Eye, I am trying to get at something specific here. Let me try again.
Would it only be a “possibility” that you date women at all (not thinking about particular individual women)? As in, you might be celibate? I assume you wouldn’t date men with penises if you won’t date…umm, women with penises.
Basically is “Oh I would date women. And, maybe, possibly, women who have had their penises removed?”
I mean, you have already made a revealing statement.
I will not date women with penises. I might date them if they undergo a rather invasive surgery on what is probably a perfectly healthy reproductive organ. That alone demonstrates that in practice, you see a massive and important distinction. It would take surgery…
What about 'women who have had their penis split open, rearranged and turned inside of them?" Same possibility as the ‘women who have never had a penis and testicles?’
Didn’t say I could. Neither can you. You can’t falsify “I felt God move through me.” Yet you won’t except the existence of God as reality in debates here.I don’t accept that a man is really a woman because he says he feels like one.
Obviously there are differences. The question you don’t answer is why you feel you need to intentionally hurt people’s feelings. If an atheist can say thank you when someone says god bless you, without feeling like he cause himself some major distress, why can’t you use a pronoun that someone wishes you to? Why do transgender people have to be less sensitive than Christians?
I won’t accept god’s existence as reality when it comes to anything other than my personal beliefs, that is if I believe, since it would take a narcissist to believe that his irrational beliefs should hold others hostage.
You aren’t telling a lie. The person feels like a different sex from their birth sex. They prefer to be called by that pronoun. How is it a lie if you use it?