No, you don’t. You may have actual feelings but you choose to attribute them to God. The feelings reflect reality, your interpretation reflects a reality you created in your mind that may or may not exist outside of it.
You are, in essence, no different than a transsexual. You should be kinder to them since you share something in common.
Not a Tiger. I’m a meanie.
I never told a believer he should not believe or was silly to believe. You confuse comments on beliefs with comments on believers.
See earlier about the falsifiable differences.
And you’ve made an mistake. Feel free to say God doesn’t exist.
Feel free to say it’s irrational. Again.
We’ve already acknowledged you can’t falsify their beliefs anymore than someone can falsify yours. Keep in mind, we are talking about how they feel, not their actual DNA. You seem to miss that point altogether.
Absolutely false. You continue to confuse the existence of feelings with the existence of a man being a woman. You have already said it exists only in their mind.
Religion is, by definition irrational. If you don’t understand that then you are telling me that you lack the intellect and education to engage in that discussion. Funny how me, the supposed unbeliever, has a greater knowledge of Thomas Aquinas, Augustine, Origen, Lactantius, etc., than the supposed believer.
Their feelings do. You can’t falsify them. Science may one day be able to explain those feelings better.
You have a bad habit of retreating to attacks when cornered. Good day Z.
Did I hurt your feelings? Should I have lied and pretended that you have an understanding of the nature of religion you clearly lack? It might exist in your mind but not in reality.
So even you prefer that people be nice.
Not the feelings…I can feel like I’m a tiger…
I can falsify that he is a woman…penis, xy, (see above). You already surrendered the argument Only exists in their mind. You can falsify that I am a tiger
Don’t question my intelligence and continue to somehow miss the above. We’re done. Have a good day.
No, you just can’t even keep track of your own arguments, statements you’ve made in other threads, repeatedly back track, and become belligerent. Take care Z.
No, you can believe you feel like a tiger. A tiger doesn’t even know what a tiger feels like.
I can’t falsify that you feel something however. You choose to define it as tiger. A transsexual man defines it as a woman. You choose to define it as God.
Somehow I don’t think you meant that last part.
To anyone else, I’m still open to engage.
No, you simply avoid the question of why you can’t be nice to people instead of dehumanizing them.
Pretty weak beer here. First, you rig the game by tailoring the definition of man/woman to suit your argument. Then, when it’s shown that you’re wrong even by the (rigged) definitions you set forth, you still claim victory by arguing that the counterfactuals are “exceptions.”
Very, very weak beer, my friend.
You proved me wrong with a medical condition? A ‘syndrome?’
Humans are a species with eyes? And their function is sight?
Good post!
Just one question. You said he’s representing sex and gender and slanting it to one side of of a false dichotomy? The dichotomy being nature vs. nurture. Are you saying that’s not the categories we are moving through?