[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
QFT
Some people never understand you get the spouse/partner/mate you deserve.
[/quote]
QFT!
In this case, I mean Quite Fucking True!
lol
[/quote]
Wow.
You guys just took a giant shat on thousands if not millions of battered women.
Are you guys misogynists?
[/quote]
Nice try, Raj. I think you know what we meant.
[quote] DN wrote:
How many children do YOU have, O, ALMIGHTY O???
[/quote]
That is entirely irrelevant because my dick is the not the reproductive bottleneck, your womb is.
You have a few hundred eggs at most, I produce so much sperm that can hardly keep up with getting rid of it.
Pesky, pesky double standard I know, sometimes it is so hard to tell the difference between misoginy and reality…
I blame Canada.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote] DN wrote:
How many children do YOU have, O, ALMIGHTY O???
[/quote]
I produce so much sperm that can hardly keep up with getting rid of it.
[/quote]
Uh uh uh, I hear ya, O.
That’s what happened when you spend too much time masturbating at the sight of 20 years old getting fucked on porn sites. You need to GET OUT MORE and produce that sperm inside womens, not on your hands. I hope your desk is crammed with box of tissues.
[quote]orion wrote:
my dick is the not the reproductive bottleneck, your womb is.
You have a few hundred eggs at most, I produce so much sperm that can hardly keep up with getting rid of it.
[/quote]
I hear ya, O.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote] DN wrote:
How many children do YOU have, O, ALMIGHTY O???
[/quote]
That is entirely irrelevant because my dick is the not the reproductive bottleneck, your womb is.
You have a few hundred eggs at most, I produce so much sperm that can hardly keep up with getting rid of it.
Pesky, pesky double standard I know, sometimes it is so hard to tell the difference between misoginy and reality…
I blame Canada.[/quote]
Chauvinism > Feminism?
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote] DN wrote:
How many children do YOU have, O, ALMIGHTY O???
[/quote]
That is entirely irrelevant because my dick is the not the reproductive bottleneck, your womb is.
You have a few hundred eggs at most, I produce so much sperm that can hardly keep up with getting rid of it.
Pesky, pesky double standard I know, sometimes it is so hard to tell the difference between misoginy and reality…
I blame Canada.[/quote]
Chauvinism > Feminism?
[/quote]
Definitely, because it rarely is codified.
Meaning, the average chauvinist does not turn to the government to make women finance his chauvinism.
Also, men can be chauvinist as fuuuuaaaark and society does not hit a demographic wall, with feminism, no such luck.
But, that is a value judgement on my part, if you dig the Sharia and lines in front of soup kitchens, feminism > chauvinism.
[quote]orion wrote:
the average chauvinist does not turn to the government to make women finance his chauvinism.[/quote]
That concept made me laugh.
What do you mean? As in, I literally have no idea what you mean by “demographic wall”.
[quote]LoRez wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
the average chauvinist does not turn to the government to make women finance his chauvinism.[/quote]
That concept made me laugh.
What do you mean? As in, I literally have no idea what you mean by “demographic wall”.
[/quote]
Its, like, when you hit such a low demographically speaking that you can no longer support your infrastructure.
Nobody looked after Romes aqueducts after the population dropped from 1 million to 60000, which incdentally happened because the grain ships from Egypt were kind of important to sustain such a population.
In our case it will be the welfare state.
A lot of people will go cold turkey quite abruptly.
Orion, do you ever bore yourself?
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
After mulling on this for a while I thought of a few things:
You shouldn’t. American feminism’s reach extends beyond US borders.
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
2. The terms feminism and feminist are being tossed around fast and loose. There is a spectrum that ranges frome women like my wife who simply want to be as equal as men to women who want to spell “woman” “womyn”. Even these two groups don’t necessarily agree on everything. [/quote]
“Equality” has actually lead to many societal woes including diminishing professional standards. They’ve actually lowered the physical requirement of firefighters, policemen and military just to promote “equality.” There are several other instances but that’s the example fresh in my mind.
Even if the above weren’t happening, your wife is still providing cover fire for radical feminists as she’s using the exact same label for herself.
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
3. Giving women equality has dramatically increased my personal quality of life because it means that my wife can get a good paying job. This takes the pressure off of me to be the sole bread winner. This equates to more flexibility in my schedule which directly coincides to me spending more time with my son. The true winner in this case is my 4 year old so you can say that feminists actually increased his quality of life too.[/quote]
What about outside of your direct personal life?
How many children now are latchkey kids, become obese from being fed McDonalds from tired working parents, are born into single parent households?
Also how many kids ya got? Only 1? If so that still isn’t cutting it.
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
4. Single parents are higher among black and Latina woman. Since these groups are traditionally less “feminist” I’m not sure how anyone can link feminists to single parents. [/quote]
Feminists created the conditions in which single motherhood blossoms. It isn’t necessarily just feminist women.
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
I think it has more to do with things like culture and incarceration rates than it does with women wanting equal rights. Instead of trying to get rid of feminism we should be asking why these men are not stepping up to fatherhood or why they are being incarcerated at rates higher than in white communities. But that’s a different thread.[/quote]
Why are men under any obligation to “step up” at all?
The law stipulates a man has no legal right to tell a woman whether she should carry a pregnancy to term or terminate it.
Your body your choice?
Well then your body YOUR RESPONSIBILITY, additionally.
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
james
[/quote]
Finally we agree!
This one is for you atypical1
This thread is boring so far.
[quote]LoRez wrote:
This thread is boring so far.[/quote]
It’s Orion’s fault.
The revelation from a DNA test was devastating and prompted him to leave his wife ? but he had not renounced their child. He continued to feel that in all the ways that mattered, she was still his daughter, and he faithfully paid her child support. It was only when he learned that his ex-wife was about to marry the man who she said actually was the girl?s biological father that Mike flipped.
Supporting another man?s child suddenly became unbearable.Two years after filing the suit that sought to end his paternal rights, Mike is still irate about the fix he?s in. ?I pay child support to a biologically intact family,? Mike told me, his voice cracking with incredulity. ?A father and mother, married, who live with their own child. And I pay support for that child. How ridiculous is that??
Tanner Pruitt, who owns a small manufacturing business in Texas, paid child support for seven years after divorcing his wife. His daughter never looked like him, but it wasn?t until she was 12 that it began to bother him. He told the girl he wanted to check something in her mouth, quickly swabbed some cheek cells and sent the samples off to a lab. After the DNA test showed they weren?t related, he contacted a lawyer, figuring the lab results would release him from child-support payments and justify reimbursement from the biological father.
But the lawyer told Pruitt his only option was to take the matter to court and that doing so might mean giving up his right to see the girl at all. It might also alert her to the truth. Pruitt didn?t want to chance either possibility, so he stayed silent and kept paying.?I spent thousands and thousands of dollars, and it hasn?t cost that biological father a penny, and yeah, I?m angry, but it would have been more harm to her psychologically than it was worth,? says Pruitt, who eventually fought for, and won, full custody.
But why aren’t men stepping up?
Why are men not interested in marriage in the same way they use to be???
It’s a mystery guys
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Orion, do you ever bore yourself?[/quote]
No, I chose to bore other people.
Or, rather, they chose to be bored by me.
News articles about happy marriages are about as rare as news articles about successful flights, people who made it to work safely, people who enjoy their jobs, families that are functional, etc.
And in my experience, I’ve actually met far more many women not interested in marriage than men.
Marriage really only seems to come up when they’re talking about kids… and even then, they might still wait several years after having kids before actually getting married.
This whole “women overall have gone downhill, so men aren’t interested in marriage” line just isn’t matching up.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]LoRez wrote:
This thread is boring so far.[/quote]
It’s Orion’s fault. [/quote]
Way to blame me for your lack of action.
Just so you dont have to visit my hub:
“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”
And, actually, I think men and women are still interested in long term relationships just as they were before. They’re just wary on actually getting ‘married’.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]LoRez wrote:
This thread is boring so far.[/quote]
It’s Orion’s fault. [/quote]
Way to blame me for your lack of action.
Just so you dont have to visit my hub:
“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”[/quote]
Nice going, Teddy.