"In the 1989 abortion case, Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, for example, Stevens argued that a state law that defined life as beginning at conception violated the First Amendment by – yes, establishing a religion. The abortion law, he said, gave “a theological answer to the question of when life begins.” (You’ve all heard of the First Church of When Life Begins, United, haven’t you?)
Fortunately, Stevens didn’t read far enough to see that the Bible also condemns murder generally, or he might have voted to strike down all laws against murder.
In the 2002 school voucher case, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, Stevens argued that an Ohio program giving poor parents tuition aid to send their children to schools of their choosing also violated the establishment clause. Stevens admitted that the public school system in question was in “crisis” and also that the new schools were freely chosen by the parents."
— guess
And hello some other activist hack.
I’m trying to imagine the looks on the faces of people like even Ethan Allen if he knew the SCOTUS was debating the killing of unborn children at all, nevermind the twisted deranged notion that it is somehow a right protected by the constitution that he took Ticonderoga to help establish.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
And hello some other activist hack.
I’m trying to imagine the looks on the faces of people like even Ethan Allen if he knew the SCOTUS was debating the killing of unborn children at all, nevermind the twisted deranged notion that it is somehow a right protected by the constitution that he took Ticonderoga to help establish.[/quote]
True. I can’t even imagine Obama picking someone like Roberts.
Maybe he’ll pick someone like Alito. (LOL!!) as an aside, I wish Alito had just stood up during Obama’s speech and quietly walked out, looking neither left nor right. How sweet would that have been!!
I hold the belief that I would rather fight the devil I know than the devil I don’t, and that is especially true with Obama.