George Soros Owns McCain

"In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros’ Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry’s Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections."

Wonder if any of this criminality is covered under McCain-Feingold?

Hillary is owned by the Rothschilds (English aristocracy) and McCain is Soros’ sock-puppet.

It’s not about electability, it’s about “puppetability”

[quote]jlesk68 wrote:
It’s not about electability, it’s about “puppetability”[/quote]

He doesn’t even SEEM presidential material to me — a short little guy with a wierd voice who loses his temper a lot.

Anyway, we have to wonder what the plan is if he (and therefore Soros) wins. A George Soros presidency…what are the implications of that?

I don’t think he’ll win, look at the number of dems compared to repubs that are voting in the primaries.

[quote]Rocky101 wrote:
I don’t think he’ll win, look at the number of dems compared to repubs that are voting in the primaries.[/quote]

This doesn’t tell you very much historically.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjFjNTM4YTM3OWQwZDNjZDFjNDZlOTBlN2NlODA3ZTg=

These kinds of kooky theories based on little or no evidence aren’t worth the cost of the computer pixels used to spread them around.

Sure, in the face of some actual evidence, the “follow the money” idea has some explanatory value. For instance, if McCain voted for something he did not otherwise have a history of supporting, or changed a position in favor of Soros for no apparent reason, something like this would suggest looking further.

But most often, these sorts of things confuse cause and effect. If I were someone with a large financial stake in free trade, I would go out and find people who supported free trade and give them money. I’d suggest that in this case, Soros supported restrictions on free speech via campaign finance laws (for his own reasons - he funded a whole lot of Dem 529 organization since the passage of McCain/Feingold) - and low and behold, that was a position McCain already held.

You need to come up for air out of the fever swamps once and awhile.

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
These kinds of kooky theories based on little or no evidence aren’t worth the cost of the computer pixels used to spread them around.

Sure, in the face of some actual evidence, the “follow the money” idea has some explanatory value. For instance, if McCain voted for something he did not otherwise have a history of supporting, or changed a position in favor of Soros for no apparent reason, something like this would suggest looking further.

But most often, these sorts of things confuse cause and effect. If I were someone with a large financial stake in free trade, I would go out and find people who supported free trade and give them money. I’d suggest that in this case, Soros supported restrictions on free speech via campaign finance laws (for his own reasons - he funded a whole lot of Dem 529 organization since the passage of McCain/Feingold) - and low and behold, that was a position McCain already held.

You need to come up for air out of the fever swamps once and awhile.[/quote]

His staff are being paid by George Soros and Theresa Kerry. He set up a front organisation to handle the finances.

Bet that part’s not covered in McCain-Feingold.