[quote]SSC wrote:
PonceDeLeon wrote:
I hope they don’t ruin Ironman 2. I think it will be better than the first. Let’s hope.
Well, considering the extremely un-interesting villains they’re using.
Again.
I love Iron Man and RDJr., but at this rate we’ll probably have Unicorn and the Living Laser for Iron Man 3.[/quote]
extremely un-interesting is a far stretch,my friend. Justin Hammer and Whiplash/Crimson Dynamo make for interesting villians and good plot/story for the big screen.
Not to mention,having Black Widow and Hawkeye included in the film and the importance of their characters for Avengers movie. Sounds interesting enough for me.
I know what you’re thinking though…you want The Mandarin. But I think I speak for the majority when I say that as long as we have more action than the first,we will be happy with whatever villians they choose…AT LEAST for the sequel.
[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
SSC wrote:
PonceDeLeon wrote:
I hope they don’t ruin Ironman 2. I think it will be better than the first. Let’s hope.
Well, considering the extremely un-interesting villains they’re using.
Again.
I love Iron Man and RDJr., but at this rate we’ll probably have Unicorn and the Living Laser for Iron Man 3.
extremely un-interesting is a far stretch,my friend. Justin Hammer and Whiplash/Crimson Dynamo make for interesting villians and good plot/story for the big screen.
Not to mention,having Black Widow and Hawkeye included in the film and the importance of their characters for Avengers movie. Sounds interesting enough for me.
I know what you’re thinking though…you want The Mandarin. But I think I speak for the majority when I say that as long as we have more action than the first,we will be happy with whatever villians they choose…AT LEAST for the sequel.[/quote]
True enough… I didn’t even realize they were introducing Black Widow and Hawkeye though, that’s definitely a big plus.
I mean, I know Crimson Dynamo is like, one of Iron Man’s pure nemesises, but they better come with a brilliant way of presenting him so non-comic nerds that watched the last movie aren’t saying “What, another big robot?”
[quote]SSC wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
SSC wrote:
PonceDeLeon wrote:
I hope they don’t ruin Ironman 2. I think it will be better than the first. Let’s hope.
Well, considering the extremely un-interesting villains they’re using.
Again.
I love Iron Man and RDJr., but at this rate we’ll probably have Unicorn and the Living Laser for Iron Man 3.
extremely un-interesting is a far stretch,my friend. Justin Hammer and Whiplash/Crimson Dynamo make for interesting villians and good plot/story for the big screen.
Not to mention,having Black Widow and Hawkeye included in the film and the importance of their characters for Avengers movie. Sounds interesting enough for me.
I know what you’re thinking though…you want The Mandarin. But I think I speak for the majority when I say that as long as we have more action than the first,we will be happy with whatever villians they choose…AT LEAST for the sequel.
True enough… I didn’t even realize they were introducing Black Widow and Hawkeye though, that’s definitely a big plus.
I mean, I know Crimson Dynamo is like, one of Iron Man’s pure nemesises, but they better come with a brilliant way of presenting him so non-comic nerds that watched the last movie aren’t saying “What, another big robot?”[/quote]
I think they will do well with introducing him with the nature of Justin Hammer and Black Widow characters. My only concern is the rumor that Rourke’s character is “supposedly” a mesh of Whiplash and Crimson Dynamo.
I would like to see them just commit to Crimson Dynamo…considering,that Rourke’s character is Russian,anyways. But Whiplash did work for Justin Hammer in the comics…We shall see…can’t wait to see.
So I had some time to kill today after I got shafted by fucking cyber-nerds, but thats another story. I was watching the intro cinamatic for Wrath of the Lich King and was thinking about the live action Warcraft movie they were talking about awhile back.
But really who needs Hollywood when you have Blizzards CG department? Their shit looks as good or better than anything HW does. Im sure the masses wouldn’t much care to see a CG Warcraft movie but they would never know it was CG till someone told them.
[quote]Himora22 wrote:
So I had some time to kill today after I got shafted by fucking cyber-nerds, but thats another story. I was watching the intro cinamatic for Wrath of the Lich King and was thinking about the live action Warcraft movie they were talking about awhile back.
But really who needs Hollywood when you have Blizzards CG department? Their shit looks as good or better than anything HW does. Im sure the masses wouldn’t much care to see a CG Warcraft movie but they would never know it was CG till someone told them.
I could sit through 2 hrs of that![/quote]
Hey, it could always be straight-to-DVD like other really good CG films have been. There’s an audience for it.
I’d also like to see some non-MMORPG (but still RPG) games based on those characters.
[quote]Backlash79 wrote:
Vash wrote:
Every season gets better and better.
I’ve got every ep on my hard drive.
I love how it combines the stories and origins together to make fresh stories. Very interesting stuff! I can’t believe they canceled it…bastards.[/quote]
And what’s worse is Cartoon network is going to start to drop everything to jump on the reality tv bandwagon.
I think the problem with Justice League is that it did cater to adults. You still have people who think cartoons are just for kids…which limits viewership. Maybe they should have advertised differently…and then really pushed the envelope with the subject matter.
