[quote]merlin wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
If the topic is making an ass of yourself you are succeeding admirably. Kudos for staying on topic.
If the definition of being an ass is telling the truth & telling it the way it is, …[/quote]
No it’s not. Keep up the good work.
[quote]merlin wrote:
rainjack wrote:
merlin wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
Everyone see my point?
No thunderbolt23, you often have NO point …you are as dull as the pencil that spent too much time writing illogical essays. The only point I’ve seen you TRY to make is to deny reason, in hopes of tooting your own horn in some cloudy way. Some of us don’t wear foggy goggles. We see right through your eversoclear ways. Add some color to a post, being bland is is as boring as well …confirming conformity.
merlin
One would think that with a supposed 120 IQ, you could do better than the “conformity” stuff you have been getting off on lately.
But, I guess when you learn a new word, it helps to use it as often as possible. Too bad you aren’t intelligent enough to actually grasp the definition - as your entire existence is nothing more than a poorly educated college kid’s desire to belong.
I have to call bullshit on the 120 IQ.
Almost forgot, I take it you don’t like the word “conformist”. I know it sucks, but that’s exactly what you are. Too bad you don’t stand very tall, deal with it or stop conforming to stupidity.
The only reason you are an idiot Rainjack is because you CHOOSE to be. I choose not to defend W no matter if I agree with him or not. He is an IDIOT. Therefore, it will be well noted!
merlin[/quote]
More blather from the kid. You make my points for me.
I have no problem with the word conformist. I have a problem with mouth pieces like you mis-using words.
You have not lived a day free of conformity in your life, and every single post you have on here in the last 1.5 months shows it.
I find it humorous that you tell me I am not worth your time, yet you need to reply to me twice to let me know how conformist I am.
I still have 50 bucks that says you are not even out of your mother’s house yet.
120 IQ? Try telling the truth. I have another 50 that says you have never been north of 90 in your life - even before the lobotomy.
Go away and play with your other “nonconformist” friends. You know - the ones you dress like, talk like, and desperately want to be like.
[quote]merlin wrote:
…
I’m older than you son, be careful who you call “kid”. …[/quote]
RJ is older than dirt. You really must be merlin.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Everyone see my point?[/quote]
No, I don’t see your point. Bush is a moron. I would like to believe people were tricked into voting for him–both times–but considering the other options present at the time…what can you say? The people have spoken.
Clearly, people are going to disagree with regard to his policies. I don’t think Bush’s policy is responsible for the negative response people have to his perceived intelligence. I don’t think it helps matters in some regard but they don’t contribute significantly either.
There are many very intelligent people who, for various reasons, also look favorably at Bush’s policies. It’s his mannerism.
The man might be intelligent behind close doors, capable of completing a coherent sentence, but since I only have access to his recorded public appearances I am going to side with the massive amounts of evidence that oppose this theory.
Look, I don’t blame Bush for everything that goes wrong–we all know there are certain things beyond one man’s control. It’s the things that he has control over that we should be scrutinizing: who he puts in charge of certain organizations, for example; or how he handles himself in public when speaking into a microphone.
These are the least common denominators of public service and they serve as evidence of his failures.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
merlin wrote:
How on earth did the media make W seem dumber than he is? I provided a photo of the man, 50 quotes, and 3 videos of him. What you see if what you get. I didn’t even have to provide a statement or an essay. W simply does all his talking for himself. He’s so good at being a dumbass, the media would only help him seem more intelligent.
You don’t need to be coerced …not when you can watch this man in action, jerking your head back in disbelief. You can’t even make this kind of stuff up, who’d believe you? Some of this stuff is so fuckin’ crazy, I can’t even believe it, I think the videos are a figment of my imagination and I am in a dream.
Defending stupidity, we’re going down the fuckin’ drain …and fast! Defending the pluralistic reasoning to secure your own justifications of your own opinions …LUDACRIS! If my twin brother fucked an elephant, that’s on him. He’s a fuckin’ loon. Just because we have the same mother don’t make him sane!
merlin
Everyone see my point?
Yup. Nailed it.
[/quote]
LMAO!
You two assclowns remind me of W. After he gives a botched speech or states his idicoy with HIS belief that he actually knew something …he walks off of the stage and pumps his fist & says “nailed it”.
You assclowns should join a cult. Call yourself “We’re smart arn’t we, we defend idiotic reason, sure we are …NAILED IT!”
You assclowns are something else.
We’re kicking ASS!
Nailed it!
Yeah, you less than thought provoking assclowns nailed one thing …its called IGNORANCE.
You are as ignorant as Dubbya …how bout that war huh fellas? Nailed it huh?
merlin
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
merlin wrote:
…
I’m older than you son, be careful who you call “kid”. …
RJ is older than dirt. You really must be merlin.[/quote]
Zap you are intelligent. You have reason, rainjack doesn’t. I think you personally lower yourself by defending pluralism. This is my main point. If you know that Bush is an idiot, why would an intelligent person promote that …unless you really believe this man is NOT the person he displays.
The fact that the two leading parties are polar opposites of each other and people try to adhere to one or the other …only proves my point. They’d rather belong to something; even if the choices are less than acceptable, then to take a stand that suits their reasoning the best.
merlin
[quote]merlin wrote:
If the definition of being an ass is telling the truth & telling it the way it is, instead of CONFORMING to some popular opinion or illogical reasoning to justify those common interests …then I’ll gladly be the ass for the donkey this time.
At least I stand for something other than a fart in the wind. You won’t even make a difference other than to change a confirmation number …and the number aint right.
[/quote]
You seem to fascinated by this ‘conformity’ concept. Anyone disagreeing with you is conforming to the stupid people who disagree with you.
May the circle remain unbroken, by and by Lord, by and by…
[quote]merlin wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
merlin wrote:
How on earth did the media make W seem dumber than he is? I provided a photo of the man, 50 quotes, and 3 videos of him. What you see if what you get. I didn’t even have to provide a statement or an essay. W simply does all his talking for himself. He’s so good at being a dumbass, the media would only help him seem more intelligent.
You don’t need to be coerced …not when you can watch this man in action, jerking your head back in disbelief. You can’t even make this kind of stuff up, who’d believe you? Some of this stuff is so fuckin’ crazy, I can’t even believe it, I think the videos are a figment of my imagination and I am in a dream.
Defending stupidity, we’re going down the fuckin’ drain …and fast! Defending the pluralistic reasoning to secure your own justifications of your own opinions …LUDACRIS! If my twin brother fucked an elephant, that’s on him. He’s a fuckin’ loon. Just because we have the same mother don’t make him sane!
merlin
Everyone see my point?
Yup. Nailed it.
LMAO!
You two assclowns remind me of W. After he gives a botched speech or states his idicoy with HIS belief that he actually knew something …he walks off of the stage and pumps his fist & says “nailed it”.
You assclowns should join a cult. Call yourself “We’re smart arn’t we, we defend idiotic reason, sure we are …NAILED IT!”
You assclowns are something else.
We’re kinging ASS!
Nailed it!
Yeah, you less than thought provoking assclowns nailed one thing …its called IGNORANCE.
You are as ignorant as Dubbya …how bout that war huh fellas? Nailed it huh?
merlin [/quote]
It gets better and better!!
[quote]merlin wrote:
…I am in a dream.[/quote]
First step is always admit to your disease.
[quote]…assclowns…
…assclowns…
…assclowns…
…assclowns… [/quote]
Did you hear your “nonconformist” friends using a new word today? Do you score cool points for talking just like them?
[quote]merlin wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
merlin wrote:
…
I’m older than you son, be careful who you call “kid”. …
RJ is older than dirt. You really must be merlin.
Zap you are intelligent. You have reason, rainjack doesn’t. I think you personally lower yourself by defending pluralism. This is my main point. If you know that Bush is an idiot, why would an intelligent person promote that …unless you really believe this man in NOT the person he displays.
The fact that the two leading parties are polar opposites of each other and people try to adhere to one or the other …only proves my point. They’d rather belong to something; even if the choices are less than acceptable, then to take a stand that suits their reasoning the best.
merlin[/quote]
Still no clue how old Mr. Conformity is. And he must not have 50 bucks.
Kids…
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
merlin wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
merlin wrote:
How on earth did the media make W seem dumber than he is? I provided a photo of the man, 50 quotes, and 3 videos of him. What you see if what you get. I didn’t even have to provide a statement or an essay. W simply does all his talking for himself. He’s so good at being a dumbass, the media would only help him seem more intelligent.
You don’t need to be coerced …not when you can watch this man in action, jerking your head back in disbelief. You can’t even make this kind of stuff up, who’d believe you? Some of this stuff is so fuckin’ crazy, I can’t even believe it, I think the videos are a figment of my imagination and I am in a dream.
Defending stupidity, we’re going down the fuckin’ drain …and fast! Defending the pluralistic reasoning to secure your own justifications of your own opinions …LUDACRIS! If my twin brother fucked an elephant, that’s on him. He’s a fuckin’ loon. Just because we have the same mother don’t make him sane!
merlin
Everyone see my point?
Yup. Nailed it.
LMAO!
You two assclowns remind me of W. After he gives a botched speech or states his idicoy with HIS belief that he actually knew something …he walks off of the stage and pumps his fist & says “nailed it”.
You assclowns should join a cult. Call yourself “We’re smart arn’t we, we defend idiotic reason, sure we are …NAILED IT!”
You assclowns are something else.
We’re kinging ASS!
Nailed it!
Yeah, you less than thought provoking assclowns nailed one thing …its called IGNORANCE.
You are as ignorant as Dubbya …how bout that war huh fellas? Nailed it huh?
merlin
It gets better and better!!
[/quote]
It sure does. I have an arsenal of firepower to use against the Republicans, they’re so fucking dumb and in denial about it, its easy to show ignorance from these assclowns. It shows itself, no digging required, no shovels.
“There’s an old saying in Tennessee – I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee – that says, fool me once, shame on --shame on you. Fool me – you can’t get fooled again.” …Nailed it!(this is their entire philosophy …they believe in their idiocy)
See what I mean?
They actaully believe what they say, no matter how idiotic …they’re that dumb.
Whether or not you agree with Democratic policy does little for arguing their intelligence. Find me a Democratic president that was labeled dumb. You won’t find one, they’re all Republicans.
These people(Republicans) arn’t hard to make assclowns out of …they do that themselves. The Democrat you actually have to dig into his policy to find their flaw, for some reason they just arn’t as idiotic on the surface. Repulicans are as blatent as their illogical speech/response …then at the end “nailed it” with a slammer(!)
Kinda like the fat 250 LB girl on Jerry Springer that thinks “I look good” in this bikini …there’s your whole Republican attitude.(Sigh)
merlin
[quote]rainjack wrote:
merlin wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
merlin wrote:
…
I’m older than you son, be careful who you call “kid”. …
RJ is older than dirt. You really must be merlin.
Zap you are intelligent. You have reason, rainjack doesn’t. I think you personally lower yourself by defending pluralism. This is my main point. If you know that Bush is an idiot, why would an intelligent person promote that …unless you really believe this man in NOT the person he displays.
The fact that the two leading parties are polar opposites of each other and people try to adhere to one or the other …only proves my point. They’d rather belong to something; even if the choices are less than acceptable, then to take a stand that suits their reasoning the best.
merlin
Still no clue how old Mr. Conformity is. And he must not have 50 bucks.
Kids…
[/quote]
Mr. Non-conformity. Conformity is fine when it IS defined by reason. Not by any other means. You don’t take the road less traveled. Not because it won’t get you there, but you need someone to hold your hand and show you the way. I don’t! You don’t question authority, that takes brains & balls, you have too much of one and not enough of the other.
Learn to use reason over opinion and you just may make more sense. Opinion is not a strong motivator or convincer! People are fundamentally struck by the truth. I wouldn’t expect you to understand anything about reality though rainjack …you and that word probably don’t often collide in the same sentence.
merlin
merlin
[quote]merlin wrote:
More of the same “look how enlightened I am because I talk like my friends” bullshit
[/quote]
You still haven’t said how old you are.
Please tell me about the roads I have taken - or not taken. You seem to be way too quick with passing judgment, and way too slow to substantiate said judgment with anything but your baseless opinion. And just so you know - your opinion is not nearly as valuable as you want it to be.
There are 3-4 guys on here that have disagreed with you - and you have attacked every single one of them. Self-righteous chest thumping, or fear? I say both.
LOL. Rainjack, you are like a magnet.
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
LOL. Rainjack, you are like a magnet. [/quote]
A Babe Magnet.
Ask around.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
There are 3-4 guys on here that have disagreed with you - and you have attacked every single one of them. Self-righteous chest thumping, or fear? I say both.
[/quote]
That’s it? Only four, not bad …could have been better or worse. Arguing on the internet is pretty retarded anyway …this is why I don’t do it on a daily basis like some of you assclowns (I’m usually in the bodybuilding section or the sex & the male animal section just talkin’ shop)
There should be hordes of them comming by the thousands if they were that opposed (some conservatives are embarrassed by this, they don’t seem to need to defend him and shy away). I just attacked the entire Republican Conformist Philosophy …should have been a swarm of idiots trailing, maybe they see Bush as an idiot themselves and are praying that Rudy revives the party.
I specificly attacked those who defend republicanism even in the act of stupidity(I rarely engage in discourse because it is for retards, but since there were those that would defend that the 50 quotes i posted were not stated by an idiot named W then I had to interject.
W fucks up …bigger idiots than dubbya defend it. That is what I’m attacking. Even dubbya knows he’s an assclown. He takes himself less seriously than you take him.
Your entire approach is weak. You arn’t unintelligent by virtue of what you know. However …you are not very intelligent in how you choose to elict responses to the obvious. Any statement that suggest that W is not as dumb as he seems …is for idiots bigger than Bush to make. PERIOD.
Democrats …same principle. They don’t defend Clinton for his disgrace in the White House because they are a Democrat or supporter …only a weak mind defends these things. But yes, some will defend that.
Well my point was proved quite well. I didn’t expect to get people to try to argue Bush is smart(proves my point with the getting DEFENSIVE stance, must be true) …that only makes us realize how dumb he really is. You don’t see Democrats trying to argue how smart or dumb Clinton is …its understood he was smart. No need to defend him, he was smart …why even bother. Last time …people are struck by the truth, not your lame ass opinion or rationale.
merlin
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
LOL. Rainjack, you are like a magnet. [/quote]
He’s not a magnet that attracts though. He’s repulsive. He repels more than he attracts. One of the more intelligent debaters on this forum “vroom”, argues with reason instead of rage. I would assume vroom sees him as a jackass in any definition.
I could care less if I agreed(which I do on some policy issues) or disagreed with everything he has to say, his tone is strictly that of a repulsive man. Not an intellectual.
merlin
I think Merlin’s new word of the day is ‘assclown’. If he learns one new word per day, he hopes to someday communicate like an adult.
Until then, he’s a … <drumroll, please>…assclown.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
I think Merlin’s new word of the day is ‘assclown’. If he learns one new word per day, he hopes to someday communicate like an adult.
Until then, he’s a … <drumroll, please>…assclown.[/quote]
When you learn the value of virtue HH …I’ll share that thought with you. Arguing is for the weak. The strong don’t have to argue. The point in my post was so strong that I didn’t have to argue it. I left zero words for an argument.
Those that spend countless days, weeks, months in these forums and still can’t argue or convince properly after the countless attempts …are the less than fortunate communicators. No wonder you see very little applause. My guess is that you don’t receive much in the real world and then put your countless hours on this forum to try to get it …any way possible. Sad sad sad. All for nothing right?
I accomplished my goal. Set a trap, snare the weak!
Ya know, the purpose of life to many is “to test”. What are some of you testing, how many people you can repel? Or add to your internet buddy list LMFAO?
WELP, I’m done here.
merlin
[quote]merlin wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
I think Merlin’s new word of the day is ‘assclown’. If he learns one new word per day, he hopes to someday communicate like an adult.
Until then, he’s a … <drumroll, please>…assclown.
When you learn the value of virtue HH …I’ll share that thought with you. Arguing is for the weak. The strong don’t have to argue. The point in my post was so strong that I didn’t have to argue it. I left zero words for an argument.
Those that spend countless days, weeks, months in these forums and still can’t argue or convince properly after the countless attempts …are the less than fortunate communicators. No wonder you see very little applause. My guess is that you don’t receive much in the real world and then put your countless hours on this forum to try to get it …any way possible. Sad sad sad. All for nothing right?
I accomplished my goal. Set a trap, snare the weak!
Ya know, the purpose of life to many is “to test”. What are some of you testing, how many people you can repel? Or add to your internet buddy list LMFAO?
WELP, I’m done here.
merlin [/quote]
NOOOOOO! Please don’t leave! You are funnier than hell! Don’t run away and hide, little boy!