’s an extension of how we have sadly allowed the idea that others are responsible for our safety and freedom to infiltrate a large enough portion of the population to make these rules stick. That said, why can’t this kid have a gun in his apartment? Just because the university own it? He does pay rent, correct? How can the 2nd amendment be so clearly breeched?

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/11/10/wash-college-students-face-possible-expulsion-for-using-gun-to-ward-off/[/quote]

I understand, although think it’s total BS, the no guns on campus rules. I think it’s an extension of how we have sadly allowed the idea that others are responsible for our safety and freedom to infiltrate a large enough portion of the population to make these rules stick. That said, why can’t this kid have a gun in his apartment? Just because the university own it? He does pay rent, correct? How can the 2nd amendment be so clearly breeched?[/quote]

…can’t have any guns on campus or off campus housing because we want everyone one to be “SAFE”. fuck gonzaga’s administration and their inability to grasp the facts of this specific situation.

they will suspend or expel the two seniors for successfully defending their selves and who could have easily been murdered by the six time felon who just got out of jail.

…this is the same politically correct “higher education” blind wisdom that runs this country and is why so much is screwed up. it can be certain a politically correct judge felt this six time felon was of “no danger to the community” (meaning can’t get into his gated community) and that is why he was released from jail.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Anti-Gun Activist Shannon Watts: Open Carry Texas ?Like the Taliban,? Might Shoot and Rape Moms

This woman was seriously expressing fear that folks who want to open carry in Texas might very well be into murdering and raping women.

“I don’t know too much about OCT (Open Carry Texas), I grant you. But I do know that one is probably unlikely to plan to shoot up and then rape a restaurant full of mothers after one has alerted the press to one?s presence and brought along one?s wives and children for good measure.”

Good grief, the world is heavily populated with dunces.[/quote]

Ive always wondered how much of the fear coming from gun grabbers is projection of there own L’appel du vide.

If your not hearing the call of the void why would you even consider that a legal publicized protest with children present would turn violent unprovoked.

Awesome clip to watch before I climb into the shower.

One quick note; the pro-LIFE movement already has the arguments covered. My wife helped me find Abort73.com and the site is far better than others. Mike lacks certain traits but he is human after all ; )

[quote]Hell-Billy wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
Awesome clip to watch before I climb into the shower.

One quick note; the pro-LIFE movement already has the arguments covered. My wife helped me find Abort73.com and the site is far better than others. Mike lacks certain traits but he is human after all ; )

[quote]Hell-Billy wrote:

[/quote]

Boo! Anarchist! Why should anyone other than the government possess weapons?

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go!

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]

Well, the 2nd amendment doesn’t specify you can use arms. Just that you can Keep them and Bear them if necessary. You can’t use them though. That’s barbaric. /sarcasm.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]

Well, the 2nd amendment doesn’t specify you can use arms. Just that you can Keep them and Bear them if necessary. You can’t use them though. That’s barbaric. /sarcasm.[/quote]

Lol. You can only rack the slide to scare them away. If that doesn’t work, call the cops so they can come and investigate your death and hopefully put the intruder to justice.

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]

Well, the 2nd amendment doesn’t specify you can use arms. Just that you can Keep them and Bear them if necessary. You can’t use them though. That’s barbaric. /sarcasm.[/quote]

Lol. You can only rack the slide to scare them away. If that doesn’t work, call the cops so they can come and investigate your death and hopefully put the intruder to justice.[/quote]

exactly.

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]

Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]

Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]

I’m strangely comfortable with this

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]

Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]

Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?

I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/06/new-york-city-confiscating-rifles-and-shotguns/[/quote]

Now that they are enforcing the law the lawsuits will start going to the courts. Lets see if the SCOTUS will take this up in the next year or two.
[/quote]

You have a right to defend yourself and your household and the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed. However, you can only defend yourself with 5 round magazines, one arm tied behind your back, and the intruder gets a five second head start and no limitations on weaponry. Go![/quote]

Ah another city that I will NEVER visit again or spend any money in. The list keeps growing. I personally think all the fucks enforcing this and who came up with the laws to do this should be tried for treason and hanged publicly.[/quote]

Seems reasonable. Who needs amendments 5-8 as long as we protect the 2nd?

I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]

How does that violate 5-8?

[quote]Bismark wrote:
I am a proponent of the horizontal proliferation of small arms by the way.
[/quote]

Please explain?