[quote]Nards wrote:
[quote]js252 wrote:
[/quote]
Well, I guess if she says so it’s OK for all of them then.[/quote]
Coming from a woman who trains for fighting I expect her way of thinking to be similar to that of a man.
Take a social climbing 9/10 hottie who loves attention, pisses off a guy who decks her and what have you got?
“HE HIT ME!” Proceed to local hospital after other men in the bar/club attack him.
The issue about hitting a woman who hits me is not the issue, its controlling the situation once you hit her. Other men will always be her Ace.
roybot
October 21, 2012, 8:05pm
242
[quote]harrypotter wrote:
Coming from a woman who trains for fighting I expect her way of thinking to be similar to that of a man.
[/quote]
Miesha Tate has cultivated a set of values beyond the modern pseudo-romantic ideal of a man acting like a gent regardless of how the “lady” conducts herself. Tate would happily step into a ring against a man, she’s less likely to flip out on a bus and I’d wager her attitude is more ladylike than bus girl’s.
Going back to my last post, in days of yore the knight would protect the virtue of the lady and slew the dragon. Modern women acting like dragons, getting beaten down then summoning all the white knights in the area is not a feminist issue, it’s a social one.
And I’m LMAO at the attempt to carry over such an inherently sexist concept as courtly love into a society that strives for equality.
orion
October 21, 2012, 10:38pm
243
[quote]roybot wrote:
And I’m LMAO at the attempt to carry over such an inherently sexist concept as courtly love into a society that strives for equality.[/quote]
And what society would that be?
I see Bastiats " great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else."
roybot
October 21, 2012, 11:12pm
244
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
And I’m LMAO at the attempt to carry over such an inherently sexist concept as courtly love into a society that strives for equality.[/quote]
And what society would that be?
[/quote]
The society we live in.
orion
October 21, 2012, 11:31pm
245
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
And I’m LMAO at the attempt to carry over such an inherently sexist concept as courtly love into a society that strives for equality.[/quote]
And what society would that be?
[/quote]
The society we live in. [/quote]
Na.
There are looooooooaaaaaads of people trying to get the upper hand by riding a moral high horse.
They will suffer the same fate all parasites do when they have finally killed the host.
roybot
October 22, 2012, 12:00am
246
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
And I’m LMAO at the attempt to carry over such an inherently sexist concept as courtly love into a society that strives for equality.[/quote]
And what society would that be?
[/quote]
The society we live in. [/quote]
Na.
There are looooooooaaaaaads of people trying to get the upper hand by riding a moral high horse.
They will suffer the same fate all parasites do when they have finally killed the host.
[/quote]
So you refute my point by saying that people riding moral high horses are parasites and we’ll be rid of them when the host dies?
orion
October 22, 2012, 6:35am
247
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
And I’m LMAO at the attempt to carry over such an inherently sexist concept as courtly love into a society that strives for equality.[/quote]
And what society would that be?
[/quote]
The society we live in. [/quote]
Na.
There are looooooooaaaaaads of people trying to get the upper hand by riding a moral high horse.
They will suffer the same fate all parasites do when they have finally killed the host.
[/quote]
So you refute my point by saying that people riding moral high horses are parasites and we’ll be rid of them when the host dies?[/quote]
Yup.
Because striving for equality and pretending to strive for equality to achieve social dominance are two very different animals.
Neither one of us lives in a society that “strives for equality”.
Matt_D
October 22, 2012, 12:37pm
248
Well I’m obviously late to the party but that lady deserved it.
If you put your hand on a hot stove, you’re going to burn it.
It’s not appropriate for anybody to hit, but self defense is appropriate for everybody.
And yeah, it was self defense.
roybot
October 24, 2012, 10:50pm
249
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
And I’m LMAO at the attempt to carry over such an inherently sexist concept as courtly love into a society that strives for equality.[/quote]
And what society would that be?
[/quote]
The society we live in. [/quote]
Na.
There are looooooooaaaaaads of people trying to get the upper hand by riding a moral high horse.
They will suffer the same fate all parasites do when they have finally killed the host.
[/quote]
So you refute my point by saying that people riding moral high horses are parasites and we’ll be rid of them when the host dies?[/quote]
Yup.
Because striving for equality and pretending to strive for equality to achieve social dominance are two very different animals.
Neither one of us lives in a society that “strives for equality”.[/quote]
Spoken like a true misanthropist.
P.S. Your semantic suplexes won’t work on me.