[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
what are these differences you speak of? and how do you use them in the real world?[/quote]
The differences are obvious. How you choose to “use” them in the real world is individual choice and conditioning. [/quote]
humor me.
and how do you choose to apply them?[/quote]
Why don’t you state your case? Instead of asking me to lay the ground work for your retort? Are you strictly a counter-puncher? Do you have any original thoughts on these matters other than those which would be a retort to another’s opinion?[/quote]
Copied from previously:
"The problem I have with this whole “context” thing is that color of your skin shouldn’t be part of context. If it’s part of context in your opinion, you’re a racist. Period.
People assume far far to much based on skin color. Being white doesn’t make it inherently easier. It doesn’t mean you’ve never been systematically discriminated against. It literally doesn’t mean anything. The same way being black doesn’t.
You don’t know anyone’s life story based on color. A black guy could have grown up the son of a rich politician in Africa on a 1000 acre estate in a country of 99.9% blacks. A white guy could grow up son to a poor white farmer in Mexico and been discriminated against for being white every day of his life.
The experiences of life both within this country and in this world are simply too diverse to make any assumptions about anyone based on skin color. Color simply shouldn’t be a part of any evaluation."
You said that this didn’t work in the “real world” because there were “obvious differences”. I’m simply asking what exactly these obvious differences were. You claimed these differences invalidate my view, so what are they? I’m the one that laid out the foundational argument we’ve been talking about. If anyone is lacking in original thoughts it ain’t me.
My case is I don’t see these difference that supposedly invalidate my post. So please, point some out for me.[/quote]
I’m not sure I want to engage you. I think it will be pointless.
Acting as if the color of your skin does not matter, or is never part of the “context” is a utopian view of the world that just isn’t based in reality. Your claim seems to be that if one even acknowledges or is cognizant of skin color, they are acting from a racist perspective. If that’s the case, then we are all racists under your definition and if so, biology has made “racism” (under your definition) unavoidable.
The term “racism” is generally defined as follows:
- a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
- a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
- hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
So, from the start, we disagree on terminology. Just because I recognize someone as black, and that they may be sensitive to a word, an action or, that I am sensitive to a cultural difference or sensitivity, does not make me racists…it would make me “aware”. If I choose not to use the word “nigga” or “nigger” in a room full of black people, my choice NOT to use it does not stem from any of the above criteria. If I DO choose to use it, it very well could stem from any of the above criteria, but then again, as we have discussed exhaustively, it may not.
Next, this thread is not about “making assumptions based on skin color”. However, as I have stated earlier, unless you live in Camelot, the reality is that people do make assumptions based on skin color. And I will repeat, an assumption based on a lifetime of experiences, does not necessarily fit the criteria of definition provided above. We make countless assumptions each and every day based on our experiences. We make assumptions based on how people dress, their social circle, their education, where they live, the car they drive, the way they speak, their carriage, male or female, - the list is endless, and none of it necessarily has any root in “racism”. I judge white people every day based on their appearance and probably dozens of other conscious and unconscious social cues. Until we know someone, this is the only way we process information. Sounds like you don’t like such judgments or assumptions based on appearance, but that doesn’t make it “racism”. If so, I’ll repeat; we’re all racist under your definition of the word.
Your view is a Utopian view and not rooted in everyday reality. Should we make such judgments? That’s a different debate. A better debate might be that given our hard wiring, can we even AVOID making any such judgments. I’d say we cannot, and I’d even venture to say that in spite of your stated beliefs, that you are just as guilty as making assumptions based on appearance as the rest of the world. As long as our souls are contained in bodies, and those bodies are different, we will always be “judged” on some level, however brief, by our appearances. Such judgments may however be transient, until we get to know someone or we have a brief social exchange.
I say to you we do not process such social information in any other way.
So, I just stated clearly how ALL OF US make such daily judgments. How you choose to use such assumptions or judgments is highly individual, based on your own experiences and temperament. But I assure you, none of us fail to make such assumptions or judgments. And some of us may be more inclined to not heed those initial reactions, and some of us may be very dogmatic about the accuracy of those assumptions. Most of us fall in the middle, like most bell curves. Turn the clock back 50 years, and I’m guessing there was an uneven bell curve distribution of such attitudes.
Your ideas are really not that clever, no offense. You’re really just stating we shouldn’t make assumptions based on someone’s color or appearance. Intellectually, we all know that. But it doesn’t mean that’s how we’re hard wired. It doesn’t mean we can even avoid our hard wiring. But we can certainly control how we choose to apply this information and act upon it.[/quote]
If he really tries arguing against this, there is no point in going further.