[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:
RJ, I’d rather root for our seemingly sad sack of a QB (albeit not the past two weeks) than your egotistical prick of a WR.[/quote]
Eli is a good QB who also gets way too much criticism. You’ll always hear about how bad Eli played in a loss, but no one harped on Romo’s five INTs in BUF or Peyton’s six INTs in SD.
It prob has to do with Eli’s bad body language at times and the fact that everyone expects Eli to be a great QB already.
[quote]chillain wrote:
Eli is a good QB who also gets way too much criticism. You’ll always hear about how bad Eli played in a loss, but no one harped on Romo’s five INTs in BUF or Peyton’s six INTs in SD.
It prob has to do with Eli’s bad body language at times and the fact that everyone expects Eli to be a great QB already.
[/quote]
It’s definitely his body language. He’s got one of the greatest jobs in the world, but every-time there is a close up of the guy, it looks like he just feels sorry for himself, and if they win and he had a good game, he’s just relieved that it’s over and he gets to go home now. Maybe if he won a super-bowl he’d be able to relax and enjoy himself a little bit, but that’s not going to happen this year.
Hopefully Eli Manning continues to play as well as he’s been playing. If he does, I really think that the Giants have a chance at winning this game. One can only hope.
Next week: Giants @ Packers, Lambeau Field, Green Bay, Wisconsin on your local FOX channel
That was some crazy shit…I don’t know what the hell happened at halftime in the Cowboys locker room…bad play calling in second half in my opinion…which was reflected in Barber having…what?..101 yds first half…28 yds the second half…horrible.
Oh well…this game was on par with a no L.T. San Diego upsetting Indy…but I wanted that!
Great fucking game! Can’t wait to see them against the Packers. I think Favre makes mistakes if you put enough pressure on him. Either way, NFC championship and superbowl this year are going to be great games.
ah this makes me happy. Well, I don’t know who’s gonna win this game. if the Giants can get their secondary patched up (they REALLY need Madison and Ross), they should win this game.
either team is facing the Pats, the Chargers aren’t gonna get this done
[quote]Padilla7921 wrote:
ah this makes me happy. Well, I don’t know who’s gonna win this game. if the Giants can get their secondary patched up (they REALLY need Madison and Ross), they should win this game.
either team is facing the Pats, the Chargers aren’t gonna get this done[/quote]
Chargers weren’t suppose to beat the Colts, especially with their backups in. Anything is possible.
[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
That was some crazy shit…I don’t know what the hell happened at halftime in the Cowboys locker room…bad play calling in second half in my opinion…which was reflected in Barber having…what?..101 yds first half…28 yds the second half…horrible.
Oh well…this game was on par with a no L.T. San Diego upsetting Indy…but I wanted that![/quote]
Maybe Barber was tired. Doesn’t he usually just play the half the snaps at the most? He runs hard as hell I wouldn’t be surprised if he left it all on the field in the first half.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Maybe Barber was tired. Doesn’t he usually just play the half the snaps at the most? He runs hard as hell I wouldn’t be surprised if he left it all on the field in the first half.[/quote]
no, it wasn’t that. The Cowboys just stopped running the ball altogether in the second half. They have Barber and Jones, yet they barely used either after halftime. The Giants’ secondary was weak, down to a practice squad player called up a few weeks ago (they didn’t even attack him, either…wtf?).
Bad coaching on Dallas’s part. Poor decision making on the whole for them, they should’ve attacked the inexperienced players more than they did. They should’ve also ran the ball a lot more, but failed to do so.
I think Chargers VS Patriots has potential. There’s bad blood there, that usually makes for an interesting game. Pats should win, but then, that Baltimore game shouldn’t have even been close.